Many people fear that World War III will be more devastating than all the prior wars combined, but it could be a most essential settling of accounts to set the foundations of a more just and stable future.
The idea of World War III is understandably frightening to most people. They fear the use of nuclear weapons(a reality made available only at the far end of World War II), especially given that all the major powers have them. If World War I and World War II ended up with body counts in the tens of millions, many fear that World War III could end up with billions dead, entire countries incinerated into ashes in the nuclear Armageddon. The absolute worst case scenario of the next world war could indeed be horrific, unprecedented in human history, making World War I and World War II seem like picnics by comparison.
However, there’s the far greater likelihood that the next World War will be limited in scope(largely to three theaters) and far nobler in scope and objectives than the definitive events of the 20th Century. Granted, World War II has been remembered in the West, especially in the US, as the ‘Good War’ but only because the Axis forces seemed even worse. In contrast, World War III could really be a Very Good War or the Best War as the contrasts between the Good and the Bad/Evil would be starker.
World War I and World War II were essentially imperialist wars. They were about empires vs empires. For all the talk of ‘dictatorships’ vs ‘democracies’, the great powers got drawn in because they maneuvered for larger slices of the global pie, regional domination, racial supremacy, militarist aggression, and/or financial greed.
World War I or The Great War pitted the French, Russian, and British Empires against the German, Austro-Hungarian, and Ottoman Empires. The US joined in the last year of the war as an aspiring imperial power; even though it sided with the British and French empires against the German empire, it was positioning to gain at the expense of its allies as well. In the East, the newly ascendant Japan sided with the Entente powers against German possessions in China. Its aims were also imperialist. Even though Germans were saddled with the blame, many(even among the victors) sensed that an avoidable war had resulted from blind arrogance and foolishness on all sides.
Upon closer scrutiny, for all the various ‘Good War’ narratives, World War II was also a war of empires, an all-out war between aspiring empires and established empires. Germany, Italy, and Japan strove for larger stakes in the world, and their ambitions didn’t go unnoticed by the British and French empires.
The US and USSR played a more ambiguous role. Since the Bolshevik Revolution, Russia had gone from an imperialist power to one committed, at least in Leninist theory, to anti-imperialism. To cynical observers, the Soviet Union was a continuation of the Russian Empire under a new set of justifications, but to the communists it was a vast union of justice of various ethnicities and cultures committed to equality and mutual respect than to capitalist exploitation. In many of its actions the USSR certainly behaved like an empire, but its conflict with other empires wasn’t merely military and economic(or geo-political) but ideological, i.e. the Soviet Union believed itself justified in ruling over vast territories and huge populations to fend off the clutches of imperialism(of the West and Japan) and shackles of reaction(of aristocratic forces) and ignorance(of religion, be it Christianity and Islam, employed by the elites as opiates of the masses).
The role of the US was even more ambiguous. As a capitalist power that had pacified a vast continent through Anglo-American expansion, it was an empire in its own right. Also, it had built up ‘friendly’ relations with the world empires in the early part of the 20th century: British, European, and Japanese. If anything, the US had once joined with the capitalist-imperialist powers to nip Bolshevism in the bud during the Russian Civil War. The ruling elites of the US through much of the first half of the 20th century believed in the superiority of the white race(especially of Northern European stock) and the nobler aspects of imperialism as a civilizing influence around the world. The American ‘liberation’ of the Philippines and Cuba from Spanish rule was followed by American occupation and domination. By and large, the white ruling elites of the US identified far more with white European imperialist powers than with their nonwhite subjects.
On the other hand, Americans took pride in the myth of 1776 as a declaration of independence from imperial tyranny and preferred to view their history as an experiment in freedom and dignity for all men regardless of race, creed, or color, with Abraham Lincoln as one of its most revered historical icons. In the aftermath of World War I, the US played it both ways, calling for self-determination for all peoples while also siding with ‘friendly’ imperialist powers over their subjects who’d foolishly trusted the American government.
Until 1941, the US and USSR were nominally neutral. Until the sudden expansion of the war due to German and Japanese actions, World War II hadn’t really become a world war but a limited war of empire among blatant imperialist powers. The British and French empires continued to fear the resurgence of Germany as an imperial rival. And, increased Japanese ambition in Asia had soured relations between Japan and the European imperialists(and the US). From Japan’s (cynically self-serving) perspective, the crisis in Manchuria made China the ‘imperialist’ power, i.e. the Chinese empire failed to recognize the national-territorial integrity of Manchuria as protected by beneficent Japan. Of course, Manchuria or Manchukuo was really just a puppet state of the Japanese Empire, but people will believe anything to justify their interests, like the Jewish-dominated West pretending to support the national integrity of Ukraine against Russia when, in fact, Ukraine became a political whore-colony of the West following the 2014 Maidan coup.
That said, China under the KMT government wasn’t fully committed to anti-imperialism in the ideological(and mostly leftist) sense and actually hoped to develop constructive relations with European empires and the US so that modernizing China could take part in the capitalist-imperialist globalist system. While resentful of China’s humiliating status vis-a-vis the great powers, Chiang Kai-Shek was less interested in driving out the imperialists than developing more favorable conditions so that China could more freely and profitably take part in the Western(and even Japan)-dominant system, the very actions Japan had taken in the late 19th Century to join the Imperial Club of ‘civilized nations’. To that degree, KMT-ruled China was also part of the imperialist world, though aiming to be an equal partner with the great powers than a mere political colony(like India grown accustomed to a subservient role).
World War II really began in 1941, first with Germany’s attack on the USSR and then with Japan’s attack on the US naval base in Pearl Harbor, especially as the two conflicts, one in the West and the other in the East, once separate, became linked not only by way of political alliance(and some degree of ideological affinity, especially in their abject hostility to communism) between Germany and Japan but Germany’s declaration of war on the US following the Japanese attack on Hawaii. (It’s worth noting that, whereas Germany and Japan regarded Russia/USSR as a mortal enemy that had to be dealt with in some way sooner or later, neither sought a confrontation with the US that enmeshed itself into the conflict by aiding the enemies of Germany & Japan and applying economic pressures, such as embargos, eventually driving both Germany and Japan to exasperation/desperation.)
Thus, what had been an imperialist war between empires morphed into a war of aggression against seemingly neutral countries. Germany attacked the USSR, its partner-in-crime in dividing up Poland the Baltic States. And Japan attacked the US, a neutral power in which the great majority of people had insisted on non-intervention in foreign conflicts.
Henceforth, the great conflict went from a war among empires to a war of overly aggressive powers(Germany and Japan) against seemingly all of humanity. The USSR defined itself as ‘anti-imperialist’ and the US fashioned itself as ‘non-imperialist’. The attacks were deemed especially vile and perfidious because the USSR had been supplying Germany with war materials(against the British Empire) and the US was in the middle of negotiations with Japan. Apparently, out of the blue, Germans and the Japanese decided in a fit of madness to strike out in all directions. Maybe, the lunatic ‘Krauts’ and ‘Japs’ were out for World Conquest!
Given these factors, World War II could be distinguished from World War I, unmistakably a war of empires. World War II, in contrast, could be framed as a war of aggression by rabid powers against ‘rational’ peace-seeking countries, like the USSR and the US that got sucked into a fight that neither desired.
Of course, upon closer scrutiny, it was far more complicated. For all of Soviet ideology about the dignity of man, Stalin was a Red Tsar who ruled the Soviet Union as his personal empire with an iron fist. And the USSR had made provocative moves in the bordering areas of German interest that tried Hitler’s nerves. And despite its veneer of neutrality, the US was aiding the British in myriads ways against Germany.
And Japan was in difficult negotiations with the US because the latter employed all its political influence and economic might to strangle Japan during its epic struggle with China. From Japan’s perspective, the US offered only two impossible choices: (1) To save its economy, Japan had to relinquish the bulk of its imperial aims, a demand the US didn’t make on other European powers that ruled over much of Asia (2) In order for Japan to further its imperial aims, it would have to make war on the US navy to secure the Asian Pacific. In other words, the US offered, “Heads I win, tails you lose”, meaning that the US, far from being a neutral party, was goading Japan into a war for long-term American imperialist aims. Indeed, the US military still lords over the Asian Pacific even after the end of the Cold War, coming up with ever new rationales to justify its neo-imperialist hegemony.
There can be no doubt as to the nature of World War I. It was an imperialist war among empires. Even though World War II was more complicated, politically and ideologically(and morally), it too was essentially an imperialist war. The supposedly democratic Great Britain and France ruled over vast empires of their own. The Soviet Union, despite its ideological commitment, inherited Russia’s imperial legacy and practiced a form of geo-politics that was as paranoid and devious as that of the great capitalist empires. And the US, far from an innocent victim of an act of infamy, had done everything to provoke a war with Japan and held quasi-imperialist ambitions of its own. Indeed, American behavior after World War II only confirmed the suspicions: It has betrayed an almost pathological addiction to hegemony and domination, though partly ameliorated under the cover of the Cold War in the name of ‘containing communism’.
Thus, in retrospect, neither World War I nor World War II seems like such a noble event, with the exceptions of Russia’s Great Patriotic War and Chinese resistance against the Japanese given that they came down to the brutal necessity of national and ethnic survival, especially as the German and Japanese war efforts went from being merely imperialist-hegemonic to downright eliminationist, either by ideology(in the case of Nazi Germany) and desperation/frustration(in the case of Imperial Japan).
In contrast, World War III could essentially be a noble struggle with anti-imperialism as its main theme. It would be about globalist-supremacist-imperialism vs nationalist-humanist-anti-imperialism. Instead of a great conflict among empires(as with World War I and World War II), it could be about empire vs anti-empire.
Furthermore, the wages of the conflict would be a lot simpler as it would involve only one empire, in stark contrast to the complications arising from the involvements of multiple empires in World War I and World War II.
In the world today, there is only one real imperialist power, the US, though arguably the true supremacist hegemon is the Empire of Judea, of which the US is the Jewel-in-the-Crown and the Hammer-in-the-Hand. Either way, it’s Jewish global supremacy aided and abetted by debased white cuck maggotry.
Even though both World War I and World War II pitted two sets of alliances against one another, the fact remained that even the alliances were unstable given the imperialist nature of the times. In World War I, Germans and the Ottomans didn’t have much in common. Neither did the French and Russian empires. The British could easily have sat out the war but entered to safeguard its own imperial interests.
In World War II, Germany and Japan initially formed an alliance based on anti-communism and the shared dread of Russia/USSR, both perceived as threats to their own imperialist ambitions; this alliance grew stronger in rivalry with the empire of Anglosphere(that initiated and intensified the friction). If we follow the conventional narrative that World War II began with the invasion of Poland in 1939, then Germany and the USSR were partners-in-crime in an informal imperialist alliance, albeit with each side holding a knife behind its back.
The odd alliance of the US and the USSR had to pave over fundamental differences, making believe that FDR and ‘Uncle Joe’ were brothers-in-arms against the fascist evils of Germany, Italy, and Japan.
