Fragility of MAGA Idealism, Terminological Perversion of 'Anti-Semitism', and the Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Iranian Fatalism on the Nuclear Debate

 Possible exodus of idealists from MAGA, Panic over 'Antisemitism' as cover for Jewish Supremacy, Iran's foolish defensive posture against Israel as rogue state.

MAGA rots. In any movement, there’s elitism and populism, and then there is a sliver of idealism. Idealists are always in the minority but lend the luster of integrity and principles. Elitists mainly care about position, status, and privilege. Populists mainly crave red-meat, a sense that the Great Man is watching out for them and making them FEEL PROUD. The elitists love to manipulate, the populists are ripe for manipulation, like when the Tea Party movement was usurped by Con Inc.

MAGA elitism was represented by Mike Pompeo who got on the Trump Train to manipulate patriotism into more gung-ho imperialism and hegemony. Trump populism is well-represented by truck drivers with MAGA hats. They feel eviscerated by globalism and look to Trump to restore their sense of national pride and purpose. The danger of populism arises from its unthinking passions that are easily swayed.

MAGA idealism, on the other hand, hoped that Trump would at least try to deliver on draining the deep state swamp, calling out the Neocons, end the unnecessary wars(that only serve Israel’s megalomania), defend free speech(against DEI and other repressive forces), and pursue a more sustainable long-term economic policy centered on US industry.

It was that bit of idealism that gave the MAGA movement a bit of shine, e.g. Tucker Carlson atoning for his Neocon past and urging Trump to fulfill his mission as a Peace President. And the expectation that Trump would restore free speech under attack by the elites, ‘woke’ mobs, and the Jewish Lobby. Also, that the US would focus on domestic problems in a sober way. It is why even Democrats like Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr. joined the Trump team. It’s why Trump decisively won in 2024 because the Democratic Party became almost synonymous with corruption, abuse of power, mendacity, incompetence, war-mongering, and horrors in Gaza. In other words, Democrats lost its idealists.

So, even though the populists voted for Trump with rather primitive red-meat appetites(or their FEELINGS) and the elitists supported Trump for hegemonic reasons(or what’s good for Israel as too many Democrats were in the streets demonstrating against Israel), MAGA had a bright spot in having its limited but real cheering section of idealists or principle-driven figures.

In a symbiotic way, populism and elitism can go hand in hand. Though opposites, populism can be steered toward elitist ends. For example, Trump has decided to restore army base names like ‘Fort Bragg’ to the delight of many US soldiers, many of whom are politically or socially conservative. It sounds like a win for the populists against the elites who pushed the ‘woke’ agenda. But it also means more working class and lower-middle class being drawn into the military. Whose wars will they fight? If the US gets into a hot war with Iran, they will do the killing and dying for Zionist supremacist elitists.

In contrast, the MAGA idealists stand on principle and reject both elitist deceptions and populist gullibility. Without them, MAGA just turns into a political perversion of the elites using Trump as the ‘man of the people’ to sucker the childlike masses.

Trump has already betrayed the MAGA base but hasn’t totally lost the idealists. The venal elitists(led by Jews) want Trump to suppress free speech and persecute dissidents in service to Zion.
The sucker MAGA populists have been persuaded into believing that such are patriotic actions against foreign elements. It’s the idealists who’ve been calling FOUL on the sham.

With this attack on Iran, it could well be that Trump will lose the idealists, and MAGA will turn into just another Tea Party circus. Not that Trump cares much at this point. In the end, it’s all about his big fat ego. If the Jewish oligarchs praise him as the ‘New Churchill’, his vanity couldn’t resist the flattery and will just kick the idealists into the gutter. And the populist masses will cheer on Trump as the Big Tough American who showed the world who’s boss. America First will go from meaning ‘We should care about America first’ to ‘America is first in the world, so bow down before it.’

MAGA will be just another Cuck Soup.

Video Link

As for Iran’s dilemma, it has once again demonstrated a timeless truth of man and nature: The side only doing defense will lose to the side doing offense and defense.
The nature of the mismatch doesn’t matter. A black bear is many times bigger and stronger than a badger, but if it only defends itself against the badger, the latter will eventually win. If a big strong boxer confronts a smaller weaker boxer but only plays defense, he will eventually lose.
Indeed, this was true of the dynamics that led to the Jewish takeover of the US(and the West). By cleverly manipulating the Holocaust Narrative, Jews made ‘antisemitism’ the ultimate taboo. Thus, Jews could attack, offend, insult, impugn, and defame other groups, but other groups couldn’t do the same against the Jews. At best, goy groups could only defend themselves against Jewish accusations but couldn’t likewise go off on the Jews. Jews could emphasize the Italian-American role in organized crime, but Italian-Americans were hesitant to mention the extent of the Jewish involvement. Jews could speak of the ‘Arab Mind’ or ‘Russian Mind’ in critical and even negative ways, but speaking in a similar vein about the ‘Jewish Mind’ would have been cause for outrage and moral panic. Zionists could invoke ‘from the river to the sea’ in their dream of Greater Zion, but when Palestinians spoke the same words in the spirit of liberation, it was deemed a call for ‘genocide’.

Jews keep asking, “Does Israel have the right to exist?” while ignoring the obvious counter-question, “Does Palestine have the right to exist?” If so, its right to exist was erased by the Zionist project.
Of course the obvious answer to “Does Israel have a right to exist?” would be, “Yes, but not on Palestine”, just like if someone were to ask, “Does Germany have a right to exist?”, the proper response would be, “Yes, but not on Poland, or on Russia for that matter.”
If Bob takes over Bill’s home, it’d be silly for Bob to ask, “Do I have a right to a home?” when his ‘home’ was established by confiscating Bob’s property and evicting Bob.

Besides, if the West loves Jews so much, why not hand over some of its vast territories for a price(and Jews sure got lots of money, what with Blackrock buying up entire properties). So much of Canada, Australia, and the US sit vacant, truly ‘a land without a people for a people without a land.’ Been to Montana lately? Especially since the history of ‘antisemitism’ is usually associated with the West(where the Holocaust happened), a just outcome would have been for the West to hand some of its land to the Jews as a homeland.
Instead, whites, in all their venality and foulness, chose to direct Jewish ire at the Middle East. That way, especially by supporting the Jews against the brown Arabs, whites could cleanse their own image of ‘antisemitism’ and posture as redemptive supporters of the Holocaust Folks against the hateful Arab/Muslims savages and hordes as the New Nazis.

