Showing posts with label White Race. Show all posts
Showing posts with label White Race. Show all posts

Sunday, June 8, 2025

White or Western Specialness Forfeited by Blind Unconditional Obedience to Zion, or Now, the Myth of White Uniqueness in the West Gone Cuck

The idea that the West needs white people to uphold Western Values has been blown to smithereens by white submission to Judeo-Semitic Despotism.

Video Link

It’s often voiced or at least felt within the white community that whites advanced and developed far ahead of all the other peoples to better appreciate the values of freedom, personal conscience, and individual thought. It’s still openly voiced in the white racial dissident sphere, e.g. white people appreciate principles like Free Speech whereas nonwhites do not, therefore immigration must be halted to preserve Western values and principles. Establishment Conservatives opt to explain these matters in terms of culture than race, whereas so-called ‘Liberals’ and ‘Progressives’ dare not make a racial or even cultural case for Western values.
Still, if we judge people by practice than rhetoric, most white people, even ‘liberals’ and ‘progressives’, at least FEEL this way. So-called ‘Liberals’ are among the most dogged supporters of globalist Neo-Imperialism premised on making the world a better place via Western hegemony. Even something like BLM is, at least at the subconscious level, based on the assumption that white conscience/compassion is essential because nonwhites, especially blacks, simply cannot do things on their own: If indeed blacks are genuinely conscientious and capable, they would have dealt with the problem of black deaths mostly brought upon by black-on-black violence. Blacks would have cared about all those dead blacks and taken necessary measures. BLM, on the other hand, compels non-blacks to invest their treasury, talents, and hearts in black problems. The unstated implication is that blacks simply cannot deal with their own problems because blacks don’t much care about other blacks and/or lack the will and means to solve their own problems.
But openly stating the obvious would be ‘racist’, and so the BLM hysteria was all about the evils of blacks being killed by white ‘systemic racism’. The end result was to urge white people to care more about blacks, i.e. as blacks don’t care about fellow blacks, maybe whites and non-blacks should fill the vacuum, but with the pretense that the problem is ‘white racism’ because noticing black internecine violence and black unconcern for fellow blacks would be ‘unacceptable’ and ‘racist’.
And so, BLM placed caring-about-blacks at the front-burner of white priorities… except it did no good(and did much harm) because of the powerful taboos surrounding race. If you suffer from a problem that cannot be self-corrected and therefore go to see a doctor, the treatment could be worse than the disease if proper diagnosis simply isn’t allowed. With BLM, blacks outsourced their problems to whites but blamed it on whites than on themselves. It’d be like someone messing up his own car and then going to a mechanic for help but then blaming the mechanic for the car’s troubles.
Because the Jewish-controlled media have routinely fixated on the relatively rare cases of white-on-black violence(often in reaction to black aggression) while mostly ignoring black-on-black and black-on-nonblack violence, much of the world formed the impression that white policemen constitute the main source of violent deaths in the black community even though the primary reason for higher murder rates in the black community has been black-on-black violence.

Anyway, BLM couldn’t have grown so big without white involvement built on white conceits. Even so-called white ‘Liberals’, who stake their self-worth on ‘anti-racism’, can’t help feeling that nothing is possible without their commitment and input. Blacks just can’t fix their own problems; therefore, caring, intelligent, and well-educated whites must bolster, support, guide, or lead the movement-of-the-hour. Indeed, Negrolatry is essentially a white thing. Black jiveass self-regard alone doesn’t make for Negrolatry; it requires the fawning, gushing, and even delirious immersion of whites in stuff like Black Girl Magic, washing stinky Negro feet, and erecting monuments to fat black women, i.e. black self-esteem is incumbent on white caring.

There’s an element of submission-and-humiliation ritual in this but also a kind of condescension: “We progressive and liberal white people are so conscientious and full of compassion for these unattractive, troublesome, intellectually childlike, and economically challenged blacks. To boost black self-esteem, we caring whites are obligated to exaggerate their achievements and potential.” It’s like a special ed teacher heaping praise on retarded kids with Downs Syndrome, calling everything ‘wonderful’ and ‘brilliant’. Thus, Negroes are both the gods and the pets of whites. Whites are awed by black athletic, musical, oratory, & sexual prowess and worship blacks as the super-race, but whites also feel pity for black backwardness in all other areas and go out of their way to aid in black self-esteem.
So-called white ‘liberals’ and ‘progressives’ pride themselves on being ‘radical’, ‘different’, ‘subversive’, or ‘ahead of the curve’ in some way, making them feel glibly superior to ‘conventional wisdom’ as they go about pretending that some fat black woman is ‘beautiful’, a third-rate scientist like Neil deGrasse Tyson is OMG-brilliant, or the fashionable Negro Thinker of the Day, be he Ta-Nehisi Coates or Ibrahim X. Kendi is a freaking gEnIuS. Or, pretending that some guy in women’s sports is really a ‘woman’, if only as a status marker of being ‘more evolved’.

So, whether it’s the race-ist(or racialist) whites of the dissident right or the globalist whites of Con Inc., Liberal Centrism, or Progressive Left, there is either a blatant or implicit notion that whites are different, special, or more advanced in some way. Even white self-loathing is a way of saying, “We whites are so advanced in our ethics that we’ve transcended atavistic tribalism in favor of higher consciousness.”

And then, there are statistical racialists like Charles Murray. Instead of blurting out in an uncouth(but candid) manner, “We whites are special as a race”, they go about amassing copious data on ‘human achievement’ to arrive at the foregone conclusion, purportedly without any original intent to do so, LOL, that whites are the most awesome and super-special race there ever was, though pound-for-pound, they lose out to the Jews, the implication being that whites must suck up to Jews as the ultimate master race.
Further to the Right are figures like Jared Taylor who harbor no inhibition in blurting out that whites are indeed special & different and therefore have every right to maintain their own worlds separate from the troublesome darkies and the smart-but-robotic-and-unoriginal yellows.

But looking at today’s ideological and political landscape, there’s hardly any evidence of white specialness. All the values and virtues extolled in admiration and defense of the West, implicitly meaning the white-made-world, are hardly discernible among whites. Consider principles such as free speech, defense of liberty, rule of law, individualism, true conscience based on facts & critical thought, aka independence of mind, rejection of mindless dogma, and defiance against tyranny, none of which is possible without dignity and courage.
The so-called white ‘liberals’ and ‘progressives’ have shown themselves to be abject tools of power, a bunch of commissars with the mentality of the East German Stasi. Having outsourced all their thinking to the institutions, they turned into a bunch of NPC’s of the famous meme. Ideology is dead among so-called ‘liberals’ and ‘progressives’ who are far more likely to be animated by the idolatry of certain groups, namely Jews, blacks, and homosexuals. The Democratic Party is the quasi-official oligarchic party funded by super-rich Zionists and served by institutions run by Jewish supremacists and their cuck goy dogs.