Predictably, the suppressed differences soon surfaced following the war’s end, resulting in the prolonged Cold War. Unlike the USSR that was designated as the next mortal enemy, the UK grew friendlier with its Anglo-American giant, but it became clear that, even minus any overt hostility between the US and the British Empire, one had to cave to the authority of the other(or one had to submit and be subsumed into the other), and soon enough the UK embarked on the path of becoming a poodle to the US, most of its empire gone and gradually sucked into Pax Americana. Post-War Europeans by and large resented the American presence almost as much as they appreciated the American role in defeating Nazi Germany and providing a defense shield against the (much exaggerated)Soviet threat. (Inseparable to the gratitude was the sense of humiliation that Europeans relied on vulgar Americans to liberate them from the Nazis and to protect them from the commies. The European Left even regarded the US as the great enemy driving a wedge between the European comrades and their Russian counterparts. The European Right, for whom cultural/historical pride was everything, felt shame in being ordered about by rich and powerful but shallow and callow Americans. The European Left and the European Right also grew to hate the US on the question of empire, albeit for different reasons. The former regarded American hegemony as merely a continuation of capitalist imperialism/exploitation, whereas the latter regarded it as Americans stealing the hard-fought-and-won European colonies for themselves.)
In World War II, the alliances were mostly of convenience, compulsion, or accident, essentially unstable at their core given the name of the game was imperialism whereby the stronger powers were perched(like eagles or vultures, take your pick) to take advantage of weaker ones, like when the US had taken advantage of the Spanish Imperial decline at the end of the 19th Century to grab the Philippines and Cuba.
At times, the predatory powers opted for compromise, choosing to share the pie than risk a bloodbath, but there were always tensions afoot, as in the case of Imperial Japan going from a co-imperialist partner with the West in cutting up the China Pie to a zero-sum game competitor in the Asian sphere. It’s like the game with the gangsters. In THE GODFATHER PART II, Michael Corleone and Hyman Roth do business but never on the basis of trust.
The unstable legacy of imperialism even affected the anti-imperialist countries, most of which came into partial or full independence, through violent struggles or peaceful negotiations, in the aftermath of World War. Consider the tensions between China and India over disputes concerning borders drawn up by the British Empire. Prior, India had undergone an even greater crisis over the creation of Muslim Pakistan — from the Muslim perspective, the retreat of the British Empire meant the absence of an impartial referee between the Muslims and Hindus, meaning that the former would come under the ‘neo-imperialist’ domination by the latter.
China provided essential aid in Vietnam’s struggle against the US empire, but both countries came to blows and bitter relations for several decades since the late 1970s. The Soviet Union, the stalwart ideological champion of anti-imperialism, seemed very much a Red Empire when it periodically rolled its tanks into East Germany and Eastern European states behind the ‘Iron Curtain’, and its later involvement in Afghanistan certainly didn’t do wonders for its international image, with the US, China, Iran, and Pakistan, in one way or another, doing everything to undermine the Soviet effort.
And the Sino-Soviet Rift created havoc in the International Left that called for unity against capitalism/imperialism. For all the talk of Soviet commitment to the anti-imperialist cause, the legacy of Russian imperialism and land grab animated some of Mao’s pronunciations and fears.
Besides, communism, rather like a secular form of Christianity and Islam, envisioned replacing capitalist-materialistic imperialism with a kind of ‘spiritual’ or ideological imperialism, a kind of materialist or ‘scientific’ Jihad or Crusade to ‘liberate’ mankind. Thus, the Cold War degenerated into a game of the US and the USSR calling each other ‘imperialist’.
Now, if World War III is a real possibility, it won’t be plagued with many of the tensions that defined the past century. Whatever one calls it — American Empire, US hegemony, NATO-stan, Anglosphere, Anglo-Zionist Empire, Liberal West, Democratic World, Rules-Based Order, or etc. — there is only one imperialist/hegemonic player: Jewish Master Race politics and White Cuck doggishness, or white caninism(or the way of canines).
Many believe that the EU, Japan, Arab Gulf States, and virtually all of Latin America are beholden to the US, but this overlooks the fact that White Americans(and US goyim in general) are just as cuck-enslaved as the whores of the EU, the mama-sans of Japan, and the jackals of Arabia. It isn’t as if the ‘leaders’ of the EU, Japan, and UAE are taking orders from the likes of Ted Cruz, the late Lindsey Graham, Mike Johnson, Tim Walz, Elizabeth Warren, Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris, Pete Hegseth, and Donald Trump. Rather, all those saphead cucks, American or European or Asian or Arab or Latin America(like Javier Milei or the cucked traitors of Venezuela), are all weak and pathetic goy cuck maggots licking the anus of Zion.
The US is clearly the dominant country among the so-called alliance and remains the most powerful player in the world in terms of military projection, high-tech industry, and financial might, but its goyim(that comprise 98% of the demography) lack sovereignty in obeisance to their Jewish masters whose far-reaching power derives from vast network of globalist-hegemonist-imperialist links. Elon Musk has Starlink, and Jews have Schwarzlink.
Thus, even discussions pertaining to the US and Israel are only half the story as they usually leave out the true power behind the curtain: The worldwide Jewish Supremacists(aka the ‘Masters of the Universe’) calling the shots to ensure the US-guided global submission to the Zionic Empire, of which Israel is only a part, i.e. the Zionist use of dumb Arab Muslim terrorists on 9/11, the Zionist use of dumb White Christian neo-crusaders in Iraq, the NATO destruction of Libya, the Israeli-Saudi-Turkic-US destruction of Syria, the Ukraine War, Gaza Genocide, Israeli attacks on Lebanon, the Iran War, and White Nakba(aka the Great Replacement animated by anti-white ideology) are all part of the same struggle to bring about total and eternal Jewish domination.
Outwardly, the various crises may seem like separate wars or conflicts, but running through all of them is the insatiable supremacist will of Jewish megalomania buoyed by the pathetic servility to goy cuckery, perfected to an art form among wussy white goyim of the US and EU whose obeisance to Jewish Power serves as the template for the world. For many whites, not complying with the Jewish Agenda is tantamount to disobeying god, as profane and blasphemous as disrespecting Jesus was in the Middle Ages.
Unlike World War I and World War II, World War III would strictly be a matter of Imperial Hegemony vs. National Sovereignty. Its political morality would be clearer than World War I and even World War II(as ‘The Good War’). American behavior since the end of World War II(and especially the end of the Cold War) has exposed its essentially bullying and avaricious imperialist nature, though one could argue that this development, especially beginning with the Clinton presidency, owes more to the Jewish-Zionist Supremacist takeover of the US than to the British/Anglo Imperial legacy. After all, if Anglos(or white Americans) really wanted to revive old imperialist and racial-supremacist attitudes, why did they cave to Negrolatry, the Diversity Cult, mass immigration(aka the Great Replacement that amounts to White Nakba), widespread inculcation of anti-white ideology from the cradle, and Anti-White/Western iconoclasm? Why would the West demonize as ‘far right’, ‘xenophobic’, and ‘extremist’ the modest desires of Europeans to protect their own borders and preserve their own ethnos and heritage? Furthermore, why do the very critics who denounce even the hint of white identity/interests support not only the right(or imperative) of Israel to do whatever is deemed necessary to serve not only its ethno-nationalism but even its imperialist expansion to incorporate more territories into the Greater Israel Project?
If the latest iteration of Western Imperialism is indeed predicated on deep-rooted and ineradicable white supremacist tendencies, it sure goes about it in a strange way, i.e. appeasing mostly anti-white Jews at every turn while submitting to the Jewish-led agenda of White Guilt cult and Diversity-mongering. White elite goyim of the US and EU, who are utterly committed to the Globalist Agenda, have no qualms about suppressing every last vestige of white identity/interests and are wholly invested in appeasing Jews as the rightful master race.
Given that Jews count as ‘white’, perhaps white cucks rationalize that Jewish WHITES ruling the world is still better than The Other gaining dominance; or perhaps they hope and pray that Jews will one day grow appreciative of white loyalty/servility and abandon or considerably ease their anti-white agenda.
World War III, were it to break out, wouldn’t be about two or more power blocs competing for global hegemony or regional domination but about the last remaining sovereign countries fending off the would-be lone superpower rabidly infected with an insatiable mania for absolute power. On one side would be the Empire of Judea/Zion that directly rules over the US & Anglosphere and the EU, indirectly dictates to Latin America, East Asia(except for China and perhaps Vietnam), & most of the Arab states, and routinely twists the arms of hopeless India.
Granted, most of the satellites of the US(as power center of the Empire of Zion) will sit out the war, reliably remaining within the Zio-American sphere but forsaking any direct involvement in the conflict. This applies to Latin America, Africa(North and Sub-Saharan), and most of Asia, with Japan and possibly South Korea being the exceptions. The supportive participants in the Zionist-US aggression will be the EU(against Russia) and possibly Australia(against China). Canada will support the US war effort but is unlikely to get involved militarily.
The Zio-US power projection, for all its global reach and heft, will represent a singularity: The irreversible and out-of-control phenomenon of White dogs cucking to their Jewish Masters(of the Universe), willing to go to any length to appease them. As such, it will be unlike World War I and World War II that featured genuine alliances on both sides. While the participants were hardly equal in power and/or stature, each nevertheless possessed a measure of sovereignty and agency. For example in World War I, Germany was many times more powerful than the Ottoman Empire, but the latter wasn’t a toady-flunky to the former. Germany was far stronger than Italy and Japan in World War II, but Italy and Japan had their own agendas and interests. Among the Entente powers, France, Britain, and Russia pursued their own strategies and objectives; each entered the war for its own perceived national interests than as hapless puppets of the most dominant power. Likewise, despite American power’s ascendance being inversely proportional to British power’s decline, almost palpable in real time, they were politically independent of one another during the war.
Such can’t be said of the current West where the Empire of Zion rules over the US(as the ‘lone superpower’) that runs roughshod over its vassals and proxies in the EU, East Asia, and elsewhere. Jewish Power is the only game in town, the sole power. The image of the West where the US(as the lone superpower) bosses around its vassals is useful enough but misses the bull’s eye as figures like Joe Biden and Donald Trump are no less hapless and pathetic than the white goy cucks of the EU.
In the World War III scenario, the three main adversaries of the Empire of Zion would be Russia, China, and Iran. Among the three, Russia has the most powerful military, China has the biggest economy, and Iran has leverage over key geopolitical assets related to all-important energy. Contra the Central Powers of World War I and the Axis Powers of World War II, the cooperation among Russia, China, and Iran would be more flexible as none of them would harbor imperialist ambitions. If the alliances on both sides in World War I and World War II teamed up for greater control of the world, the main objectives of Russia, China, and Iran would be national sovereignty and regional security. Unlike Germany(that sought lebensraum in Russia), Italy(with imperialist ambitions in North Africa at odds with the British and French empires), and Japan(that spread its tentacles across Asia), there would be no need for Russia, China, and Iran to pool their resources for a greater piece of the global pie. Russia is vast with no need for more land and gave up the messianic agenda as the Cold War drew to a close. First and foremost, China prioritizes peaceful trade with the world and, contrary to John Mearsheimer’s paranoid fever dreams, has no plans to replicate the American Model of lone-superpower-ism.
