How the Game of GO illustrates the Importance of Context as Nothing Exists in a Political Vacuum — Facts are contained within the Context like Chickens are inside the Coop — Modern Jews don't worship God but take pride as the Creators of God

There is something to be learned from the game of Go. It's about routing and counter-routing, surrounding & sieging and counter-surrounding & counter-sieging. Your position on the board, advantageous or disadvantageous, is relative to who has the edge in surrounding whom and/or whose space has been made siege-proof. So, it doesn't matter how much area your pieces occupy if they're surrounded by your opponent's pieces that rob them of 'liberties'. It's like it doesn't matter how many men you command and the space they occupy IF they're surrounded by the enemy who have built walls or fences to cut them off; they've essentially been reduced to captives, like German soldiers under siege in Stalingrad — they were 200,000 men-strong but surrendered to the Soviets because they were deprived of reinforcements and supplies from the main force outside. When your forces have been routed, surrounded, and sieged, whatever freedom they have is confined to the space enclosed by the enemy. At best, it is freedom within the larger unfreedom dictated by the enemy. As the survival and well-being of your men now totally depend on those who control the supply routes, the ins-and-outs of your enclosed domain, you must accede to the terms set by the enemy.

So, everything exists and operates within a context. Even in the most tolerant and permissive prison system, your freedom is limited within the walls and in accordance to the rules set by the prison system. Same with slavery. Even under the kindest and most compassionate slave-master, the slave is still a slave. He may be freer than other slaves, but his freedom, even if extravagant for his ilk, is within the whims of the master. This is true of the Palestinians in Gaza and West Bank. They do have freedoms but within the confines and context of what is allowed by the power and reach of Greater Israel. Their freedom of movement and settlement operates within what is permitted by Jewish Power. This is why the British control of the seas was so elemental to imperialist dominance in the 19th century. It enabled the British to surround and besiege many parts of the world, and not surprisingly, the US sealed its role as the new hegemon by taking over as the premier naval power in the world. US also built military bases all over to block the influence of Russia, China, Iran, and etc.

But the Go-strategy need not be physical, as with pieces on the gameboard or ships-and-soldiers around the world. It can be emotional, moral, ideological, idolatrous, historical, and etc. Indeed, a prisoner's physical confinement follows from the logic of moral containment. No matter how good and decent an individual may be in prison, society has deemed he must remain imprisoned because he is guilty and must pay for the crime. And if it's a life sentence, it doesn't matter how good and decent he is while in prison. He is still at a moral disadvantage on the basis of what he owes to society, which is to remain in prison for the rest of his life.
Now, we would all agree that putting a man in prison per se is a grave wrong, even an evil. Who would want to be arbitrarily arrested and placed behind bars for the hell of it? And yet, this wrong is regarded as righteous and justified IF the prisoner has been convicted of a crime. And even something as grievous as life-sentence is seen as necessary if the crime was serious enough; indeed, certain crimes are regarded as so heinous that the convicted is given multiple life-sentences.
So, even what seems like a terrible wrong can be seen a just act within a certain context. On a far larger scale, consider the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Now, any sane person knows it's a great evil to nuke a city and indiscriminately kill countless people. If the US did it for the hell of it, virtually all would agree it committed a horrendous act. But given the context of the Pacific War — Japan's aggressions in Asia, its attack on Pearl Harbor, calculations of human cost in invading Japan, and etc. — , good many Americans have been convinced that it was necessary and even justified. So, what seems like an evil act is made nonevil(or necessary evil) or even righteous based on the context. Indeed, the nukings go to show that even the most horrific acts can be justified depending on which context has narrative primacy.

It also goes to show almost nothing is a stand-alone moral certainty. Even matters regarded as fundamentally wrong take on moral shadings depending on the contexts presented. Most people would agree with one of the Ten Commandments, "Thou Shalt Not Kill". Killing is dirty business. So, don't kill and instead try to do unto others as you would have them do unto you. If you don't want someone to kill you or your loved ones, you shouldn't go around killing others. And yet, many killings are justified in the eyes of society and the law depending on the context of the event. Obviously, if some psycho-criminal broke into your house and threatened to harm your family, most people would agree you were justified in killing the intruder. Or, if a much-abused wife shot her husband dead in self-defense or out of rage, it's far more understandable than cold-blooded murder. The term 'murder' is used only for unjustified killing.

So, even though we all agree that killing is wrong, it can be justified within the context of self-defense or justice(as in capital punishment). On a larger scale, the US government(and governments all over the world) even justify bombings, invasions, and all-out-wars on the basis of moral necessity or outrage, e.g. such-and-such regime is so odious and pose such a threat to World Peace that the global community or the (self)designated 'policeman of the world' must do SOMETHING, even if it means war and considerable loss of life. It all depends on how one surrounds the act with what moral context. US is currently illegally occupying Syria, but the narrative pushed by the Deep State and the Jewish-run Media is "Assad is a butcher and tyrant, and therefore the US must be there to protect such-and-such groups." It's horseshit, but Jews control the deep state and the flow of information that shape the dominant context. They can 'rout' and justify any act with their favored narrative contexts. Palestinians know this all too well. They're a terribly wronged people, but most of the West doesn't care. While people in the West would agree that ethnic cleansing, occupation, and apartheid policies are wrong, they tend to see the realities and events in Gaza, West Bank, and the Middle East in general within the framework arranged by Jewish Power and their cuck-allies.
In the game of Shoah-and-Tell, whatever Jews have done in the Middle East is always deemed necessary because of 'Muh Holocaust', 'Never Again', and 'It is Anti-Semitic!'. The Holocaust Cult says Jews need their own homeland for survival. So, if Arabs resist the Jewish Homeland built on Palestine, they must be the New Nazis. Also, as the West has been judged guilty for 'antisemitism' that led to the Shoah, they owe something big and eternal to the Jewish Community. It's the only way they can pay back the Holocaust-Debt. And it's gotten to the point that anything that offends or displeases Jews is 'Anti-Semitic', which can destroy careers in the West. As a result, all the evils perpetrated by Jews are spun as morally necessary or justified by historical context. As in the Game of Go, what is within a certain space matters far less than what forces surround it. So, even if there's white pieces over a portion of the board, they come to be owned by the black pieces that surround them and seal them off. Likewise, the reason why so many moral arguments against Israel, Zionism, and Wars for Israel are ignored is they are surrounded and hemmed in by the larger context of the 'Muh Holocaust' narrative. Sure, Jews do a lot of questionable things, BUT they are the Holy Holocaust People, and as such, their tragic wisdom and tribal survival cannot be questioned... unless you be one of those odious 'Anti-Semites'! That context surrounds, suffocates, and seals off any counter-argument.

Similar dynamics explain why American discourse has become so useless. Jews control America, and as such they control the gods. Now, there is a thing called Reality, but it is at once starkly simple and infinitely complex. Due to its simplicity, it has to be contextualized. Due to its vastness, it has to be framed. Reality is both the tiniest micro-fact and the grandest macro-truth. It is both too minute and too much for the human mind. Just like food is served in limited portions on a platter, reality has to be cut, cooked, and prepared for human consumption. Jews, long known for their dietary laws, are no strangers to preparing and serving reality in their own way.
Context both broadens and truncates reality, much like how a movie screen functions. The screen places a person or object within a larger space and context, but however large the space or vast the vista, it is limited to the screen size-and-shape. The Bible served as a Jewish Screen. On the one hand, it broadened our perspective on the Jews. In the Good Book, they aren't just another desert tribe but the Chosen of God whose lives and stories have significance within the vast context of history and God's design. And yet, its very Judeocentrism leaves out the counter and competing perspectives of other tribes and groups often at odds with the Jews. The Biblical context broadens the Jewish Experience while excluding other contexts of the goyim.
This is why Christian-Zionists are so utterly blind to the plight of the Palestinians. As their view of Middle East affairs is so fundamentally shaped by the context of the Biblical Narrative, they view current events as mere extensions of the prophecies of the Bible: Jews as God's Chosen People struggling for the Holy Land against the various Rottenites and Lowdownites. Given Christianity's overtly 'Anti-Semitic' context of Jews-as-Christ-Killers and the coming of the New Covenant, one might think Christians would be immune to such a mindset. But apart from anti-Jewish Christians who believe Jews must return to the Holy Land in order for Jesus to return(to finally mete out justice to Jews by killing them by the bushel), the Christian-Zionist types are just as much affected by the 'Muh Holocaust' contextuality. By being so mindlessly pro-Zionist, they seek to prove to themselves and the world that they, as Good Christians, had been friendly with the Jewish People all along and that Christianity, far from being 'Anti-Semitic', is the best friend of the Holy Jews.