The Zionist rationale never made sense. Israel was deemed necessary because Jews needed a safe homeland from specter of ‘antisemitism’. Then, why build a nation where Jews were bound to be surrounded by unfriendly or downright hostile countries? Also, if the Jews had to leave the West, where the bulk of them resided, to found a safe homeland elsewhere, doesn’t it imply that the West is the most hostile and dangerous to the Jews? If so, who is the West to be accusing other countries of ‘antisemitism’? Just think: Jews must leave the West to have security in their homeland in Israel. Doesn’t it mean the West is the most terrible place for the Jews? But logic wilts under Jewish pressure. It’s like Schrodinger’s Cat: The West is at once the most ‘Anti-Semitic’ and the most Philo-Semitic.

The West prides itself as the most supportive & protective of the Jews and often berates the Arab/Muslim countries as the most ‘Anti-Semitic’. Following such logic, shouldn’t the Jewish homeland exist in the West(Europe or the US or Canada or Australia), where whites/Christians are so full of love and admiration for Jews, than in the Middle East, the supposed hotbed of Arab barbarism, Islamic intolerance, and general cutthroat murderousness? “We whites care so much about the Jews that we’re gonna help them set up house in the most dangerous place on Earth.” That sounds crazy.

Of course, Jewish Zionists insisted on that part of the world for historical, cultural, and spiritual reasons, but if the priority of Zionism was ‘safe homeland for the Jews’, it didn’t jibe with the Western Narrative that the Arab/Muslim world is dark and barbarous, a land of tyrants and terrorists.
As for the Christards into Biblical rationales as to why Jews are the Chosen with eternal right to the Holy Land, haven’t they figured it out that Jews turned the place into Sodom and Gomorrah and a safe haven for pedophiles and gangsters. A GloboHomo Mecca?

Of course, the reality was always far more complex than was propagated by the Jewish-controlled media. Just like there was no single united white/Christian world against Jewry, there was no single united Arab/Muslim world against Israel or Jews. After all, it wasn’t the Jews who defeated Nazi Germany but an extensive alliance of white countries from the US to UK to Russia.
Likewise, especially given the Western Imperial legacy in the Middle East, many Arab/Muslim countries came into being as satellites of the West. And even independent countries like Egypt eventually came under the US fold through threats and bribery. Indeed, the bulk of the Middle East and North Africa comprises cucks and puppets of the Jewish-controlled US as lone superpower than independent-sovereign countries, among which Iran is nearly alone, especially with the total destruction of Libya and Syria.

 Video Link

The only real difference between White/Christian cucks and Arab/Muslim cucks is that the former talks the talk and also walks the walk, whereas the latter talks the talk but doesn’t walk the walk. In other words, Whites/Christians preach total obeisance to Zion and practice it, whereas Arabs/Muslims preach resistance to Zion but practice cuckery to the Zionist-controlled US, which makes them indirect puppets of Jews. Lindsey Graham says, “I will suck Netanyahu’s cock” and then sucks it, whereas Saudis and Turks say, “I won’t suck Netanyahu’s cock” but then do just that behind closed curtains. It’s all a charade, the Arabs and Turks pretending to be with the Palestinians but doing the bidding of Zion. Such snakes. It’s like the US and Israel using ISIS, Al Qaeda, and other Jihadi elements to destabilize countries they don’t like, all the while pretending to be in the Middle East to fight those terrorists. The vileness is now out in the open, but the powerful flout the rules of decency like a bunch of gangsters. The world has become Jewish Gangster Paradise.

 Video Link

The current state of the world isn’t surprising given that terminology has been corrupted with the hysteria over ‘antisemitism’, now often used to smear Arabs and Muslims who decry Zionist madness. It’s all very ironic since Arabs are Semites, more so than European Jewry who rule Israel. Calling Arabs ‘anti-Semitic’ because of their tensions with Jews/Israel is like calling non-German Europeans ‘anti-white’ for condemning and/or opposing German aggression in World War II.
It’d be like accusing the native blacks of Liberia of ‘racism’ for resisting the actions of repatriated American blacks who enslaved them. (Liberia was like Black Zionism, with members of black diaspora returning to Africa as their true homeland. The problem was the black returnees treated the black natives like whites treated blacks in the South. And later, the Semitic returnees, the Jews, treated the Semitic natives, the Palestinians and other Arabs, like total shit.)
Now, it’d be crazy to let Germans hog the title of ‘whiteness’, but Jews get to hog the title of ‘Semite’ in the West. So, when Jews smite countless Palestinian Semites, that isn’t deemed ‘anti-Semitic’; however, if Arabs call out on the Zionists, that’s ‘anti-Semitic’.

The problem runs deeper with how the term ‘antisemitism’ is employed. The very notion should be rejected by humanity because it says being Anti-Jewish is unconditionally, universally, and eternally evil and wicked. In a sane and normal world, there’s a reason to be pro-something and anti-something. It’s all conditional to the time and place. While it’d be stupid to be kneejerk anti-German, putting down even Beethoven and beer-and-pretzels, one could understand why some people would be anti-German at a certain time and place. What Pole living under German rule during WWII wasn’t anti-German? Likewise, American anti-Japanese rage was understandable following the attack on Pearl Harbor. And surely many Vietnamese had cause to be anti-American during the war.
Therefore, we accept the reasons for various peoples being anti-something under certain conditions. If Jews had only been nice to the Palestinians, anti-Jewish feelings among Palestinians would seem odd, even offensive. But how can Palestinians not be anti-Jewish given the Nakba and the Occupation and the mass slaughters?
Besides, Jews were never slouches when it came to fomenting fear and hatred against certain groups. For example, the Jewish-run US fanned anti-Serb sentiments all over the Balkans on the basis of atrocities committed by the Serbs(though, to be sure, all sides did likewise). Jews believe that, given the time and place, anti-Serbian attitudes were most justified, especially among Albanians in Kosovo.

In contrast, the way ‘antisemitism’ has been defined, the idea is that any hostility whatsoever toward Jews, Jewish Power, or Zionism is evil, wicked, horrible, intolerable, and etc. If Germans had concocted the term ‘anti-Aryanism’ and convinced the world that it’s the worst sin, then the Poles and then Russians would have been denounced for daring to fight back against the Germans. Why, their violent resistance would be ‘anti-Aryan’. Thankfully, such idiocy never took root, which is why the Warsaw Uprising was deemed heroic despite its violent acts and ‘terrorism’.

In contrast, the Gaza Uprising of 10/7 has been deemed a great crime against the Jews. Never mind what the Zionists have been doing to Gaza over the decades. The Palestinian uprising was denounced as evil because the conception of ‘antisemitism’ has instilled the West with the truism that Jews are always good and right, and therefore even the bad things they do is ‘good’, whereas even noble resistance against Jewish abuses is ‘evil’.

The narrative-dynamic is playing out again in Israel’s attack on Iran. It’s called ‘pre-emptive’ or a case of ‘Israel defending itself’. In contrast, Iran’s response is characterized, even condemned, as ‘offensive’.