Over the decades, the fact that Iran opted for negotiations instead of nuclear weapons is a clear indication that it is primarily interested in the preservation of national sovereignty & dignity and open to compromise leading to greater stability and prosperity.
Therefore, World War III would not be about Imperialist Team A vs. Imperialist Team B, as were the cases with World War I and World War II.
Rather, it would be about the last remaining sovereign powers with a measure of autonomy and self-respect standing up to the pathologically hubristic End-of-History-spouting West taken over by Jewish supremacist gangsters.
Of course, the current End-of-History formula has fundamentally deviated from the Liberal Democratic vision of Francis Fukuyama that prioritized individual liberty, free speech, the Rule of Law, middle class expansion, and democratization(that can only develop organically at the national level devoid of foreign interference). When the Cold War was nearing its end with Gorbachev drawing down the so-called Iron Curtain, Fukuyama still conceived of the West in which White Christian/Gentile elites were moving away from white racial domination/privilege toward a more universalist and humanist ethos based on individual freedom and merit. Indeed, the transparent phenomenon of the WASP or Anglo-American elites willingly reducing their own power and privilege for the sake of creating space for other groups to gain in status & influence seemed a sure indication that the principles of Liberal Democracy were indeed spreading and strengthening across the West.
As things turned out, Fukuyama and co. were blind to the potential that the WASP decline and the consequent power vacuum would result not in a more colorblind society for all groups but in a Jewish supremacist gangster takeover that would chisel away at core Liberal Democratic pillars and principles.
For as long as anyone could remember, the Liberal Democratic School argued that the whole world would embrace democratization with the expansion of the middle class. Yet, within the so-called Liberal Democratic West, the middle class continued to shrink while the uppermost elites perversely grew wealthier than ever. (In contrast, ‘autocratic’ China that resisted Western-style ‘liberal democracy’ brought about the biggest expansion of the middle class.) Under Jewish rule, free speech became an empty slogan across the EU; it went from people being fined for ‘denying the Holocaust’ to being dragged off to prison for refusing to acknowledge that a male tranny is a ‘woman’ or for opining that never-ending waves of foreigners are destroying the fabric of society. Recently, people in the EU are being fined or imprisoned for sharing RT(Russia Today) posts.
The war with Russia in Ukraine turned into a wholesale campaign against all of Russian heritage and history, even diminishing Russia’s indispensable role in the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II.
And instead of colorblind justice based on humanist ethos and universalist principles, the West adopted special idolatries for certain groups, with Jews, Blacks, and Homos consecrated into the new holy trinity; other groups may come into favor on a temporary basis in accordance to their utility to Jewish Supremacism, i.e. Kurds as proxies of the Zionist-US empire and Ukrainians as cannon fodder against Russia, but only Jews, homos, and blacks have permanent seats in the pantheon.
Contrary to the views of Jeffrey Sachs, the current trajectory of the West(led by the US) doesn’t appear to be a legacy of British Imperialism. True, for centuries the Anglos, British and American, were tireless empire builders, their ambitions and appetites unprecedented in history. But, like George Harrison’s album declared ‘All Things Must Pass’, the British gracefully(relatively speaking, of course, in contrast to, for example, France that became embroiled in horrific wars in Indochina and Algeria) accepted the end of the empire in the decades following World War II and grew comfortably accustomed to a more normal place in the world. A similar shift in attitude took hold in the US, with the Anglo-American elites(who’d dominated the uppermost echelons of the Republic from its inception) making way for others to share in elite power and prestige. If Sachs is correct, then the Anglos, British and American, should have fought tooth-and-nail to cling to every last crumb of power and privilege. Yet, they seemed resigned to accepting the profound changes afoot mostly at their own expense: Blacks taking over sports, dominating popular music, and sexually conquering white women; Jews taking over elite institutions & industries and replacing the WASPs as the new ruling elites; white Americans demographically being eclipsed by mass immigration, aka Diversity; MLK, Mandela, Harriet Tubman, and Anne Frank elevated as the new heroes, icons, prophets, or saints while prominent white figures of the history were eclipsed or erased; Queertianity as substitute for Christianity, which went from the worship of Jesus as the Savior of mankind to the veneration of Jews as the Chosen-Master-Race above and beyond the morality of lowly goyim.
If the Anglo-Imperialist mindset is still alive and well as Professor Sachs contends, why have the Anglos(in the UK and US) been so defeatist and submissive in the face of dramatic changes that have demoted and degraded everything white and European?
And yet, there may be a kernel of truth in Sachs’ assertion in this sense: Anglos on both sides of the Atlantic had the opportunity of accepting the New Reality in which all citizens within the geo-political order be treated with equal dignity and fairness under a colorblind set of laws and values. In order to make this a reality, they would not only have to abandon special privileges for themselves but deny them to all other groups(that may aspire to be the new domineering or supremacist rulers of the order). If special privileges for Anglos in the past were problematic, then it would be no less problematic for any other group to insist on special privileges and supremacist ambitions for themselves. Could it be that the apparent signs of conscience among Anglos(British and American) were less sincere and heartfelt than cynical and calculated to reserve slots for themselves in the new order led by Jews?
Suppose there are ten people and one person holds the gun and dominates others; but suppose he realizes it’s unjust for him to use the gun thus and, upon the advice of the others, decides to relinquish his control of the gun; so far so good, but in order for his good deed to take permanent effect, it must be assured that NO ONE else grabs the gun for himself lest he become the new bigshot threatening others.
When Anglos were in the process of abdicating their privileges, it was obvious that Jews were eager to grab those for themselves. It was a crossroads moment for the Anglos(and white gentile elites in general) in American History. Anglos/Whites could have summoned up their remaining power and influence to unite all principled peoples against the possible rise of Jewish supremacism and Zionist imperialism. If Anglos don’t deserve special privileges, then neither does any other group, Jews included. That would have been the principled, consistent, and ethical course of action. “We Anglos didn’t give up the throne just so you Jews could lord over humanity as the new kings.”
The other option would have been for Anglos/Whites to allow the Ring-of-Power to pass to the Jews and bow down before Zion as the new global master. Instead of Anglos giving up their power/privilege in favor of equal dignity for all, Anglos handed the scepter to the Jews as the new masters of the world.
At the subconscious level, is it possible that the Anglo dream of empire was never extinguished even if renounced at the conscious level? ‘White supremacist’ or ‘white racist’ imperialism was no longer deemed viable, and Anglos were willing to give up their empire, special privileges, and elite authority; yet, when Jews took over as the new emperors, the Anglos, far from denouncing it as yet another form of supremacism, pledged full fealty to the Jews as the truly rightful master race over all of humanity.
Thus, Anglo imperialist ambitions were subsumed into Jewish supremacism. Notice the very whites who reliably revile any sign of ‘white supremacy’ are besides themselves in their pants-wetting fits of ecstasy in their endorsement of any amount of Jewish power, privilege, wealth, influence, domination, and supremacy, cheerleading the entire destructions of peoples and nations, be they Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Iran, and etc.; anything to appease and bring joy to the Holy Jews as the Chosen Master Race, the superior genius race with the most Nobel prizes. Revelation(religious) or Evolution(HBD), Jewish supremacy and domination are championed and defended as the final culmination of history, i.e. the ultimate End of History isn’t about the inevitable triumph of Liberal Democracy but the prophetic fulfillment of the Zionic Tribal Supremacy. Just consider the laughter and delight of Hillary Clinton for having delivered Libya to the Zionic empire. It was like a dog fetching slippers for its master in eager anticipation of praise and a doggy biscuit. Pure white caninism.
Could things have been different if the Anglos, upon their abnegation of special privileges, had opted for equal dignity for all instead for the new hierarchy with Jews at the top? It’s been said that George H.W. Bush and James Baker made such an attempt(even if half-hearted) when they insisted on Israel curtailing further encroachments in the West Bank. But given Jewish influence on both political parties, neither side was willing to alienate the Jews who, with their vast fortunes and media control, could tip the balance in any election. So, instead of white Republicans and white Democrats standing together against the abuses of Zionist influence, they pandered to Jewish Power to gain an edge in elections, and Jews predictably grew more powerful with the Democrats trying to out-cuck the Republicans and the Republicans trying to out-cuck the Democrats on issues pertaining to Jews, Israel, and the Empire of Zion.
Granted, the factors went far beyond media control and political donations; it was a quasi-spiritual matter as the Jews had used the Holocaust to paint themselves as the new-christs who were ‘holocrucified’ for the sins of Western/White/Christian folks. So, even though Jews nursed Nazi-like supremacist ambitions of their own, they used the bogeyman of ‘antisemitism’ to render blasphemous any stinging criticism or rebuke of Jewish power and influence. It became “heads I win, tails you lose” for Jewish Power.
This is why Jewish domination of the West is far more dangerous than Anglo domination of yesteryear was. It was always fair game to scrutinize, criticize, and denounce Perfidious Albion and WASP blue-blood snobbery/hypocrisy. Even Anti-Americanism was within bounds of respectable opinion in America, and indeed, Jews were historically among its biggest practitioners when American Power was mostly closely associated with WASP domination. (Under the Trump-Rubio regimen, anti-American voices are welcome to visit America but anti-Israeli voices are banned from entry. Americans may boycott other states but better not boycott Israel lest they be sanctioned by the US government.) Jewish criticisms, even denunciations, of American policies in Vietnam and Latin America were commonplace in the media and academia, and through much of the Cold War, it was fashionable to be anti-American in Jewish-dominated intellectual circles.
Problematic were the critical assessments of Jewish power and influence, and so, even as Jews were poised to take over as the new overlords, the discourse continued as if Jews were still the underdog critics and/or perennial victims, always focusing on historical moments in which Jews were abused and/or spoke truth to power while ignoring the Jewish co-imperialist role with the West in the plunder of the world, like in the African slave trade and selling of opium to China.
Thus, the Jewish Empire is an invisible empire, a truly harrowing state of affairs whereby the power most responsible for world events cannot even be named, much like Jews feared to speak the name of Yahweh.
This is why, if World War III is to be meaningful, it must be stated loud and clear that the struggle is between Jewish supremacy(aided by white cuckery) against the last remaining sovereign states.
Anglo imperial ambition faded and handed the baton to Jewish imperial ambition. Thus, the current American hubris(or chutzpah) isn’t an expression of Anglo legacy but of Jewish pride in having vanquished the greatest empire-builders in the world. In the modern era, the Anglos built the biggest empire the world had ever known. And in the 20th century, the Anglosphere led by the US defeated the Germans and the Japanese and then presided over the dismantling of the Soviet/Russian empire. Yet, these great Anglos lost to the Jews(and their allies, Negroes and Homos) and lay prostrate at the feet of Zion. White people became white dogs. Thus, Jews feel that they conquered all and deservedly so. If Anglos who conquered the world have been conquered by the Jews, then Jews are the greatest people to whom all goyim must bow down to. And such a ‘prophecy’ fuels the conviction of many white goyim in the West, i.e. what animates them is the eagerness to remake the world in the image of Jewish supremacist fantasy, just like nothing makes a dog happier than to appease its master. White caninism in action.
