Thursday, January 23, 2025

Syria as Metaphor for an Ultra-Cucked World

 Syria, which collapsed like a house of cards in the closing months of 2024, might as well be a metaphor for much of the world. Upon close inspection, many peoples and cultures had already collapsed in pride and prestige long before Syria finally did. The fallen, especially those who've embraced their defeat, tend to be envious of those still standing as stark reminders that a people can resist and be independent. Then, it's no wonder that white cucks in the West were so eager to see Syria fall and join the club of goy cuckhood to Zion. If all are fallen, shame becomes universal, therefore moot in a world where humiliation is the shared and accepted norm, like the queues worn by Han Chinese men under Manchu rule.


Syria map on white background vector

Has anyone witnessed anything like the recent collapse of Syria? Not just the regime but the entire social fabric of the country. It appears everyone was overtaken by events, some with joy, some with sadness. No one, not even Assad’s most ardent enemies, thought it would happen so suddenly, so fast.
It appears Erdogan of Turkey initially targeted only the northern parts of Syria; it was meant more as a power play than a grand design to take down the Syrian regime. But, once the first domino fell, the rest followed in a manner at once spectacular and pathetic.
Granted, it was arguably the final chapter of a prolonged process of regime change. The Syrian Civil War(which soon became a global war, with the Jewish-run West, Turkey, and the Gulf Sunni states all ganging up on Syria by lending support to Jihadis, the worst dreck of humanity) had raged on from 2011; Syria was ravaged by war for over a decade, on top of which the West applied crippling sanctions while also occupying key economic zones. In more ways than one, the collapse was a case of the final straw that finally broke the camel’s back.

Still, the endgame seemed downright surreal, not least because many observers in the West and Non-West were resigned to the Syrian regime, with the crucial support of Russian-Iran-Hezbollah, having gotten the better of their enemies and stabilized the situation to their advantage. Also, Turkey appeared to have come to terms with Syria via Russian diplomatic intervention. And Syria was back in the Arab League.
If Syria collapsed as it did in the middle of a hellish war that it was badly losing, it would be understandable. But the general consensus was that the Syrian regime had weathered the worst of the storm, more or less defeated the Jihadis who’d been pushed to the margins.
So, just how did this happen? Analysts have pointed to the steady decay of politics and economy following the uneasy ceasefire agreements. And the demoralization of the underpaid military. Still, has anyone seen anything like this?

The Byzantine Empire diminished over centuries and, by the time the Turks finally conquered Constantinople, was a mere husk of itself. Still, there was a great final battle between the invaders and the defenders of the city. South Vietnam was doomed when the US left, but it fought on for two more years, and despite all the problems, the North Vietnamese military had to fight its way to Saigon. Following the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan, most Western analysts said the secular Marxist regime would fall within weeks. But it actually held on for a couple more years, a real challenge for the rebels.

True, Poles got crushed by the Germans in 1939, but they still put up a stiff resistance despite the hopeless situation(and there were pockets of Polish resistance throughout the occupation). When the Germans steamrolled into the Soviet Union, countless Soviet troops surrendered, and it seemed all over for Russia. But that didn’t mean the Soviets in Leningrad and Moscow lost heart and just gave up. One might draw parallels between the Syrian situation and the Russian defeat in World War I, but even as the Bolsheviks conceded huge chunks of territory to Germany, most of them were non-Russian lands that had been absorbed into the Russian Empire. It wasn’t as if the Bolsheviks were willing to surrender all of Russia to Germany. Also, even in 1917, Germany had a formidable force, which wouldn’t have been defeated if not for American entry into the war.

As it turns out, about 15,000 to 20,000 Jihadis made their move on Aleppo, Syria’s second biggest city and key economic hub. Even if the Syrian Army was something of an inflated paper military, surely the government could have mustered enough men to fend off a bunch of ragtag Jihadis who, despite their shiny toys supplied by Turkey and the West, had little chance of taking over a big city, let alone the entire country. Besides, Russia was more than willing to provide air support and did, blowing Jihadi columns to smithereens. But there was no resistance among Syrian authorities and armies. It wasn’t so much a collapse as a total no-show to the event. Incredibly, within a week, the entire country was taken, about the time it took for the Jihadis to trek from the north to the south on foot. It was like a building collapsing in free fall speed with zero resistance.

Some have blamed Russia and Iran for not having done enough, and there’s some truth to that. Russia aided Syria in destroying Jihadis but not against naked Israeli aggression. So, Israel kept on bombing Syria while Russia did nothing, e.g. forbidding Syria to use Russian air defenses against the Israeli air force. Of course, Israel wasn’t just a stand-alone enemy of Syria but part of Global Zion with a grand plan to destroy Syria(and Iran and Russia as well).
Russia, by pretending it could maintain good relations with the Jewish State while resisting the agenda of World Jewry, was fooling itself. Indeed, the reason why the so-called ‘Collective West’ was so invested in destroying Syria was because Israel wanted it that way. While Israel alone couldn’t do it(and assured Putin that it wouldn’t attack Russian assets in Syria), it was pulling every string in the US and EU to make sure that Syria would be destroyed.
Putin, like so many foolish conservative figures in the West, seems to believe that Israel can be used as a kind of insurance policy against World Jewry, i.e. if Jewish Power wants to destroy you, get some reprieve by making nice with Israel(as mediator between you and World Jewry). But this has proven to be a fantasy time and time again.

After all, White American Conservatives have been sucking Netanyahu’s dong forever, and Jews have still been unrelenting in their anti-white, anti-Christian, and anti-conservative mania. Russia’s chummy(and often servile) ties with Israel didn’t reduce the likelihood of the Ukraine War(more accurately the Judeo-Russian War) or the endless vilification of Putin and the Russian people/culture in general in the Jewish-dominated West. Or the ongoing efforts to encircle and isolate Russia, to agitate neighboring states against it.
There’s this idea among the HBJ( or ‘hated by Jews’) that cucking to Zion works as protection against Jewish hostility. Well, if Jews are only into extortion, this could work, i.e. be nice to Israel and then maybe World Jewry will ease the pressure on your kind. But Jewish Power isn’t content with Russia making nice with Israel; its ultimate objective, megalomaniacal and insatiable, is to take over all of Russia, made worse by Anglos cucking to Jews and indulging their god-complex.
Jews feel, “If we took over the Anglo-World, the greatest empire known to mankind, who are those lowly stupid vodka-swilling Russians to ever say NO to us?” Putin may think, “If I suck Israel’s cock, World Jewry won’t fuc* me in the arse.” But the World Jewry has thrown everything at him, including the kitchen sink, the toilet, and then some. Since the outbreak of the Judeo-Russian War, Russia has been hit with World Record-breaking levels of sanctions and has lost what might be hundreds of thousands of lives in the battlefield because Ukraine was armed to the teeth with the most advanced weapons of the West. Jewish Power is a gangster operation that extorts, takes over, squeezes it for all it’s worth, and then burns it to the ground. Like in GOODFELLAS with the greasers. The restaurant owner goes to Paulie for protection against Tommy, but Paulie rips off the whole joint.

Video Link

And what do Jews care about dead Ukrainians? In their eyes, Ukrainians are just dumb sucker Slavs, and if many of them become refugees or corpses, all the easier for Jews to take over the country and establish it as the New Pale of Settlement.

So, Russia deserves some blame in Syria and Ukraine because of Putin’s softness on the Jewish Issue. While Russia successfully aided Syria in fending off the Jihadis(even targeting the borders of Turkey), it looked the other way on ongoing Israeli hostilities. It’d be like protecting Bob from Bill’s pit-bulls while pretending Bill bears no responsibility. Never mind Bill is the one setting the pit-bulls on Bob.
So, even though Russia, along with Iran, destroyed the bulk of the Jihadis in Syria and gave Assad’s regime a second life, the whole project was doomed in the long run as Russia had failed to address the core issue: The Jihadis were, to a large extent, armed and funded by the CIA(that does the bidding of Zion) and Turkey, a duplicitous member of NATO ever keen to do the bidding of Jews for its benefit.

Russia handled the symptoms but didn’t name the disease. Even after the Jihadis were beaten back, Russia pretended as if Syria would survive despite the Jewish-controlled US occupying key economic zones that starved Syria of material and money. As for Iran, it was too nervous, anxious, and even timid in countering Israeli and (Jewish-controlled) American provocations. It did precious little about the murder of Soleimani. It countered Israel’s murder of its scientists, diplomats, military officers, and politicians mostly with rhetoric. The two missile attacks on Israel were half-hearted. While Israel uses its military to destroy and kill as many as possible, Iran pussyfoots with caution. If Iran hopes that trepidation will be appreciated by the West as concern for human life and commitment to peace(contra excessive escalation of conflict), it’s sorely mistaken because Jews and their craven Anglo cuck dogs regard such restraint as cowardice on Tehran’s part.
So, even though Russia and Iran were effective in zapping Jihadi cancer cells, they failed to remove the tumor of Jewish supremacism within Syria, and it was only a matter of time before the disease began to metastasize again, and by then, Syria’s immunity had been severely weakened, resulting in the sudden death of the entity hitherto known as Syria, now to be torn apart by other powers, rather like Poland by Germany and Soviet Union in 1939. THIS is what the West is now celebrating, which goes to show that the white elites are little more than jackals of Jewish hyenas.

But then, the fact of widespread and even worldwide white cuckery suggests that ‘Syriaitis’ is a global disease. ‘Even worldwide’ is warranted because Syriaitis infects parts of Russia and China as well; why else would they be so adverse to naming the Jewish Power as the real power?
But then, this shouldn’t be surprising because, except for Palestine and some Arab territories, Jews haven’t militarily conquered anything yet has managed to gain domination over much of the world. The UK and US weren’t conquered by Israelites on sky chariots descending from Heaven. France and Germany weren’t conquered by the IDF. Canada and Australia weren’t conquered by hordes of the Jewish Defense League. Poland, Ireland, and Sweden weren’t conquered by the Stern Gang. And yet, the elites and the great majorities in those parts are mostly cuck-maggots of the Jews.