As for the GOP, far from serving as the countervailing force against the Democratic Party, its big dream is to supplant the rival party as the favored tool of the globalist Jewish supremacist oligarchs. In other words, the GOP, instead of assembling a coalition of groups and interests at odds with the interests of Jewish supremacist oligarchs and globalist corporations, hopes to win over those very oligarchs by demonstrating an even greater servility to Zion.
So, if the Democrats are Jewish Supremacist, the Republicans aren’t anti-Jewish Supremacist but willing to be even more pro-Jewish Supremacist to win over the Jews as the ideal overlords of the GOP.
Perhaps, it’s part of GOP’s political DNA as the Republicans were, for a long spell, regarded as the party of wealthy rock-ribbed upper-crust reactionaries and Big Business(at odds with Big Labor, the underclass, and etc. that were more likely to be represented by the Democrats). But it’s also because Jews, who control the gods(what is deemed holy and unholy), have profoundly transformed the canonical themes of Americanism and Western values, with Holocaustianity having supplanted Christianity as the holiest of the holy and with ‘antisemitism’ constituting the absolute worst ‘sin’.

Given the current state of affairs, whites are mostly ‘wheaks’(or weak whites), rank hypocrites, servile dogs, numbnut toadies, insipid idiots, craven cowards, braindead commissars, venal opportunists, and second-rate turds. White Americans, who once contrasted their free spiritedness and individualism with the robotic nature of the Japanese, the servile demeanor of Mexicans, and the theocratic mindset of Muslims, are now hardly better than the rest of the world, or even worse. Any notion of white uniqueness now rings hollow.

As for those whites who insist that the Western advantage has nothing to do with race and everything to do with ideas and culture, they sound just as bogus because whites who make up the great majority of the West are no longer exemplars of the so-called Western Values.
2020 was a banner year as demonstration of the myth of the white/Western specialness given that so many whites collectively lost their minds over issue after issue, sheepishly or rabidly conforming to whatever craze, panic, or hysteria handed down from above. Where was the dignity of the individual, sense of skepticism, spirit of defiance, and power of critical thinking? Instead, most whites were lemmings or cattle with herd mentality.
Not that nonwhites were any better, though they certainly weren’t worse. There was plenty of (what came to be known as)Mass Formation Psychosis to go around on all five continents, though it was the White West that was most rabid about Covid hysterics while the Yellow East was the most mindlessly obedient.

In the West, a particularly sorry sight was that the people who prided themselves as the most secular, rational, educated, and intellectual consistently turned out to be the biggest suckers of a series of frauds, be they political(Trump as Putin’s puppet), medical(Covid’s gonna kill us all unless you get 100 boosters), racial(innocent blacks are being genocided by KKKops), biological(that male beating the females in women’s sports is a ‘woman’), cultural(“love is love”, or sodomy is just as valid as real sex), international(the unprovoked Russian invasion of eastern Ukraine), and etc.
Perhaps the pride of status and the prestige of influence got the best of them. As their side controls all the elite institutions, perhaps they were so sure that such an impressive array of experts, scholars, intellectuals, and opinion makers couldn’t possibly be wrong. The anointed Dr. Fauci. Or, given the ideology of ‘empowerment’ where power trumps principles, they’ve all turned ‘gangster’ and don’t care which means are employed AS LONG AS their side keeps the power and controls the world.

But, if anyone hoped that the Western Right offered a meaningful alternative, he would have been sorely disappointed, especially following Donald Trump’s recapture of the Oval Office that supposedly signaled the end of ‘wokeness’ and the new dawn of liberty, dignity, and decency. Instead, the result has been just another form of hypocrisy and collusion with the forces of corruption. Less emphasis on DEI but only to facilitate the Zionist agenda of suppression of voices critical of Jewish supremacism, Israel First-ism, and US government’s servility to Netanyahu & his tribal brethren in the US. And just look at the rank and file that make up the GOP: Mealy-mouthed cowards, flunkies, and toadies, a party of total supplication to Zion in the dream that rich, smart, and powerful Jews will shower them with cash and prizes.

And some of the biggest names in alternative ‘conservative’ or ‘right-leaning’ media, like Tim Pool(the Fool) simply want to have it both ways, which is to mouth off gripes generally unheard in ‘mainstream media’ but nevertheless to gain access to officials and to gain/keep advertisers. As such, even though they’ve been at pains to complain about the increasing censorship under the Democrats, ‘liberals’, ‘progressives’, and ‘woke’ types, they’ve either ignored the equally egregious(and in some cases worse) abuses by the Trump administration or tried to spin them as the fulfillment of MAGA patriotism.

In the end, pockets of meaning are to be found not by trusting the Right or the Left but in seeking out those voices that have a sense of independence and integrity for the truth regardless of one’s ideological leanings and party affiliations, like when Glenn Greenwald lambasted the ‘Liberals’ for trashing the liberal principles of free speech. And even though his detractors said he turned ‘right’, he was just as quick to call out Trump’s mangling of free speech(critical of Zionism) as a favor to his Jewish donors. Unlike so many ‘liberals’ who knew that the Hunter Biden laptop was NOT Russian ‘disinformation’ but pretended to for partisan sake, Greenwald called it for what it was, leading to the breakup with online news site The Intercept.