World War I was clearly an all-around imperialist war when empire-building was the name of the game than a cause for shame. World War II was also mostly an imperialist war but complicated by the ideology of anti-imperialism that had gained traction during the interwar years, not least due to the rise of the Soviet Union and its Marxist-Leninist opposition to imperialism as the inevitable expression of capitalist exploitation. The US, despite its friendly and productive ties with the great imperialist powers, tried to have it both ways, i.e. remain cooperative with Western Imperialism but also express criticism on the basis of ideology(of freedom and self-determination of all peoples) and strategy(of expanding American power and influence at the expense of the British, the French, and the Japanese).
At any rate, the nemesis of the Axis Powers(the imperialist wanna-be’s) was the alliance of imperialist powers: The British Empire, the US empire(the supposed ‘isolationism’ of which was overblown), and the Soviet Empire(that had partnered with Nazi Germany in the carving up of Poland, in the process gobbling up the Baltic states as well).
However, a key distinction of the Soviet Empire was namely the absence of an ethno-imperial core. If the British were the masters of the British Empire, the French were the masters of the French Empire, and the Japanese were the masters of the Japanese Empire(and white Americans, especially of Anglo lineage, were more or less the masters of the US empire), the Soviet Empire was hardly a Russian Empire with ethnic Russians as the core power bloc; instead, Stalin the Georgian and his functionaries of various ethnicities ensured that ideology dictated the terms of the Red Empire. (The current US Empire may appear similar to the Soviet Empire of old, one absent of a dominant ethnic core and in which all groups equally take part in the American Global enterprise, but in fact, Jewish Power is absolutely dominant where it matters most, the key areas of finance, law, media/academia, tech/intelligence, organized crime/blackmail, entertainment/vice industries, political puppetry, and quasi-spirituality, with Jew Worship as the de facto religion of the West.)
World War III, unlike I and II, would be imperialist only on one side: The Empire of Judea/Zion with its iron grip on the US & Anglosphere and the EU and considerable sway over much of East Asia, Latin America, and Arab states, especially with Gaddafi, Assad, Hussein, and etc. gone.
Of course, there would be the propagandistic pretense of ideology: the Liberal Democratic Free World Order vs the repressive autocracies. However, many around the world have grown wise to the conceit of the Jewish-controlled US cynically invoking ‘democracy’ as a political justification. So, when Ukraine freely elected Yanukovych in Ukraine and strove for neutrality between US/EU and Russia, he was derided as a corrupt autocrat. But Zelensky who has suspended elections and handed over the state to Zionist-globalist gangsters is praised as a champion of democracy. And the tiresome dichotomy of the Free West and the unfree Other has turned into a joke as the EU has embarked on stringent suppression of free speech and free flow of information. And Jewish Americans have made a full 180° turn from the most impassioned defenders of free speech to the most brazenly shameless monopolists of media and silencers of speaking truth to Jewish supremacist power.
No doubt, there are still plenty of suckers who believe in the canard of the Liberal Democratic West against Russian barbarians, Iranian terrorists, and the ‘Chicoms’, but, given the likes of Clinton, Bush II, Obama, Biden, and Trump as craven executors of Jewish Supremacist gangsterism, more and more people have had scales fall from their eyes and recognize US-dominated globalism for what it really is: A new form of imperialist hegemonism predicated on Jews as the rightful master race(by way of God or evolutionary selection for genius) and whites vying to be favored as the most loyal dogs and horses of the Chosen Tribe.
While self-respecting goyim of all stripes find this arrangement repulsive, plenty others find it most appealing. Conservatives by their very nature favor hierarchy and respect for authority, and from their perspective, Jewish success, power, and wealth translate into authority worthy of reverence and obedience. Conservatives feel they must serve the higher-and-superior, and Jewish ascendancy in the US means they’re the biggest winners to whom the conservatives must carry water for. Besides, even if whites got knocked off the pedestal by the Jews, they get to be second in command, serving as the managerial class and military caste at the beck and call of their Zionic masters.
How MAGA turned on a dime from America First to Zion First goes to show it wasn’t really against Jewish domination per se. The MAGA faithful initially supported Trump as an apparent critic and opponent of Jewish-led globalism based on the perception that Jews were anti-white. But with Trump spinning MAGA as a partnership between white cuckservatives and Jewish supremacists, MAGA maggots are now okay with Jewish Power based on their (mis)perception that Jews have finally mended their ways and have formed a reciprocal partnership whereby whites wage war on whatever Jews target for destruction and in turn Jews ease on the ‘cancel culture’ against white conservatives and refrain from sticking the hot BLM poker up the white arse. “We’ll murder subhuman Muzzies and force all of Latin America to support Israel if you Jews don’t unleash black mobs and Antifa lunatics to wreak havoc on white communities.” One glimpse at the likes of Pete Hegseth & Karoline Leavitt reveals the sick soul of American Conservatism or the lack of any soul whatsoever.
World War III need not be as destructive as World War I and World War II. It would be limited to three main theaters, and the objectives of the anti-imperialist camp should be within reach with the proper strategy and requisite will. The three main spheres of combat would be far western border areas of Russia, the Middle East, and Asia Pacific. Russia would have to forcefully assert itself against the Jewish-controlled US-led NATO order that has crept up to the borders of Russia. Indeed, Russia’s failure to address this problem over the years finally culminated in the Ukraine War, really a Judeo-Russian War. In the Middle East, Iran needs to send a clear message that it will not tolerate Zio-US interference in the region. And China needs to finally do away with the legacy of past imperialism by driving out US naval assets from the Asian Pacific.
Unlike the Empire of Judea(with the US as its top dog), neither Russia, Iran, nor China would be fighting for world domination. NATO crept up to Russia’s borders, not vice versa. Zio-US surrounds Iran in the Middle East and uses puppet whore regimes. The US navy threatens China in the Asian Pacific, whereas there isn’t a single Chinese naval ship near US borders. Strictly speaking, it would be a war of regional security & integrity versus Jewish-led global hegemonism. Therefore, Russia, Iran, and China only need to wage localized wars(near their home turfs), whereas the Empire of Zion has to employ its forces all around the world, its vast logistics supplying three theaters of war. It would technically be a world war because the Zio-US would be fighting for neo-imperialist world domination far from its home base, whereas Russia, Iran, and China, having no imperialist ambitions of their own, would merely be fighting to drive away the nasty forces of Jewish supremacism from their borders/shores.
Imagine four dogs and four dog-bowls. Three dogs keep to their own dog bowls, but the fourth dog isn’t content with its own bowl but sticks its snout into the bowls of other dogs as well. The Zio-US is like the fourth dog, feeling entitled to eat from any bowl it feels like. Now, if the three dogs acted together to force the fourth dog to behave and stick to its own bowl, what would be wrong with that? The end result would be each dog sticking to its own bowl and respecting the bowl-sovereignty of the others.
World War I and World War II were problematic as a crazed melee of all dogs trying to grab stuff from other bowls. World War III would be far neater in objective and strategy as only one dog, the Zio-US, still violates the bowls of others. It would finally teach the Zio-US to be a good dog and accept the Iron Dog Bowl doctrine as the international norm and law.
All three anti-imperialist objectives are realistic and attainable, especially if the three powers, Russia, Iran, and China, understand what’s at stake and coordinate their efforts. If all the opposing sides had overweening imperialist objectives in World War I and World War II, the objectives of Russia, Iran, and China would be limited, realistic, pragmatic, and justifiable on grounds of simple national security and interest. Russians merely need to plot for a future in which NATO-stan is finally disabused of the illusion that it could do as it pleases against a weak and timid Russia that is all talk but no walk. Russians need not go beyond core ‘existential’ objectives. Likewise, Iran wouldn’t be fighting for empire or hegemony over the entire Middle East. Rather, it would take actions to ascertain the retreat of the Zionist-US empire from the part of the world it has no business meddling in. Indeed, if not for the Jewish-control of the West, it’s likely that American foreign policy might have prioritized constructive live-and-let-live relations with all the countries in the region; being captive to Jewish supremacism, however, the white cuck managerial class have aided and abetted in the policy of everything-for-Zion in the Greater Israel Project, which could only be achieved by taking out all the relatively sovereign Arab leaders(like Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi, and Assad) while pressuring the whorish Arab rulers to acquiesce in the Jewish-Zionist hegemonism throughout the region with the backing of US military might. The reason why the obsequious Arab rulers resent Iran and want it destroyed is because its very existence shames them for what they are: Toadies and flunkies of the Jewish-run West. In a sensible world, the Arab rulers would take inspiration from Iran and few others in MENA(Middle East & North Africa) who resist the Zionist-US empire, but the ruling class tends to be made up of vain and crass scum.
Likewise, white cucks fume at any proud white person who speaks truth to Jewish Supremacist Power because his courage exposes their doggish obeisance to the Jews as the master race. When white cucks routinely bend over to be rammed in the arse by Jews, the only way to hide their shame is to ensure that ALL white guys do the same, thereby ho-hum-normalizing the humiliation ritual; but if one white guy refuses to go along, he exposes their shameful submission to serve as prison-bitches to Jewish sodomites. Why was Donald Trump so hellbent on having Thomas Massie removed from Congress? Because Massie’s standing up to the Lobby made Trump look like a slavish coward to the Zionist oligarchs who have him by the balls.
In a similar vein, it must be embarrassing for Japan to be the bitch mama-san whore of the US empire, all the more so in contrast to the rise of China. When China was poor and backward, Japanese whoredom didn’t seem so disgraceful because, at the very least, Japanese lived so much better and enjoyed far more personal freedoms than the Chinese. But China’s example as a sovereign Asian country that can rival the US has made the Japanese feel very small indeed, and so it has doubled down on cucking to the US, as if their sidekick militarism alongside Uncle Sam(or Shlomo) makes them look so proud and tough when, in fact, they’re yellow dogs to the white dogs to the Jewish masters.
The existence of Russia is no less embarrassing to the hapless EU cucks with zero agency and autonomy in regards to the destiny of Europe that is now utterly cucked to the US that is, in turn, totally beholden to the Jewish Supremacist sorcery or Sorosism.
The one advantage of Russia, Iran, and China is that cucks don’t make the best fighters. Their bark tends to be far worse than their bite. An entity defined by its cuck maggotry will dutifully stick by its master as long as the master seems to be on top. But once the master falters and appears weak, the cuck entity will lose heart and prepare to make amends with the new power on the block.
The reason why the EU, Taiwan, and UAE bark like chihuahuas is because they’ve grown accustomed to the confidence and assertiveness of the Zionist-US empire in contrast to the excessive caution of its targets, namely Russia, Iran, and China. However, in a World War III scenario, if the three powers were to join forces to deal decisive blows to the Zio-US empire in their regional spheres of interest, the chihuahuas will stop yapping. The Baltic States, Finland, Taiwan, and Japan will behave if Russia and China finally decide to take far-reaching action and throw down the gauntlet. Precisely because they don’t anticipate a World War III scenario developing in the global order that, in the foreseeable future, seems likely to continue under the Zio-US hegemony, they keep yapping away like chihuahuas.