It’s often been noted in dissident circles that Vladimir Putin reclaimed Russia from the clutches of venal Jewish oligarchs, but if so, why is it verboten in Russia to Name the Jewish Power, especially when Jews ceaselessly name Russia, or Russia-Russia-Russia, indeed even blaming Russia for fantasies like ‘Russiagate’. If the Jewish Agenda runs into any problem, Jews blame Russia, as in ‘Russia ate my homework’.
Imagine Jim calling out John and blaming him for everything, even slandering him for what he didn’t do, but John, despite being constantly insulted and impugned, doesn’t call Jim out. In the Judeo-Russian War, Jews made it clear in no uncertain terms that Russia-Russia-Russia embarked on an ‘unprovoked’ invasion of ‘democratic’ Ukraine, a shining beacon of freedom(LOL), but Russia, while pointing its finger at the US-EU-NATO(as well as Anglos and ‘Ukro-Nazis’), has failed to name the main instigator, World Jewry.

The ‘Syria’-esque character of the Current World, especially the West, owes to the suddenness and totality with which it has caved to the New World Order as dictated by Jewish Power. It seemed for a time that Assad’s Syria could indefinitely put up a stiff resistance, taking its place among countries that dared to defy(at least partly) the World Jewry, only to be exposed as an empty shell about to crack and crumble into dust.

But then, the same might be said of the entire West, especially the Anglosphere. When Anglos ruled the world, Jewish upstarts posed a feisty challenge to the prevailing order. But given the deep heritage and vast network of Anglo power, who would have thought that the Anglos would transform overnight into groveling dogs at the feet of Jews?
Even if Jews were destined to gain an edge over the Anglos, the latter could have done to Jewish Power what Jews had done to Anglo Power: Serve as its main critics and competitors. But once the Jews gained the advantage, Anglos had no fight left in them and were, in quick succession, consigned to roles as co-rulers, then partners, then servants, and now dogs.

Even as Jewish Power gained at the expense of Anglos/Whites, there was hardly any criticism or challenge to the Jewish ascendancy from the latter. Thus, if Anglo Power had come under healthy(and unhealthy) scrutiny and critique from the Jews, Jewish Power expanded with minimal pushback from Anglo-American elites, thus setting the philo-semitic template for all other gentile groups, white and nonwhite.
If anything, Anglo-Brits and Anglo-Americans were profoundly and/or cravenly apologetic for their progenitors having espoused any ‘Anti-Semitic’ views in the past and had them expunged. They also generated endless philo-semitic hosannas in the hope that their past would be forgiven or forgotten. Whenever white Christian conservatives howl about those ‘anti-Jewish’ Muslims, you know they’re signaling to Jews that they themselves are totally reformed and redeemed whites; they’ve seen the light and have been baptized of the sin of ‘antisemitism’ with the golden shower of Holocaustianity and Zionism.

If Jews as upstarts and challengers to WASP-power served as the model of the ‘Culture of Critique’ for all non-WASP groups, with even white Catholic ethnics getting into the act of bashing the Anglo-American Establishment, WASPs as sidekicks to the Jews served as the universal goy model of servility and obeisance to Zion. When Jews gave the middle finger to the WASP establishment, others flicked their fingers as well, whether they be Italian Catholic, black, or Chicano. But when the dethroned WASPs bowed down before the Master Jew to suck his toes, other goyim soon followed, all competing in the anal-lick Olympics to be in good graces with Jewish Supremacy. Even Syria’s pathetic surrender was more dignified than this, especially as the Anglos had the means to push back, whereas Syrians were strangled and starved into submission.

In a way, Anglo and Anglo-American cuckery to Jews was even more disgraceful than the Jewish ingratitude and subversion of WASP power. At the very least, challengers got balls, like Tony Montana in SCARFACE, whereas those who cuck are a bunch of castrated wussies.
Perhaps the Anglo elites, having been accustomed to power and privilege for so long, weren’t suited for roles as upstarts, challengers, and/or subversives. Their ingrained sense of entitlement got the better of them. Instead of adapting to the new reality and challenging Jews(as the new King of the Hill), they favored the conceit of being equal partners of Jews. Or, they affected magnanimity in having relinquished authority out of gracious sense of fairness/meritocracy and historical redemption. Certainly easier than facing the brutal but newly heretical fact that the white race was doomed upon abandoning awesome race-ism.

Whatever the reason, the collapse of Anglo power/prestige in both the US and UK has been both spectacular and pathetic, or spectacularly pathetic. Who could have foreseen such a calamity, such total abnegation of one’s heritage and claim? Just like Syrians at the end of their tether at the mercy of Turks & Jews(and their proxies), the White West totally prostrated itself before Jewish Power.
There was hardly any will to resist the virulently anti-white nature of the Jewish Ascendancy.
Whites deemed as obligatory to praise and celebrate any addition to Jewish power, wealth, and influence, rather odd given the Jewish-led accusation that whites have too much wealth and privilege at the expense of nonwhites. (It’s like there’s never any problem with blacks dominating most key positions in football, but there’s always the issue of ‘too many’ white quarterbacks. Even when blacks are overrepresented in sports, more black players is a cause for celebration whereas under-represented white athletes are made to feel apologetic and guilty.)
While Jews led the charge that whites have too much, whites led the choir that Jews can never have enough. Talk about pathetic cucking on the part of whites.

In the new discourse, any skepticism about Jewish Power and Influence was denounced as ’Anti-Semitic’, the consensus shared by both the Liberal White and Conservative White Establishments, perhaps in the misplaced hope that Jews would appreciate the gesture and become more normal — but surely, abnormally indulging a neurotic demographic is hardly an incentive to normalization of attitude as someone who’s treated like a princeling expects special privileges than mere rights shared by all the ‘losers’.

Given the shifts in social attitudes and historical narratives, it’s not surprising that World War II, the greatest triumph of the ‘liberal democratic’ West in modern times, turned out to be a poison pill, not so much because of the war per se but the control of official history in the post-war era. In the first half of the 20th century, when ‘antisemitism’ came with a certain intellectual, spiritual, and moral pedigree(as Jewish radicalism on the Left, Jewish cultural subversion especially in Weimar Germany, Jewish hostility toward Christianity and white racial consciousness, and Jewish exploitation via finance capitalism had baleful impacts on the world), Jewish Power could be checked and countered, at times with gratuitous viciousness but often with healthy instinct for self-preservation among white goyim.
Back then, both the Jew and the goy could punch and parry in the ring. But after the war, Jews could punch and parry while the goy could only parry but not punch. Given the new rules, the goy’s only hope was to survive, never to win, as no fighter can win only by playing defense against an opponent hellbent on a beat-down. But then, it got worse as even blocking the punches were penalized for white goyim. Thus, the white goy had to take the punches as well-deserved for his past ‘historical sins’. The white goy was disallowed not only in attacking the Jew but in defending himself from the Jewish attack. It’s no wonder that whites are so eager to hate on China, Iran, Russia, or some foreign ‘enemy’ in the hope that Jews will direct their attacks on others than on the much bruised and bloodied whites, but then, there are white masochists who seem to get off the humiliation as a kind of secular variant of Christian self-flagellation.

The World War II narrative exonerated Jews of all accountability. Typical was the Catholic Church’s full endorsement of the Jewish religion. If ‘antisemitism’ prior to World War II could be excessive at times, as with the National Socialists, in the aftermath of the war it grew feeble, then non-existent, finally to be reviled as the greatest evil of all time. This was bound to be fatal to Christianity, a religion founded on the rejection of Judaic dogma. After all, if there’s nothing wrong with Judaism, why the need for Christianity? Imagine Protestants declaring that there’s nothing wrong with Catholicism; that being so, what would be the justification for PROTESTantism?

Such indulgence of Jews would have been harmless IF Jews lacked the wherewithal to gain dominance in the West, especially in the United States(as the lone superpower). With ‘antisemitism’ made verboten and excoriated as the greatest sin known to men, religious and secular alike, it became declasse to name the Jewish role in radical politics, leftist violence, political treachery(like spying for the Soviet Union & Israel), cultural degeneration, anti-white hostility, anti-Palestinian murderousness, anti-Christian filth, and etc.
Even when Jews were the obvious culprits in the latest scandals, the permissible discourse was to BLAME ANYTHING but Jewish character, culture, and attitudes. It became a national pastime to deflect blame from Jews in ever more disingenuous ways, rather ironic when Jews never tired of blaming entire nationalities, cultures, and races(especially whites) for the failings or transgressions of a segment of their population — if some whites are ‘Anti-Semitic’, the whole of white society must acknowledge the issue and do something about it, but if some Jews are anti-whatever, it mustn’t reflect on the entirety of the Jewish community, even if the majority of Jews may well share in the bias or hostility of the troublemakers.

Rationalizing the Jewish Problem has been the favorite hobby of White Conservatives, whose vision of America has often been at odds with the Jewish Agenda. If the great majority of Jews push a certain anti-conservative and/or anti-white program, white conservatives tend to selectively highlight those contrarian Jews who aren’t with the program(at least not so blatantly), thus creating the false impression that there are just as many or a considerable number of Jews who ‘stand with us’. So, if Jewish Power by and large push GloboHomo, white conservatives point to the odd Jew who happens to be anti-globohomo to assure themselves that Jewishness isn’t relevant to the issue. (It’s like seeking out the rare law-and-order black to argue that crime isn’t a black problem and has nothing to do with race.) Thus, white conservatives can avoid addressing the JQ that often leads to accusations of ‘antisemitism’; furthermore, they feel morally sanctified in having some Jew, a member of the Holy Holocaust Tribe, on their side.
Or, the Jew in question, far from being a true moral conservative, may espouse and promote globohomo BUT minus the anti-white hostility, thereby making himself or herself more palatable to white conservatives(or ‘cuckservatives’) who, lacking the cojones to push back against the Jewish socio-cultural juggernaut, are resigned ultimately to acquiescing in a manner that isn’t totally humiliating. Here the ‘good’ Jew provides the cushion for the fall. White Conzos tell themselves that, far from caving under pressure, they were rationally and morally persuaded by kindly globohomo Jews, like that Dave Rubin guy, the bungdonging ‘Jewish conservative’ who adopts children in the name of ‘family values’.