Video Link

Everyone in politics is part of a team, but if one forsakes his personal independence/integrity merely to be a team player, he’s a cog, not cognitive. Besides, it should be obvious to all that the Official Team doesn’t necessarily represent the values of the said ideology, just like the Catholic Church was never the end-all when it came to the meaning of Jesus’ teachings. Institutions play for power, and as such, there’s necessary compromise but also corruption that invariably leads to betrayal.
Indeed, one wonders if the main function of both political parties is to lend the other side a convenient excuse or plausible denial as to why it failed in its agenda. Perhaps, the Republicans don’t really want a conservative agenda even as they attract conservative voters. With Democrats blocking their supposed agenda, the Republicans always have an excuse as to why they couldn’t deliver, and vice versa. Do Democratic politicians really want ‘socialism’? They make the noises but likely with welcome relief that the Republicans will derail anything ‘radical’ that arises from their side. This way, both sides can have the cake and eat it too. Pump up its ideology with the readymade excuse that the OTHER side stood in the way. Some may argue that this makes for a Moderate Center to dominate US politics, but it’s more like the Extreme Center, with the dominant forces in the Middle of both the Democrats and Republicans supporting the extreme ultra-tribal Jewish supremacist globalism that dominates the US. It’s the middle or the center that is most extreme in its support of what many people call ‘genocide’ in Gaza while the supposed ‘extreme’, ‘marginal’, or ‘fringe’ elements on the left and right denounce the horror. Notice that the biggest warmongers are found in the center of both the Democrats and Republicans, whereas a ‘fringe’ or ‘extreme’ figure like Ron Paul called for a more modest role for the US in the world. The current state of Extreme Centrism is a danger to both the US and EU.

At any rate, one facet of the (mostly rightist)white argument against mass immigration(of mostly nonwhites) has gone out the window in light of developments surrounding the Gaza Horror(often called ‘Gaza Genocide’ or ‘Gaza Holocaust’). In the face of this evil, whites, especially craven cuckservatives and Boomer Conservatives(and even Liberals), have shown the least amount of sense, decency, principles, and values. The claim that the West needs white people to maintain the Western Principles of free speech, liberty, skepticism, open-mindedness, universal human rights, personal conscience, and political courage has been exposed to be a fraud. White people, by and large, have shown themselves to be cowardly, submissive, conformist, repressive, opportunistic, and quasi-theocratic(in their worship of the Awesome Jew).

The white elites in the Democratic Party said little or nothing about the horrors unfolding in Gaza(and the Zionist destabilization of the entire region by aiding ISIS in Syria and beating the war drums against Iran, one that the US will have to bear the brunt of). As for whites in the GOP(aka the ‘white party’), they’ve shown themselves to be castrated, wussy, servile, venal, and murderous(if only to appease Jewish Power). The main animating spirit among Republicans is Jew Envy, i.e. Jews are the golden goose, the super-elites, superior whites, and the rightful master race, not only the biggest victors but the most sacred victims(based on the cult of Forever Holocaust). Jews are the Cash Cow and the Holy Cow. As such, the main(and possibly the only) opportunity for white success and survival is to suck up to Jewish Power, appease it at every turn(even if it means aiding and abetting mass murder, genocide, and more unjust wars based on Zionist lies), and to gain some more shekels & pats on their white-dog heads. It’s also a vile and sleazy way to project and transfer the ‘sins’ of ‘antisemitism’ onto the Other, the Arabs/Muslims.

As the Jewish Narrative would have it, ‘antisemitism’ has mostly been the ‘irrational’ & ‘rabid/virulent’ fear and loathing of the Christian(and then ‘racist’) White West in regards to the Jew as spiritual Christ-killers and/or an alien race with origins in Levant. Holocaust or Shoah, according to this narrative, was the ultimate and even inevitable culmination of the sickness inherent in the White West animated by hypocritical Christian purity spirals and then racial science that emerged in the 19th Century.
In having accepted this Jewish-driven Narrative, whites have been burdened with the greatest ‘sin’, that of ‘antisemitism’. Sure, some whites are more guilty than others. Germans are the most guilty, but other Europeans are guilty of either Collaboration or lack of resistance. White Americans are partly guilty too for having dragged their heels into confronting Germany prior to the Pearl Harbor attack. Besides, according to Jews, white American history of black slavery(and Jim Crow) is analogous to European hostility and violence toward Jews. As Jews control the academia/media and the ‘gods’, they could render anything as a sacred cow or a cursed scapegoat, and in order to get revenge on whites and to control them, the white race has been scapegoated for just about everything; it was also a useful ploy in forming a Jewish-Diversity alliance whereby Jews-blaming-whites-for-antisemitism and nonwhites-blaming-whites-for-racism became the core constituency of Democratic and ‘progressive’ politics.

As for wimpy and wussy Conservatives, their fear of Jews(and the labels of ‘antisemitism’ and ‘racism’) prevented them from calling out the actual political mechanism behind this anti-white defamation and crusade. The ONLY hope nursed by Republicans and Conservatives was to find some way to win over the Jews. For George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, it was following the Neocon blueprint for Wars for Israel. When that project went south, it was sucking up to Jewish supremacist globalists at every turn in all their agendas: Anti-Russian ‘new cold war’, harping about Iran as the ‘main sponsor of terrorism’, licking Bibi Netanyahu’s anus every time he visited DC, and pleading with Jews that they should favor White Conservatives who are more likely to be reliable(meaning mindless and obedient) supporters of Israel than White Liberals and Diversity Folks are. In other words, no criticism of Jewish Power, no pride and dignity on the part of White Conservatives. Just doglike mewling to the Jewish Master that their side is more likely to be UNCONDITIONALLY supportive of whatever Israel does, even if it is genocide, support for ISIS & Al Qaeda terrorists, and more wars for Jewish Supremacist Hegemony.

One thing for sure, by unconditionally supporting Jews & Israel, the White Conservative hope is to dump the ‘sin’ of ‘antisemitism’ on the Arab/Muslim/Iranian world. Supposedly, Western whites & Christians are now totally in atonement mode and doing their best to fully cure themselves of the ‘oldest hatred’, whereas THOSE MOOSLIM SAVAGES are the new ‘Anti-Semites’ and New Nazis, against whom the much reformed whites are aiding the noble and beleaguered Jews. (Never mind that the Arab/Muslim world is deeply divided, with the bulk of it only talking the talk when it comes to Palestinians while walking the walk of collaborating with the US as the #1 puppet of Zion.)

Now, where are the values of Western liberty, independence, and morality in such attitudes and outlooks? Where is the spirit of 1776? Where are the principles of the Enlightenment? Where are rationality, skepticism, and the determination to speak truth to power?
Instead, great many White Conservative, especially among Boomers, are of the Oriental Despotic mindset, except that, instead of bowing down before the Great Mongol Khan, Chinese Emperor(as the Son of Heaven), or Japanese Shogun, it’s at the feet of the Great Awesome Super Jews as the god-emperor tribesmen. Just one look at the cuck-maggot face of Mike Johnson and one word from his mealy-mouth are enough to make one nauseous. Physiognomy is real in that one.