But then, Israel’s flouting all international rules and possessing 200 nukes(many aimed at Iran) have been handled as No Problemo, whereas Iran’s enrichment for civilian purposes has been reason enough for the entire West to conspire against that country.
In order for this hypocritical lunacy to end, we must retire the term ‘antisemitism’, thoroughly corrupted and discredited by Jewish supremacism’s exploitation of it. The term is employed as insistence that Jews must be unconditionally praised and supported at all times and that any criticism of Jewish Power is ‘rabid and virulent’.

Honor is impossible among cucks.

With the horrors in Gaza, Jewish Power let the mask slip. Jewish groups that once said opposing Israel’s policies isn’t necessarily ‘Anti-Semitic’ are now saying Anti-Zionism is synonymous with Antisemitism. They’re saying this when Israel has been acting worse than at any time in its history, at least since the Nakba.

Now, a fundamental problem of Iran was its entire approach to Israel & the Empire of Judea was utterly misconceived. There are two kinds of powers/peoples in the world. Those that appreciate compromise and reciprocate in kind when the other party concedes on some matters. Thus, a sense of mutuality develops between the two parties.
But there’s another kind of power/people, one that is arrogant, megalomaniacal, contemptuous, and stingy. Such has to have everything its own say, or its way or the highway. It has quasi-monotheistic god-complex, i.e. “We are totally right all the time simply because we are superior.” It’s like the master is always right, even when he is objectively wrong, vis-a-vis the slave.

Such a power/people view compromise as weakness, mental and/or emotional. They never negotiate in good faith and view the process merely as a game through which to hoodwink and destroy the other party, like how con-men act in David Mamet’s films, pretty spirited depictions of the Jewish worldview.
But then, as gangsterism is despised by humanity, Jews usually project their own evil onto others, e.g. Israel, which acquired 200 to 300 nukes(by means more foul than fair) and aims the bulk of them at Iran, has the chutzpah to accuse Iran of being a nuclear threat, and to ALL HUMANITY than just to Israel, which, by the way, devised the Samson Option of blowing up Europe in a nuclear armageddon were Israel to fall.

In other words, Jewish Power usually acts in bad faith. It never accepts the good will of the other side as reason for mutual respect and compromise but merely sees it as the naïvete of idiots dumb enough to trust the Jews and their Western cuck dogs. Surely, Jews were laughing harder than Hillary Clinton when Gaddafi was sodomized with a bayonet and lynched to death. The fool had trusted the West, ROTFL.
Jewish Supremacist contempt oozed from every pore when Netanyahu and his gang demanded the Libyan Option for Iran. Imagine that. The entire world knows that Gaddafi was fooled and Libya was destroyed, but the vile Jew Netanyahu still has the temerity to invoke it as a viable plan. Jewish Power simply sees the world as dummies to fool and idiots to destroy. Come to think of it, some of the biggest Jewish holidays commemorate how the Jews tricked the enemies and led them to slaughter. How many religions have holidays like that?

Negotiation and compromise are good but ONLY WHEN two or more parties come to the table in good faith and genuine willingness for understanding. Diplomacy never works when one side merely bides time to deceive the other side. Consider how Russia was tricked by Minsk I and Minsk II while World Jewry played him like a fiddle. Putin ended up with egg on his face. Despite his many achievements, Putin lost a lot of time and energy in trying to come to some kind of understanding with the Jewish-run West, which is now decency-incapable.

It’s all the worse because corruption and treachery are infectious when they begin at the top: Fish rots from the head down. As Jews control the West, their cuck goy minions, the white dogs, feel obliged to go along, in the process turning into obscene cretins themselves.
Of course, their tender egos cannot accept the truth of their roles as amoral flunkies of Jewish gangsters, and so, they pretend to be outraged by the infamy-of-the-month(as chosen by Jews), such as the ‘unprovoked Russian aggression’.

The predilection is evident in Trump as well. Perhaps, he really wants to be known as a peace-maker and do business with every country in the world, but, when push comes to shove, Jewish Power is his master. Instead of admitting he’s a pussy-bitch of the Zionist oligarchs and was helpless to stop Netanyahu’s actions, he huffed-and-puffed like he’s the grand master of history or something. His tough talk at Iran — “we will destroy you unless you accept the Libyan option” — only shows his weakness in relation to the Jews.

Ironically, his attitude toward Iran is merely a variation of the Jewish attitude toward him: “Do what we want, or we will destroy you and your family.” Subconsciously, Trump and white dogs are triggered by Iran because it hasn’t caved to Jewish Power and taken it up the arse like all the Blanka Hundos have done. Iran is a reminder that some ‘brown’ people are a lot braver and have more real pride than Whites & Western Christians who are now mere minions to the Jews.
Blacks were shamed as ‘Uncle Toms’ in the past for sucking up to whites, and in time, blacks were more fearful of being called a ‘tom’ than a ‘nigger’. What is Tom Cotton but a White Tom to Zion?

Along with Russia and others, Iran thought some kind of compromise could be reached with the West. Perhaps, Iranians were thinking of the goy-ruled West of yesteryear, one that was half-gangster and half-gentleman, capable of treachery but also of compromise and give-and-take. That West is gone, and the New West is totally under the thumb of Jewish Gangsters who want it all.
As Michael Corleone understood in THE GODFATHER, Sollozzo’s truce offer was only a ruse, his long-term plan being the total destruction of the Corleone family. And as his father Vito Corleone understood, Barzini(the Soros-like figure) feigned his role as a neutral mediator while pulling the strings behind the scenes. So, even though the Corleones pretended to go along, they had a plot of their own.

In contrast, the Iranians have been hoping that the honorable gentleman side of the West would ultimately prevail over the gangster-side. Thus, Iran went back and forth from hardliners to more moderate figures in the belief that if the Iranian side made more concessions, the West would ultimately welcome it into the family of ‘civilized nations’. But that ‘gentleman’ side of the West is totally gone. Jewish culture never had an honor code, and whites can be honorable ONLY IF they are in control and possess the pride of agency and fair play. That good side of the West was often tenuous, more talk than walk, but it wasn’t entirely absent. Now, it’s totally gone as the Jews-in-charge want everything while the white cucks lack the requite power and pride that could make room for honor, dignity, and integrity. Instead, we just have White Dogs whose only mode of politics is “What can I do that will please by Jewish Master?”

In any deal-making, one must assess the psychology of the other side. Does it have a mindset capable of fair play and mutual compromise? With Jewish Power, that is NO. Does it have the pride of independence and agency? If not, no use negotiating with it.
Imagine any power trying to negotiate with India or Hong Kong when it was under British Imperial Rule. What would have been the point as the ‘leaders’ of India or Hong Kong were always looking over their shoulders at their British overlords. Likewise, the goy cuck West makes a lot of noise about the ‘rules-based order’, but its only rule is total obeisance to Zion. Iran thought it could negotiate with Trump’s administration as an independent entity, but how did it turn out? Israel hit Iran, and there was Trump the dog barking for his master.