How did Jewish Power prevail in shaping the American narrative and moral context? By corralling and containing reality within their favored contexts, even facts that undermine the Jewish-favored Narrative are rendered ineffective. (It's like it's a fact that rabbits are fast, but their speed is moot in an enclosed area; they have no place to run.) Take crime statistics. Whether one is familiar with FBI crime stats or not, most people in America know that blacks commit disproportionate amount of crimes. After all, even 'leftist' Jews and 'liberal' whites tend to live away from heavily black areas. Then, how come discussions of this fact fail to gain traction in the American Narrative and Moral Discourse? Because they've been routed and sieged within the Noble Negro historical narrative: Evil greedy soulless whites committed a great crime against a noble and wonderful race of Magic Negroes, and therefore blacks are righteous victims whereas whites have much to atone for.
It's like the WWII context of the Good War, one of the Free World vs Fascist Tyranny. So, it doesn't matter that the Allies had some cretins among their ranks and committed their share of war crimes and that the Axis powers had some soldiers of honor, principle, and courage. All said and done, one side was Good, the other side was Evil. Thus, the macro-goodness of the Allies contextualizes and absolves their crimes and guilt, whereas no amount of facts of exemplary behavior on the Axis side matters because, all said and done, the it stands for Evil in the postwar narrative established by the winners.

Jews are deep inside the power structures of goy society and are surrounded by so many goyim. Physically, Jews are surrounded by goyim, but they've mentally surrounded the goyim(especially white goyim) with Holocaust Guilt. Such is the power of the prophetic mind. Even if physically surrounded, you might surround your enemy with YOUR favored worldview. No wonder a shepherd has control over the far more numerous sheep. He has a mind and can manipulate their behavior whereas the sheep, though numerous, lack minds and agency of their own.

This is why the Dissident Right focus on black criminality, though factual and reality-based, doesn't really go anywhere. They are like white pieces besieged by black pieces in the game of Go. No matter how factual, they are owned by the narrative that surrounds and captures them. No matter how many facts and how much truth whites speak, they are regarded as guilty prisoners of history. It doesn't matter that most whites aren't in literal prisons. What matters is they are captives of mental walls constructed by Jewish Power. According to Jews, whites have been judged guilty by History, and as such, they must be held as moral prisoners by the Holy Peoples, mainly Jews and Blacks. The only kind of whites who are relatively guilt-free are Homos and Trannies, but this is fine with Jews as globo-homo craziness has a subversive and corrosive impact on white unity and solidarity.

In an order where whites are hemmed within the mental prison of endless excoriations about 'racism'(and its various forms, such as 'institutional racism', 'subconscious racism', 'systemic racism', etc.), they can never be innocent whereas blacks can never be guilty. While it's true that individual blacks who commit crime will be locked up behind bars, the black race as a whole is regarded as innocent and sacrosanct whereas the general white population is regarded as tainted with 'historical sin' and 'white guilt'. If anything, the fact that so many blacks end up behind bars despite America's commitment to 'anti-racism' confuses matters even more. As a matter of fact, more blacks end up in jail because they do terrible things and commit lots of crime due to their racial nature owing to evolution in Sub-Saharan Africa. If American Society was defined by simple racial truths, no one would be surprised or troubled by lots of black criminals and thugs ending up behind bars. But because America reveres the idolatry of the Noble Negro and places all blame on whitey, it seems terribly unjust that so many blacks end up in prison, not least for their attacks on whites. If indeed the US is in sync with its chosen narrative, shouldn't tons of whites be going to prison for 'racist' attacks on noble and innocent blacks? But the reality is the opposite, what with black-on-white violence being the norm and with many more blacks being incarcerated for attacking whites than vice versa. And yet, Jewish Power is such that so many whites remain locked within the Jewish-constructed mental-moral prison and seem incapable of breaking out. If anything, things have gotten worse since the Civil Rights Movement when whites from cradle were indoctrinated to see 'racism' as the worst evil, and the worst possible form of 'racism' is one directed at blacks.

So, what are whites to do about the stark reality of racial differences and why blacks cause so much trouble? Ideally, they should accept it for what it is and break out of the contextual walls erected by Jews. But, as they've failed at that, there only remains the coping mechanisms. One way is to turn a blind eye to reality and pretend that high crime rates don't exist among blacks; it's all just a 'racist' fantasy. Another way is to identify and blame a characteristic other than race, e.g. if black thugs run amok, pretend 'teens' or 'youths' done it. Yet another way is to admit blacks do commit lots of crime but it's all due to poverty caused by history of 'racism'. And some even go so far as to celebrate the violence as a form of rough justice, i.e. 'no justice, no peace'.

As long as the context remains, no amount of dissident-right detailing of facts and numbers will make any difference. The what-of-facts is routed and immobilized by the why-of-narrative. Americans must be more cognizant of the power of the context. After all, the 'genocide' of the American Indians was justified on grounds of progress and development. Sure, it was sad what happened to the Indians, BUT and it's a Big But, it was necessary to create America the Land of the Free, the Land of Liberty and Opportunity. You see, context can even justify the eradications of entire peoples and cultures.
And sure, the nukings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were pretty awful, BUT it was the Good War between the Free World and Tyranny, and besides, the 'Japs' acted really nasty and deserved it. Control the context, and you can control just about anything as nothing exists in a vacuum. Everything has meaning and place relative to everything else. While we can't control the universe, we can control our perception of the universe and the world around us. Every religion sought to contextualize the universe with its own cosmology. Every history contextualizes the Story of Man to contain events in the service and justification of certain groups and interests. It's no wonder Jews focus so much on history. It's not just about remembering the past but controlling the present and the future, as George Orwell said. History serves as context, and those who control history control the mazes of the mind. Depending on the context, something is justified or unjustified. In the past, slavery in America was justified on account of the oogity-context favored by whites. It was argued that blacks are oogity-boogity savages in the Dark Continent, and even though slavery as an institution was regrettable, it was necessary and a step up from the darkness for the black race under the tutelage of the white race that taught them to pick cotton and worship Jesus than chuck spears at hippos and shake their booties all night. Context even made white people feel justified in their practice of slavery.

What happens in a game of Go? As your opponent tries to surround you, you try to surround your opponent. He tries to create his own safe spaces, and you try to create your own. He seeks to subvert your space while you try to subvert his. He tries to swallow you, you try to swallow him that is trying to swallow you. It's like a game of who has the bigger mouth.
The dissident right with its details and facts are like a school of fish up against a humpback whale that represents the power of context. Context has a big mouth and swallows up all the details. It wasn't a school of fish that swallowed Jonah, that's for sure. Therefore, one way to counter the Jewish context is to create a larger context that can swallow it. If your enemy lays siege on your forces, you try to muster bigger forces to lay siege on your enemy that is laying siege on your forces. The besieger becomes besieged. Germans besieged Stalingrad in World War II, only to be counter-sieged by Soviet forces. If Jewish Power sieges whites with the contextual narrative of 'white guilt', then whites need to besiege Jewish Power with 'Jewish Guilt'. In a way, this shouldn't be too difficult as 'white guilt' cannot be divorced from 'Jewish Guilt'. After all, consider all the Jewish money that was invested in Western Imperialism. The Rothchilds sure lent a lot of money to British explorers and conquerors. Also, consider the roles Jews played in the South American slavery and in opium trade in China.