In contrast, some of the key essence of Western Values have been best expressed by nonwhites since Oct 7, or the Gaza Uprising. They’ve shown courage, they’ve stood on principles(despite the prospect of career apocalypse), they’ve spoken truth to power, they’ve named the great evil of our age, Zionism which is now genocidal Jewish supremacism. They’ve called on the ruling elites to listen to the people and open up their hearts to the victims in Gaza(instead of pretending that Jews are Forever Victims who need to be saved from ‘New Hitlers’ that now even include starving children in Gaza).

For the longest time, White Democrats and ‘progressives’, at the behest of Jews, have been pushing for censorship and managed to silence countless voices on social platforms, especially 2016. But, when pro-Palestinian sentiments exploded on the Western Progressive side(against the wishes of Jewish Power that cultivated ‘wokeness’ to contain ‘leftism’ within the controlled framework of ‘climate change’, GloboHomo, Negrolatry, and White Demonism), Jews figured on easing the suppression of right-wing speech in the hope that the Right will take on the ‘woke’ types gone rogue and off-the-reservation, like Greta Thunberg, once a useful idiot in Jewish-Wall-Street-Soros promoted Climate Hysteria but now an independent voice calling out Jewish evils in Gaza. So, give the anti-‘woke’ Right greater leeway in social platforms, and have it duke it out with the generally pro-Palestinian Left.

But, this may have been a miscalculation as the kinds of rightism that were suppressed hardly harbored pro-Zionist sentiments, i.e. they may hate ‘wokeness’ but they hate Jewish Supremacism more than anything.
While Establishment Conservatives(or Con Inc.) have been downright pitiful in their doglike obsequiousness to Zion, the dissident/independent Right has long been at the game of calling out Jewish Power. Basically, we have Establishment Liberals and especially Establishment Conservatives sucking up to Israel Firsters while true leftists/progressives and alternative rightist/conservative voices are calling out the total perversion that has become Zionism.

In the current landscape, for all the litany of arguments against non-white immigrants as poor prospects of upholding the great and noble values of Western Civilization, in reality it’s almost as if whites, in their doglike servitude to Jews and in total absence of agency & conscience, have outsourced Western values to the ‘browns’ who’ve shown the spirit of freedom, justice, courage, dignity, and human rights in calling out the evils of Jewish Supremacism. Compare Kristi Noem the puppy-killing wench and Dumb Blondie Pam Bondi with this young woman.

Video Link

Kristi Noem, like virtually all white cuck politicians of both parties, observed Memorial Day by visiting Israel with an offer of UNCONDITIONAL support of whatever Jews do. It’s almost as if Jews are god and whites are their faithful servants. There is nothing like thought, rationality, or independence of mind. Just blind faith, craven opportunism, and stupid obedience.
And, there goes the idea that Conservatives care about free speech and America First. Some might say people like Noem and Mike Huckabee are merely expressing their religious convictions, but where in the New Testament does it say Christians must worship Jews, aid & abet their massacres, and look upon goyim(such as Palestinians and other Arabs/Muslims hated by Jews) as subhumans deserving to be smitten? It’s all the more embarrassing given that Jews have constituted by far the most anti-white and anti-Christian force in the West for as long as anyone can remember.

In the post-World-War-II period, Jews(especially in the US) gained not only great power but unprecedented prestige as a wise and tragic people, the kind with the depth of knowledge, experience, and insight to revolutionize and repurpose the true meaning of Western Civilization, as well as the true principles of the American Experiment as a Proposition Nation committed to universal human rights, freedom of conscience/speech, equal justice, and anti-supremacism. It was hoped, surely a people who suffered the Holocaust would understand the pain of others and would, based on their own experience and contemplation, teach and remind the West of its failings and hypocrisies, in the manner of Gandhi who said of Western Civilization that it’s a good idea. With wise and intelligent Jewish elites at the helm, the dream was that the West would finally practice what it preached.
As things turned out, Jewish Power proved to be just as bad or even worse as the hypocritical imperialist-supremacists of old. All said and done, Jews merely exploited their Holocaust victim status to psycho-politically blackmail the West into supporting every Zionist abuse and browbeat into silence anyone who notices Jewish Power and its perversities. Indeed, there were warning signs when the Jews, while making much noise about the Holocaust and ‘racism'(mostly against blacks), were practicing a kind of Jim Crowitz in Israel/Palestine and forging alliances with Apartheid South Africa.

But the true face of Jewish Power bared itself with the end of the Cold War, with just about every policy, domestic and foreign, being based on “Is it good for Jews?” with total disregard for the interests and feelings of other groups.
Jews, once most closely associated with free speech, are now the main force for censorship. Thus, the Jewish conceit of fulfilling the mission of Western Civilization has been exposed as fraudulent. Jewishness is now mostly about demanding that White Cucks in the West do the bidding of World Jewry to sanction any country, terrorize any part of the world, and wage any war so that more power and wealth will be concentrated in Jewish hands. There are plenty of Jews who oppose this Jewish supremacist evil, but they’re mostly voices in the wilderness, helpless to change the course of history as delivered by both parties in total obeisance to Zion.

 Video Link

In the commencement video above, following the speech by the brown woman, the MIT College President Sally Kornbluth insists on sticking to protocols and the rules of the graduation ceremony — no politicking — , and I would be inclined to agree as nonpolitical events shouldn’t be politicized. In a Perfect World, Kornbluth the Zionist makes good sense. But since when has the Jewish-run academia and media played by any rules? Would Kornbluth have made the same remark if a black college student spouted off about BLM and white ‘racism’ in 2020? When controversial guests were shouted down and intimidated on college campuses, did college presidents and deans speak out or condemn such behavior? How many students were punished or expelled for physically threatening Charles Murray at the Middlebury Campus? If colleges should be politically impartial, why were college students offered milk & cookies and copious therapy sessions upon Donald Trump’s win in 2016? When have college presidents and deans condemned expressions of black rage? And did they similarly censure protests against South African Apartheid in the 1980s? Why didn’t colleges resist the witch-hunt against college administrators in the aftermath of the Gaza Uprising, soon followed by the Gaza Apocalypse and protests against it? The very Liberals, especially Jewish ones, who’ve been pontificating endlessly about the dark days of McCarthyism were either silent or utterly ineffectual against government demands that speech and expression be curtailed on campuses lest they offend the tender sensitivities of Jewish supremacist Zionist students. When have colleges ever demanded that voices of professors or students be shut down lest they offend white or Christian students?
And where were all these Conservative Politicians when Jews led the way in spreading anti-white hatred in media & academia since at least the 1960s? Why didn’t they ever call out the Jews or demand that anti-white hatred be condemned? White Conservatives, who’d done nothing for white students against the Jewish-led assault, were suddenly so outraged by ‘antisemitism’ on campus, even though the protests included many conscientious Jewish students and weren’t directed at Jews per se but at Zionism’s monstrous cancer into a form of JudeoNazism.