All these years, Iran should have been on the moral offensive, making a case against Israel as a nation that acquired nuclear technology/materials illegally, built anywhere from 200 to 300 nuclear warheads, and targeted Iran(and who knows what other countries) with those weapons. Iran should have been incessant on the world stage with these accusations. Instead, it accepted Israel’s nuclear arsenal as a fait accompli.
Even though it had the moral advantage as a country that signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, allowed for inspections, and even had an official fatwa against nukes, it was forced to play moral defense against the truly roguish Israel.

Iran, by not making a case against Israel(a nation with nukes) even as Israel was making a case against Iran(a country with no nukes), allowed itself to be put in the dock: A case of the guilty charging and trying the innocent.
Imagine a man with many guns with lots of ammo accusing an unarmed man of posing a threat. Unless the latter makes a big stink about the former owning lots of guns(acquired illegally), the issue will go ignored while the main attention will focus on the accusation made by the former. The innocent party should never allow itself to be on the moral defensive.
By all rights, the negotiations should have been about why Israel should give up its nukes as no country in the region has any. Instead, it’s been about how Iran must make Israel feel safer even though Israel’s the one that thumbed its nose at international norms, acquired nukes illegally, built a massive arsenal, and threatens not only Iran but the West(with the Samson Option).

It’s like Jews making a mountain out of Iran’s molehill while stupid Iran went along with the pretense that Israel’s mountain is a molehill. Israel has lots of nukes, most of them targeted at Iran, but let’s ignore that mountain of evidence and instead focus on Iran’s molehill as somehow hiding some Doomsday Machine. It’s Heads-I-Win-Tails-You-Lose.

Perhaps, Iran thought that it was pointless to argue about Israel’s nukes since the West will simply ignore it. Also, given that Russia and China were seeking good relations with the West, they dared not fully back Iran lest they run afoul of Jewish Power. After all, plenty of innocent voices have gone unheard throughout history while evil forces commanded the megaphone.

But if the shoe were on the other foot, it would have been different. If the roles of Israel and Iran were reversed, with Iran having nukes locked on Israel but accusing Israel of being a global threat, Jews would not have taken it sitting down. By hook and by crook, loudly or softly, but incessantly, Jews would have made the case against Iran as the real culprit in the manner.
True, it’s far easier for Jews to mold the global narrative as they control most of Western Media(that heavily impacts non-Western media) and have even gone so far as to shut down outlets such as Russia TV and Press TV in the West, but one should never give into fatalism as it affects the very premise of one’s relation vis-a-vis others, especially those that are hostile.

It was Russia’s fatalism that had resigned itself to playing by Western rules, i.e. the Jewish-controlled West set the rules, made the demands, and lodged the complaints, and Russia either complied, remained muted, or offered timid defenses. From day one, Russia should never have accepted the Western template that was intrinsically biased against it in favor of Western elements, especially Jewish Power. Through all those years, Russia tried to accommodate Western pressures as best as possible or at least tried not to offend the West even as it rebuffed the demands, always speaking of Western countries as ‘our partners’ and ‘our friends’. Well, how did it turn out? Fatalist acceptance of the Other’s foundation consigns one to moral disadvantage. This is why Jews never accepted the foundations of Christianity. Had they done so, they would have had to meekly justify themselves to the superior-feeling Christians.

And that’s exactly the kind of trap Iran fell into. In international diplomacy, it resigned itself to a world where it was perfectly normal for Israel to reject the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, secretly develop nuclear weapons, target them at whomever, and make demands on Iran. Rogue Israel went on the moral offensive, and Iran adopted the defensive posture. It signed onto non-proliferation even though Israel hadn’t, built nukes, and targeted them at Iran. It opened itself to endless rounds of inspections while Israel’s nuclear sites never came under scrutiny. It pretended that the US and the West could be impartial mediators between tensions between itself and Israel even though all such organizations were gradually purged of men of any integrity and filled with cucks to Zion. Iran subjected itself to being patted down for guns, switchblades, brass knuckles, nunchakus, and clubs while Israel was let alone to carry a machine gun and several grenades.

This is rather odd because Iran has been resolute on other matters. It never caved on the narrative concerning the Palestinians and never abandoned its support in deference to the false narratives of the Jewish-controlled West.
Arguably, the West’s anti-Iranian stance might have been softened had Iran not been so intransigent in its geopolitics. But, Iran never compromised its integrity on such matters to appease the West, even if it meant sanctions, military threats, and sabotage. It stuck to its Islamic revolutionary principles.
Then, why did Iran deal with the nuclear issue so defensively, accepting the role of the party that had to answer for trespasses when, time and time again, it passed all inspections with flying colors and, furthermore, the party that had violated all the rules was none other than Israel?
Iran’s position on the nuclear issue should have taken a page out of its book on the Palestinian issue. Put Israel(and the West) on the moral defensive. Never stop making the case against Israel’s ill-gotten nuclear arsenal and its existential threat to Iran.

Russia and Iran, as well as any country in the crosshairs of the US-Israel complex or USrael, need to finally wake up and realize that good faith negotiations with the West are impossible AS LONG AS Jewish gangsters are in charge.
Granted, they might as well go through the motions of diplomacy, like the Corleones in relation to Sollozzo-Tataglia-Barzini and later Hyman Roth, just to bide time, but they should never ever believe anything good can come out of such deals as the Jewish Power is playing for total hegemony and supremacy.
In the West itself, did Jews give whites any quarter in their ethno-political struggle to come out on top? No, it wasn’t enough for Jews to be the new elites; they had to compel the white race to strip bare naked, get on all fours, stick its arse out, take the Jewish dong up its bung, and then say “We love it, we love it!”.

Jews want to do to the entire planet what they did to the white race that now worships the Jews like Winston Smith(of George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four”) learned to love Big Brother.
And, the problem isn’t isolated in an evil faction of the Jewish community but runs through the entirety of the Jewish Power Complex. After the Iraq War debacle, the supposed Liberal Jews, the dominant force in the community, could have purged the Neocon Jews from the institutions, but the very opposite happened. Neocons were promoted to be editors and writers for influential magazines. They were invited into the Democratic Party to merge with the Neolibs who proved to share in the same biases and hatreds.
If, following the Judeo-Russian War in Ukraine and the dastardly 6/13 attack on Iran, people still think they can negotiate with the Jewish-controlled West, they are beyond mental repair.