Of course, narrative power isn't just about saying but about being heard, and to be heard, one needs control of the industries of media and institutions of academia. How foolish it was for whites to allow Jews to grab so much of the media. And how foolish it was for American 'conservatives' to ignore institutional power in favor of 'muh individualism'. After all, even in the Wild West, it was cooperative communities than lone mythic John-Wayne figures who made a difference and created civilization.

Still, everything must start somewhere, and in the game of contextual Go, whites must be more like whales(or pythons) than schools of fish. All the FBI statistics on crime discussed by honest whites and the members of the Dissident Right only go so far. They are right about reality, but humans are emotional than factual. The righteous context prevails over the right data. It's sort of like how love works. When you really love someone, so many of his or her faults are overlooked or absolved. "Love means never having to say you're sorry", says Ali Macgraw's character in LOVE STORY. Alida Valli's character is so in love with Harry Lime in THE THIRD MAN that she didn't care about the dark facts about him. In some cases, the faults become part of what's lovable about the man or woman. In Film Noir, femme fatales are alluring and irresistible precisely because of their dark side. And in THE LONG RIDERS, Jesse James' fiancee says she wouldn't like him any other way.

Consider how long it took for science to finally break free of theology. So many rational and factual minds lived under the shadow of spiritual righteousness that few dared to challenge lest they end up burnt at the stake with jeers from the mobs. The West was so in love with God and Jesus that it was dangerous to speak facts that might undermine the total devotion. Indeed, science made headway under religious authority not so much in opposition as with a vow to reveal the divine ways of God to prove how totally great He is. It attached itself to religion for protection even as it revealed secrets that finally subverted religion. But given that science lacks a grand vision, it was the only way it could progress. After all, science is about how things are, not how things should be; it lacks prophetic reach.
There are surely some in academia who justify their scientific inquiry in the name of proving the truths of 'progressive' ideology, only to have the science reveal the very opposite. They speak through both sides of their mouths. Under the cover of PC, they are allowed to pursue real science. But even when the discoveries undermine PC, the scientists cleverly explain the findings as being in line with the official ideology... when they really aren't.
It is an artfully devious strategy of power. When the official dogma of an order is so overwhelming and almost universally accepted by all, it is hazardous to speak heresy, no matter how true. Thus, the only chance of getting the ball rolling is to present the heresy as actually being in tune with the dogma. It's like Jews want to destroy Christianity but knew they couldn't do it outright. There were too many Christians who would have been outraged. So, using the Rules for Radicals, they presented anti-Christian agendas as pro-Christian, just like Jewish Power pushed anti-Western agendas as part of 'Western Values'. Thus, Jews injected globo-homo into churches and then gleefully watch as the church rots from within. And in China, the regime moved toward capitalism with the Marxist rationale that it's all part of the eventual plan toward real communism. And it never gave up on the Maoist symbolism.

But for those in the Culture War or in the Revolutionary Struggle, such strategies are too subtle, slippery, and slow. Also, while science may be on our side, our main motivation isn't objective truth but a sense of who we are, where we came from, and where we, as a people, must go. Pure objectivity, after all, doesn't care who wins. In a jungle war between chimpanzees and baboons, objectivity is totally neutral. It doesn't care if chimps wipe out the baboons or vice versa. Indeed, objective reality doesn't care if a virus spreads and kills all apes and monkeys. It doesn't care if an asteroid hits Earth and wipes out all life. Facts not only don't care about YOUR feelings but EVERYONE'S feelings.
So, while it'd be good to be grounded in facts and have them back your arguments, they are not what the battle is really about. One thing for sure, given the brutal nature of history, there are sufficient facts to make your side seem virtuous or villainous. It's like the coin-toss that is 50/50 heads and tails. Every group won as many times as they lost and lost as many times as they won in the brutal game of history. For the longest time, the Germanic barbarians were clobbered by the Romans, but then they clobbered the Romans. Before Spain became a world power, it was under Moorish occupation for a long spell. Russians were crushed by Mongols before becoming a great power.
To be sure, the human species broke out of the natural balance and gained overwhelming supremacy over the other species. And, the white race broke out of the civilizational balance and gained world dominance, but those are recent events in the arc of history. Taken as a whole, white race got clobbered as badly as all the other races.

It's like there are equally facts of chimps as victims and chimps as killers, and the same goes for baboons. Sometimes, the chimps bit off the groins of baboons, and other times baboons bit off the groins of chimps. But notice Jews aren't interested in such truth, that all human groups have been victims and villains. They are motivated by Jewish pride and power. As such, they ignore, suppress, or rationalize facts that make them look bad while emphasizing the facts(or even fantasies) that make them look good. This is the kind of power that whites are up against, but then, it's the white folks who've forgotten the laws of power. It's as if whites, in their great prolonged & unprecedented success and prosperity, forgot about this in a foolish fit of magnanimity, especially with Jews and blacks.
By the way, if you're going to be compassionate, always ask yourself, "What is the nature of the object of pity?" After all, if you bring home an orphaned baby bunny, at most it will grow into a harmless rabbit. But if you bring home an orphaned baby gorilla or tiger cub, it's going to grow into something that can totally whup your butt. Given blacks & brawn power and Jews & brain power, whites should really have considered the long-term implications of letting Jewish/black power grow in their midst. It's like the American Indians who took pity on the Pilgrims and gave them food might as well have been feeding a T-Rex baby that would grow into a giant Tyrannosaurus that would devour the Indians. Take pity on a baby rabbit or baby fox, not a Grizzly cub... unless you have a plan to release the bear back into the wild away from human areas.

The Game of Go isn't only about the macro-strategy of surrounding your opponent's pieces but about the micro-plays along the barriers to gain an advantage. Indeed, sometimes it's a matter of a single piece that decides whether you have your opponent surrounded or vice versa. In the complex and intricate web of pieces aligned on the board, it finally comes down to a few pieces that determine if the player A has player B sealed off or the other way around. In this way, it's not unlike wrestling where one special move tips the balance and turns two men interlocking one another to one man locking down the other man.

Likewise, there are two ways for whites to take on Jewish Power. One way is to formulate a bigger narrative to surround the Jewish narrative. Out-contextualize the Jewish context. But, the other way is to look for weaknesses within the Jewish narrative wall, break down down, and form a white wall that intersects and cuts off the Jewish context with a pro-white context, thus linking white elements trapped within the context with white elements on the outside. It's like the motorcycle Go in TRON where the riders create trail-barriers to contain the motion of the opponents.

To play this game, whites must go beyond wimpy notions such as 'white advocacy' and adopt the bolder vision of White Liberation. The very concept is deeply threatening to Jewish Power as, to the question, "Liberation from what?", the answer is "From Jewish Supremacist Power(which can be detailed factually without fail)". The wussy notion of 'white advocacy' is merely a plea to be left alone and allowed to survive as whites. "Oh, dear Jewish Master, you are so almighty and powerful. We whites got nothing against you and just want to be left alone in our spaces, please pretty please." Does anyone thing Jews will let this happen?
No, there must be emancipation, independence, and liberation from Jewish Supremacist Power that is not only bad for whites but for all the world as it pushes for New Cold War with Russia and endless mayhem in the Middle East. It is also encouraging anti-Chinese rhetoric on the American 'right'(as it inflames anti-Russian rhetoric on the American 'left') so that idiot American goyim will fulminate against other goyim around the world than on Jewish Power that is really destroying the White West. 'White Advocacy' is at best a battle plan without a war plan. It fixates on little battles without a larger war strategy. But in order to win, you must know who your main enemy is and devise a grand plan against them. That is the real war. It's like doctors don't merely advocate for health but wage war on the disease and target its source. Battles are then chosen and fought as part of the larger war plan. 'White Advocacy' picks pro-white battles but totally disregards the larger war waged on whites by Jewish Power. It'd be like the US fighting the Cold War without ever addressing the Soviet Union & Communism as the main enemy. It's like a man with eyes closed swinging his stick at threats nearby without ever opening his eyes to see the real enemy standing further back.