Short of World War III, Russia, Iran, and China will either restrict their countermeasures to dealing with the annoying proxies of the Zio-US empire or take ineffective half-measures in their conflict with the US. Only a World War will force the hands of Russia, Iran, and China to go all in and all the way with full-blown efforts to drive the empire away from their spheres once and for all. Only such an outcome will finally convince the EU cucks, Arab cucks, and Asian cucks to accept the new reality and expunge themselves of the long-entrenched mindset of kneejerk obeisance to the US empire(utterly degraded morally and culturally under Jewish domination).
In a World War III scenario, the Zio-US would be over-stretched across three zones of conflict whereas Russia, Iran, and China would only need to secure nearby regions vital to their security. And at last, the US itself would have to militarily engage with Russia instead relying on its proxies. World War III with Russia will mostly be contained in western Ukraine. Turkey, even as a NATO member, is unlikely to join with the Jewish-run West in the actual fighting. Finland would be retarded to attack from the north. The US and Japan will not attack the eastern flank of Russia from the Pacific given the Sino-Russian cooperation. Against US-led NATO in Ukraine, Russia would no longer make war with one arm tied behind its back(as has been the case with the ‘Special Military Operation’). Even in the limited conflict in Ukraine so far, tremendous numbers of Ukrainians have been sent to the grave. With Russia holding nothing back against a direct confrontation with NATO, the US empire simply couldn’t sustain the kind of losses suffered by hapless Ukrainians, if only because the American public would be outraged by the casualty numbers. And Europeans by and large lack the morale and mindset to commit to another all-out war, a World War. Russia only needs to bruise the US badly in Ukraine, conquer the Baltic Republics, and decimate the Polish military with overwhelming missile barrages.
What Russia fails to understand or has forgotten over the years is that scumbags and lowlifes respect power above all else. Russia, relatively restrained in Ukraine, has fruitlessly sought endless rounds of negotiations with the EU, but such gestures were seen as weakness, indecisiveness, and even cowardice. Ukrainian Slavs, though historically and ethnically interwoven with Russian folks, suffer from the ‘Polish Disease’ and tend to regard Russians as backward, lazy, slow, unfocused, and lacking in will. Their Western-induced-and-encouraged contempt for Russia owes to the latter’s apparent timidity. A great power has to be assertive, and most people, being dogs and whores by inclination, go with the strong horse and leave the weak one. Consider Germany and Japan that appeared resolved to fight to the last man in World War II but became enthusiastic servants of the new order dominated by the US and the USSR. The Japanese came to revere General MacArthur more than they ever did their own Emperor. Why? Because the Americans, once regarded as the mortal enemy, totally defeated Japan and showed it who’s boss. Likewise, the very Nazi Germans who’d served Hitler loyally became the most loyal servants of the US and USSR. And why do Chechens stick with Russia? Because Russia displayed its might in totally quelling the CIA-backed Chechen agitation for separatism. Chechens respect and admire strength, not weakness. It’s when a cocky boxer gets thoroughly beaten that he stops talking shit and shows respect to the man who put him in his place. Consider Mike Tyson’s change in demeanor after being KO’ed by Lennox Lewis. He wasn’t talkin’ shit no more.
Not that Russia should aim to cause harm and destruction comparable to what befell Germany and Japan in World War II. Even without causing mass deaths via war crimes(like indiscriminate bombings and other horrors), Russia can demonstrate that it is for real and means business in doing what’s necessary to secure the peace. As for the Baltic Republics, Russia must offer an ultimatum: Their independence shall be restored ONLY IF they pledge permanent neutrality and never again entertain the notion of conspiring with Russia’s enemies. Otherwise, they shall remain under Russian occupation. Russia might also occupy the northern two-thirds of Finland with the offer to return them ONLY IF Finland pledges permanent neutrality and peace with Russia.
Russia need not fear anything like World War II in which Russia was invaded and ravaged. No power in Europe has such capacity, and once American body bags pile up in Ukraine in the all-out NATO vs. Russia war in Ukraine, Americans will soon lose appetite for further bloodshed.
Besides, if the conflict is indeed a World War, the US will have its hands full in the Middle East against Iran and in Asia against China as well. It will be bogged down in three theaters of war. Its situation will be similar to Germany in World War I and World War II in which Germany had to tackle multiple fronts.
Because of the near-genocidal nature of the German invasion in World War II and the zero-sum game/wager of the conflict, the Soviet Union had no choice but to move westward and conquer German territory. But, in the hypothetical scenario of World War III, Russia would need to demonstrate in no uncertain terms that it will hold nothing back in piling up NATO bodies.
In the Ukraine War, virtually all the dead have been Ukrainians and Russians. But in a World War III scenario, high numbers of casualties will be visited on NATO forces, with Americans(and scumbag Polacks) suffering the bulk of casualties. No longer will the war be about killing Russians without expending American lives, as the late Lindsey Graham(scumbag extraordinaire) once beamed. If it comes down to NATO vs Russia, Americans will begin to die and in high numbers.
The only way for Russia to finally convince the Jewish-run US world order to retreat from Russia’s security zones would be to make the Americans themselves suffer. Thus, the World War III scenario would be ideal for settling the tensions that have accumulated across Europe in the aftermath of the Cold War. The US-dominated West, instead of showing appreciation for Kremlin’s dismantling of its empire and allowing Eastern European nations and Soviet republics to go their own ways, took advantage of Russian good will to expand its hegemony, even to the point of strategizing for the ultimate dismemberment of Russia itself.
It didn’t have to be this way, but the actions of the Jewish-supremacist-ruled US and EU forced Russia into a situation where half-measures simply won’t do. The only way to resolve matters is to take the war to the US(namely its military forces stationed in Europe) that has conveniently relied on proxies to do its dirty work(thereby avoiding casualties). As this has always been a Zionist-US project, Russia must draw American forces into the conflict and draw blood.
As for the threat of an all-out nuclear conflagration, it is virtually impossible given the dangers of mutually-assured-destruction. After all, merely taking out a few big cities will effectively neutralize any civilization; as Jewish power and wealth are concentrated in big cities, the idea of Jewish elites goading Western governments to lob nukes at Russia(that will surely lob some back) is highly unlikely. Jewish supremacists are willing to sacrifice any number of goyim, even billions of them, but will not risk their own well-being and wealth in a nuclear apocalypse.
The Jewish-run US in the Ukraine War has been like Bob goading Bill to fight Jim. Even as Jim beats up Bill, Bob keeps egging Bill on to keep fighting Jim. What does Bob care when it’s Bill and Jim who are getting bloodied, not Bob himself? If Jim is really serious about ending the feud, he must drag Bob into the fight as well and bloody his nose. Sure, Bob might bloody Jim too, but it would finally be a real fight between the principle adversaries.
The main antagonists in the Ukraine War are the Jewish-run US(aiming for total global hegemony) and Russia(seeking national security and regional stability). To finally make the US stop, Russia must bloody the American nose instead of merely piling up Ukrainian corpses, of whom the Jewish-run America doesn’t care a damn. Also, Russia must call out Jewish Power as the puppet-master, and why not? Jews hold nothing back in rabidly and virulently calling out Russia as the evil empire and defaming the entire Russian government as a monstrous tyranny. Jews have no qualms about spreading Russia-Russia-Russia hysteria via their global media networks and goy mouthpieces at the head of Western governments. Yet, Russia still has cold feet about calling out the Jews? This is shameful.
The current situations in Ukraine and the Middle East(with Iran as epicenter) are symptoms of a buildup to another World War. The Ukraine War is really a Zio-NATO aggression on Russia via proxy. Once NATO is directly involved, Ukraine will go from a proxy to the battleground for the Jewish-dominant West and Russo-Slavic East. The Iran War is a full-blown war between US & Israel and Iran(backed by Russia and China); unlike Ukraine, however, Iran is not a proxy but a sovereign country, the interests of which happen to overlap with those of Russia and China. The US, which had mostly settled for proxies since the Iraq debacle, chose to go all-in alongside Israel against Iran, a sure sign that the Jewish grip on the US has only grown stronger over the years, rather ironic given that the biggest failure of Bush II’s presidency was widely blamed on Neocon foreign policy.
With Iran fighting for its very existence, two more pieces need to fall into place before World War III is upon us. Russia throws down the gauntlet and takes on NATO in Ukraine, and the US provokes China into a war over Taiwan, in which case China finally decides to engage the US for bigger stakes than Taiwan, i.e. to effectively drive out US naval power from Asian Pacific once and for all.
If the limited military capacity of Iran is giving US bases in the Middle East a run for the money, China’s overwhelming barrages of missiles might finally finish off the legacy of Western Imperialism in the Asian Pacific(and South Pacific as well). In such a war, China would have the political and moral upper-hand as it wouldn’t be vying to control all of the Pacific but only the oceans around Asia far from the US.
Indeed, it’s about time for Russia, Iran, and China to announce their own versions of the Monroe Doctrine. Russia can put forth the Misha Doctrine that says no foreign hegemonic power may encroach on the bordering nations of Russia, i.e. Russia will respect their sovereignty as long as they don’t serve as proxies of a hostile empire. Iran can articulate the Mansoor Doctrine that says no foreign hegemonic power may use the Middle East as a base for neo-imperialist operations, especially at the behest of venomous Zion. And China can come up with the Ming Doctrine that says Asian lands and waters must be controlled by Asians, i.e. the US must go.
Hopefully, such doctrines won’t be corrupted like the Monroe Doctrine that went from a good-will Pan-American vision of cooperation and independence(from the interference of Old World empires) to a form of US hegemonism across all of the Americas, i.e. Europeans must keep out because Central America and South America belong to Uncle Sam. China, for example, can make a compelling argument that Pan-Asian geo-politics mustn’t be interfered with a non-Asian power, namely the Jewish-run US that drives wedges among Asian nations in a game of divide-and-rule. Some may argue that the smaller Asian countries need the US for protection against China’s naval ambitions, but the likelier case is that China’s apparent ‘aggressiveness’ is more the reaction to American naval provocations across the Asian Pacific than a will to dominate. With the US gone, China could take a more relaxed and compromising approach with its neighbors. For sure, China must vow not to treat the whole of Asia like the US has treated the Americas, weaker ‘partners’ to kick around. Likewise, Russia must demonstrate that it harbors no ill-will toward its neighbors and merely wants a security arrangement that precludes them being used as military bases for a hostile empire. But to get to that point, Russia must exhibit the will and wherewithal to take the fight to the Zio-US empire and bloody its nose, forcing a retreat. Iran can make a similar pitch to all the countries in the Middle East. Granted, it’s quite a challenge given that, like most of the nearby or neighboring countries of Russia and China, most Arab states are largely beholden to the influence of the Zion-Clad US empire.
The World may already be past the incipient stages of World War III as both Ukraine and Iran are major conflicts, but it won’t be a true World War unless Russia goes all in and directly confront the backers of the Zio-Nazi gangsters in Ukraine and unless a major conflict breaks out between the US and China. As the leaderships of Russia, China, and Iran have tended to be overly cautious, the provocations that finally trigger off World War III will have to come from the hubristic foreign policy of the Zionist-run US.