It’s as though WHO supports the idea carries more weight than WHAT the idea is about. In the game of Who/Whom, having a Jew bless your position is more important than arguing for that position. For example, white conservative types may, instead of defending nationalism on its own merits, point to some Jew who happens to be pro-nationalist. Never mind that most Jews in the West are anti-nationalist and do everything in their power to de-bank and de-platform goy nationalism. Instead of calling out Jewish hostility to the goy need for nationhood, white conservative types tend to bark like seals about some odd Jews who happen to be pro-nationalist, of course, more for Israel than for white goy nations, i.e. usually such a Jew is for ethno-nationalism in Israel but only for bogus ‘civic nationalism’ among white goyim in Europe, US, Canada, and Australia. By profusely praising such Jews, white conservatives make believe that their worldview is aligned with that of the holy Jews; or they hope that other Jews, noting the philo-semitic adulation showered on ‘nationalist Jews’ in white conservative circles, may embark on an exodus to the White Right.
(To be sure, the formula of “ethno-nationalism for Jews and civic nationalism for whites” isn’t far off from the Jewish globalist agenda of white dissolution because ‘civic nationalism’ will invariably, albeit more gradually, lead to the erasure of the White West. Yoram Hazony is really the flipside of George Soros.)

The idea that nationalism needs the validation of Jews is another indication of the centrality of idolatry in current Western thought. Never mind that ethno-nationalist supremacists like Hazony are merely manipulating white conservatives towards supporting Israel as a racial-state in exchange for Jewish support for worthless ‘civic nationalism’ among whites. A bullshit bargain if there ever was one.
In the West where Jewishness is venerated across the political spectrum but is mostly disdainful of white conservatives, the latter find themselves in a pickle as the very people they respect most have no respect for them. Then, it’s understandable why white conservatives are beside themselves with ecstasy when the odd Jew mutters something in their favor(even if half-hearted). A white conservative subconsciously thinks, “What I think and believe matters less than if a Jew agrees with or approves of me.” In other words, white thoughts ultimately need the stamp of approval of the holy Jews. It’s no wonder that white conservatives wet their pants when someone like Bill Maher, who mostly spews filth at whites, on occasion says whites and/or conservatives aren’t totally evil. The bar is very low for Jews to win over whites. For whites to win over Jews, they must serve up a feast; but for Jews to win over whites, they merely need to offer the half-chewed gum in their mouth.

On the issue of Jewish nationalism or Zionism overstepping its boundaries and trampling all over Palestinian aspirations, most whites(‘conservative’ and ‘liberal’) overwhelmingly side with Jews. In other words, the hell with principles of respecting the national integrity of all peoples.
Why else would Jewish nationalism take precedence over Palestinian nationalism among whites of the nationalist persuasion, especially given that most Jews/Zionists regard whites much like the Palestinians, a people to quell, manipulate, dehumanize, humiliate, subjugate, and potentially erase?
Is it the fear of Jewish Power, a sense among whites that Jews are so powerful that they must be appeased one way or another, with the Hail Mary hope that if whites cuck to Israel, World Jewry will go easier on them?
But, despite the warm relations between Russia and Israel, have World Jewry gone easier on Russia? Or have the Jews pulled everything out of their bag of tricks to undermine and destroy Russia, with Israel smirking on the sidelines? Has World Jewry been kinder to Viktor Orban for his support for Israel and Netanyahu? The last we checked, he was still characterized as a ‘far right autocrat’ by the Jews who control global media.
If not so much to placate Jewish Power(a hopeless endeavor by all available evidence), is it to grease the skids with the white cuck-collaborators who manage the Western institutions and industries, i.e. white cuck elites may still maintain ties and do business with Cain-marked ‘far right’ elements if, at the very least, they cuck to Israel and the Zionist project? In other words, if Viktor Orban were to go nuclear on the Jewish Question, he would have to deal with not only Jewish hostility but the rabid rage of white cuck elites whose main rationale for being is Jew Worship.

Anyway, look all around the West(and even beyond), and in more ways than one, much of the world looks like one big Syria-as-metaphor, a house of cards easily toppled by Zion. At least Syria had resisted and managed to survive, if barely, until 2024. In contrast, much of the world was ‘syrianized’ before Syria.
Take Germany and the blow up of the Nord Stream pipelines. Any sensible person knows it had to have been directed by the Jewish-run US, but Germany has pretended otherwise, mewling along with the American Narrative that it must have been Russia…or maybe rogue operatives within the Ukrainian government wholly independent of the US and NATO, LOL.
Such weakness on the part of Germany signals utter surrender and humiliation to the US-led world order, but then the US is about total capitulation to Jewish Power. What’s the difference between Ukro-Nazis or Jihadis in Syria and the white cucks in America? Not much, as White America, like the sub-Nazis in Ukraine and Al Qaeda variants in Syria(and elsewhere throughout the Middle East), is totally in the hands and the pockets of Jewish Power. Indeed, White America had prostrated itself before Jewish Power long before Syria did. Consider the utter phoniness of American principles.
White Democrats who claim to be for ‘racial justice and equality’ readily support the tribal-supremacist ultra-right regime in Israel, and White Republicans bend over backward to Zion despite Jews being overwhelmingly anti-white, anti-Christian, and anti-white-goy-conservative. All around are signs of total white surrender to Jewish Power. After the Jewish war on Trump and MAGA, one would expect some pushback against Jewish Power, but all we hear from Trump and his appointees is pledging fealty to Israel and the promise to clamp down on ‘Anti-Semites’.

And look at the state of Western/European/American churches. The religion that once stood against Jewish influence and subversion is now totally subservient to Jewish Power in either (1) rabidly supporting genocidal-supremacist Zionism, as the Evangelicals mostly do, despite Jews having turned the Holy Land into Sodom, aka the ‘gayest country on Earth’, or (2) rendering Christianity servile to the new gods favored by Jewish Power, mostly centered on Anno Sodomini or Negrolatry(or the George Floyd faith), and prior to that, to the cult of MLK, i.e. Mainline Christianity is no longer about sinners of all stripes and colors seeking redemption through Jesus Christ but about god-and-jesus having to prove their worthiness via veneration of the homo-anus & black-butt. The West has become a Spiritual ‘Syria’, a defeated wasteland where whites and various other goyim have totally cucked to the ‘gods’ and neo-sacraments manufactured by Jews.

One of the saddest and most pathetic displays of white cowardice, defeat, surrender, and servility was the BLM inquisition-pogroms of 2020. Just as the Syrian army melted away and dissolved before the invasions of Turkish-backed Jihadis from the north and then the Zionists from the east, White America either sat on its ass or got on its knees as blacks, Antifa, wokesters, and etc. rampaged through city after city. One white kid who resisted, Kyle Rittenhouse, was put on trial and came within a hair’s breadth of spending the rest of his life in prison.

In the American South, while Jews, blacks, and white cucks were waging total war on Southern Heritage, the good ole boys just hid in their houses while governments, at the behest of the Jews, tore down Confederate monuments. Jews and white cucks cheered on blacks gleefully melting down the Robert E. Lee statue, but there wasn’t a hint of outrage from white America, not even white Southern America, certainly nothing from the Republicans. Even before the fall of Syria, White America totally surrendered to Jews and their agendas(mostly concerning homos and blacks).

2020 was surely the ugliest moment in 21st century America. As BLM tore through the streets, half of white America cheered in ‘moral’ support while the other half, one that disapproved of the mayhem, sat in silence and squirmed in fear of being ‘canceled’. This is why White Americans who mock the weakness of Syrians are deluded beyond belief. They should look in the mirror. White Americans surrendered to Jews on just about everything of significance: media control, financial control, pornification of society, promotion of interracism, Negrolatry, Globohomo, Neocon Wars for Zion, anti-Russian hatred, open borders, White Guilt cult, White scapegoating, cancerous spread of gambling, vandalism of Western/White heritage, and etc. White America is really about one bunch of losers berating another bunch of losers without ever naming the Jewish winners who relish pitting goyim against goyim.
Even when whites in the US and the West in general find themselves at the opposite side of the Jewish Agenda, they feel compelled to spin their ideological and policy preferences as ‘good for Jews’. They can never say they’re doing anything that’s good for themselves and bad for Jewish Power as their mortal enemy. Oh no, Muslim immigration must be halted because it’s BAD FOR JEWS or BAD FOR HOMOS(so precious to even more precious Jews).
How ridiculous if, even when you oppose harm directed at you by someone, your action must be rationalized as beneficial to that someone who is inflicting the harm. The White Soul is a vast Syria of the Mind, colonized and controlled by Jewish Power.

There is a total lack of autonomy and independence in White/Western thinking. Jewish Power is like the City Hall to which one must apply and appeal for license to think or do anything; as the saying goes, “You can’t fight City Hall.”
Imagine there’s Bob & Bill, and Bill’s idea of good and bad is always about looking over his shoulder at Bob to see what Bob’s thinking. If Bob nods approval, it’s good; if not, it’s bad. If Bob laughs, Bill laughs along. If Bob is offended, Bill too is offended. If Bob hates someone, Bill also hates him. But if Bob changes his mind and likes the person, Bill also changes his mind and likes him. Bill is either an idiot, flunky, sidekick, sockpuppet, or man-dog. Bill is incapable or afraid of having any thought or feeling of his own, always needing to validate his own worth in servility to Bob. In this regard, White America is to Jewish Power what North Koreans are to the Kim dynasty. Every white ‘idea’ or ‘passion’ must be processed into a kosher-approved sausage.