Facts are important, and the Dissident Right has many useful facts on its side. But they are hemmed in by the contextual power of the Jewish Narrative. As such, whites and their facts are about as useful as Palestinians with stones stuck within walled communities in West Bank. For those facts to gain traction and make a difference, the Jewish contextual walls must be attacked from both inside and outside. Even as whites chisel away at the walls from the inside with facts about Jewish power & abuse and black crime & thuggery, the walls must also be attacked from the outside by narrative routing-and-siege efforts controlled by whites. It is possible to come up with grand narratives that portray Jews as the villains of history, just as Jews have done with whites.
Now, it'd be ideal if whites and Jews don't vilify each other, but the truth of the matter is Jews are in supremacist mode and rely on white submission, therefore they've decided to institutionalize 'white guilt' premised on the special historical guilt of whites. This means whites have been convicted with life-sentence for all history; even as physically free men, they are mentally imprisoned within the Jewish moral context and worship at the feet of Jews, blacks, and homos. What kind of future is this?
Besides, mental imprisonment invariably and eventually leads to physical imprisonment as well. Consider the rapid demographic transformation of the West. As whites are mental prisoners/slaves of Jews, they do as the holy Jews say. If Jews say, "Open up your borders and let in tons of darkies", whites feel morally obligated to do just that. If Jews say, "Even when blacks burn down your city, do nothing but kiss the black ass", whites do just that. When you've lost your pride, agency, and will, you won't be free for long even on the physical and material level. After all, if your mental-master commands you to hand over all your money and the key to your house, you will do just that because you can't muster the courage to say NO. It's like how a cult operates. Legally, you are free and can walk away from the would-be-guru and the community. But the guru and his cult have gained control over your soul. You feel spiritually indebted to them, and so, it's difficult for you to walk away even if legally possible.

When we compare US and China, one key difference is China is ruled by the Chinese whereas the white majority in the US is ruled by the Jewish minority. There is enough historical evidence to shame the current CCP regime or to justify it. The crimes of Mao are legion, and millions of innocent lives were destroyed. But there is another context. China under CCP gained total autonomy from foreign intervention and imperialism after a 'century of humiliation', and the CCP has presided over great economic development in the past decades. So, current China can be made to seem good or bad. Both views are valid depending on the selected facts and chosen narratives. China prefer to make the Chinese the good people. It wasn't much different for White America. American History, like modern Chinese History, is a checkered affair. It was a great political experiment and achieved greatness unseen in history. But US was also built on 'genocide' of the natives, relied heavily on slave labor in the early decades, 'stole' huge swaths of territory from Mexico, and engaged in neo-imperialist wars that destroyed millions of lives. While acknowledging the dark side, white Americans nevertheless favored the positive view of their history, and it served as the moral context for whatever happened. That is until whites lost their minds and handed the keys of power to the Jews.

Whereas Chinese, nationalist or communist, kept control of the Narrative and Context in their own hands, the white Christian folks in the US outsourced American Narrative to the Jews out of some sentimental notion of JUDEO-CHRISTIAN solidarity. But then, maybe the Anglo-American elites didn't have a choice. They raised their kids on privilege, but the kids hungered for prophecy, and Jewish thinkers supplied it. So, in the post-war years, Anglo-American kids of the elites, under the tutelage of Jewish Ideas, were already at war with their parents. But then, so many Wasps had been turned onto radical ideas already by the 1920s with the disgraceful tragedy of World War I and the excitement over the Bolshevik Revolution. Too many had already become like Alger Hiss.

At any rate, when the power of Narrative fell into Jewish hands, most whites probably thought Jews would do what was good for all of America. But for the Tribe, it was Jews-uber-alles, and the Narrative was devised to maximize 'white guilt' mainly in relation to blacks(but also to American Indians in the Sixties) so that whites, paralyzed with self-doubt and self-loathing, would no longer be able to pursue white interests, thereby channeling their suppressed tribal passions toward serving Jews and their interests. Thus, whites, 'conservative' or 'liberal', who are utterly loathe to mutter anything resembling pro-white sentiments, will loudly profess their total commitment to Jewish identity, Jewish nationalism, Jewish pride, and etc.

Given the importance of the Narrative in the game of Political Go, it is one thing that should NEVER be outsourced to another. Perhaps, whites let Jews control it on the assumption that Jews are allies or wise men, but Jewish wisdom was always about furthering the Covenant at the expense of goyim. Also, modern Jews are even more dangerous than traditional Jews. The latter believed in God, and therefore, their tribal pride was tempered by humility before God. The Covenant meant Jewish submission to God. But modern Jews no longer believed in God. Thus, instead of seeing themselves as the creation of God, they saw God as the creation of Jews. Jews took pride in the fact that the Jewish Mind constructed the greatest spiritual idea/force in history. Jews created God, not vice versa. Thus, it is Jewishness itself that is the real center of the universe, so think the modern Jews. The Covenant, which used to mean Jews belong to God came to mean god belongs to Jews.
With the Jewish Mind being the greatest thing, one that even invent god, all peoples must serve the godlike Jews. And lucky for Jews, they formed a symbiotic relationship with the Anglos, the history's greatest empire builders. Jews rode on the underbelly of the Anglo Beast that conquered the world, and when the conquest was complete, especially with Anglo control of North America, Jews climbed to the top and rode on its back as the master. And this arrangement can last AS LONG AS whites play the subservient managerial role in the Jewish Empire. But then, whites will be content to play the subservient role ONLY IF they feel Jews(and their allies such as blacks) are morally superior and objects of worship by which whites can redeem themselves and wash away the sins of 'racism' and stains of 'white guilt'.

If, at the very least, whites were allowed to keep their majority position in the West, it wouldn't have been so bad. After all, Japan, even as cuck-puppet of the US, was allowed to remain majority-Japan. But Jews, in their determination to permanently secure power, have decided to turn the West into white-minority nations so that no goy majority could ever wake up and unite against Jewish elite power. And as the West is now Jewish-ruled, this New Normal is pushed on nations like Japan as well. It's as if Jews feel, "Let there be no example left of a successful and prosperous homogenous goy nation."