The Similarities between White Identity and Iranian Uranium, and the War on Both by Jewish Supremacism

 The Zionist War on Iranian Uranium is uncannily like the Jewish War on the Power of White Identity

What do Iranian Uranium and White Identity have in common? The two categories are interrelated in current geopolitics dominated by Jewish Power. One might say the Jewish War on whiteness not only predated but set the preconditions for the Jewish War on Iranian nuclear power. Without the Jewish subjugation of the white race(and its doglike servitude to and collaboration with Zion), would the US and the West in general be in this perpetual state of mini-Cold War with Iran?
Just like the Mongols amassed the means for world conquest only after securing rich and populous China as its political and economic base, Jewish Power’s current global dominance owes to having utterly tamed and enslaved the white race as its most obedient dog and reliable horse. Just like Mongols-minus-China would have only amounted to ragtag barbarian marauders, Jewish Power minus the US would be far more constricted, thereby far less effective in its global schemes.

There are striking similarities between the Jewish attitude toward White Identity and the Zionist attitude toward the Iranian nuclear program. Jewish monomania acts on the ethnocentric basis that Jews and only Jews are deserving of identity politics and nuclear weaponry(especially within the Jewish sphere of influence, to which the entire Middle East and North Africa belong because of the global Jewish commitment to Israel’s supremacy, though, to be sure, Jews sought to deny North Korea the nukes on grounds that other states nearer to Israel would likewise be emboldened to defy the commands of Zion). Indeed, many Jews seem to feel that the ONLY way Israel can survive is via hegemonic supremacy over the entire region, i.e. survival and supremacism are interchangeable from the Zionist perspective.

Given the Jewish war on whiteness, the logical white position would be an identification with and sympathy for peoples such as the Iranians and Palestinians. If Jews attack white identity and Iranian uranium, shouldn’t whites and Iranians join together against Jewish ethnocentrists who would deny whites their pride of identity and Iranians their means of defense(and survival)? When Israel aims its nuclear arsenal at Iran, an objective observer would conclude that the latter is most justified in having an nuclear option of its own. After all, if someone owns guns to do you harm, you should think of owning guns as well.

Ironically, white Americans who face the prospect of disarmament(of personal firearms), a policy led by the Jewish Lobby, are more likely than not to side with Zion’s attempt to render Iran utterly defenseless against Jewish Imperialism emanating from Tel Aviv(with the backing of Western metropoles dominated by Jews).
Given that no group other than the Jews has done more to seriously restrict or downright abolish the right to bear arms in the US, one might think whites would have connected the dots and figured out that the Jewish war on Iranian uranium is not unlike the Jewish war on white guns, which is, of course, just another expression of white identity as the two biggest reasons for gun ownership among whites is to resist tyrannical government(currently in the form described by some as Z.O.G., implying that Historical White America is ruled by a hostile tribe) and to fend off black criminality(on grounds that whites will lose out in the contest of muscles with the tougher Negro, thereby needing the gun as the last resort, which is unacceptable to Jewish Power that employs black muscle against whites in the way that the Tsarist government employed the Cossacks against its subjects; total and unconditional white surrender to Jewish brains and black brawn is the ideal arrangement in the current order). As Jews control the institutions, they want statist monopoly on firearms, with the white masses rendered disarmed and defenseless. It’s no different from Israel’s insistence that it be the only country in MENA(Middle East and North Africa) to possess nukes while Iran and others remain forever disarmed. Given the Jewish hostility toward whites and Iran, why are whites always sucking up to Jews?

White behavior is understandable given that Jewish Power has already accomplished with whiteness what it intends to do with the Iranian nuclear program. Whiteness has been totally and utterly discredited, deactivated, decommissioned, defused, and disarmed, and it explains why the white race cucks to Jews in the way that conquered and destroyed Iraq, Libya, and Syria now serve as whore-colonies of Zion.
Even though Jews haven’t yet succeeded in disarming White America, especially in the ‘Red States’, they’ve more or less rendered whiteness inert and impotent. Whites still own guns but not the pride of identity that would lead them to take up firearms against their anti-white tormentors and oppressors.
Whiteness is considered, no less by the majority of whites themselves, as toxic and dangerous radioactive material. In other words, whites mustn’t own or handle whiteness as an identity or interest, let alone an ideology. Instead, Jewish Power must take ownership of whiteness and do with it as it pleases. Under Jewish Control, whiteness is deemed as vile and obscene, an evil that must be denied to the white race as a source of political energy. It must be constantly excoriated and denounced. White people must be denied whiteness as a matter of pride and unity; instead, they must be made to reject and renounce every last vestige of whiteness as akin to the Original Sin.

In the Jewish Supremacist Mind, ethnic or racial identity is like nuclear material. It can provide spirit and pride(as the basis of power) to a community of people of shared ethnicity and/or race, not unlike how nuclear technology can be harnessed to provide energy to towns and cities.
Racial and/or ethnic identity can go further and can be weaponized in a us-versus-them manner against the Other, a constant feature of history where power was often delineated along lines of identity: ‘We Greeks versus the Persians’, ‘We Romans versus the Germanics’, ‘We Germans versus the Russians’.
Usually, a conquered people are denied the power of identity, thereby rendered to serve the dominant power, like when the Asian-Indians and the African subjects served the British Empire — instead of Indians serving Indian identity and interests, Indians serving God-and-Country centered in London as the capital of the world. Just as identity can be weaponized, so can nuclear power. If anything, nuclear power had first been weaponized before it was developed for civilian use.

For Jewish Power, it’s not enough that whiteness is denied weaponization into a source of pride and power for the white race. Jewish Power demands nothing less than the total denial of white identity to white people(except as a source of guilt and shame, which is like an anti-identity).
This is why Jews wage war not only on white supremacism but on white identity itself. Indeed, white identity is treated as virtually synonymous with white supremacism. “It’s Okay to be White” is no less grounds for alarm.

Jews talk as if any positive(or even neutral) sense of white identity can cancerously grow into white supremacism that may blow up the world. Such an extreme reaction might partly be the result of Holocaust Trauma, i.e. Jews are serving all of humanity against the resurgence of white supremacism that tyrannized the world for centuries.
More likely, however, Jews are trying to guard their own racial-ethnic supremacism by preventing the (re)emergence of white independence, or white autonomy & agency. In other words, Jews are less motivated by anti-supremacism(of any kind) than by a supremacism for the Tribe at the expense of humanity. It just so happens that nothing is more indispensable than White Cuckery for the perpetuation of Jewish Supremacist power.