Besides, politicizing EVERYTHING has been the feature of the modern Jewish-led academia. There was a time when Archie’s comics were just fun. But college-educated commissars felt a need to politicize it with the globo-homo message. It’s oft-been noticed that TV ads & commercials blatantly promote race-mixing, especially ACOWW(or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs), GloboHomo, anti-white-male messaging, and the like. The Fashion Industry, in order to be more ‘inclusive’, recruited fatsos, freaks, and uglies over the years. Historical monuments, even non-Confederate ones, have been desecrated or removed because they might ‘offend’ some group, especially blacks of course. Hollywood Franchises have been saturated with ‘woke’ stuff that has nothing to do with the stories or themes.

All such developments are the product of the academia that promoted the politicization of everything. Even things that have nothing to do with homosexuality are wrapped in the ‘gay rainbow’ banner. And speaking of following the rule of law, when have people like Kornbluth given a damn? Hasn’t she heard of Jewish Lawfare? When billionaire Jewish oligarchs are using their muscle to intimidate colleges in violation of the spirit and even the rules of academic freedom, it seems the brown woman’s graduation speech was hardly the biggest offense, unless you’re a white cuck eager to win favors from Jewish Power by mewling about the rise of ‘antisemitism’, implying that doglike toadies like yourself would always stand by Jews no matter what they do and therefore should be favored by Zion.

So, next time the likes of Ann Coulter whines about how nonwhite immigration will undermine Western Values, that stupid white-bitch should look in the mirror along the rest of her ilk whose craven bullshit line and hope is still, “Look, you super-smart and super-rich Jews are totally awesome, and we whites want to be your dogs, whereas those browns are ‘ANTI-SEMITIC’, so please make us your favorite pets because we will roll over & fetch and surrender our agency in total devotion to you Jews as the rightful master race.”

Maybe whites failed to notice, but they’re now less representative of the Western spirit & values than the brown people with the power of courage and conscience are. In a true democracy, the most important thing is to notice WHO has the power and to honestly criticize that power, thereby preventing its tyranny. The Liberal West wouldn’t be liberal or western without the honesty to notice and the courage to criticize. The biggest power in the West is Jewish, now in supremacist mode. Yet, white people have not only failed to call out this power but pathetically and pitifully submitted to it like servile dogs.
Meanwhile, some of the most honest and courageous voices on the true nature of power in the West have been ‘brown’. In doing so, they are acting more in the spirit of Western values. Whites with any integrity should be shamed by this and rethink their position vis-a-vis Jewish Power, but for any such white person, there are likely two or three whose conclusion is, “Western Civilization is all about worshiping and serving Jews as the Chosen-Master Race, and therefore Western Civilization must be saved by deporting all those browns who refuse to bow down at the feet of Jews like we whites do.” The Jordan Peterson Way. Just pathetic.

 Video Link

Thursday, May 22, 2025

The Dirty Canard About White People Opposing Mass Immigration Because They Don't Want to be Around 'Brown' People

 

It’s an oft-heard complaint, even a canard, about white people in general and white conservatives in particular. The immigration issue is framed in terms of white dislike for other races. It’s misleading, even among most white right-wing types. While it’s true that some whites do harbor disdainful, contemptuous, hostile, and even hateful views in regards to nonwhite groups, sometimes grounded in facts(especially black criminality) and sometimes grounded in ignorance(of different peoples & cultures), the main issue regarding mass immigration isn’t about race/ethnicity but territoriality.
Now, it’s true that some individuals have a more distrusting, suspicious, and/or pugnacious personality. Among right-wing types, such personality traits tend to be directed against the Other, the outsider groups. Among left-wing types, such personality traits tend to be directed against ‘wrongthink’, i.e. leftists are more tolerant of other racial/ethnic groups, less tolerant of ideological differences.

Still, most white conservatives and right-wing types don’t have a particular dislike for most groups. They don’t mind dealing with other races and ethnic groups. For example, a white conservative may travel to a nonwhite country or do business abroad. In doing so, he has little or no problem in dealing with ‘brown’(meaning non-white) peoples. He realizes there’s good and bad in all societies and among all peoples. He may get along just fine with Mexicans, Peruvians, Hindus, Chinese, Arabs, and Polynesians. In other words, he has nothing like a ‘phobia’ about being around ‘brown’ people. He may also find much to admire in the histories and achievements of other peoples.

So, if he has no problem rubbing shoulders with nonwhites, what is the real issue surrounding mass immigration? It’s about territoriality. Whites, especially of conservative, rightist, or nationalist bent, have no problem being around ‘brown’ people. They just don’t want their own traditional white/European or white-established-and-developed lands taken over by nonwhites.
It’d be like a Japanese businessman-traveler who’s been all around the world. He got along just fine in Pakistan, India, Saudi Arabia, Burma, Peru, Brazil, Russia, France, and etc., and he has no problem associating or doing business with non-Japanese peoples. He isn’t hostile to non-Japanese, but suppose he’s opposed to the idea of non-Japanese peoples arriving en masse and fundamentally altering the deeply rooted demographic character of Japan.
That wouldn’t make him ‘xenophobic’, meaning knee-jerk hostility toward foreigners, let alone ‘Japanese supremacist’. If anything, in believing that Japanese have a territorial-cultural right to their own country, he believes other peoples have similar rights over their own territories. So, even a Japanese who isn’t averse to mingling with non-Japanese people(and indeed has mingled with non-Japanese all over the world in business and travel) can oppose mass immigration as a threat to the ethnic and cultural integrity of Japan.

Jared Taylor says he grew up in Japan and socialized with many of them. He also traveled around the world and communicated with all sorts of people on a friendly basis. So, he has no problem being around ‘brown’ people. What he has a problem with is the prospect of his white or white-dominant country being overtaken by waves and waves of nonwhites who, good or bad, will fundamentally transform the character of the country that he cherishes.