CHRISTIAN ZIONIST SLAVES - Know More News

Jewish Trick of Servant Lording over Master

Tiepolo: Abraham and Isaac

There is a great contradiction at the heart of Judaism. Jews conceived of the most powerful and greatest God of all time and all places. Indeed the only and only God. So, this God, as formulated by Jews, is infinitely greater than any people, place, or time. He isn’t just a great force above man but the greatest power beyond man’s capacity to fathom. He is non-specific to any single realm and is the owner & ruler of everything in the cosmos and beyond.
But if this the nature of God, the one and only Deity of all things and all times, then why would He have invested so much of His time and energy with a certain tribe? (It’d be like the FBI diverting its resources to track down the insipid troll who tormented Kurt Eichenwald on Twitter. Doesn’t the FBI have better things to do? It goes to show justice is never blind. Organs of the Law prioritize certain cases over others depending on which groups have the clout.) If a rich man had a billion dollars, would he care about one of his many dollars over the others? If God is so great and mighty, why would His destiny be affixed to the travails of some desert tribe? And, consider the man with whom God made the Covenant, Abram who was renamed Abraham. What was so great or notable about Abraham that he(and his descendants) deserved such a blessing from the one and only master of all the universe? Imagine if you’re the lord of all animals(that ever were, are, and will be) but choose a bunch of rabbits or rats as your ‘chosen’ creatures. But why would you do that? If you have lordship over all whales, elephants, lions, tigers, bears, wombats, kangaroos, sharks, dolphins, gorillas, rhinos, and etc, why would you favor a bunch of rabbits or rats as your special breed? And why would you give them special protection over others? Abraham may have been a good man — or better than most — , but he hardly exhibited greatness. So, why would God choose him & his tribe and bless them with great promise, power, and wealth? If God’s domain were limited to Earth alone, His special concern for Jews might be somewhat understandable — like a parent having a favorite child — , but as God happens to be creator, lord, and master over all things for all times, it means even ALL OF mankind is insignificant in His overall design. So, why would His fate be so closely tied to some tribe, half of whose members are either swindlers, comedians, and/or degenerates?
Was this a fair transaction and bargain betwee God and Jews? Which side gains more from the Covenant? If God is the owner and ruler of everything, what can Jews possibly do for Him? Even if Jews accumulated all the worldly wealth and offered it to God, it would be a pittance in the eyes of God who owns all the universe. It’d be like a homeless person offering his pennies, half-smoked cigarettes, and stained gumdrops to a billionaire. All the wealth on Earth would be nothing to God, the master and ruler of all the galaxies. So, there is nothing that Jews can do for God. Whatever Jews offer to God, God already has. Besides, if everything in the cosmos belongs to God, what Jews offer to God is His to begin with. Jews would only be taking something from God-owned world and offering it to God. It’d be like a kid buying a gift for his parents with allowance money given to him by his parents. So, God has no need for Jews. In contrast, Jews have everything to gain by being chosen by God. They would have protection and favoritism of the one and only God, the greatest power in the universe. Therefore, it’s a game in which Jews win, God loses. Jews get everything from God, God gets nothing from Jews.

HOUSE OF GAMES - David Mamet

So, how did Jews cover up the con or swindle? Jews created a narrative in which they portrayed themselves as beholden to God, faithful to God, and obedient to God. Jews would offer utmost devotion and to Him alone as the one and only God, the true God. Their fanatical subservience to Him would be such that, hopefully, He will take notice and offer them the blessings of protection, guidance, and favoritism. So, the Jewish Narrative would have us believe that Jews are the ones who are chained to God. They are the willing children, dogs, and servants of God who do complain of their bondage to Him. Whatever God tells them to do, they shall do it because God wills it and because there’s nothing holier to Jews than carrying out God’s will. So, given their obedience to God, it only seems proper that God should reciprocate and offer them good tidings in turn.

But this Jewish devotion to God is really useless to God. Why would God need such devotion from Jews or any other people when He has everything? He has all the power, matter, energy, truth, time, and wisdom of the universe. Jews could do nothing for Him. God is God regardless of what Jews or any people do, say, or believe. It’s like a person is a person regardless of what a colony of ants think. Suppose an ant comes to you and says its colony will be devoted to you. Okay, but what good will it do you? You have your life, your house, your wealth, and your happiness. And those things have nothing to do with some dinky dirt colony full of stupid ants. Whether the ant colony worship you or not, you are you and you have all your stuff. No matter how slavishly the ants try to worship and serve you, there isn’t a thing they can do for you. But, suppose these ants are tricky and persuade you that, in return for their undying loyalty to you, it’d be awful decent of you to return the favor and offer them protection(from all other critters) as the ‘chosen’ among all wild organisms. So, what is the nature of this bargain? You can actually do substantive things for the ants because a human is many times more powerful than a bunch of ants(whose colony can be destroyed a child’s foot or urine). You can offer them food, you can destroy critters that might harm the ants, you can build roof over them so that the colony won’t be soaked with rain, and etc. So, even though the ant narrative says they are slaves to you, you’ve really become a slave to them. After all, their supposed slavishness to you offers you nothing, but your favors for them make a huge difference.

Indeed, the Jewish art of trickery with God can be seen in the story of Abraham itself. In a way, the story seems to be about Abraham caught in a trap set by God. God gives Abraham a son, Isaac, and then, tests Abraham’s loyalty by ordering a blood sacrifice. Abraham dearly loves his son, but his main loyalty is to God, so he must do as God orders. So, he ties Isaac up and is about to slay him when God, in recognition of Abraham’s devotion, retracts His command and spares Isaac. So, on the surface, it sounds like a story of the first Jew’s unwavering obedience to God.
But seen in another way, it is God who is placed in a trap and bound ever closer to the Jews. After all, if God goes through with His demand, He will still have His power but not the glory as just and righteous God. He will still be the most powerful and the one & only God of the physical universe, but He would make Himself a stranger in the moral universe. He could be reduced to a nihilistic cosmic gangster who delights in the murder of an innocent & helpless child. Thus, He would be a God to fear and obey but not one to love and honor. (Also, there is vanity in the conception of all gods, and they naturally want to be worshiped by people of quality. If God had made humans dog-like, He would have had devoted followers but also clone-like dolts and yes-men. God wants to be worshiped by People of Quality, just like a famous artist or actor wants to be admired by intelligent critics & scholars than by saliva-drooling fans. The problem is, the more ‘quality’ a people are, more difficult is to earn their admiration and devotion. So, the problem of Judaism is God has the following of a very intelligent people but their very intelligence often puts them at odds with God. God wants total obedience from a people capable of total freedom. A great contradiction.) So, by testing His power and Abraham’s loyalty, the result was Abraham’s moral victory over Him and, furthermore, His need to make amends to Abraham and his tribe. After all, Abraham was a man of love for his son and for God. He wanted to raise his son and worship God. There was moral consistency in his fatherly devotion to his son and his sincere devotion to whom he believed to be a good & wise God. So, when God commanded Abraham to kill his son, it was God who was the violator of the Covenant. He ordered Abraham to do something horrible and unseemly. Abraham’s soul was divided. He wanted to protect his son, and he wanted to serve God. But God, the great Being who’d given him the gift of a son, ordered him to kill that very son for no apparent reason than to prove his loyalty to God. This great moral contradiction meant that things could never be the same between Abraham and God if the order was carried through. It would mean Abraham proved his loyalty but to a God who is amoral, capricious, and unhinged. So, in order for God to be both masterful and honorable, He had no choice but to nullify His own order. So, it was God who was caught in a trap and reversed His order to save His reputation. And so He did. But it didn’t end there. Even though God has proven His goodness by allowing Abraham to keep his son, He still has to answer for the fact that He made called for blood sacrifice in the first place. The fact remains that He ordered Abraham to do something that no human should be made to do. The moral equation favors Abraham over God since Abraham didn’t want to kill Isaac but willed himself to do so in loyalty to or in fear of God. So, Abraham was right on both counts. His moral sense abhorred the terrible request. But his spiritual devotion remained true to God to the very last; or he understood that he didn’t have a choice since it was an-offer-he-couldn’t-refuse. After all, if God is all-powerful, disobedient Abraham could be robbed of everyone and everything dear, not just Isaac. So, if only to save the rest of the tribe, he had no choice but to offer what God demanded.
From the other side of the equation, God made a horrific request of a good man who’d already proved his devotion to God many times over. And even though God reversed the order and allowed Abraham to keep the kid, He’s confronted with two conclusions that bind His power. First, He discovers a power beyond godly power. Morality is bigger than God Himself. So, even though God has the power to transgress any moral law, so doing will remove the righteous crown from His head. So, God, despite His power and greatness, lost His nerves and called off the sacrifice. The greatest being in the universe got cold feet. He couldn’t go through what He Himself had ordered, whereas Abraham was willing to go through with it.
Second, He is faced with the silent truth that He did Abraham wrong and has to make amends. Abraham had long ago proven his loyalty to God in accordance to the Covenant, but his loyalty was tested once again and in such horrible manner. Also, God, despite His claim of being Lord of the all that is, came across as insecure and neurotic in His need to ascertain and confirm Abraham’s loyalty to Him. It’s like a jealous husband who is never sure that his wife is faithful to him despite her seemingly impeccable fidelity.
So, in a way, the story of God and Abraham is more the story of God falling into the trap of the Jews than vice versa. According to the narrative, God ordered Abraham to bind Isaac to a rock and slay him, and Abraham had no choice but to obey God. But in the process, it was God’s power that became bound to the bedrock of morality. It was God’s nihilistic tendencies that were sacrificed, whereupon God finds Himself bound to the Jewish tribe — like Atlas bound with the sky and Prometheus chained to a cliff — because its founder proved his utmost loyalty and worthiness before God. And yet, the great irony is Abraham proved his utmost loyalty in a deed that God simply couldn’t see through to the end if He were to retain His reputation as a good God. Abraham proved his utmost ‘goodness’ to God through his unstinting resolve to carry out God’s order, and God salvaged His glory by reversing His own command. So, in a way, everyone wins and everyone loses. But given the power imbalance between Abraham and God, the latter had more to lose.