The collapse, defeat, and/or surrender of the Soviet Union in the Cold War has been endlessly discussed but hardly ever mentioned is the possibly more momentous surrender of the White gentile/Christian elites to World Jewry.
The US may have won the Cold War, but the Jews won the Old War, the ancient and timeless conflict between Jews and Goyim, a matter of great importance because Jews didn’t merely defeat a rinky-dink people like the Palestinians but the most powerful, successful, and hegemonic people of all history, the Anglos of both the British Empire and the American Empire.
And even though it happened ‘unnoticed’, the sudden and total collapse and surrender of white goy power to the Jews was of epic proportions. It could be that white goyim henceforth barked loudly and growled viciously at any nation or people hated by Jews because, by ‘sharing’ in the Jewish hostility and rage, they can perpetuate the illusion that they are not a defeated people, a bunch of dogs and cattle, but equal victors and partners alongside Jews in the game of global hegemony. But no amount of a dog barking can hide the fact that it’s a dog.

‘Syria’ can be extended as a metaphor beyond the West. Taiwan caved to ‘gay marriage’ pushed by Jews, and Japan is now ‘this’ close to adopting it as well given that its judiciary and ‘intellectual’ class are a bunch of spineless, sappy, soyboy cucks to the Jewish-run West. Whenever Jews visit Japan to push globohomo and Negrolatry, the Japanese grovel before their masters and pledge kanarazu to turn Japan ‘gay’.

One would think the rise of democracy in South Korea and Taiwan would have made them more independent-minded but their entire ‘intellectual’ class have been shaped by American White Thought, which is really dog-thought servile to Jewish Master Thought. Given the vertical thinking among the East Asians, with authoritative masters teaching dutiful students, yellows are among the biggest suckass toadies and flunkies in the world. East Asians also live in a ‘Syria’ of their own, i.e. they always surrender and conform to the prevailing narratives and agendas of the supreme power.

And then, look at the Arab states. Given all that has happened, you’d think they’d finally get their act together and coordinate a grand plan to contain the madness of Zionist hegemonic agenda, but the key Arab states still remain beholden to the US. In a way, they’re more embarrassing than the fallen Syria because Syria at least once had a degree of autonomy and sovereignty. In contrast, those cucked Arab states never had any independence to lose as they were always vassals of the West from day one; and of course, their support for the Palestinians was usually just lip-service. In this sense, they were ‘Syrias’ before Syria. Not that Latin America is any better.

What the fall of actual Syria and the sorry states of metaphorical ‘Syrias’ suggest is that power has a limited shelf-life when there’s a fatal disconnect between the rulers and the ruled. The disconnect could result from incompetence, corruption, or tyranny, but it could also manifest in good times due to ideology, decadence, and/or nihilism. France in 1968 was a reasonably well-governed nation that had experienced remarkable growth since the end of World War II, but the disconnect between the rulers and the educated youth was palpable in the streets. Even though the ridiculous revolution failed, the ruling class suffered a moral defeat that defined the decline and decay in years to come.

Throughout the West, despite the advances and successes, the hearts and minds of many youths were set against the ruling class, in no small part due to Jewish influence. In the US, the white goy ruling class grew increasingly defensive and apologetic for their power and privileges. Increasing Jewish influence drove a wedge between the white rulers and the white masses, and in time, the white ruling class could no longer rely on white mass support while the white masses no longer had a white elite to lead and represent them.

In time, the white elites decided the only way they could preserve some of their status and privilege was by making themselves useful to the Jewish elites that had the respect and veneration of the goy masses(due largely to Jewish control of media and academia that sanctified Jews as a wise and tragic people who survived the Holocaust, the greatest crime of all time). Just when the white ruling elites had to answer for past ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, and other evils, even the most powerful and privileged Jews were cloaked in the sacred cloth of Shoah-hood.
Thus, even though Jewish elites didn’t identify with the white goy masses who, in turn, were rather puzzled as to how the Jewish-White relations could be of benefit to white people in general, the idea was that the Jewish elites, unlike the previous white/WASP/Anglo ones, were unassailable given their tragic history(mostly owing to ‘Anti-Semitic’ whites, be they Christian or pagan) and/or Chosen covenant(at least in the eyes of white Evangelicals and the like).

Given that the Jewish elites radiated with the glow of Holocaustianity while the white/WASP/Anglo elites were branded with the Mark of Cain of ‘racism’ and ‘antisemitism’, the latter found it most convenient to serve the Jews as the new overlords, thus associating themselves with the new holiness(along with globhomo and Negrolatry) while distancing themselves from anything with the slightest whiff of whiteness that became almost synonymous with evil within the prevailing Jewish-dominated ideological and idolatrous paradigm.

Once the elites are de-legitimized in the eyes of other aspiring groups and the masses in general, the crisis of authority makes way for radical transformation. It happened to the Anglo-American elites in the US and Anglo-elites worldwide in general. No longer willing to appeal to and connect with their own racial base(that was turned against them by the media and academia directly or indirectly controlled by Jews), their only hope of clinging to any vestige of power/privilege was by serving as brownnosing suck-ups to Jews as the new ruling elites.

In a way, the fate of the WASPs bears a certain similarity to the fate of Assad’s Alawite elite minority rule in Syria. Even though the Assad family reigned as Syrian rulers for all the Syrian people, ethnic and sectarian divisions remained that could be exploited by insiders and outsiders seeking to subvert the entire Syrian national project. Ironically, outside forces, especially Israel and the Jewish-run West, along with subservient Sunni-ruled Arab states, sought to discredit the Syrian regime as being propped up by foreign elements, which in the end came to be true as only the intervention of Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah could fend off the hostile foreign Jihadis armed by the West and Turkey.

Just like the fallen WASP elites held onto the trappings of power and privilege by cucking to Jews as goy sidekicks and flunkies, surely remnants of the Old Order in Syria are eyeing which set of new masters to serve, mainly Turkish or Jewish, to gain favors. In essence, they are no different from the likes of Lindsey Graham, Joe Biden, Mitt Romney, the Cheneys, the Bushes, and Mike Pence: The fallen seeking to maintain or gain privileges by being useful to the new power in charge. It’s like Sal in THE GODFATHER, convinced of Corleones as a spent force, sidling up to Barzini as the future mafia boss of the East Coast. There are many more Sals than Clemenzas(who stood by the Corleones) in this world.


Video Link


Friday, December 6, 2024

Worst Foreign Policy Disaster in American History?

 

It’s often been said, during and in the aftermath of the Iraq War, that it was the single greatest foreign policy failure/fiasco in US history. Was it?
Of course, given the passions surrounding the event then spiraling out of control, many agreed with the assessment(especially given the incompetence of George W. Bush), but in retrospect, the Iraq War pales in comparison with, say, the Vietnam War and its impact on American society. It’s unlikely that future historians and social critics will obsess over Bush’s misadventure as people have done so about the role of the Vietnam War in American politics and culture. Indeed, prior to the raging controversy over the Iraq War, many had pointed to ‘Vietnam’ as the biggest foreign policy mistake in US history.

But, even that assessment may have been overblown, partly because of the trauma of America’s first ‘defeat’. Arguably, the victories in previous wars obscured their longer-term dire effects. The US was on the winning side in World War I and World War II, but its key role in the defeat of Germany in the First World War led to disastrous results, paving the way for World War II.
To be sure, World War II, like any great historical event, wasn’t an inevitability, but the preconditions created by the peace forced on Germany by the US and its partners escalated tensions in Central Europe that made another war more likely. Such considerations have been obfuscated by the official narratives that conveniently placed all the blame on Hitler and Germany.
There’s also the view that Hitler was SO EVIL that it was indeed a moral imperative for the UK and US to have goaded him into war so as to bring down his villainy, i.e. even if Hitler was provoked, it was justified in order to bring him down by whatever means necessary.
There’s also the uniquely American view that the war was a welcome boost that finally ended the Great Depression. Besides, the Good Guys won the Good War against the Most Evil Regime in History. And the Americanists regarded the post-war order as one in which the freedom-loving US defended liberty and spread prosperity around the world, especially against the communist threat.

But, such a narrative is rather too convenient for Americans whose domain was untouched by direct conflict, notwithstanding the attack on Pearl Harbor. If American policies had made the war more likely, they were partly responsible for the tens of millions of deaths across Europe.
Also, had the war been avoided, most Eastern Europe nations would have allied with Germany against the Soviet Union, thereby limiting the extent of communist influence. The so-called Cold War could have been avoided with Germany and its partners as bulwark against communist Russia.

Also, had the war been avoided, there would have been no Holocaust, which means no paralyzing narrative to guilt-bait-and-burden the entire West as either genocidal mass killers, collaborators, or do-nothings in regard to the ‘greatest crime of all time’. Thus, abuses of Jewish Power could have been countered and checked more effectively, preventing the rise of the conditions that currently infest the West with the pathology of Jew Worship. What kind of civilized and sane order would hand the keys to the kingdom the likes of Victoria Nuland and her ilk?

Also, without the complete collapse of Europe as a viable power center, the tragic consequence of World War II, the second half of the 20th century would have been more balanced and multipolar in its power equation. The US and USSR as great powers would have had to contend with the great power(s) of Continental Europe and of course the British.
World War II effectively divided Europe into two camps, vassals of the US and the vassals of the USSR. Minus an autonomous Europe with the will and power to fend off both American and Russian hegemonism, world history turned into a cartoon of ‘democracy vs totalitarianism’, ‘imperialism vs revolution’, ‘free world vs tyranny’, ‘capitalism vs communism’, ‘individualism vs collectivism’, and etc. as if the ONLY historical/ideological choices were Americanism and Sovietism. There was, to be sure, the Non-Aligned Movement, but its anxious existence implied that the two towering giants were the US and USSR, with most the world compelled to be on the side of one or the other.

The American role in the creation of Israel should be recognized as another contender for the biggest foreign policy disaster. Given the lack of direct US military involvement, its dramatic success as nation-building(as Palestinians were quickly neutralized), and the Jewish grip on academia/media, it’s no surprise that few people dare to name the American role in Zionism as a foreign policy disaster, let alone the biggest ever.
Yet, so much of what has gone wrong in American foreign policy(and domestic affairs as well) could be traced to that event. Increasingly, the ‘Arabists’ were purged from the US government, leading to an imbalance in America’s formulation and application of policy throughout the Middle East and North Africa. Even though the US support for Zionism initially concerned only the lands of Palestine, as Jews grew in power and ambition it went from a national project to an imperial overreach, getting the US into one hell of a mess in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Lebanon, and Iran. America’s increasingly one-sided support for Israel has embittered and inflamed much of the Arab/Muslim world. And now with the ‘Gaza Genocide’, America’s reputation around the world is in the toilet.
Furthermore, the tragicomic spectacle of all those brown-nosing white goy politicians and pundits shilling for Jewish Supremacism has done irreparable harm to the global perception of white folks. No longer seen as members of a proud, confident, and free race, they’re seen as servile, craven, and venal. White Republican idea of success is winning Jews over by indulging the Tribe’s absolute worst instincts. “If we support them in genocide, maybe just maybe they’ll kick us less and toss us more shekels.” How morally bankrupt is American Conservatism?