After all, it was Jewish Power that prevented constructive relations between the West and Russia, setting off the series of events that sparked the Ukraine War. It was the Zionist Lobby that compelled the US to sabotage negotiations and directly attack Iran. Jews are okay with using stupid goyim to fight other stupid goyim. Jews kvetch about how 10/7(what should be called the Gaza Uprising) caused the highest number of Jewish deaths since the Holocaust. Notwithstanding the fact that most Israeli civilians on that day were killed by Israel’s Hannibal Directive, Jews must have had it pretty good if their death toll on 10/7 constitutes their biggest tragedy since World War II. As for all the Palestinians, Lebanese, Iraqis, Syrians, Libyans, Yemenis, Iranians, Afghanis, Ukrainians, and Russians who’ve been killed, directly or indirectly, as the result of Jewish-supremacist instigated wars since the end of the Cold War, it only elicits a yawn from the Jews.
The number of goy deaths is surely in the many millions, but the Zionic mindset holds that Jewish lives are precious while goy lives are expendable. As current ‘Western values’ are molded by Judeocentric biases, most white goy cucks comply with the axiom that a single Jewish life is worthier than a million goy lives.
If Jewish elites see goyim as expendable cannon fodder, white cucks take to foreign wars as relief valves for their frustrations at home. In the West, whites are cucked maggots who must bend the knee to Jewish supremacism, black thuggery, and homosexual vanity. Jewish control of institutions and industries have insisted on white obeisance at home. Under the weight of Jewish Power, black megalomania, and homo narcissism, white cucks have been rendered spineless and neutered, always and reliably groveling at the feet of the Shlomo-Homo-Negro trinity.
Then, the ONLY way for the likes of Trump, Hegseth, and MAGA morons to feel tough and Hulk-Hogan-like is to talk shit about Big Bad Russia, the ‘Chicoms’, and the ‘Eye-ranians’(and ‘Muzzies’ in general). Or they may flex their muscles at the parts of Latin America that resent being treated like America’s backyard.
Such doglike ‘toughness’ is less an expression of white pride/power than of white weakness.
It betrays the fundamental truth that whites must channel their rage outwards because they are totally pathetic and obeisant in their own domains in which the dominant hostile Jewish Power has inverted the rules, values, and symbols that once governed the West. Today, the premier Anglo director Christopher Nolan’s idea of telling the greatest epic of the West is by casting a Negress in the role of Helen and some female-tranny as a Greek warrior. White brains are putty in Jewish hands.
Jewish Power loves the action but fears the attention, even though Jewish hubris/chutzpah has reached near the boiling point, with some Jews publicly opining that they’re the ‘masters of the universe’ whose ‘law’ is as good as God’s Word(as they themselves are the real-world deities) and that the world is their (g)oyster.
Jewish Zionists in Israel & across the West are becoming ever more brazen in their demands that white/Western goyim deliver whatever Zion demands. No less shamelessly flaunted are the levels of cuckery among white goyim, especially the so-called ‘conservatives’ who now sense that their eyes are on the prize(the golden leash, i.e. the dream of conservatives isn’t to be the masters but the favored pets of the Jews as the masters), the one that may settle the future of the GOP. For the longest time, Republicans had problems winning over the Jews because the Democratic Party was just as cravenly servile to Zionist demands. But with changing demographics and the impact of social media on the so-called ‘left’ and would-be ‘progressives’, support for Israel has become anathema among many Democrats. Ideally, American Jews wanted to have the cake and eat it too: Associate with the ‘oppressed’, ‘victimized’, and ‘marginalized’ against Christian reactionaries and ‘white supremacists’, thereby perpetuating their own victim status(despite their rapid socio-economic and political gains) via politicized camaraderie with the ‘have-nots’ as justification for the support for Zionism, i.e., Israel as the home of Holocaust Survivors as brethren-in-arms with the blacks, browns, women, homos/trannies, and ‘undocumented immigrants’, all of whom have been or are still under the thumb of unrepentant hateful, ‘heteronormative’, ‘racist’, ‘homophobic’, ‘misogynistic’, ‘white supremacist’, and/or ‘Christo-fascist’ elements of the American Right.
With the defensive White Right thus smeared by the Jewish-led ‘progressives’, just about the only redemptive and ‘respectable’ qualification for conservatives was to suck up to Jews and denounce ‘antisemitism’, the Buckley Cuckley Way. With self-abasing Philosemitism as the only ticket in town for conservatives, the GOP grew ever more fanatical in waving the Israeli flag, and Zionists milked it for all it was worth… even as they mostly remained on the Democratic side and pushed anti-white ideology and anti-conservative agendas.
As Zionism grew ever more extreme and far-right(in the real sense), the most reliable support for Israel was found on the cucked American Right(and its counterparts in Europe, usually condemned by Jewish-run media as ‘far right’ but more reliably pro-Zionist in every case). The conspicuous sight of Netanyahu and his ilk working in cahoots with vilest elements of the GOP substantially altered perceptions on the Left. Maybe, Israel was no longer the haven for Holocaust Survivors and more like a Genocide Incubator all over the region. The Gaza Genocide that soon followed the Gaza Uprising on 10/7 led to a open rupture between the Democratic elites(comprising Jewish Zionist oligarchs and craven goy cucks) and the Democratic base, especially at the grassroots activist level.
It was such a shock to Jewish Power that the Zionist elites eased on the lawfare against Trump and cut a deal with him whereby he’d return to the Oval Office and be allowed to rake in billions through corrupt schemes IF he totally did the bidding of Jewish Power and reliably bent over to take Netanyahu’s cock up his arse.
For the Republicans, it was at long last the golden opportunity they’d been waiting for.
As long as both Democrats and Republicans were equally pro-Israel and mindless Philosemitc, the former held the edge with the Jewish community that wanted the support from the Republicans but didn’t want to be associated with Right-wing ‘pathologies’: ‘racism’, ‘sexism’, ‘misogyny’, ‘xenophobia’, ‘homophobia’, Christian reaction, small-town cracker culture, ‘white supremacism’, Southern Confederate legacy, and etc.
Even when ‘moderate’ or ‘more evolved’ Republicans went out of their way to embrace the New Values and renounce the Bad Old Ways — Pat Buchanan and Joseph Sobran were purged, ‘conservatives’ made peace with ‘gay marriage’, even Southern Whites don’t oppose the demolition of Confederate monuments, GOP welcomes endless immigration as long as it’s legal, and white conservatives hate, hate, and hate the Nazis more than the Left does because, among other things, the Nazis were ‘big government socialists’ — the ‘right’ label was deemed counter to the proper course of history, which is about ‘progress’, therefore led by the ‘left’ and grudgingly but eventually followed by the ‘right’.
In other words, the left, real or fake, may be over-zealous and foolish at times, but it’s more in sync with the dynamism of change essential to modernity. In contrast, while the right might be judicious and sensible at times, its fundamental view of pleading with history to stop in its tracks goes against the favored teleological view of history as progress. Given that historical change in the modern era has led to worker’s rights, end of slavery, equality under the law, expanded opportunities for women, more humane treatment of animals, environmental protections, and so on, the leftist association with the cult of change has advantaged it over the rightist support for reactionary elements. Just about every achievement that the West is proud of, especially in contrast to the static and stagnant non-West mired in tradition and dogma, owes to the acceptance of historical change, the forces associated with liberalism and leftism.
In retrospect, most conservatives today will find more in common with the liberals and leftists of the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries than with the conservatives of those times who sought to preserve aristocracy, class privilege, and even serfdom or slavery. What conservative today would argue against the 8-hour workday in favor of a 12-hour or 14-hour workday? Some libertarians may argue against any regulated working hours but then on the basis of classical liberal individualist contractualism between employers and employees liberated from ‘socialist’ government regulation, certainly not on the basis of class privilege; libertarians envision a world where workers as individuals would gladly and freely contract to work 14 hrs a day 7 days a week and for a pittance well below minimum wage.
If the modern right got some reprieve in the 20th Century, it was because communism, a form of far-leftism, caused immeasurable damage in terms of human lives, cultural heritage, and wasted energies. (Prior to World War II, the modern right also gained an advantage through fascism that combined rightist themes with leftist energy.) If leftism for most of Western history had been a reformist agent pushing for improvements in the justice system and the economic sphere, full-blown capture of the Russian Empire by radical leftists led to unprecedented horrors with the first manifestations of totalitarianism. It taught the world that leftism is useful in measured doses than as a shock treatment crammed down the patient’s throat. (Shock treatment of any kind is usually bad. The Jewish-led communist shock treatment led to horrors in the early stages of the Bolshevik Revolution, but then so did the Jewish-led capitalist shock treatment in the 1990s.)
Still, the main story of the 20th Century has been Liberalism vs. Leftism than Rightism vs. Leftism, not least because the one force deemed even worse than radical leftism was radical rightism, especially in the form of Nazism that brought about World War II and carried out a genocide not just of any people but of the Chosen Race that would take over academia and media in the West.
At any rate, the GOP finally sees an opportunity in snatching the JP(Jewish Prize) from the Democrats, and it has something to do with death; ‘Nixon’ in Oliver Stone’s film reflects that his path to the presidency was paved with deaths, those of JFK and the fallen in Vietnam. The Republicans are so devoid of anything resembling a soul, heart, or conscience that they go all in with their endorsement of the worst excesses of Jewish supremacism and genocidal tendencies. Ironically, the GOP’s road to victory with the blessing of the Holy Holocaust people is by fully aiding and abetting in their holocaust of the Palestinians(and others that inconvenience Jewish hegemonic goals).
Such lays bare the true nature of politics in the US. The main concern of White American Conservatives was never that millions of Jews died in the Holocaust. People truly horrified by the crimes against humanity in World War II would be equally horrified by other great crimes regardless of who/whom. The only reason why White Conservatives care about the Holocaust is because Jews are the biggest winners in the US, the gangster-masters uber alles. Does anyone think American Conservatives would really care if Hitler killed 6 million gypsies or Russians instead of the Jews? As a matter of fact, over twenty million Russians perished in World War II, but the GOP is fully on board with the Jewish recruitment of Ukrainian sub-Nazis in the war against Russia. GOP jackals cackle with glee that Russians are dying with no cost to American lives.
Conservatism, in its basest form, is a craven submission to hierarchy, whereby the toadies and flunkies bow down to the power-holders of society. The Holocaust Cult, along with Biblical prophecy, merely serves as pseudo-moral mirage to obfuscate what amounts to a shameful obeisance to the masters-of-the-universe. GOP cucks may invoke the Holocaust or quote verses from the Old Testament with the faux-piety of Televangelists, but their only real consideration is that Jews hold all the cards. Being fundamentally dishonest, Republican cuck-dogs may well believe in their self-deceptions, but their pathological Philo-Semitism that blindly defends Zion at every turn regardless of the latest outrage gives the game away. Surely, even if you admire a certain group/people, they can’t be correct all the time(as perfection is the sole domain of God). The GOP’s attitude that Jews and Israel can do no wrong(despite Jews having spearheaded just about every agenda that eviscerated American Conservatism) simply cannot be construed as any kind of moral position.