The moment when whites, like Pat Buchanan on the eve of the Gulf War, express their own identity and expound on their own interests independent of those of Jews and Zion, it could be game over for the Empire of Judea. Just like the British Empire was effectively over in India when the native masses led by Gandhi declared an identity and interests independent of their imperialist masters, the Empire of Judea, or World Jewry, could be over as a global hegemon once whites throw off the Zionic yoke.
And the most potent way for such an outcome is for whites to once again embrace and extol their own identity and interests. This is threatening to Jewish Power, and therefore any sign of national pride, sovereignty, and independence among white populations in the West is decried as ‘far right’ or ‘extremism’.
But, what is so supremacist about the Hungarian desire to remain Hungarian in culture, heritage, and demographics? Do patriotic Hungarians want to conquer other countries? Do they want to enslave non-Hungarians? Do they want to set up death camps for Jews or anyone else? No, their rather modest and humble desire is for Hungary to remain Hungarian. Even such a moderate agenda is demeaned as ‘far right’. If any German politician wants an end to mass immigration in order to maintain the demographic integrity of Germany, he or she is defamed as ‘far right’ and ‘neo-Nazi’. (Because the Jewish-Zionist media vilified ‘white supremacism’ as the embodiment of Western Evil and because, ironically enough, the very vilified whites in the US & EU are diehard supporters of Israel, many Third World and leftist types tend to conflate white identity politics with Zionism, i.e. Zionism is a variant of ‘white supremacism’, implying that white identity politics will boost Jewish-Zionist supremacy, when, far more likely, the rise of autonomous white identity politics will defy, resist, and push back against Jewish Power. If most whites shared the politics of David Duke, the US support for genocidal Israel would dry up overnight and there would be no more clamoring for Wars for Israel.)

Do Jews in the media and think-tanks really believe White Supremacy or Neo-Nazism is just around the corner? Of course not. It’s all pretense, and they push the Big Lie in order to maintain white cuckery to Jewish supremacism. As it happens, Viktor Orban’s Hungary isn’t entirely free of Jewish influence. Even as it fends off the influence of George Soros, it rolls out the red carpet to Bibi Netanyahu the truly far right supremacist lunatic.
Current politics sure is surreal. If a people reject Jewish Supremacist Sorosian globalism, they get labeled as ‘far right’; but in order to soften the denunciation lest Jews go into total destruction-and-war mode, they must appease and pander to the truly far right Israel that is now essentially a JudeoNazi state. A nation like Hungary is falsely accused of being ‘far right’, but the only chance of salvaging its reputation is by utterly debasing itself by cucking to ultra-rightwing Israel. It’s like a law-abiding man being accused of criminality, with his only recourse against the accusation being a partnership with a real gangster. Jews don’t really believe that the resurgence of nationalism in Europe will lead to World War III or white supremacism. They really fear white people finally waking up and saying NO MORE to Jewish Supremacism and its constant demands, lunacies, and war-mongering.

 Video Link

Now, given the obvious parallels between Jewish War on Iranian Uranium and Jewish War on White Identity, one would think whites would have wised up by now and made common cause with the Iranians, but we see the very opposite across the political spectrum in the US. Even as more Americans have become aware of the darker aspects of Zionism, with the majority of Americans viewing Israel unfavorably, the fact remains that much of the population, especially white Americans, still see Iran as some kind of threat that must be neutralized, even destroyed even though Iran poses no threat to the US or the West. Zionists have harped endlessly that Iran poses an ‘existential’ threat to Israel, the greatest ally of the US of course, but this is rather odd considering Israel has hundreds of nukes aimed at Iran, which, by all US intelligence estimates, still hasn’t developed the Bomb. It’s like pretending that a man with a gun pointed at his head poses a threat to the man holding the gun.

Some argue that if Iran gets the Bomb, other countries in the region will get it also, and then things will spiral out of control, but the logic fails upon scrutiny. If all other Middle East countries will try to get the Bomb if one country has it, why doesn’t any country other than Israel have the Bomb in the region? Shouldn’t Israel’s possession of nukes be reason enough for them to acquire nukes as well? If all those countries still don’t have the Bomb decades after Israel got them, why would they suddenly feel a need to get the Bomb ONLY IF Iran gets it? If anything, even Iran, long targeted by Israel and the Zionist-controlled US, has yet to take the crucial steps necessary to build the Bomb. All these rationales of the Foreign Policy think-tanks sound nonsensical when we analyze the evidence.  The demands made by Israel are ludicrous, but then, it isn’t just Israel but all of World Jewry. “Israel vs Iran” makes it sound somewhat even, but Iran isn’t just up against a small Middle Eastern country but the entire Empire of Judea that stretches across five continents. Why is this empire in a state of hostility even with countries like Venezuela that pose no threat to Israel? Because they dare to independently build relations with countries such as Iran that the Jewish Supremacist Empire vehemently loathes. Jewish demands are especially outrageous given they’re directed at smaller powers. The biggest powers demanding that smaller powers render themselves weaker, indeed defenseless, to make for a more justice-and-rules-based order is like a super-rich person demanding that a poor person relinquish what little property he has to make things more even and fairer. When a big predator threatens a smaller animal, the only defense the latter has is its special weapons: venomous fangs of a snake, claws of a housecat, quills of a porcupine, spray of a skunk, shell of a turtle, horns of a deer, incisors of a rabbit, and etc. When faced with a bigger animal, the smaller and weaker animal’s only chance of survival is to threaten with its limited but potent weapons that could inflict serious harm even if the bigger animal were to ultimately prevail — would a predator be willing to lose its eye or limb over a meal? Thus, even though a bear will win an all-out battle with a badger, it prefers not to engage because the badger can do real harm. The Jewish-run US is the biggest animal, the apex predator, in the world. Countries like Iran rely on their limited but potent weaponry to fend off aggression, but the US, the aircraft carrier of the Empire of Judea, demands that Iran give up its weapons or abandon the capacity for developing more potent weapons. The demand is all the more outrageous in light of what the Jewish-run US has been doing to the Middle East and North Africa in the 21st century. If indeed American Power had been a force for peace and prosperity throughout the entire region for the equal welfare of Jews, Arabs, and Muslims alike, it’d be one thing. But the Jewish-run US has demonstrated over and over that it’s just a Beast of Zion. When confronted with a towering beast with all sorts of lethal weaponry, a country like Iran is supposed to be ‘reasonable’ and comply with the demands in the manner of Gaddafi, RIP. Never mind Hussein actually acceded to all the demands on WMD but was still targeted for destruction just the same. The US asking Iran to give up its defenses is like a pit bull telling a cat to be declawed. It’s like a leopard telling a baboon to lose its fangs. It’s like an eagle telling a snake to give up its venom. In nature, has any animal been spared by not using its special defenses against the aggressor? Did a grizzly bear spare a gopher for not biting back? Even animals proved to be smarter than Gaddafi who ended up with a knife up his anus while Hillary Clinton, the whore of Zion, cackled like a wicked witch.