Notice that virtually no white conservative or white rightist is opposed to travel and business. They aren’t opposed to whites traveling to nonwhite countries nor to nonwhites(or ‘browns’) traveling to white countries. No problem in whites visiting the Great Wall of China or the Taj Mahal. Or checking things out in Mecca or Istanbul. And they have no problem with non-white tourists visiting NY and taking pictures of the Statue of Liberty. Or going on a trip to Niagara Falls or Grand Canyon. Or having fun at Disneyland in California or Florida.
When such white conservative types travel abroad, they get along just fine with the locals. They don’t fear being around ‘brown’ people. And when such white conservative types encounter nonwhites as guests(businessmen, foreign students, visiting scientists, or tourists) in their midst, they are kind and welcoming.
So, the stuff about whites not wanting to be around ‘brown’ people is a canard. Tons of white conservatives annually visit Mexico and Latin America to see the sights and have no problem mingling with the ‘beaners’, Gomezers, and Tacoans. What they have a problem with is tons of ‘browns’ mass-migrating to white or white-majority countries and changing the very character of the long prevailing demographic and cultural norms.

It’s like a patriotic Hungarian has no ill will toward non-Europeans. If anything, such a person probably wishes the best for all peoples of all nations. And he would get along just fine with ‘brown’ people if he were to travel to non-European countries. But he would oppose tons of nonwhites barging into Hungary and turning it into Hungarstan or Hungambia.

Same goes for the Jews. In their diaspora, Jews have learned to co-exist with lots of different peoples. So, plenty of Jews have no problem dealing with goyim. Still, they insist on Jewish-Only immigration to Israel, not because they’re averse to dealing with goyim but because, on the basis of territoriality as the sound basis or foundation of any real nationhood, they know that a Jewish nation-state is impossible were Jews to be replaced by Jews via waves of mass immigration. Tragically however, Israel was founded by waves of Jewish immigrants replacing the native Palestinians. Worse, instead of acknowledging the Palestinian tragedy and trying to make amends towards some kind of compromise, Jews have gone from the national to the imperial mode and now seek Greater Israel, a kind of Naziesque form of Zionism.

In a way, accusing white conservatives/patriots of being hostile to nonwhites per se is like accusing Palestinians of being ‘anti-Semitic’. In either case, white or Palestinian, the objection to mass immigration is really about territoriality, not ethnicity. Palestinians would have zero problem with Jews if Jews hadn’t taken their land and continue to occupy the few remaining Palestinian territories. On an individual basis, a Palestinian could be good friends with a Jew, could do business with Jews around the world, and so on. Jewishness per se was never the problem for the Palestinians. The problem was the Zionist violation of Palestinian national territoriality.
Likewise, the Sino-Japanese hostility of the 20th Century wasn’t about nationality or ethnicity. While all groups harbor negative and funny stereotypes about other groups, most Chinese would have been happy to associate with, do business with, or socialize with the Japanese. The problem was, once again, territoriality. Japanese didn’t come to China merely to do business, see the sights, or teach & learn about cultures but to invade, colonize, and take over. Thus, Chinese antipathy wasn’t about ‘not wanting to be around Japanese people’ but not wanting their lands taken over by a foreign power.

And consider the Vietnamese. Given the horrible war, one would think most Vietnamese would hate the Americans. But plenty of American travelers say the Vietnamese have no problem getting along with Americans in terms of business, travel, and/or cultural exchange. What they hated in the past was American militarism, imperialism, and occupation of the southern half of Vietnam.

Unfortunately, because whiteness has been defamed and demonized, white people, even conservatives and rightists, are loath to oppose mass immigration on racial or ethnic grounds. They dare not say, “Europe, the US, Canada, and Australia are white or white-made countries, and we have the historical duty and ancestral pedigree to keep them that way.”
Because it’s deemed intolerable to defend or justify anything on the basis of ‘evil’ and ‘innately racist’ whiteness, white conservatives and rightists tend to cook up excuses and rationales premised on ‘values’ and ‘ideas’ to oppose mass immigration.
One of the worst abusers has been Ann Coulter whose ADIOS, AMERICA is a compendium of all the cultural, moral, and/or spiritual failings of nonwhite immigrants. The rhetorical result of such cartoonish caricatures of every immigrant group is hysterical and deranged. Sure, every group comes with its own baggage of issues, some more than others, but were white groups any different in the past? The drunken Papist Irish, the clannish criminal Italians, the radical anarchist Jews, the nasty & vicious Scotch, the Dumb Polacks, and so on. And all those religious nutters of various denominations. And speaking of criminality, who can beat the Negroes who, by the way, were forcibly brought to the New World by none other than whites.
Anyone can play the Ann Coulter game in reverse. A book can detail all the virtues and contributions of immigrant groups while pointing to all the vices and failings of the native white(and black) groups. Surely, the Arab Muslim community is a hell of a lot more productive than black American neighborhoods in Detroit or hillbilly towns in West Virginia.

Given the taboo against the (white) racial argument against mass immigration, white conservative and rightist types have opted for something far worse: Impugning the character, morality, culture, and values of entire populations, e.g. Ann Coulter’s characterization of Hindus as rat-worshipers because she once watched a Globe-Trekker travelogue that portrayed a peculiar community with a reverence for rats, which is NOT the national norm in India. True, India has tons of problems, but let’s not pretend an average Hindu is praying to rats(or that most Arabs have four wives or that most Mexicans are drug-dealing gangbangers).

Using Coulter’s own logic, the problem can be solved through a massive campaign of high-pressure assimilation. If she won’t mention race and instead raise objections based on morals and values, there is a solution as people can be ‘civilized’ or acculturated. Non-Americans can be taught the American way. Indeed, many Anglo-Americans long ago felt about Eastern and Southern European immigrants the way Coulter does about non-white immigrants. In time, all those groups became assimilated into Americanism and became Good Americans. Also true of Japanese-Americans, despite the unpleasant experience with the ‘internment’.
Even accepting Coulter’s premise, the problems of immigration can be solved by a determined effort to turn newcomers into Good Americans who understand ‘Western values’ and American norms(such as cheering for trannies in women’s sports and celebrating sodomy as the closest thing to godliness).
So, if all these nonwhite immigrants learned to be Good Americans, would that be okay with Coulter and her ilk? Following their logic, they would have to say yes because the essence of their argument is about the ‘bad’ values and ‘backward’ ways of these newcomers.
Indeed, there are ‘conservatives’ of libertarian leaning who make just this argument, i.e. it doesn’t matter what happens to the racial makeup of America(and the West in general) as long as the newcomers adopt and practice ‘Western’ norms.