George C. Scott as Abraham in THE BIBLE by John Huston

Anyway, the power dynamics between Jews and their God is now played out in global politics, especially in the relation between Jews and the USA, the sole superpower. (USA has become like the monotheistic god of power, or a mono-power.) A kind of ‘political monotheism’ has come to govern the world. It’s as if the United States is the One and Only True Nation(and it and only it may serve as the model for all other nations that are seen not so much as distinct national entities but mere supplicants, dependents, clones, and mini-me’s of America; even non-Americans must obey & serve America before their own nations, just like all gentiles in the US and the EU are expected to serve Jewish identity & interests before their own). United States is claimed to be the ‘exceptional’, ‘indispensable’, and the ‘greatest’ nation that ever was, is, and will be. Indeed, it is so great that it is more than a nation. It is the world itself. It must take in the whole world, and the whole world must reflect and receive Americanism as the only true and correct way of organization, production, consumption, and conduct. America deserves to be the sole hegemonic power in the whole world and not just militarily and financially but linguistically, culturally, intellectually, morally, ideologically, musically, leisurely, spiritually, fashionably, faddishly, and in every other way. So, if America is a ‘nation of immigrants’, all nations must re-brand them as such too. If America worships Jews, homos, and Negroes, all other nations must pay special heed to that holy trinity. Monopower-ism says America is above the conventional laws & norms of other nations(with the exception of Israel, of course). So, the US may do whatever it wants around the world. Whatever it does is right and ‘just’. And since the US controls global-media, it spins anything to fits its own warped narrative. So, even though the US has been the aggressive power against Russia and Iran at the behest of Jews and/or Israel, the world is often duped into seeing US in a defensive position against ‘aggressors’. It’s like how the saying goes: "A Jew cries in pain as he strikes you." Jewish-controlled America is the main aggressor but whines the most about other ‘aggressors’. And even in cases where the world feels that the US has acted in unwarranted or criminal manner, there’s nothing that can be done about it since the US is the sole superpower that cannot be touched. Unlike Germany, Japan, and Iraq that paid a heavy price for their aggressions, the US can bomb & invade or subvert & destroy any number of nations but face no consequences or comeuppance. Whatever the US does is defended as matter of ‘defending human rights’ or ‘spreading democracy’ , and America has the gangster-muscle to back up whatever it chooses to do. The US can carry out a 1000 Pearl Harbors and laugh it off since no other nation can ever retaliate like the US did against Japan in WWII.

Even though the US was envisioned & created by Anglo conquerors and settlers, that narrative is no longer viable if the US is to ascend to its role as the One-and-Only-True-Nation-of-the-World. Thus, America is not a nation among many other nations but The Only Nation, the lone sun around which all other nations are mere planets. Indeed, other nations are not even real nations since America is the only nation that is also the world. Other nations exist only to be part of Pax Americana. America is about all the peoples of the world since their only true destiny is to become ‘New Americans’; some may opt to be ‘New Europeans’, ‘New Canadians’, or ‘New Australians’, but globalized Europe, Canada, and Australia are mere shadows of America. All peoples must be allowed to come to America and thereby transformed into ‘Americans’, and they must export Americanism to their places-of-origin that are to be relegated into planets revolving around the American Sun. Only America has the True Light, radiating from the torch of Lady Liberty and Hollywood, that outshines all other lights into irrelevance & insignificance. America is the One-and-Only-True-Nation and all other nations are false nations, just like the Bible says there is only one true God and all other gods are false idols. As false nations, they must abandon their false identities, histories, & territoriality, and instead, surrender to Americanism and remake themselves in the image of America: Rap Culture, Homomania, Jew-Worship & Holocaust Cult, Afrobatics, hedonism, materialism, and youth culture. If a nation like Russia or Iran rejects Americanism-as-the-only-correct-way, it must be smitten with fire and brimstone of economic sanctions, media denunciation, and/or military invasion. If a nation won’t accept the tenets of Americanism, then it must, at the very least, be slavish to the US in foreign policy. For example, Saudi Arabia rejects Americanism but remains in good graces with the US because it serves the US and Israel strategy of undermining other Muslim nations, especially Iran and its allies.

According to Jewish monotheism, there is only one true God, and all others are false gods. According to Americanism, there is only true nation, the United States, and all others are false nations. As such, America must be universal Rome-Israel-Mecca to all peoples in the literal or figurative sense. Peoples everywhere should aspire to abandon their own nations, make the journey to America, abandon their ancient identities for the superior American identity, and raise their kids in a culture of amnesia to grow up to be ideal consumer-hedonists. As for those who aren’t able to come to the US, they must do everything to turn their own nations ersatz-americas as much as possible. Instant gratification and immediacy of meaning — the hallmark of Pop Culture — should trump all other considerations. So, America is the only destination for emigration or the only model to follow. Margaret Thatcher once said, "America is philosophy, Europe is history." But (Jewish)American-style globalism extinguishes all memories and cuts off all connective roots to the past. For religion there is homomania. For meaning, there is Jew-worship and Holocaust-cult for all humanity even though most peoples had nothing to do with World War II and the Holocaust. And for culture and mythos, there is rap music and Hollywood comic-book-blockbusters. For ‘art’(among those with more discriminating tastes), there is American TV shows touted as ‘mature’ entertainment in this supposedly ‘true golden age of TV’.

Presently, even European nations have lost their sense of history and connective roots. European youths have Eurovision and the ‘bearded lady’ as their cultural icon. They hardly feel any connection to their own histories that have been denigrated and dismissed as ‘atavistic’, ‘uncool’, ‘racist’, and ‘reactionary’. The only Europe that matters is the New Europe to be created by massive Diversity in the image of the New World.
So, does this mean that Europe, like the US, is now about ‘philosophy’ than ‘history’? Actually, that would be too kind as Americanism, in the current incarnation, is more about propaganda than principles. Perhaps, there was something genuinely philosophical about Americanism when Thatcher made her remark, but as practiced today, it is little more than False Advertising for Jewish Supremacism. The New Americanism is about hysteria, mania, and fashion, a constant barrage of sensationalist distractions to obfuscate Jewish designs on the whole world. In simplest terms, America is a Mass Cult of Ephemera contrived to serve the shifting interests of the GLOB(globalist masters). Indeed, it’s to Jewish advantage to keep the rules of Americanism as loose as possible because real principles will bind the rulers to their own rules, just like morality tied God’s hands to do the right thing by Abraham and spare Isaac. Jews don’t want to be bound to any law or principle when it comes to their insatiable lust for more wealth and power. So, if More-Jewish-Power calls for the killing of 100,000s of Iraq children, Americanism must be remolded to justify that. (But after having killed all those innocent Arab/Muslim kids, Jews feigned compassion by aiding Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo, a maneuver to their advantage since Serbia was backed by Russia.) Vaguer the meaning of Americanism, greater leeway for Jews to play fast and loose to bolster and maximize their own power. So, Jews, who insisted on the separation of church and state in the past(as an iron principle), are now saying the US must allow special privileges for Muslims and Sikhs in schools and other public places/institutions in the name of Diversity. Especially if the US is to invade & intrude into the affairs of the Muslim World(for the sake of Israel and Zionist hegemony), it needs to justify its act of aggression and interference with displays of ‘good will’, ‘compassion’, and ‘tolerance’.