Now, it’s possible that white goyim would have turned into cuck-maggots of Jewish Power regardless of Israel’s existence. Even without the fruition of the Zionist project, Jews would likely have amassed great power and influence in the US with their talent, drive, cunning, and networking. One could argue that the Holocaust Narrative, more than Zionism, became the main albatross(or gooney bird) around the white goy’s neck.
To a degree, Zionism has tainted the Jews with accusations of ‘racism’, imperialism, colonization, supremacism, and ‘Nazi-like’ behavior, especially with Netanyahu’s Israel gone full armageddon on the ‘Amalek’. Even without Israel’s creation, one could argue that the Shoah Business alone would have been sufficient to morally check the white race into cuckdom.

That said, the Zionist narrative, especially in the US, has been instrumental to Jewish Power for several reasons. As Jewish-dominated media shaped the narrative, the general perception was of Israel as the plucky underdog, the only homeland for the Jews(and the ‘only democracy in the Middle East’, as well as ‘safe haven’ for Sodomites), surrounded by barbaric Arabs/Muslims with Nazi-like genocidal intentions. Prior to the role of social media(and shrewd Arab-American inroads into the influential Middle East Studies departments across the academia), most Americans bought into the Jewish narrative on Middle East affairs, especially during the Cold War when Israel was portrayed as America’s trusty(LOL) ally pitted against the clients of the Soviet Union.

Zionism also elevated the standing of Jews among the American Christian community, a key voting bloc among the Republicans, quite a feat considering that Christian conservatism long distrusted Jews for religious and/or ideological issues. For many white Christians of the Imperial persuasion, the idea of ‘white’ Jews (re)conquering the Holy Land from the darky Moslems was the next best thing to the Christian Crusades. At the very least, the West had once again wrested control of the sacred territories from the swarthy ‘sand niggers’.
Among the more zealous-minded within the Evangelical community, the Jewish return to the Holy Land was the first step in the fulfillment of the Prophecy. And among the more cuckish Christians(who idolize Jews as the superior master race of Chosenites), salvation was inconceivable without blessing the Jews to secure the blessing of God.

So, even though Israel was founded as a secular national-socialist state, American Christians found reasons to rhapsodize about the People of the Book, the Chosen, restored to their sacred homeland as precondition for the Second Coming. Given that the mindless Christian fealty to Israel has kept the masses of Evangelicals predisposed to favor Jews — even ‘liberal’ Jews are deemed as prodigal sons who, with enough adulation from the Christian community, shall return to the fold as God’s Chosen folks —, Zionism has been a net positive for Jewish Power.
If Israel didn’t exist, most Christian Conservatives might have regarded Jews as anti-religious, cosmopolitan, rootless, radical, subversive, and etc. The Christian fantasies of Israel keeps the Evangelicals hoping and praying for the day when Jews shall finally see the light, reject secular material liberalism, and lead all of humanity, especially the Christians, towards the promise of Salvation.

Of course, Christians don’t need Jews and Judaism to be ‘saved’ as the New Testament explicitly states that the original Covenant(between God and Jews) was rendered null and void so as to make way for the New Covenant between God and all those who would accept Jesus, the Son of God whose death was demanded by Jews.
But, given the rise of Holocaustianity as a rival cult and America’s obsession with winners, post-war Christianity found itself having to come to terms with the image of Jews as little-christs who were crucified(or gassified) for the sins of Gentile Europe and as neo-Caesars of money and power in the postwar era.
Even though most Jews are anti-white, anti-Christian, and/or anti-conservative, the fantasies about Israel has sustained the Christian dream of the ‘conversion of the Jews’(if not to Christianity itself than to a favorable attitude toward Christians).

Now, it’s all laughable upon close inspection. While it’s true that Democratic Jews despise white conservatives and Christians, it’s no less true that most so-called ‘conservative’ Jews loathe whites & Christians, maintaining a bogus one-sided alliance only to exploit the goyim as dogs and cattle in service to Jewish Power and Zion. When has the Jews in Israel ever reciprocated the affection(or delusion) of the Christ-cuck community? While these Christians believe they must bless Jews in order to be blessed by God, no Jew believes he must bless whites/Christians in order to be blessed by God(or be justified in the eyes of History). Jews believe they’re blessed by God regardless(even if they hate goyim), whereas white Christians believe they must bless Jews to earn God’s blessing. When the likes of Netanyahu spout nonsense like ‘our cause is your cause’, they mean ‘you must serve us’, not ‘we must serve each other’. It’s about white interests being nullified in total subordination to Jewish interests than about whites and Jews finding common grounds for mutual benefit. When Israel doesn’t want illegal African migrants, what does it do? It steers them to Europe. “We Jews don’t want these troublesome savages, but if you Europeans don’t take them off our hands, you’re ‘racist’!” Such is Jewish ‘moral’ logic.

The relative amnesia about the Iraq War(for all the negative hype during the crisis) may owe to several factors. The Vietnam War proved traumatic to the Liberal Elite not only for its divisiveness but for re-igniting the political career of Richard Nixon, whose comeback had been inconceivable earlier in the decade. Thus, the Democrats not only faced defeat abroad(to the ‘commies’) but lost at home to Tricky Dick, one of the most reviled figures in liberal and elite circles.
In contrast, the Iraq debacle led to the triumph of Obama as a kind of dream-deferred-finally-come-true. For a spell, the Democrats could believe he was The One, the spiritual fusion of JFK and MLK whose missions of peace and justice had been cut short. Foreign policy disaster led to the biggest Democratic success in the 21st century. Thus, the Iraq War, which could be blamed mostly on the GOP, had a far less depressive effect on the Liberal elites(who are now most of the elites) who write History.

But, another(and more significant) reason is that the Democratic or Neolib Jews (not so)quietly continued with the Neocon policies of the Dubya era. If the US retreat from Vietnam genuinely signaled an acceptance of new realities — former Indochina firmly in the communist sphere — , the chaos of Iraq hardly dented the overall policy trajectory premised on Jewish supremacy and Zionist hegemony. Besides, if the blame for the Vietnam War could be laid squarely at the feet of the red-baiting, paranoid, and ‘rightwing’ Anglo-American Establishment(still the ruling elites in the Sixties and Seventies), with Jews taking credit as the conscientious voices for peace, there was no getting around the fact that Iraq War was largely a Jewish concoction, even though the Jewish media never tired of reiterating the Gentile character of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and etc.
In truth, GOP goyim went all in with the Neocon policy in the hope of winning more Jews to their side. When the Bush project failed, the Neocons(at least the Jewish ones) weren’t permanently disgraced and dislodged but resuscitated via connections with the Neolib Zionists in the Democratic Party; thus, the agenda of destabilizing the region in service to Israel and World Jewry carried on despite Obama having gained the presidency on the promise of rolling back the policies of the Bush regime.
It wasn’t long before the War ON Terror became the War WITH Terror, as the Neolib Jews well understood that Jihadis made the most effective fighters against the regimes in Syria, Libya, and Iraq. Because the Zionist-led Democrats more or less continued with and even intensified the agenda of George W. Bush years, the disastrous aspects of the Iraq War were mostly memory-holed than held up as reminders(as the Vietnam War had been so often for so long as a dark lesson on the hubris of US foreign policy).

If anything, the Jewish Supremacist agenda only intensified and metastasized to Ukraine as well under Obama, the puppet monkey of the Jews. And the fact that Donald Trump, who campaigned on friendlier relations with Russia, spent his four years arming Ukraine to the teeth only demonstrated the primacy of the Jewish Supremacist agenda, i.e. whoever won the election had to do the bidding of the Jews, even if it entailed arming sub-Nazi types in Ukraine to lob missiles into the Donbass and slaughter Russian civilians.

It’s no wonder that the Iraq Debacle narrative was quietly sidelined as a possible hindrance to the continuance of the Jewish Supremacist agenda, expanding even to Ukraine, to find and destroy ‘new hitlers’(like Assad the ‘butcher of Syria’ or Putin the ‘hot-blooded Slav’) or to spread and defend ‘democracy’, because, of course, there are no finer icons of liberty and human rights than the Ukro-puppets shoe-horned into power following the CIA-backed Maidan coup. (Also, it’s no wonder that Jews now downplay the once pervasive narratives about McCarthyite paranoia and the threat of nuclear war. Jewish Power now fulminates against Russia-Russia-Russia everywhere and accuses anyone of being a Putin-puppet if not sufficiently antipathetic to Russia. Jewish supremacist pathology is such that it even entertains the possibility of nuclear war, indeed as if the Tribe could emerge relatively unscathed to scoop up all of Russia’s assets and resources from the ashes. Jews, who once used to mock hawkish figures like General Jack D. Ripper of DR. STRANGELOVE, now elevate the voices that reliably saber-rattle against Russia, even positing the possibility of victory by first strike.)

Some disasters are loud, others are silent. The latter may prove to be worse, but the former obviously gets more attention. Surely, the Iraq War was a lot louder than Harry Truman’s decision in the aftermath of World War II to aid and abet in the creation of Israel at the expense of the Palestinians. Consider the difference between someone cliff-diving & breaking his legs and someone choosing to become a habitual smoker. The cliff-diving accident is surely more dramatic in its immediate consequence, but tobacco may do greater harm in the long run, causing diseases of the heart, lungs, and other organs. Once the bones mend, one may be restored to full health, whereas diseases brought on by tobacco may well be fatal.