It even fails at the level of political strategy because politics is about give-and-take, with both sides making compromises, whereas the relation between white conservatives and Jews is the former gives and gives while the latter takes and takes. Bill Ackman had been funding just about every anti-white agenda, but when he backed Trump for the Gaza issue, the GOP cucks stood in line to lick his anus. The partnership is one where Jews shit on the dining table of white conservatives, who then use their family linen to wipe the Jews’ arse and say ‘thank you for the honor’. Surely, even Hindu collaborators in India weren’t so debased in their sucking up to the British.
Given the nature of the current West, World War III must be framed as the great struggle against Jewish Evil. As long as the war is billed in terms of Russia-China-Iran vs the West(or Liberal West or NATO or US & EU and etc.), what’s truly at stake may go unnoticed. Besides, Jewish Power won’t face pressure to mend its ways because, regardless of the cost for all sides, it will be seen as a goy vs goy affair(with goyim getting all the blame), whereas Jews walk away unscathed in reputation and without political/economic repercussions.
Consider how Jews dodged the blame for the Iraq War, which was spun as an Evangelical-Christian crusade by the born-again George W. Bush and blood-for-oil war by Texas oilmen. And so many idiot goyim, American and European alike, were fooled by the Ukraine War as the result of Russian Aggression because cowardly Russia feared to name the Jewish Power. (Incredible that Jews name Russia even for things that Russia didn’t do but Russia dares not name the Jewish Power that has wreaked havoc in the region resulting in the deaths of over 150,000 Russian lives. Russians have been chicken about naming the real Zionic culprit, but Jews have been utterly uninhibited and unhinged in naming Russia-Russia-Russia for just about every woe in the world. ‘Russia-gate’ was one such Jewish lie spread far and wide by the media and deep state — when, in fact, the foreign country that has long interfered the most in US political affairs is Israel — , and the vilification accounted for so many Democrats endorsing the US-EU support for Ukraine against Russia as the country that had allegedly aided Trump in stealing the election from Hillary. Jews are shameless even in the most brazen lies, whereas Russians are timid and cowardly to even speak the truth. If a Jew raped and murdered a woman, nothing prevents him from blaming the Russian, whereas the Russian, even in having witnessed the crime, has cold feet about naming the Jew as the predator. It goes to show the near-divine power that Jews have over the world. Russia fears that if it names the Jewish Power, it will go from a mere pariah to the absolute satan in the eyes of the West that, over the years, have canonized Jewish victims of World War II as the only ones that mattered. Also, whereas Russians have honored the Jews mass-murdered by the Germans, Jews haven’t returned the favor in honoring the 20 million-plus Soviets/Russians who perished in the war to defeat Nazi Germany. So, even as Jews cackle with hideous glee as they use Ukrainian sub-Nazis to kill Russians, the Kremlin line is that Russia is fighting the scourge of Nazism in Ukraine, indeed as if Russians and Jews are soul-brothers in a common struggle. On the occasion when Russians mention that Zelensky is a Jew, it’s as if to pretend that Jews must be ‘forgiven… for they do not know what they’re doing’, when in fact Jews know exactly what they’re doing, which is using low-IQ Ukrainian Nazi larpers as cannon fodder against Russians so that Ukro-Slavs and Russo-Slavs slaughter one another while Jews sit back and munch on popcorn. Even if using Ukraine as proxy will fail to destroy Russia, all those dead Ukrainians means that Jews can take over the carcass of Ukraine and rebuild the Pale of Settlement as their European colony. Putin, instead of alerting the Ukrainians of this horrible truth and waking them up as a brotherly people from the Zionic hypnosis, has continued to defer to global Jewish Power and restricted Russian war-making to killing hapless Ukrainians dragged to the front by the goons used by Jewish gangster oligarchs. Putin will kill a million Ukrainians but not touch a single hair on the very Jews who fomented the bloody havoc in Ukraine. Putin will fight the ‘Rosato Brothers’ but won’t touch, not even name, ‘Hyman Roth’.)
To bring about a proper World War III, Russia, Iran, and China need(and deserve) better leaders. Putin the Wimp or Putimp, whose formative professional years were spent in West Germany, is stuck in the delusion that Russia and the Jewish-run West can come to some kind of an arrangement as brethren of a vast pan-European civilization. But, Western/Central Europe today isn’t the one Putin experienced during the Cold War. Amity based on mutual good-will may have once been possible, but the political transformation of the US & EU(falling totally into the clutches of Jewish Power), the rapid onset of cultural degeneracy(with sodomy-celebration as the main theme), and the dramatic demographic changes have made any real rapprochement between the West and Russia most unlikely.
Russia may still do business with the West, but it would be retarded to develop any cultural or people-based ties with what is now an utterly debased and rotting corpse of a once-great civilization.
But old habits tend to lag behind the reality, and the now useless Putin must go if Russia is to embark on its true destiny. If Putin had some sense, he would know that all the European ‘leaders’ aren’t worth a plate of beans. They’re just craven cuck-dogs of their Zionic masters. If Russia wants real dialogue of consequence, it should openly call out the Jewish Power Elites to discuss and settle matters. What a waste of time with the likes of Starmer, Macron, Meloni, Merz, and etc. It’s like talking to dogs than with their master, like talking to puppets than with the puppet master.
Another Russian illusion is that the US controls the EU. In truth, the US and EU are both controlled by the Empire of Judea/Zion. Trump, for all his Pro Wrestling ‘macho man’ antics, has about as much agency as the Euro-cucks do, which is zilch. American politicians are just as beholden to Jewish Power as the EU-crat dogs, if not more so. There’s no difference between Nancy Pelosi and Ursula von der Leyen. Foolish Russians thought they could bypass EU obstruction by dealing with the US under Trump’s presidency, only to learn that it’s a case of tweedle-dee and tweedle-dum, with both EU and US doing the bidding of Jewish oligarchic gangsters.
Iranian elites have also been a bunch of fools. The religious idiots enforced a fatwa against nuclear weapons, leaving Iran exposed to attack by USrael. Perhaps, Iran feared an attack would have been more likely if it had pursued nuclear weapons, but it was attacked precisely because it didn’t have them. Far from sustaining security for Iran, it emboldened USrael to wage war.
Besides, surely Iran must have known that the Nuclear Excuse was never about the security of Israel. An Iran with nukes would never have opted for a first-strike against Tel Aviv, and of course, the West knew this too. It was really about Zionist hegemonist expansion and saber-rattling throughout the region, which might be thwarted by an Iran armed with nukes, i.e. while nuclear-armed Iran wouldn’t start a total war with Israel, it could push back against Israeli expansionism, and then, Israel would think twice about engaging a nuked-up Iran. As long as Iran lacks nukes, Israel sees itself having a free hand to do as it pleases across the entire region, especially as stupid Russia and Iran failed to protect Syria from the Mossad-CIA-Turkey-backed ISIS takeover.
Even without nukes, Iran is a tough nut to crack for USrael, but Iran with nukes would be untouchable. As long as Israel is the lone nuclear power in the Middle East, it can remain in attack mode, but Israel wouldn’t dare risk a total war with Iran that could take out entire Israel cities.
If Iran is serious about checking Zionist expansionism, the ONLY way is to get the Bomb. Otherwise, Iran is just wasting time as USrael will prepare for more wars in the future. As tough as Iran may be, war on the current scale is too costly, especially as Iran can only fight defensively while the US mainland remains untouched. The only way to stop the aggression once and for all is for Iran to have nukes.
But through all these years, Iranians always played defense, rhetorically and militarily. It insisted on its promise not to build nukes while never making Israel’s nuclear arsenal the main issue. Imagine someone owns a gun to kill you with, but you vow to never obtain a gun and without mentioning that the other guy has a gun(to kill you with). How stupid is that? All these years, Iran’s position should have been, “We will forgo nuclear arms IF Israel gets rid of its own.”
Stupid Iran ceded the moral high ground to the Jews who have 300 nukes aimed at Iran. Just how is it that a violator of international laws on nuclear arms goes before the UN(and US Congress) to demand that a country that has complied with all the rules be subjected to inspections, sanctions, assassinations, and even bombings?
Israel’s nuclear arsenal contravenes even American laws that forbid aid and support to countries that violate international nuclear agreements. Yet, Iran, instead of exposing this total hypocrisy and fraud, just went along with the Zio-US-EU that Iran be subjected to endless inspections and be hit with endless rounds of sanctions while Israel with its illegal nukes were showered with billions in aid and favorable economic treaties with the US and EU. Are Iranians retarded or what? Israel is like the Lee Marvin character in THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE. It can commit all sorts of crime but be protected by the global barons.
Iran played a weak hand in its negotiations and will remain vulnerable as long as it doesn’t have nukes. The very supreme leader who prevented the development of nukes was murdered along with his family by the USrael regime that also slaughtered school children and destroyed civilian infrastructure. Yet, Iran still wants to negotiate with the Zionic monster and forswear a justifiable nuclear weapons program just for some sanctions relief?
If someone murders your father and mother, do you then negotiate with the murderer in the hope that he may hand you some bucks?
If the late Ayatollah stupidly took the high road against the biggest lowlifes — no good deed goes unpunished in a world of gangsters — , many Iranian elites have something akin to the Polish Disease; they crave approval from the supposed more advanced/evolved West, fainting and swooning over a literary prize by some European body or a trophy at a film festival in Cannes or Venice. As such, Iranian elite society — the goody-good cosmopolitan Iranians contra the intractable Iranian hicks — has been teeming with turncoats willing to betray their country to the West in cuckish supplication.
North Korea has no problem with turncoats as it’s a totalitarian state where everything is under tight control. Any sane person would prefer the relative freedom of Iran compared to North Korea, a prison-state of sorts, but freedom has to be guarded against hostile outside forces. If the problem of North Korea is the excessive unfreedom(to the point of paranoia), the problem of Iran(and Assad’s bygone Syria) is a kind of freedom easily permeable to outside forces. How else did Iran allow so many sleeper cells to set up shop and launch attacks in coordination with USrael, not once but twice? Freedom is good but has been corrupted and weaponized by the worst people in the world. Opening the window to let in some fresh air is good but not if some psycho releases sarin gas in the vicinity.
There was once a time when democratization was seen as synonymous with anti-imperialism — people freely choosing their own governments via elections against puppet-dictators installed and/or backed by the US and West — , but so-called ‘democratization’ has subverted into a neo-imperialist tool, a kind of ‘demperialism’.
While increased freedom can be used to strengthen national sovereignty and improve social conditions, it can also be used by outside forces, especially those with limitless resources, to penetrate society and set up instruments of foreign manipulation.
As most people are busy with work and/or leisure and don’t pay much attention to politics, even a so-called democratic society is mostly controlled by the elites, elected or otherwise; and, it just so happens that most politicians are lowly and venal in character, i.e. they’re in it for themselves, thus more than willing to sell their country and people down the river if there’s something in it for themselves.
As ‘democratization’ allows for expanded opportunities for powerful outside forces to gain access to the inner-workings of any vulnerable country, the bagfuls of money, the allure of status(by rubbing shoulders with agents of rich/powerful countries), the indoctrination via global media and academia(as elite-wanna-be’s usually get their degrees in the US or EU and tune into Western Media), and/or blackmail all conspire to turn the political class into a bunch of saphead cucks as pathetic as the white cucks who lick Zionist anus in the US Congress. Take a look at the Philippines and Thailand, countries just as useless as Poland and Armenia.