Was Americanism always thus? Of course not. Even though the Founding of the United States had an element of universal idealism, there was nothing to imply that the US must become a Universal Nation, let alone the one-and-only template for whole world, a concept all-too-cynically employed by Jews to justify their global meddling expand Jewish power — Americanism and Homomania are proxies and fronts to mask Jewish supremacist-imperialism. Besides, for the first hundred years, the priority of the nascent republic was to defend & sustain itself and then wrest more land from the indigenous folks via the westward expansion. It was only when the entire continent was claimed and settled that America began to vie for a place-in-the-sun as a world power. But even then, America saw itself as one of the several great powers with no special right or authority to lord over others. It was really with the devastation of World War I that America emerged as a semblance of the most powerful nation on earth. With Germany defeated, with Russia caught up in the throes of revolution, and with victorious Britain and France set back by tragic losses of life and wealth, it was only natural that unscathed America would emerge as the premier power. Even so, WWI elevated Japan’s role in the Pacific, Great Britain and France still retained their vast world empires, and communist Russia was re-emerging as an industrial power from the bloody revolution. Also, as yet unfamiliar with the notion of America-as-a-superpower, most Americans looked inward and had no interest in taking on the role of global hegemon during the inter-war years.

It was only with the catastrophe of WWII that the US emerged as the undisputed superpower. WWII finished off the Empire of Japan. Germany’s ambition to be a great power was gone forever. And the rise of nationalism around the world doomed the British and French empires, already on shaky legs because of crises of the two World Wars. And even though the USSR emerged as the other great power, even a ‘superpower’, its huge losses in the war and its unpopular occupation of Eastern Europe force it to relegate most of its resources on rebuilding and defense. Also, the Cold War drove Europe and Japan to the US for protection. Thus, they essentially became vassal-states despite their economic re-emergence in the post-war era. Perhaps, if it weren’t for the Cold War, the US might have retreated once again to serving its national interests, as it had following the Wilsonian setbacks of the post-WWI era.
Or maybe US expansion was more the result of the breakup of the British and French empires. With the Third World no longer under the thumb of European powers, the US was tempted to step in and play the role of new boss or ‘policeman/salesman of the world’.

Even so, the notion that the US is the one-and-only true model for the entire world and that all national borders — except Israel’s — must be dissolved to facilitate mass migrations of peoples is a relatively new development. It is globalism, a radical departure from the internationalism — nations learning to cooperate and get along peacefully — of the postwar order. By massive movements of peoples across all nations — but especially headed to the West — , globalism’s agenda is to weaken and wipe out all distinct national identities and interests. So, what will replace national identities and national interests? After all, people need to feel as members of something, part of a community. Once all peoples are de-nationalized and deracinated, are they all to become ‘American’(as citizen or imitator)? This can be achieved by coming to America or by ‘Americanizing’ their own nations with Hollywood, MTV, Homomania, rap music, and PC. This globalism is really the brainchild of Jewish supremacists who loathe all nationalisms except their own in Israel and Judenia, Jewish networks of power-centers around the world. After all, nationalism commands that the elites of every nation are obliged to represent & defend the identity & heritage of their own people against the intrusions & interferences of other nations and imperial powers. For Jews, this means that every gentile nation must prioritize its own identity and interests against World Jewry that controls globalism.
Jews want elites of every gentile nation to serve Jewish supermacism than represent and defend their own people. Jews like Angela Merkel and hate Viktor Orban because Merkel serves Jewish supremacists against Germans whereas Orban serves Hungarians against Jewish supremacists.
But Jews target not only gentile elites for conversion but gentiles masses so that deracinated mobs will pressure their own elites to ditch nationalism and adopt Diversity, Homomania, and Globorgy-ism. This has happened already in Ireland where the majority voted for ‘gay marriage’ and, being addicted to Afromania in sports-music-sex, demand that Ireland welcome more demographic imperialism to erase Ireland as a distinctly European and Celtic civilization. So many Irish now want Ireland to become a St. Patrick’s Day celebration in America where anyone can be ‘Irish for a day’. Ireland has become just a Shamrock Puerto Rico of globo-America. Globalism is about the Puerto-Ricanization of the World. Because Jews control the academia, they infect elite minds all over the world with their brand of PC. And because Jews control mass media, Hollywood, and music industry(and much of the internet which they manipulate to favor their brand of ‘fake news), they’ve been able to sway countless gentiles from top to bottom with their globalist agenda — the Americanization of the World. Jews hate Trump’s talk of nationalism-over-globalism because, without US hegemony, the New-Jew-World-Order cannot be sustained. Jewish supremacist power piggybacks on the back of American might-and-muscle. Without the US as sole hegemon, nations of the world will revert to the national-sovereignty mode, and that means it will be more difficult for globalist Jews to penetrate and take over. As rich and powerful as Jews are, they need the obedience & cooperation of US muscle to do their bidding around the world.

For the above-mentioned reasons, America is now hailed and celebrated as the One-and-Only-True-Nation. It isn’t only the lone superpower but the only nation worth emulating and obeying. In the Jewish mind, there is America, ‘America’, and "America". America is a normal nation, one among many other nations. It may be the most powerful nation, but its power and wealth don’t invalidate or negate the uniqueness, autonomy, and values of other nations. The way of this America is for America only, and it isn’t necessarily suitable for other nations. Jews are allergic to this notion of America with its own unique history, dominant culture, and core majority population. Jews prefer the notion of an ‘America’ that is ‘fluid’ and in constant flux of ‘reinvention’. This ‘America’ is always changing, and ‘Americans’ aren’t supposed to settle upon who and what they really are. The ONE AND ONLY PERMISSIBLE CONSTANT in this formulation of ‘America’ is Jewish supremacist domination gaining added leverage the more ‘Americans’ become clueless about their identity, thereby more compliant to the vicissitudes of fads and fashions controlled by the Jew-run academia, media, and entertainment.

Katy Perry's 'Murica

With the rug under their feet constantly pulled away geographically, culturally, ideologically, and politically, it will be difficult for ‘Americans’ to consolidate a strong sense of who they are, where they came from, and where they are headed. Instead of a continuous thread running through various fabrics of Americanism, Jews favor the replacement of whole cloths in an ‘America’ gone demographically shopoholic as a ‘nation of immigrants’. Prior to the rise of globalism, white Americans had felt some degree of racial, cultural, and historical continuity from the time of the first settlers to the present period. But with massive arrivals of non-whites(whose children are indoctrinated with anti-white and anti-Christian vitriol), the white narrative has become increasingly paved over with New Narratives. And with unceasing waves of immigration, the New Americans will, in turn, be buried under More New Americans. It’s as if all Americans, ‘old’ and ‘new’, are condemned to be bored & enervated, therefore needing to be replaced by newer New Americans who, as fresh immigrants, might appreciate the good fortune of being in America and slavishly work for or vote for the globalist elites who let them in.
The only constant will be the Rule by Jewish Elites who will go on playing the game of ‘divide-and-rule’ between Settled Americans and New Americans. So, if Jews now encourage Mexicans to take over from whites as the New Americans, in the future Jews will use Chinese, Hindus, and Muslims against Mexicans. The Jew giveth, the Jew taketh away.
If America is the literal nation and if ‘America’ is the proposition of what Jews want it to be, "America" is the Jewish supremacist project to turn the entire world into reflection of ‘America’. So, every corner of the world, with the exception of Israel, must be turned into "America".