In that light, even though America’s role in the creation of Israel was muted in comparison to the brazen rampages in the Middle East, it sowed the poison seeds that sprouted into something like the monster plant in LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS. Indeed, nearly all the US wars in the Middle East could be traced back to Truman’s momentous decision to greenlight the Zionists. If Israel never existed(or was created in a manner tolerable to the Palestinians and Arabs), would US-Arab relations soured to the point of driving several key Arab states to the Soviet sphere of influence? (It’s no wonder that Jewish Power adopted the Neocon position in the Cold War as Zionist ambitions in the Middle East were checked as long as the USSR, as the other superpower, provided arms and advisors to the ‘hostile’ Arab/Muslim states. The total implosion of Soviet-Russia as a global player provided roughly a three-decade window of opportunity for the Zionist-led US to do as it pleased in the region, finally thwarted by Russia’s resurgence and entry into the Syrian conflict.)

If not for the politics prioritizing Zionist interests, would the US have come to regard certain states in MENA(Middle East and North Africa) as ‘enemies’? For all the outrage about ‘blood for oil’ during the Iraq Invasion, that conflict(and subsequent ones) were really about ‘blood for blood’, or spilling tons of Arab and/or Muslim blood(and the blood of US goy soldiers as well) to satiate the blood-lust of Zionism premised on the conviction that Jewish blood is sacred, exceptional & indispensable, whereas goy blood, that of whites included, is just commodity to be bought, sold, and disposed of.
It was worth it not only to kill half a million Arab children(as Madeleine Albright opined) but to send white/black/brown goy soldiers to kill and die for Jewish racial-spiritual right of domination. Why risk a drop of precious Jewish bodily fluids when seemingly limitless barrels of goy blood are there to be extracted and devoured by the war machine?
A similar logic is at play in Ukraine where World Jewry cackles with hideous glee at the sight of Slavs killing Slavs(as well as the numbnut goy mercenaries from around the world). But then, Jewish Supremacists are never in short supply of shabbos goy dogs willing to spew hawkish obscenities, like dogs barking for their master. The likes of Mike Pompeo, Lindsey Graham, Sebastian Gorka, and innumerable chickenhawks among the Democrats have publicly exulted in the reports of dead Russians on the battlefield. And for all their flowery rhetoric about defending ‘democracy’ and the national integrity of Ukraine, they seem giddy at the prospect of Jewish oligarchs grabbing all the spoils of war from the graveyards of Ukrainian soldiers. Like a dog’s biggest joy is the approval of its master, shabbos goyim know no greater happiness than praises from their Jewish overlords. As Nancy Pelosi once said, even if Congress burns to the ground, she and her shabbos goy whores will always be there for Jews and Israel.
Of course, in their cleverer moments, the shabbos goyim believe that, having adopted Jewish prejudices as their own, they are spared and favored by Jewish Power. Of course, even as those comprador-elites are rewarded individually, the racial and ethnic groups they belong to are no less targeted for destruction and humiliation by the Jews than the Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians, Iranians, and Russians are.
At any rate, it’s win-win for the Jews to have shabbos goyim as their attack dogs. The growling shabbos dogs do the bidding of their Jewish masters who, however, keep their composure and present themselves as fair-minded. How often have Jews blamed the problem between Jews and Palestinian/Arabs on the fanaticism of Christian Zionists and the Military-Industrial Complex? So, even though Jews have unleashed the Christian Zionist dogs-of-hell and the saber-rattlers in the Pentagon to bark up a storm, they present themselves as ‘secular liberals’ seeking the middle-ground. Playing good cop/bad cop.

Given that nearly all post-Cold War foreign policy fiascos can be traced back to the Neocon investment in the Zionist agenda(and related Jewish supremacist ventures), the American role in the creation of Israel could be deemed as the biggest foreign policy mistake in American History.

Some people, especially conservatives, may argue otherwise, i.e. Jews would have been even more ‘liberal’, ‘leftist’, or ‘radical’ had it not been for Israel as a magnet for right-leaning Jews for reasons that are religious(traditionalist), ideological(ethno-nationalist), and/or strategic(in need of alliances with conservative goy elements). After all, Jewish support for the GOP is incumbent on its cucking even harder for Israel than the Democratic Party does.
Being less aligned with the dominant Jewish(and ‘liberal’) Agenda for America, the Republicans fear Jewish wrath and proffer compensation by way of total support for Israel, especially as the Israeli far-right has been ascendant over the years — even Israel’s version of ‘liberalism’ is hard right by current Western standards. If Jews are holy or special and if all whites must secure their blessing one way or the other but if Jews shower most of their blessing on ultra-deracinated ‘liberal’ whites, doesn’t the Republican and Evangelical going-the-extra-mile in the cucking to Israel manage to scrape together some crumbs of blessing for the ‘conservative’ side? Of course, given the levels of Democratic Party’s appeasement of Jewish Power, this is no easy feat. The ‘conservative’ argument goes like this: If Democrats send weapons to Israel to kill 19,999 people, Republicans condemn it as ‘Anti-Semitic’ for the missing bullet that would have made for the round number of 20,000.

At any rate, the pro-Zionist argument among conservatives rests on the fallacy that rightist elements across the spectrum have shared visions and interests. This may be true at the structural level — all rightwing movements lean towards tribalism, ethnocentrism, traditionalism, and/or hierarchy — but hardly at the political level. For example, the hard right in Turkey and the hard right in Greece are likely to be more antagonistic to one another on the issue of Cyprus(and various other contentious issues). While all right-wing movements are anti-leftist, they are also likely to be at odds with other right-wing movements if their tribal, ethnic, or national interests clash. Good luck with hard right Hindus seeing eye to eye with hard right Islamists. Both Likud and Hamas could be deemed right-wing in their tribal politics, but they are fighting over the same territory.

Likewise, it’s a fool’s errand to hope that, because some Jews are rightist or conservative, their rightism or conservatism necessarily shares common ground with the rightism or conservatism of a goy group. For sure, the right in Japan and the right in the US during World War II felt nothing but hatred for one another.
At the religious level, Jews see themselves as the Chosen of God and see goyim as either lesser humans(at best) and subhuman cattle(at worst), whereas the rightwing version of Christianity upholds the idea of Jews as Christ-killers whose redemption and salvation are possible only through conversion to the True Faith, Christianity, the religion most loathed by Jews.

While Jewish rightists/conservatives may dislike and distrust the universalist Left, they may fear and loathe even more the goy right that insists on putting its own tribe, nation, culture, and/or race first and foremost, possibly to the detriment of the Jews(who are unsatisfied with mere co-existence and seek domination and control of the goyim as lesser inferior beings).
After all, so-called ‘antisemitism’ was more pronounced among the rightist elements throughout European history. And notwithstanding the certain leftist aspects of National Socialism, the main impetus for its Jew-hatred was essentially right-wing, i.e. the idea that Jews had to be dealt with as radical and subversive agents against the organic unity of the goy order.
At the very least, a universalist order, even if opposed to religion(or rival religions), doesn’t deny the basic humanity of all groups and even champions the equality of rights and protections under its preferred concept of justice, whereas a particularist order(of the right) may treat foreign elements as the eternal-other, unworthy of respect and dignity. For example, communism may have rejected Jews as Jews(in the religious or ethnocentric sense) but it accepted Jews as humans, as comrades, were they to adopt Marxism. In contrast, National Socialism rejected and targeted Jews as a race. It was an assault on the very being of Jewishness than on what Jews believed.
Given the nature of particularism and universalism, the former works well within a more or less homogeneous national setting, whereas the latter is more tolerable as an imperial project. Universalists may be fanatical and ruthless as they wipe out your people’s culture, myths, heritage, and customs but they will accept you as fellow brethren or comrades if you subscribe to their credo.

Anyway, the so-called alliance of Jewish rightism and white rightism in the US has been a dud, at least for goyim who didn’t even get the short end of the stick, which fell entirely into Jewish hands. Rightwing Jews narrowly define their ‘conservative’ interests in tribal terms(as one would expect from a people rooted in an ethno-religion), whereas rightwing whites broadly define conservatism in abstract and principled terms. Jewish rightism is ‘centric’, meaning Jews are at the center of the universe and all other groups must revolve around them. Goy conservatism and the Christian Right, in contrast, are mutualist, which means all groups must adhere to a set of shared principles. Jewish rightism is unyielding by nature, whereas the goy right seeks common ground, a mutualist compromise. (Given that the goy right usually caves to Jewish demands, Jews not only get what they want but the goy right looks foolish in its betrayal of mutualism. If indeed motivated by principles, why does it favor Jews uber alles? Is the goy right really about principles or about principals, i.e. Jews deserve special privileges as the principal race that demonstrated superiority via intelligence, will-power, and wealth-accumulation?)

Naturally, Jews encourage a deracinated form of conservatism among whites while upholding a rooted form of identity for themselves. Despite the alliance, Jews regard all goyim as enemies or potential enemies and therefore urge on their dissolution while guiding fellows toward concentration.
Granted, the rates of Jewish intermarriage with goyim are considerable, but oddly enough, this may strengthen than weaken Jewish tribalism. Why? Jews in elite circles tend to meet and mate with the best of goyim. Contrary to the caricature of the nebbish Jewish guy marrying some blonde buxom bimbo and having less intelligent kids, many Jews marry goyim with comparable IQ levels. Furthermore, as Jewishness has a certain aura while goy identities grow weak in the West, goyim who marry Jews tend to ‘convert’ to Jewishness(if not religious Judaism) and raise their children as Jews. Thus, a new form of Jewishness along HBD lines is coming into being. Not the kind based purely on blood but on the degrees to which Jewishness absorbs the best qualities of the goyim into a neo-Jewishness. Then, contrary to intermarriage making Jews dumber, it may make Jews smarter whereas the Jews who insist only on intra-group marriage may be left behind as they’d rather choose a less intelligent Jew over a highly intelligent goy.