The reason why White America supports the hostile Zionist policy on Iran is because it’s been totally ‘denuclearized’ in identity and pride. The current state of White America is what Iran would be IF it gave up all its nuclear technology, armament of missiles, and deterrence capabilities to appease Global Zion.
There was a time when White America possessed an identity on par with Iran’s autonomous nuclear technology. White Americans assessed their own value and worth as a race, people, and a collection of ethnicities. It was a source of unity and power, of values and principles. Whites then didn’t apologize for their whiteness, let alone deem their own identity as toxic, odious, or evil. And in times of duress and crises, white identity could also be weaponized. (Jews certainly had no problem with such identity politics when White America stood together to fight the ‘Japs’, thereby involving the US in the war against Germany as well.)

But somewhere down the line, Jewish Power decided to deny the pride and power of identity to White Americans and the white race in general. Even though World War II was mostly about white Germans versus white Russians, it was spun as a narrative about ‘white supremacist’ menace upon the entire world. Even though Jewish Power had been deeply involved in Europe and America’s various imperialist ventures and plunders, Jewish identity was characterized as one of victimhood at the hands of ‘white supremacists’ and ‘Anti-Semitic Christians’. As Nazism was made synonymous with ‘white supremacism’, the implication was that the only good whites were those who fought against ‘white supremacism’, especially to defend the Jews.

Initially, ‘good’ white pride was acceptable against ‘bad’ white pride, the kind embodied by the Nazi Germans. Apparently, white Americans and white British were the good whites who defeated the bad whites of Hitler’s Germany. But as Steven Spielberg’s movies(not least THE FABELMANS) suggest, there’s a latent inner-Nazi in every white person that’s trying to come out, like the creature hatching out of human abdomens in Ridley Scott’s ALIEN. After all, the very same whites who fought against Hitler would have fought for him had they been born in Germany and influenced by German education and media.
Therefore, the only foolproof way to neutralize the White Threat to Jewry was to deny the white race the power of identity, from which pride and agency derive. Given the horrors of World War II and the prolonged domination of the world by the White West, the connection between whiteness and white supremacism seemed convincing enough for many. But with the rise of Jewish Power, the devaluation of whiteness had less to do with preventing white supremacy than securing Jewish supremacism facilitated by total white submission and subordination to Jewish narratives and demands.

Some argue that Israel really controls the US while others argue that the US uses Israel as a proxy, but in fact Israel and the US are two sides of the same coin. Both belong to the Empire of Judea, with Jerusalem & Tel Aviv as the ‘spiritual’ centers of the empire and with New York & Washington D.C. as the financial, intellectual, and military centers. Thus, the two are joined at the hip. It’s like Ron Jeremy sucking his own dong. Rather than one using the other, they operate in tandem.

When the US was ruled by Anglo-Americans or the WASP elite, one could conceivably speak of a symbiotic than a ‘synonymous’ relationship between the US and Israel(and World Jewry in general), but that hasn’t been the case since the Neocon-Neolib takeover of the US(and all its vassals).
If there are indeed fissures and emerging conflicts between Israel and the US, it’s no longer about Jewish Power vs Anglo-American Power but about Jewish Supremacism vs Jewish Conscience(as younger Jews are appalled by what has become of Israel, Zionism, and Jewish supremacist attitudes that have led to so many wars and mayhem). For now, Jewish Supremacism has firm control of all the institutions while Jewish Conscience(and its goy allies) operate mostly at the grassroots level(but then seeds can grow into trees, which is why Jewish Power is hard at work to chop down pro-Palestinian saplings, especially as the effort to weed out the roots of Anti-Zionism has failed in the age of the internet and social networking).

 Video Link

Rather than the question of Israel-controls-US or US-controls-Israel, a more pertinent question addresses the myth of white/gentile power in the US. The ruse of white/gentile power is invaluable in maintaining the status quo of Jewish Supremacism, a very strange phenomenon in contrast to past imperialisms. Unlike most empires that proudly asserted who was on top and in command — the British over the British Empire, the French over the French Empire, the Japanese over the Japanese Empire, and etc. — , Jewish Imperialism or Supremacism is predicated on conceits of ‘human rights’, ‘liberal democracy’, and ‘social justice’(informed by tragic history, especially Auschwitz and Jim Crow as its two main symbols, which is very convenient for Jewish Power). Even as Jews prop up the cucked goyim and use them as puppets, they position themselves as the opposition to overweening white/goy power and privilege. Consider how George W. Bush was used for Zionist foreign policy but also made out to be a would-be Christian-Fascist dictator, against whom the decent Jewish minority was supposedly in opposition. Thus, goy puppets are made to do the bidding of Jews in two ways. They wage Wars for Israel, like the invasion of Iraq, but they also serve as the bogeyman of ‘white male privilege’ and ‘Christian fascism’, thereby allowing Jews to feign as underdog dissenters.

To an extent, the duplicitous nature of Jewish Supremacism is an extension of American Imperialism that was violently expansive but often justified with moralistic rhetoric, e.g. spreading Christianity to the heathens, though today, under Jewish Control, the primary theme is the promotion of homosexual agenda around the world. Trace things further back, and the passive/aggressive nature of the American Empire(and European empires as well) has its roots in Christianity, a religion of love-peace-forgiveness that was used to justify wars, conquests, and plunder(and even the slave trade, drug trade, and various genocides).
Look even further back, and the duality of Christian Civilization has its roots in Judaism, a religion of both profound humility and arrogance. The Judeans, a weak tribe pushed around by far greater powers, came around to conceiving their victimhood as the path to victory, i.e. they may be defeated in body but not in spirit as they’ve been chosen and favored by the one and only true God; and therefore, via patience and tenacity, they were destined to reign supreme over all others. Thus, if most tribes defined their worth in terms of military might and domination, Jews retained self-worth even in the face of defeat as, spiritually at least, they could not be beaten as long as God was on their side.

The rise of Christian Power took a page out of the Jewish playbook, and in time Christians were also masters of conflating victimhood with victory, especially through the canonical narratives of their martyred saints. But then, as the West began to outpace all others and overwhelm the entire world with its superiority in science, technology, wealth, and organization, the pride of victory came to trump the sanctity of victimhood, which came to be synonymous with the losers and suckers of the Rest(or non-West). This attitude even led to arrogance, a sense of inbred superiority over the colored peoples of the world.
European Jews were heavily invested in the imperialist ventures and profited handsomely from them, but they also felt alienated from the European Center that still, under the influence of the Church and then the secular race-ist outlook, regarded Jews, however successful and integral to the Western economies, as different, suspect, and even hostile. Thus, even as Jewish Power rose alongside white power in the centuries-long Triumph of the West, it felt as much a victim as a co-victor. They gained in power and wealth alongside the whites(indeed, more than the whites in some cases) but also felt estranged from the core racial/ethnic and spiritual/religious themes of the West.