The overview of World War III would be as follows. The main theme would be the Last Empire Standing(of Jewish master-race supremacism and white dog-cuck submissivism) versus the Anti-Imperialism of Russia(that seeks to end the Zio-US encirclement), Iran(that seeks to push back Zio-US-backed Israeli hegemonism across the entire Middle East, aka West Asia), and China(that finally seeks to push US imperialism out of the Asian Pacific, the legacy of Western Imperialism and American Imperialism’s defeat over Japanese Imperialism, resulting in ‘Pax Americana’ over the entire Pacific). Neither Russia, China, nor Iran encircles and threatens the Zio-US, but the vice versa is all too true, with the rhetoric growing more heated by the day for obvious reasons.
Jewish supremacists covet control of Russian land & resources and look upon Russo-Slavs as a helot race that should bow down to the Jews, just like white cucks do so from the EU to Canada to the US to Australia. Russian sovereignty(though far from complete) is not only an affront to Jewish hubris but a threat to Jewish domination as it can serve as a reminder that a predominantly white country can say NO to Jewish demands; Jews fear the Russian Way may inspire other white countries to do likewise, which is why the Jewish-run media work tirelessly(via Hollywood movies, TV shows, news reports, and academic discourse) to defame and discredit everything Russian.
As for Iran, with most of the Arab world having submitted to Zio-US imperialism — Iraq was destroyed under dummy Dubya, Libya was destroyed under Cogro(co-imperialist negro) Obama, Syria was destroyed under senile cuck Biden — , virtually all the Arab leaders are to the Zio-US empire what their forebears had been to the Ottoman Empire: Servile dogs.
The only major power standing is Iran, and Trump the Envious, though once having run as an anti-war candidate, wants to go down history as the one who outdid the previous administrations by toppling the biggest kahuna of them all, thus winning the approval from the Jewish Masters as the Top Dog among the goy dogs. If whites can’t be the masters, they can at least be the top dogs. That’s how white caninism works. (White conservative griping about Hindus betrays white jealousy over the Jews favoring the pajeets over the ‘pathites’, or pathetic whites. The white dog is miffed that the Jewish master is giving more snacks to the brown dog.)
As for China, Jews are pissed because it has stood behind Russia in the Ukraine conflict, though not nearly as much as Russia would have liked. Also, unlike India whose arm can be twisted by the Zio-US(as Hindus prize the HinJew alliance above all as their meal-ticket to more wealth and influence), China is better positioned to say NO to the Zio-US. Hubristic Jews take umbrage at any bunch of goyim who dare to reject Jewish demands, much like Yahweh of the Torah cannot countenance any defiance from mankind. Jewish psychology feels toward non-Jews the way the Jewish God feels toward humans, but then the Jewish God was a projection of Jewish personality onto the universe. That China can say NO is unforgivable to the Jews.
However, the anti-China agenda among Jews is less overt than the agendas concerning Russia and Iran. Whereas Jews really envision taking over Russia(and ruling it like they do the US/EU/Canada/Australia) and really obsess over destroying Iran to make way for the 1000 Yr Zionist Reich in the Middle East, Jews have a more indirect approach with China. Jews seek to exert greater influence over China via finance & trade and US naval presence in the Asian Pacific, especially in cahoots with the Asian vassal states from Japan to the Philippines to Thailand.
Tensions with China are also useful in inflaming Yellow Peril hysteria, thereby scapegoating the Chinese for the problems caused mostly by Jews, e.g. blaming China for ‘wokeness’. Besides, as long as White Male America gets to flex its muscles at China, Jews figure white male rage and frustrations can be deflected away from Benny the Jew towards Ming the Merciless.
Thus far, conflict has been avoided in the Asian Pacific, but the danger of heated rhetoric and the game of double-dare-you can spark something like a Black Swan event, in which case anything is possible.
Iran is already in a full-blown war with USrael. Russia merely needs to ramp up its operation and directly take on NATO. Then, World War III will be halfway there. If China is pulled in as well with USrael, then it will be World War III if Russia, Iran, and China were to transition from a loose partnership to a full-fledged military alliance. It will be a war USrael cannot win. Whereas Russia, Iran, and China will each tackle a single front, USrael will be caught in a three-front war overseas, with the home-field advantage being with Russia, Iran, and China.
The Russo-USrael war will be limited mostly to Ukraine where untold numbers of Americans will be ground to mincemeat. With USrael’s resources dispersed in wars with Russia and China, Iran would have a better chance to finish off all of USrael’s assets across the Middle East.
China could batter the US naval forces so badly that the US will finally decide to depart from Asian waters. And there won’t be any need to fear a nuclear war as Russia and China have nukes. (Nuclear war is a danger when only one side has nukes. The US used nukes on Japan because Japan had no nukes. The US and/or Israel may use nukes on Iran because Iran doesn’t have nukes. But, fat chance of USrael using nukes on nuclear-armed Russia or China.)
World War III will finally bring to an end the legacy of Western Imperialism(that morphed into American Century hubris and Jewish supremacist megalomania). It will be good for the world. With NATO destroyed, USrael’s influence will likely diminish in Europe that might sensibly opt for constructive political and economic relations with Russia to everyone’s benefit. With USrael’s role gone in the Middle East, Iran can survive and thrive as a proud civilization, and the Arab peoples can finally emerge from their humiliating servitude to Zio-US hegemony. And with the retreat of US imperialism from the Asian Pacific, Asian countries will find ways to cooperate and build bridges(without the US playing them against one another like balls on a billiard table).
Furthermore, the American people will gain something far more valuable with the loss of empire. They could finally focus on issues pertaining to the well-being of Americans: Protect their own borders, concentrate on domestic problems, and stop wasting tax payer dollars on the game of empire that only serves the vanity and the wallets of the military-industrial-complex.
And, shorn of its overweening arrogance and hubris as the Lone Superpower, the US will rebuild better relations with the rest of the world based on mutual respect than on the mindset of my-way-or-the-highway. And without Jewish Power’s misdirection of American concerns to foreign places — Big Bad Russia, Evil Terrorist Iran, Chinese Dragon Monster — , Americans might finally address the very real issue of the Jewish Supremacist lock on the US.
The Syrian Example should be a wakeup call to the world that half-measures are useless against the Zionic agenda that, passive/aggressive and weasel-like, never relents in its long-term objective. If anyone thinks a momentary Jewish retreat means long-term truce, he is gravely mistaken. When Jewish Power fixates on something, it is hellbent on getting there by hook and by crook, if not in this generation than in the next one or the next one after that and so on. With a deeper sense of tribal and familial memory, Jews like Victoria Nuland believe they’re carrying the torch of Judaic Will of earlier generations. Success is measured not only in individual but in connective-collective terms, i.e. no matter how successful an individual Jew, his achievements are for naught if not connected somehow to even greater fulfillments by future Jews. Thus, even apparent failures can be construed as successes if they serve as stepping stones for future Jews; and even apparent successes are failures in that they’re merely stepping stones to even greater successes in the future. And so, Jews regard the ‘failures’ of earlier generations as motivations to try even harder in the here and now and in the future. What past Jews failed to bring about, it’s up to the current Jews to attempt with even greater zeal and effort. And so the flame is passed from generation to generation. Who would have thought that impoverished Jewish immigrants from backward Eastern Europe would one day take over the US as the lone superpower? Yet, after several generations, it became a reality. When Zionism was first proposed, many regarded it as a joke or fantasy, but the dream(or nightmare) was realized. There was a time when the notion of the US toppling government after government in the Middle East to appease Jewish Power sounded fanciful at best. But US foreign policy became exactly that. The idea of ‘gay marriage’ was totally crazy to most Americans. But Jews wanted it, and today most Americans think it’s just dandy. The idea of provoking a war with Russia, a great nuclear power, seemed reckless to most Americans, even the elites. But in time, the US went all in to provoke Russia into a war in Ukraine. Jewish Power is like the Charles Grodin character in THE HEARTBREAK KID who simply won’t take NO for an answer and keep gnawing away at the defenses. It’s like the Marx Brothers in DUCK SOUP who ultimately succeed in dragging the dimwit goyim into war. Even a seeming retreat is merely time-off to recoup and attack once again. We see this again and again with the Jewish-controlled Trump administration, calling for a cease-fire only to prepare for another round of attacks on Iran.
In Syria, Russia and Iran hoped they could achieve their ends with half-measures. They fought off the Jihadis and ‘moderate rebels’ but feared to tackle the real source of the conflict. Many have fingered Turkey, but it was really the Jewish-run US that continued to occupy one-fourth of Syria, the areas with the grains and oil, thus depriving Syria of essential materials for sustenance and trade. Russia also refused to do anything about Israel’s continuous attacks on Syrian territory. And Iran responded only tepidly when the Jewish-run US murdered General Soleimani.
Russia and Iran chose caution in fear of a broader conflict, but their half-hearted strategy eventually failed to save Syria, a mere hollow shell of itself when it finally fell to Turkish-backed Jihadis who met no resistance from a military that was demoralized by poverty and corruption.
Earlier, when it was widely believed that Russia and Iran had prevailed in securing Syria, many Arab states began to respect the new reality and rolled out the red carpet for Putin and opened diplomatic negotiations with Iran. But when Syria finally fell like a house of cards, the Arab states reverted to their cucked status, regarded Russia as a weak and unreliable partner, and snubbed their nose at Iran, even conspiring with the US to attack the Islamic Republic.
Thus, Russia and Iran’s caution to avoid a larger conflict ended in disaster and only emboldened the Empire of Zion to ramp up the war in Ukraine and embark on all-out attacks on Iran. Had Russia and Iran gone all-in in Syria and aided the Syrian army to oust the occupying US forces there, Syria would still be standing and allied with Iran and Russia. And the Arab states wouldn’t have worked with USrael to attack Iran. And the West would have thought twice about increasing tensions with Russia.
Sometimes, you have to take the hard road to find the easy road. In Syria, Russia and Iran opted for the easy road and found themselves in the ditch. They thought Syria could survive even with the US occupying the most fertile and oil-rich areas and stealing the loot. They thought Syria could weather ceaseless attacks by Israel. It’s like thinking one could bargain with the Terminator or the ‘Zionator’.
This is why we need World War III, something akin to the Corleones taking out the Five Families at the end of THE GODFATHER. Michael understood there was no compromising with Sollozzo the Turk, and Vito & Michael understood there was no compromising with Barzini. If Michael faltered in THE GODFATHER PART II, it was the miscalculation that he could do business with Hyman Roth. As it turned out, Pentangeli was right. The Corleones should have hit them hard while they had the muscle.
Now, whom do we have to stand up to the Zionic Empire? We have the Putimp(or Putin the Wimp), the Xicken(or Xi the Chicken), and the Pussykian(or Pezeshkian the Pussy). They’re supposed to be leaders of great civilizations, but they only react and never act proactively(like when Michael took charge and gave the order to take out the Five Families). Great civilizations deserve giants, but Russia, Iran, and China got dwarfs.