Mere mention of figures like Ben Shapiro and Alan Dershowitz should suffice to disabuse anyone of the illusion of Jewish-White alliance in the supposedly ‘conservative’ sphere. Jews feel complete, wholly justified and worthy, without any sense of obligation to whites and Christianity, whereas white conservatives have been led to believe they’re devoid of meaning and purpose unless they’re an asset to the Jews. Jews feel no compunction to support nationalist Hungary or traditionalist Russia, but conservatives and nationalists, even Viktor Orban and Vladimir Putin, feel obliged to sing paeans to Jews and/or Israel. Consider the ludicrousness of Russia, mired in a horrible war in Ukraine(that was provoked by Jews) but having to pretend it is at war with Evil Nazis, the arch-enemies of Jews, when, in fact, those very sub-Nazi Ukrainians were activated by Jews to bring about the Slav-on-Slav bloodbath.

Had Israel not come into existence, would virtually all Jews have been Democrats? Could the GOP have developed into the Anti-Jewish party, if only by necessity, what with nearly all the Jews being opposed to it? The elections of 1916 and 1920 were the last ones in which the Republicans were competitive with the Jewish electorate — if Warren Harding won more Jewish votes than his Democratic rival in 1920, it was because a whopping 38% of Jews voted for the socialist Eugene Debs. Thereafter, the Jewish vote dramatically leaned to the Democrats, and Jewish remnants in the GOP may owe to the Israel factor, i.e. it’s beneficial for Jewish Power to keep at least one foot in the GOP camp lest the Republicans totally abandon the Jews.

The issue of Israel keeps many white conservatives clinging to the hope of Jewish awakening and political conversion to the Right. While the great majority of Jews are Democrats, a not insignificant percentage(usually 20%) reliably vote Republican. But the main motivation concerns not only Israel as a national project but, more problematically, Zionism as a neo-imperial grand strategy. Remember how William Kristol the prominent Neocon Republican bolted over to the Democrats the minute MAGA populism expressed weariness about more wars(for Zion). And consider how quickly Jewish ‘conservatives’ like Jennifer Rubin and David Brooks turned on a dime and sided with the Democrats. Scum Brooks voted for Obama twice, and Rubin’s involvement with ‘conservatism’ is to spill more goy blood, American and Arab/Muslim, for Zionist interests.
If virtually all Jews were Democrats in a world without Israel, would it have extinguished the last flicker of hope for the GOP to win them over? The GOP would have had no choice but to develop into an Anti-Jewish(or ‘Anti-Semitic’) party. With virtually zero chance with the Jews, American Conservatism might have been more clear-and-cold-eyed about ethnic politics and evaded the trap of Bill-Buckley-ism.

Could a persuasive Anti-Jewish argument be made in favor of Zionism as the ultimate catalyst for Jewish Power’s downfall, i.e. too much of a good thing can be a bad thing? Especially in the aftermath of the Six Day War, Jewish chutzpah grew ever more hubristic, as if nemesis could be forever forestalled with enough money, cunning, and cries of ‘antisemitism’. Just like a series of sudden successes inflated Hitler’s egotism into megalomania, global white submission to Zion has led to pathological levels of self-worship among Jews who now believe the world is their (g)oyster. But reckless abandon is usually a formula for self-destruction as hubris is met with nemesis. Israel has crushed Gaza but also damaged, perhaps irreparably, its global brand and reputation premised in large part on the Holocaust narrative of Jewish victimology. When the very people associated with Anne Frank behave like Heinrich Himmler, much of the moral capital has gone down the toilet. While Jewish chutzpah and hubris(or hubritzpah) have been around forever and likely been pervasive even minus the creation of Israel, Zionism did pull together the dispersed obsessions in a most concentrated form.

Perversely enough, supreme arrogance and panicked hysteria fueled one another as the most vain tend to be the most insecure. A common feature of Jewish Establishment punditry is the sheer rage over anyone(especially if goy) daring to oppose or naysay the Agenda. Just like the Biblical God fulminates with apocalyptic rage over the slightest hint of insubordination, Jewish Power goes into a hissy fit whenever met with pushback, made all the worse by pathetic white cuckery that turned Jewish supremacists into spoiled bratty children, albeit with all the power.
Thus, Jews are now the most intelligent but also the most infantile group in the world. For all their smarts, the emotions percolate at the level of childish tantrums to the song “I Want Candy” on endless replay. Jewish Power needs a good spanking, and hopefully, Israel’s excesses are finally turning the global ship around on the Jewish Question. Even prior to the Gaza horror, Jews had already alienated many peoples around the world, especially in Russia and Iran, long targeted by World Jewry. Still, because Jews channeled and ‘washed’ their power and influence through nominally goy-led countries like the US, UK, Canada, France, and the like, one could overlook or fail to notice the Jewish Factor in the events. For the casual observer, the whole anti-Russia campaign might come across as a case of ‘democracy’ vs ‘autocracy’, or the West vs the East.

However, because Israel was specifically created as a Jewish State, what happens there and is done in its name(by client states, of which the US is most important) comes with the unmistakable stamp of Jewishness. Israel vs Palestine might even serve as a metaphor for many observers, i.e. “We could be the next ‘Palestine’ if Jews decide to target us.”
Given the lopsided disparity between Jewish domination and Palestinian resistance, it was long known in activist circles that Israel has a serious human rights problem. But what Israel unleashed, militarily and rhetorically, following the Oct 7 Hamas attack has awakened the entire world to the true nature of the far-right ethno-supremacist regime in Tel Aviv, the bloody policies of which has the support of over 90% of Jewish Israelis.
Especially the idealistic and impressionable youth worldwide, with their savvy navigation through social media, couldn’t help but notice the the dark side of Zionism. And the blaring hypocrisy of the West, especially in elite circles, has been exposed to the world community.
The Gaza horror may yet collapse the Holocaust Narrative like a house of cards. Either Jews face accusation as the New Nazis or the Holocaust is called into question given the lies about Hamas atrocities that were quickly debunked due in no small part to social media, without which many might still believe in the hoaxes about forty beheaded babies and baby roasted in the oven.
While Israel may weather the storm(given its powerful backers), there are now growing fissures in the Zionist project. Ironically, Zionism may turn out to be the ultimate ‘Anti-Semitic’ dream, one that turned most of humanity against Jewish Power. It’s like the moment in CARLITO’S WAY when the Puerto Rican ex-gangster tells the Jewish lawyer Kleinfeld that they’re ‘even’(and enough is enough).

Video Link

Even though the US elites are full of shabbos goyim, opinion polls among the younger generations(Jews included) don’t favor the Zionists. Donald Trump, though a veteran taker of Jewish dong up his bung, garnered significant support by channeling the populist backlash against more Wars for Israel. While Trump in his first term let Israel run loose within the territories it already occupies — Gaza, West Bank, and Golan Heights — , it was as if in de facto exchange for refusing to expand conflicts throughout the region. In other words, let Jews use bulldozers to raze Gaza, West Bank, and Golan Heights, but no tanks and bombers for more Wars for Zion. Thus, Trump managed to appease the short-sighted Jews in Israel who fixate on issues close to home but not so the far-sighted Jews with dreams of hegemony over the entirety of the Near East, not to mention the even more ambitious Jews whose agenda is global in scope, encompassing future domination over Russia and even China. In the Jewish Supremacist worldview, Jews as the Chosenites, the true master race, must take over(or reclaim) not only Palestine/Israel but what was formerly known as the (heavily Jewish)Pale of Settlement as the ramming rod against Russia with its vast resources. Jews control the West, the center of world power, but believe they must subjugate Russia as well to secure permanent hegemony. Russia remains a thorn on the Jewish side as long as it stands as an example, even model, of national sovereignty that can say NO to the Jewish Supremacist Agenda.
The Jewish dream is to turn Russians into clones of Anglo-cucks who venerate Jews as the rightful master race. Whereas the core meaning for Russians derives from their sense of independence, heritage, and pride, the core meaning for Anglos is bound up with their dog-like appeasement of and approval from Jews. Anglo-cucks have internalized and accepted their shameful status to such a degree that the mere sight of Russians rebuffing the Jewish Master Race agenda is deemed intolerable and offensive. It’s no wonder Anglo-cucks are all alike in the US, the UK, Canada, Australia, and etc. And needless to say, most of Western Europe follows this Anglo-Cuck model. The sheer hysterics of Anglo-cuckery, however, betrays something more than doglike servility. It could be a desperate attempt to repress their shame of servitude, like the Two Minutes Hate in George Orwell’s NINETEEN EIGHTY-FOUR where the minions of the state scream and holler at ‘Goldstein’ in an attempt at genuine passion despite having no choice in the matter; they must hate what they’re ordered to hate. Anglo-cucks uniformly howl and shriek at the image of Hot-Blooded Slav Putin, or Putler. Just like ‘Goldstein’ and his saboteurs are said to be the root cause of all the problems in Oceania, Putler and Putin-puppets are blamed for everything ‘wrong’ in the US and EU, like the election of Trump in 2016 and the ‘far right’ candidates in Europe, rather odd since Trump and ‘far right’ types in EU do little but suck up to Jews and Israel. As for China-China-China, the ‘Yellow Peril’ hysteria has been effective in distracting the masses from the fact of Jewish supremacy and domination.

Video Link

Even as the West cucks to Jews, there’s the agenda of White Nakba whereby Jews use mass non-white immigration and anti-white indoctrination via media, academia, and statist policies to reduce whites to the status of current Palestinians in the Middle East. The West has been turned into one big West Bank.

But then, it may boomerang on the Jews. For all their successes, Jews may be digging their own grave. The retaliation may come from whites finally awakened to the hostile Jewish agenda or from nonwhites who either regard Jews as super-white-devils or the real architects of the West’s war on the Non-West. Or it may come from both whites and nonwhites, though white motives may differ across the political spectrum, with the White Right fueled by racial vengeance while the White Left joins with nonwhites against Jews as the new super-oppressors, as with white progressive unity with pro-Palestinian voices across the West.