But there’s another interesting facet to the conceit of America as the One-and-Only-True-Nation, one that is ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’. Its relation with Jews has striking similarities to God’s relation with Jews. Recall that the Covenant between God and Jews is ostensibly about humble Jews faithfully serving the mighty God, yet upon closer inspection, it really has God serving the Jews since He can give so much to Jews whereas Jews can’t give Him anything He doesn’t already have. Jews can only offer Him prayers.
Likewise, Jews would have us believe (1) America is the greatest power in the world and (2) Jews are its most loyal & patriotic servants carrying out its true mission. But as 2% of America, there’s only so much Jews can do for America. Jews also say Israel is the most loyal and committed ally of the US. Because Israel is so devoted to America, it seems only right and fair for the US to return the favor and bestow gifts on the Jewish State. But in truth, Israel isn’t crucial to the US at all. If Israel were to disappear from the Earth, the US will do just fine, and maybe even better as one of the key obstacles to good relations with Muslim nations would be gone forever. Indeed, the notion of Israel as an outpost of ‘Western Civilization’ defending Europe and America is laughable. If anything, all the Wars for Israel concocted by Zionists and Neocons have destabilized the Middle East & North Africa and set off massive non-white migrant-invasions of Europe, a horror that is being aided by Israelis. So, the moral claims of the covenant between the US and Israel are fraudulent. Jews would have us believe Israel is so loyal to the US and indispensable for its well-being, but in fact, all the favors flow totally from the US to Israel. Without the US, Israel would be vulnerable and exposed. But without Israel, the US would do just fine.

Now, the relation between America and Jewish-Americans is more complicated. Obviously, Jews take more from the 98% of Americans who are gentile(especially from European-Americans) than the other way around. If the US were to lose all its gentiles and just have Jews, it would hardly be a great power. It would be a nation of 6 million Jews without the gentile population on whom Jewish wealth and power depend. But if Jewish-Americans were to vanish, the US would still be a great rich and powerful nation. In some ways, America might do better without those devious Jews playing tricks on Wall Street and those deviant Jews promoting decadence & degeneracy via media, entertainment, and vice industries(like gambling). After all, Iceland reversed its economic setbacks more effectively because it didn’t have to contend with Jewish elites with a lock on elite institutions, the state, and courts. Iceland is Icelandic and ruled by its own people. So, gentile America could do just as well without Jewish-America, but Jewish-America wouldn’t amount to much without gentile America(and especially Anglo-America that laid down Property Laws and other elements of Rule of Law that made rapid Jewish success possible like nowhere else on Earth). But Jews have hoodwinked or browbeaten gentile America into believing that the US must dole out favors to Jews because Jews are the most loyal and conscientious bunch of Americans when it comes to ‘true’ meaning of America. (Jews are also supposedly deserving of extra sympathy because the ‘world’ hadn’t done enough to prevent the Holocaust. The US, as the preeminent World Power during WWII, is especially culpable and in need of redemption for having failed to throw a lifeline to the Jews. If Germany is forever guilty for having killed the Jews, America is forever tainted for not having saved the Jews.) Of course, the Jewish meaning of ‘America’ is profoundly different from the original meaning of America as a nation founded and settled by Anglo-Europeans.
But just as Jews subtly rewrote the meaning of God, they rewrote the meaning of America. If indeed God is the master of the universe, there’s no reason for Him to be bound to some ridiculous tribe. Imagine some super-rich and super-handsome guy(who can have all the women in the world) being persuaded to stick with a nasty homely woman. She would be getting a lot from him, but what would he be getting from her? It’d be like Clint Eastwood, a world famous movie-star, being stuck with the crazy woman in PLAY MISTY FOR ME.

Likewise, given that the US had already developed into a rich and powerful nation without substantial input from Jews(who arrived in substantial numbers only in the late 19th century and early 20th century) — furthermore, Anglos everywhere amply proved that they can build successful economies on their own without Jews — , there was no need for the US to take in Jews or be bound to their destiny. Despite Jewish claims, the US would have done just fine even if not a single Jew had set foot on American soil. It’s like most nations of Western Europe following WWII were virtually Jew-free, but they did just fine without them. If anything, European postwar decline can be traced to the 60s generation that fell under the sway of radical Jewish ideas. Consider how Sweden would have done better without any advice from Jews. Also, the May 68 fiasco in France was led by Jews.

Anyway, just like ancient Jews disingenuously convinced God that His glory and grand design must be bound to the fate of Jews, modern Jews slyly hustled and conned America into believing that it needs Jews to serve and fulfill its ‘true’ meaning and purpose. So, God ended up doing a whole bunch of things for Jews(who never did Him any good in return), and the US ended up doing everything for Jews(who hardly reciprocated in kind). In both cases, passive/aggressive Jews feigned as loyal servants while pulling every trick in the book to make themselves the true master in the equation. Posing as eternal objects of pity supplicating at the feet of the great noble power, be it God or America, Jews feel deserving as the main beneficiaries of favors and protections granted by the ultimate power. Furthermore, Jews, playing their role of the most-tragic-and-wise-victims-of-history to the hilt, play on the moral vanity of the great power that also wants moral sanctification. Given the moral-and-spiritual capital of the Jews based on the Bible Narrative and the Holocaust Cult(the only thing that finally neutralized and overcame Christian ‘antisemitism’), what holier people than the Jews to offer benediction to a great power? Just like Abraham played on God’s moral vanity, Jews have played on America’s. If Jews say America is so great, it must be great since no people are as tragic, wise, and holy as the Jews. But just as God, in exchange for moral flattery from Abraham’s tribe, felt compelled to favor Jews over all other peoples, America, in exchange for the Jewish blessing, feels obliged to live up to Jewish ‘hope’ and ‘dream’ of what America should really be. (In a way, the rise of Christianity can be seen as God’s attempt to liberate Himself from Jews whom He couldn’t stand any longer. Perhaps, God figured that if He must do favors for pitiable creatures, why not for all of mankind than for pesky Jews? On the other hand, we are not being entirely fair to Jews. After all, God wouldn’t exist without the Jews, His creator. So, in a way, it is only right that Jews should really be the master in the equation, however disingenuously, since man created gods, not the other way around. So, if God is the one-and-only God and the sole master of the universe, He owes it to the power of Jewish imagination and thought. As God doesn’t exist except as an idea in the minds of men, His power is wholly dependent on what people think of Him. He is the Lord ONLY IF there are people to believe in Him as such. So, as long as God belonged only to Jews, Jews had the power to destroy God. If Jews were gone, God was also gone since ONLY Jews believe in Him. Jews could also finish off God simply by no longer believing in Him. So, His insurance for survival was through Christianity in case Jews were wiped off the face of the Earth or wiped Him out of their minds in favor of secularism or the Golden Calf. That way, it doesn’t matter what Jews do or think. Others will believe in Him even if Jews don’t, and that will ensure His survival as the idea of the one-and-only God, the master of all that is. It should also be noted that the relation between America and Jews has been a complicated one. While the US would still be a great, rich, and powerful nation even if not a single Jew had set foot on America — whereas Jews would be lost without gentiles — , it’s inarguable that, along with people of Anglo-or-Northern-European stock, Jews have made the most contribution to America in terms of wealth-creation, science, technology, medicine, literature, music, cinema, and ideas. True, Jews did a lot of bad things, and the current Jewish Globalist Agenda is downright wicked, but the positive contributions by Jews have been inestimable.)