But I suspect Coulter and her ilk would still oppose mass immigration of nonwhites EVEN IF most newcomers became Good Americans and contributed to society economically, scientifically, culturally, intellectually, and so on. So, what’s the real issue? Of course, it’s about race. Race matters because it’s the true foundation of any real nation.
Do a mind-experiment. Japanese are known to be an orderly, intelligent, and conscientious people. So, if ten million Japanese were to immigrate to Ireland, there’s a good chance that most of them will be nice people: Kind neighbors, good students, hard workers, and polite citizens. But even if every Japanese in Ireland committed no crimes and acted decently, Ireland would no longer be Ireland. It’d be something like New Japan. For Ireland to remain Irish, it has to be filled with Irish people.
Of course, naysayers invoke the Ink-over-blood argument, i.e. Irishness is a matter of legality, not ancestry and ethnicity. Thus, someone who is legally made ‘Irish’ through paperwork is just as Irish as someone who’s Irish by blood going back countless generations. A stamp and signature on a piece of document based on globalist conceits processed in less than an hour carries equal weight with the depth of history, heritage, and bloodlines going back many centuries, even millennia. Thus, a newly arrived Nigerian who attains citizenship is just as ‘Irish’ as a real Irishman.
If anything, according to globalist logic, he is even MORE IRISH than white Irishmen because Diversity is sacrosanct, and therefore, his contribution to the diversification of Ireland makes him even more precious than native Irishmen.
One would have to be retarded to fall for Jewish Logic such as this, but it seems plenty of whites are indeed retarded, not least because, even as they accept these loopy rules for themselves, they adamantly insist that Israel must only be for people who are Jewish by blood.

Contrary to the dominant discourse, the race-ist argument against mass immigration is the most sensible, most balanced, and most justified. Now, what is meant by ‘race-ism’? If -ism means belief, the proper definition of race + ism is the belief in the reality of race(as the subspecies product of evolution) and racial differences, as well as the need for racial consciousness.
The reason why people are so allergic to its official coinage as ‘racism’ is because the -ism in this case has been made synonymous with supremacism. The result is the misperception that one’s belief in racial reality must automatically mean that one is racially supremacist, someone who believes that his own race is the best at everything(and/or deserves to lord over all other races as inferior). Ironically, the group most responsible for promoting such misunderstanding is the Jews whose very identity, Judaism, is predicated on ethno-spiritual supremacism that looks upon non-Jews, or goyim, as inferior cattle whose cosmic purpose on Earth is to serve the Jews as the Chosen Master Race.

Anyway, a proper race-ist appreciation among white people simply means they know what they are, care about what they are, and want to preserve what they are on the very land from which the race originated or conquered, claimed, and settled as their own.
Now, there should be nothing controversial about whites(or Europeans) defending the lands of their origin, in which they were always the indigenous and native populations. It’s more problematic in lands that the Europeans conquered, especially the Americas and Australia(and New Zealand), perhaps Siberia as well. (Same logic goes for Anatolia, in which Turks constitute the majority population but were relative late-comers who conquered and displaced, raped, and/or absorbed existing populations.)
But if conqueror-settler whites have a moral-historical obligation to nonwhites, the latter should be limited to the peoples that the whites conquered/replaced or brought over by force, like the blacks who were traded for slave labor. For example, American Indians have legitimate grievances as they were replaced by whites in North America. And blacks, ‘crazy’ as they be, also have a claim because their ancestors were brought over by force and made to pick cotton.
But all other nonwhites around the world have no moral claim on white-conquered/settled lands. Asian Indians, contra American Indians and the Aborigines, have no claim on North America and Australia. When India was under British Imperialism, Asian-Indians had a legitimate claim against the English. But not outside India.

The ONLY reason why whites, not only in the US-Canada-Australia but even in Europe itself, feel obligated to welcome tons of nonwhite immigrants, migrants, and/or refugees is because of the Jewish mind-trick that Diversity is an essential component for all societies(except in Israel where greater Jewish homogeneity is the ideal) and that whites who reject massive inflows of nonwhites are somehow ‘racist’(meaning racial supremacist or racially hateful), xenophobic(or irrationally fearful of foreigners), or just plain uncool.
Granted, there is a patronizing, even paternalistic, element in the Diversity argument: Nonwhites must come to the West to work for whites in lowly jobs that whites will not do, usually the perception associated with browns from Latin America. Or, the view is patronizing toward certain segments of the white population: Too many whites are fat, lazy, and stupid, and therefore, the white elites need to import higher IQ and more industrious & diligent types from abroad as fellow globalist elites and intermarriage prospects, like when white elites marry rich Hindus, Chinese, or African immigrants with Ph.ds, a variation of the WASP fetish for marrying wealthy, accomplished, high IQ Jews.
White elite types would rather hang with the smart set from around the world than be burdened with association with hoi polloi of whites, most of whom are mediocre and lacking in fancy credentials. This is why HBD ideology is ultimately useless for the white race. Given its obsession with intelligence, intelligence, and intelligence, the logical end-result is smart whites preferring genius Jews and bright nonwhites over the masses of ‘dumb’ whites.

A proper race-ist worldview isn’t supremacist, hostile, or antagonistic toward other peoples, ethnic groups, or races. Rather, it simply says “We constitute a race and culture, we have a duty to our racial brethren, and we have a deep bond to this land as ours.” Any group or people have much to gain with such a worldview. Germans for Germany, Japanese for Japan, Italians for Italy, Nigerians for Nigeria, Greeks for Greece, and etc. Jews certainly believe in Jewry as one big extended family.

Such a humanist race-ist worldview need not impugn the character, values, and customs of other peoples in order to argue for self-preservation on the basis of blood and soil. It’s precisely because Ann Coulter isn’t allowed to have a pro-white race-ist view that she feels compelled to oppose non-white immigration by caricaturing the supposed moral failings of other groups, e.g. Mexicans shouldn’t come here because they’re lazy druglords, Laotians shouldn’t come here because they’re jungle bumpkin gangbangers, Koreans shouldn’t come here because a nutter among them shot up Virginia Tech, and etc. True, every group comes with problems(and some serious nutters), but the fact is most immigrants are not criminals or thugs, and their children do assimilate rather fast.