Conquests can lead to two outcomes. Total subservience or simmering resentment that may blow up in the face of the conquerors. Germans and Japanese have been so completely beaten, conquered, and broken after World War II that they’ve consigned themselves to eternal cuckdom. This is also true of many whites, especially of Northern European stock. Jews conquered them so thoroughly in body and soul, rammed their collective ass so deeply in ethno-sodomy, that the Anglos, Germanics, and Scandies cannot conceive of any possibility other than serving Jews as their rightful masters.
But not all peoples have surrendered and submitted with such total abandon in history, and Jews themselves have been a prime example. Even when down on their luck and seemingly defeated for good, they never stopped resenting, hating, and conspiring against the goyim who had power over them. It was wiles behind the smiles as Jews were unwilling to ever let it go, forgive and forget, and bury the hatchet. It was never in the Jewish cultural DNA. But then, Jews are not alone in the culture of vendetta.
For every person who totally submits to the Jews, there’s another looking for the first opportunity to strike back. Jewish Power is now vulnerable, more so than at any time after World War II, because it has deeply offended the elements of the most dynamic left and the most dynamic right. The Left is appalled by the brazen racial supremacism of Jews in Israel and their global facilitators. And much of the Right, one that is honest, is now awake to the true nature of the Jewish strategy of White Demise. China, once a basket-case, is now an economic giant that is tired of being kicked around by Jews and their white cucks. It won’t name the Jewish Power but won’t submit to it either. Russia, which long desired good relations with the Jewish-controlled West but on its own terms of mutual respect, discovered in the Ukraine crisis that the ONLY acceptable deal for Jews is ‘their way or the highway’, i.e. Western enmity of ‘Russophobia’ will ebb ONLY IF Russians cuck to Jews like the pathetic brown-nosing Anglos. And the spoiled-rotten behavior of Israel backed by the US and EU has just about alienated too much of the Middle East for good. And with China, Russia, and Iran as rising powers, the fear of US bullying may gradually become a thing of the past. Jewish globalism has a strange way of building bridges by burning them.
And in a way, even white cuckery, especially from the Republicans/Conservatives, is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it’s a great support system for Jews, but on the other hand, it associates Jewish Power with the white race that the Jewish academia/media have been demonizing forever. If whites are ‘evil racists’ but if whites suck up to Jews the most, even a dummy may wonder, “Jews must be super-evil to win such love from the evil white racists.” It’s why Jews both demand and demean Republican and MAGA support. If Trump is indeed New Hitler, what does it say about the nature of Jewish power when he’s so chummy with the arch-Zionists?

Speaking of foreign policy disasters and national interests, one must weigh their long term consequences against their short term impact. What may seem disastrous in the short run may prove to be advantageous in the long run, if not for the instigators than for humanity as a whole. The notion of ‘national interest’ is far more complicated than one may assume. Is it defined by policy goals of the state or what is beneficial to the nation as a whole? Failure for the state may prove to be good for the nation. So often in the political discourse, matters of national interest are focused on the elites in Washington D.C. and power centers like New York. But, the US comprises fifty states and innumerable communities, and most Americans have gained nothing and lost a good deal from America’s ventures around the world that have less to do with national defense/security than with the power-and-profit-lust of neo-imperialism(with Jewish supremacists at the helm).
Aggressive foreign policy successes, in further emboldening the imperial state, may actually be worse for the national interest, whereas the failures, in bringing forth a more sober and cautious approach, may actually serve the national interest. In a sense, a series of foreign policy disasters may actually be regarded as positives in having de-legitimized the wasteful and often psychotic proponents of empire. The Iraq War was bad but might have been worse had it succeeded, as it might have justified further wars to remake the Middle East. Likewise, as disastrous as the US venture in Ukraine proved to be, imagine if it had been wildly successful and if Russia had been defeated. Jewish supremacists might have pushed for the Napoleonic/Hitlerian push into Russia itself, and then what?

Granted, the failure of the Iraq War didn’t prevent the Obama administration from pushing for more regime changes, leading to fresh horrors in Libya and Syria, all in the furtherance of Jewish Power. That said, despite all the deaths and destruction wrought by these wars, it may be that the Neocons/Neolibs inadvertently paved the way for a rearrangement and revitalization of the region to the advantage of the Arabs and Muslims. With Saddam Hussein gone, Iraq grew closer to Iran and served as a bridge between Iran and Syria. And then, the Jewish attempt to destroy Syria led to a stronger bond among Syria, Russia, and Iran. Jewish-led US policies in Ukraine and Taiwan certainly brought Russia and China closer together. In a way, though not by intention, Jewish global meddling has perversely been a positive force in reshaping the world. For all the harm done to humanity with their domineering and destructive policies, Jews have triggered responses in the world community toward an alternative system to the End of History model posited by Francis Fukuyama. It’s like a serial killer who turns his targeted victims into an alert community of vigilant defenders. People who might have never come together if left to their own devices bonding into a brotherhood against the would-be menace. Jews took up the hammer and chisel to destroy their perceived enemies but may end up sculpting an ‘Anti-Semitic’ masterpiece. In the long run, the Neocons may be remembered not only as warmongering destroyers but as unwitting creators of a whole new order. History is funny that way.

Other than its role in the creation of Israel and indulging the worst tendencies of Zionism, the contender for America’s biggest foreign policy disaster is most likely the entry into World War I. The folly of World War I has surely been more obvious to the British, to whom the impact was immediate and devastating. Niall Ferguson’s THE PITY OF WAR reflected on Britain’s involvement in the war as a death knell for the empire and catalyst for worse tragedies yet to unfold in Europe. As the result of British involvement, the war was prolonged, many more died, German defeat led to events that led to the rise of Hitler; and of course, the Bolshevik takeover was also a byproduct of the war, perhaps preventable had the war not been prolonged by the British.

Less obvious is the long-term negative impact of the American entry into the war. Even with Britain in the fight, American neutrality would have prevented the German collapse and defeat, likely leading to some kind of eventual truce between France/Britain and Germany. With a semi-victorious Germany at the center of Europe, the social and economic catastrophe of the Weimar years could have been avoided. Also, Germans would have retained much of the territory it gained from the Russian empire, thereby limiting the power of the Bolsheviks. And of course, radicals like Hitler wouldn’t have come to power to gamble away Germany’s future.

While the US, separated from Europe by a vast ocean, was less affected by Continental affairs than the UK, the long-term impact of the German defeat in World War I spread its poison weeds to the US as well. The Anglo and Anglo-American paranoia about Germany(and the German diaspora in general) precluded the potential for the most constructive partnership in the West, the Anglo-German one. Good relations between the US, the British Empire, and Germany as the leading Continental power could have been the basis of peace and prosperity.

But even more significantly, the vilification of Germany in World War I and the demonization of Germany during and especially after World War II had profound ideological, moral, and cultural reverberations across the West. Germany, especially under National Socialism, came to be conflated not only with thick-skulled Teutonism and Aryanism but ‘white supremacy’ in general.
Therefore, despite the crucial role of the UK and US, along with the USSR, in the defeat of Hitler, the damnation of Evil Germany later served as a model of shaming and guilt-baiting any and all expressions of white identity and interests. First, Germany was burdened with guilt, then all of Continental Europe for having collaborated with evil, been neutral, or been too weak/craven to put up much of a fight. While the UK was initially honored for its resolute Churchill-led opposition to Hitler, it wasn’t long before the British racial consciousness and attitudes were compared with Nazism, i.e. both were forms of ‘white supremacism’. And then, the US was blamed for not having done enough to stop the Holocaust, apparently by bombing railroads that took Jews to the camps. Worse, American racial problems, especially with blacks in the South, were conflated with Nazi policies.

Today, many whites, even in the South, believe the Confederate flag is just as toxic, offensive, and evil as the Nazi Swastika. Anglos and Anglo-Americans, by defeating and demonizing the Germans, thought their vaunted place in the world was permanent. And for a while following the war, it seemed the world was theirs, except that Jews eventually took over the commanding heights of American institutions and spun the Anti-German narrative in such a way as to accuse and blame Anglos as well, i.e. even if Anglos in the UK and US were instrumental in the defeat of Evil Nazi Germany, weren’t the racial attitudes of Anglos and Germans, the two most successful groups of the Northern European phenotype, two sides of the same coin?
With the widespread dissemination of such consciousness, the only way Anglos could salvage their identity and honor was by going the extra mile in condemning Germanism, disavowing ‘racism’, promoting interracism, groveling at the feet of Jews(and denouncing any group or nation hated by Jews, be they Palestinians or Iran), cucking to blacks, celebrating GloboHomo sodomy(the favored pet project of Jews), idealizing degeneracy(akin to the Weimar Era), welcoming Diversity(as a means by Jews to play divide-and-rule among goyim), and etc.
Even now, Anglos in the UK and US hope that they may be spared the Jewish accusations of ‘racism’, ‘white supremacism’, and ‘Antisemitism’ by complying with every letter of the Jewish Agenda, but they will only destroy their domains by prescribing willfully destructive and degenerative policies. Then, is it any surprise that not only Germany but the UK, US, and all of the Anglosphere are doomed in the same manner?

World War I

While the military, economic, and political effects of German and Continental European affairs were limited or indirect on the US, the moral and ‘spiritual’ impact was far-reaching because ideas, unlike money and weapons, may flow freely, especially if those ideas are favored by the media and academia. It was only a matter of time before Jews spun the German Guilt into a poison formula that would include Anglo Guilt as well.
In this sense, the US role in the destruction of Germany, along with the creation of Israel, was one of the sick mothers of Jewish Domination and Northern European guilt-and-shame. Then, it’s hardly surprising that the Northern European stock, once the most powerful and prosperous in the world in both Europe and across the Americas, became the most pathetic and pissant, cucked and cooked, wussy and wimpy. Minnesota was like a Northern European paradise before the cucked mindset led the Scandie-Americans there to import the worst black trash from not only the American South but from Africa itself. Some of the ‘bluest’ areas in New England are high-status white communities that welcome policies that doom the white race. In Europe, the UK, Sweden, and Germany, once among the most respected nations, are now the biggest jokes. The ‘conservatives’ in the British Parliament now stand behind some oogity-boogity black biatch as the face of the Tory party. Tories or Whories? History is like a chess game. If you can’t see many moves ahead, the seemingly killer move can kill you down the line.