In contrast, a race-ist argument against mass-immigration is far simpler, cleaner, and fairer. It doesn’t need to smear or defame other peoples as moral cretins or cultural retards. If anything, a race-ist can be full of respect and admiration for other races, ethnicities, and groups on the basis of “Just as my race, culture, and land deserves respect and preservation, so do other races, cultures, and lands.” No need to bash the Hindus. Instead, insist that, just as Hindus have a right to defend their own people, land, and culture, white folks in their own nations have the same rights(and indeed responsibilities).

Besides, the ethno-national argument is the most organic and sensible. Those who define the West in terms of Christianity, ideology, or a set of abstract principles will soon find themselves in trouble. Take Hungary. There are Hungarians who take Christianity seriously. Some may attend church now and then but aren’t particularly religious. Some are secular and atheist. Some are downright hostile to religion or favor paganism. But they are all Ethno-Hungarians. A secular Hungarian by blood is no less Hungarian than a Christian Hungarian. But if one places Christianity at the center of Hungarian identity, one ends up like that Catholic clown E. Michael Jones who insists on Catholicism as the core of Western Identity. Using Jones’ logic, black African Catholics have more claim on Italy and Ireland than white neo-pagans who seek to reconnect with their indigenous heritage.

And then you have the libertarian types who oppose mass non-white immigration on the basis that nonwhites tend to be less invested in individualism, free speech, and personal liberty than white people generally are. But if such principles or values are what defines a nation, the most logical policy would be to welcome those nonwhites who share such values while rejecting those whites, leftist or rightist, who do not. Suppose 60% of whites are for free speech while the remaining 40% reject it(on grounds that it might foster ‘hate speech’), whereas 40% of nonwhites are for free speech while 60% reject it. Then, the ideal solution would be to unite the 60% of whites who are for free speech with the 40% of nonwhites who are also for free speech. Of course, for most of Western History the great majority on both the right and left did NOT support free speech as it later came to be defined in the Sixties and Seventies.

If principles should be the main guide for demographic policy, then whites should reject Jews who are currently the group most hostile to the free flow of ideas and information. And yet, right-leaning libertarian types who oppose Muslim immigration(on grounds that Muslims don’t share in the secular values of liberty and free speech) dare not call for keeping Jews out on the very same grounds, especially given that the current Jewish Identity Politics is premised on Zionist imperialism, ethnic supremacism, genocidal urges, warmongering, and mass censorship of voices deemed ‘Anti-Semitic’ for the crime of NOTICING the true nature of power and control in the current West.

The West must reclaim or properly define the meaning of race-ism. And it is on that basis that the West must be defended. As for nonwhites who insist on moving to white countries, they are the ones who need to answer for their demographic and/or racial preferences. Why do ‘brown’ people not want to be around ‘brown’ people? Why do they prefer to be with white people? The very thing that white people are accused of is what animates so much of the nonwhite world. Non-whites don’t want to live with their own kind. Many can’t even stand their own kind. They want to move to white countries to live with whites because they believe whites are better than their own kind. But they can’t admit it; they cannot acknowledge their own self-loathing, and so, they project onto whites their low regard for their own kind, even for themselves.

Whites must call this out. Whites must mock and ridicule this desire among nonwhites to reject their own kind and permanently resettle in white or white-made countries. Nonwhites who prefer whites to their own kind have no right blaming whites for preferring their own kind. Indeed, why shouldn’t whites prefer whites over nonwhites when nonwhites themselves prefer whites over their own kind?

And if nonwhites have a problem with white ‘racism’, why not just stay in their own ‘brown’ countries and remain safely distanced from those nasty whites? And of course, it must be asked of Jews why they are so utterly hostile toward whites, indeed so hard at work engineering the total destruction of the West. If Jews feel this way about whites, why did they emigrate to white countries? Who’s keeping them from emigrating to nonwhite countries, especially black African ones given that the Jewish-run media and academia have idolized and even sacralized blacks as most magical and wonderful. If so, Jews in the West should pack up all their wealth and move to Nigeria, Tanzania, and Bongoland. Live in Wakanda and be dazzled by Black Girl Magic. That way, Jews will never have to worry about those sicko whites infected with ‘antisemitism’ and ‘crypto-Nazi’ urges.

Now, there is an outlier when it comes to migration. Certain nonwhites have a compelling argument for migrating to the West that did so much to ruin their countries. Consider Libya, once the jewel of Africa. But the West, at the behest of the Jews, wrecked the whole place. The West also wrecked Syria by arming and funding the Jihadis, again at the behest of Jews, and then by occupying the most fertile and oil-rich areas. When an entire country is destroyed and torn apart by war instigated by the West, it’s rather rich for Westerners to whine about ‘mass migration’. Granted, the vast majority of people in the West had no say in the wars in Libya and Syria, both cooked up by the white elites who grovel at the feet of Zion. Still, given that Western countries pride themselves as ‘democratic’, the people as voters must bear some blame.

A compelling argument against mass migration must address the issue of Western Imperialism, more precisely the global hegemony of Jewish Power controls the West. As long as this empire invades, subverts, sanctions, impoverishes, undermines, and/or intervenes in other societies, the negatively affected nonwhites in certain countries do have a compelling argument to move to the West.
Consider: If I stay on my side of the fence and mind my own business, I have no obligation to my neighbor. But if I lob burning coals into my neighbor’s house and burn it down, I’m responsible to him and his property.

The current West doesn’t exist as a collective of sovereign countries but as an Empire dominated by World Jewry. As such, the West intrudes into the affairs of other countries, sometimes turning them into rubble, all to appease Jewish Supremacy. As long as white people in the West support their governments that reject national sovereignty in favor of Jewish supremacist domination, their fates will be embroiled in Western destabilization of the world, leading to mass migration of refugees to the West. Jews very well understand this dynamic, except that, instead of steering those refugees into Israel, they steer them to Western countries. Zionists will destroy Syria & Libya and then set up ‘welcome refugee’ organizations in Europe.

Granted, MOST immigrants aren’t refugees, nor from countries wrecked by the West(like Syria and Libya). Still, white people had less of a moral case when desperate people from Syria barged into Europe. Or when Jewish-driven US sanctions and subversion led to the impoverishment of Venezuela that set off waves of migrants northward.
So, before nonwhites are slated for REMIGRATION back to their homelands, white people must make sure that their own governments choose ‘republic, not an empire’. As long as the West is in empire mode, it reserves the right to invade and intervene in other countries; but then, if the West can invade or intervene elsewhere, why shouldn’t the people in those places come to the West for compensation?