Then, it’s hardly surprising that Jews have been running a subterfuge operation in their total ascendancy and domination in the 21st century. Despite their vast powers and supremacist arrogance, they prefer to hide behind the fronts or ‘buffers’ of goy figures who remain the official faces of Western Power. This way, if the West does come under accusations of unwarranted aggression, plunder, and corruption, the blame usually falls on the goyim. Take the movie VICE(about Dick Cheney) that would have us believe that the Neocon debacle was mostly the doing of unscrupulous gentiles, especially those ‘white males’. And even though Biden and Trump have done the bidding of Jews in suppressing free speech and intimidating dissenting voices, the blame falls on the figureheads, the puppets than on the puppet-masters. How surreal: Jews decrying the tyranny of Trump who is merely following the orders of Jews. You can’t make this stuff up.

As such, even though whites in the US and EU have been utterly defanged, castrated, neutered, and pootered, they still act like they got the power and get to make policy for the Middle East. But, white cuck-power in the West has as much agency and autonomy as Japanese and German ‘democratic’ power after World War II — for all the talk of their re-emergence as democracies premised on liberty and rights, Japan and Germany had outsourced their political power to the US. Likewise, for all the charade about whites in the West standing up for democracy and human rights rooted in American values and principles, these whites are like dogs whose barks, however loud and fierce, are always in service to their masters.
Today, when Germany or Japan puts on airs against Russia or China, is it really acting independently for its own national interest? No, it’s just doing the bidding of its master, the US. It’s a game of dog and master. The situation, however, is the same within the US itself. American Power isn’t about all Americans of various races, ethnicities, religions, ideologies, and backgrounds sharing and expressing power for national(or global) interests but about all these pathetic goy groups competing in a dog show to win the most good-doggy-points from the de facto ruling-master-class-race of the Jews.

In a way, current Iran is like the past bygone White America that retained its own sense of identity and destiny as the foundation of its unity. Back then, whites were proud of their race(that was also suspicious of Jews as a rival ethnicity), rooted in Christian Faith(that guarded against Judaism as a hostile religion), and in control of the narrative & iconography(that prioritized white strength as the health of the nation). However, piecemeal by piecemeal, Jewish Power disassembled and deactivated all those crucial assets of white pride and power. (Today, the mere idea of ‘white power’ sounds evil, like Sieg Heil or Heil Hitler.)

The Jewish admonishment against White Supremacism was understandable given the unpleasantries associated with any supremacism, but whites should have been more perceptive as to what was really at stake. Just when Jews were denouncing white supremacism, they were pressing on whites to support the Jewish supremacism over Palestine.
At any rate, Jews weren’t satisfied with the white renunciation of white supremacism, just like Zionists aren’t satisfied with Iran’s promise(in so many negotiations, past and present) not to expand their civilian nuclear technology to weapons-grade capability. As far as arch-Israel fanatics(who’re all over Western corridors of power) are concerned, Iran’s refusal to build the Bomb(with full inspection by the international community) isn’t enough. Iran must effectively abandon its nuclear technology. It must adopt the Libyan Plan as expounded recently by Bibi Netanyahu. We know what happened to Libya following Gaddafi’s abandonment of its WMD programs and stockpile. (Assad of Syria gave up all chemical weapons during the so-called ‘Syrian Civil War’ in which the Jihadi rebels were backed by the West and its vassals, and look what eventually happened to Syria. The government fell, and then the Israeli air force destroyed every last vestige of Syrian military hardware in Damascus.)

Just like Jews weren’t content with the white promise not to ‘enrich’ and ‘convert’ white identity into white supremacism and instead waged total war on white identity itself(until whiteness was degraded into demonism for which the white race must atone forever, especially to Jews and blacks), Jews refuse to accept any promise on Iran’s part to restrict their nuclear technology for civilian use. It doesn’t matter even if the international community pledges to work with Iran to prevent the development of nukes. As long as the possibility of the Bomb is there, Jews see Iran as a rival and a threat to the ambitions of the Greater Israel project, or the Yinon Plan, as today’s Zionists are effectively Yinonists.

Jews claim to fear a nuclear holocaust in Israel if Iran were to acquire the Bomb, but it’s a case of pure projection as Israel, with its Samson Option and endless aggressions against its neighbors, is the real bully in the region. Samson Option says all of Europe will be nuked were Israel to face collapse, whereas Iran doesn’t possess a single Bomb, yet the cucked whites of the US and EU keep pretending that Jews/Zionists are the sane ones talking sense while Iran is planning for a nuclear Armageddon. If anything, it’s the Christian Zionists who seem most hellbent on bringing about the conditions that will lead to the Second Coming and its apocalyptic rain of fire.

Israel’s real fears have nothing to do with Iran lobbing nukes at it. Israel fears that a nuclear-armed Iran will stand as a deterrent to the Yinon Plan, which requires lots of power projection by Israel with its conventional weaponry. Israel wants to use its tanks, jets, bombs, and missiles to attack, threaten, intimidate, and defeat its neighbors, but it would be far more difficult if Iran got the Bomb. Iran thus far has limited its responses to Israeli provocations because, in an all-out war, Israel would have the upper-hand with its nukes. But if Iran also had nukes, Israel would have to think twice about its terror campaigns throughout the Middle East. What the Zionists fear most about Iran getting the Bomb is it serves as a restraint on Israel’s conventional power.
Indeed, had Iraq possessed nukes, the US and NATO would have thought twice about using conventional weapons to invade it. All this alarmism about ‘rogue’ nations getting the Bomb to nuke the US, the West, or Israel is just malarky. The West knows that such nations want nukes only as defensive insurance against attacks by the US, NATO, or Israel, and it’s those restraints that are most intolerable to the Jewish-controlled Lone Superpower, which, even if not at war with the whole world, wants the power to destroy any part of the world.

The US wants every country outside its direct control to be like Libya than North Korea. Whereas North Korea’s nukes render it nearly impossible as a potential target for US aggression, Gaddafi’s Libya, especially after it gave up all its WMD, was ripe for destruction if the Collective West so desired. Jews want Iran to be another Libya than another North Korea.
Realistically, Iran wants to be something in between. It wants guarantees of security, autonomy, and sovereignty through a combination of conventional military might, diplomatic ties with powerful non-Western countries(especially Russia & China), and the hope that white goyim still have some balls to say NO to more Jewish Supremacist wars, aka Wars for Israel. Iran also hopes that the more sensible Jewish elements in the West will push back against the most virulent Neocon hawks.
However, the predominant consensus within Jewish Power is to destroy Iran in the long run. Even the nuclear deal under Obama, a Negro tool of the Jews, was likely a stalling tactic before something more drastic could be devised. Indeed, notice that after Trump nixed the deal, Biden(even a bigger tool than Obama of the Jews) refused to restart it. Jewish Power is more patient and tenacious than most, and even if it means taking one step backward for every two moves forward, it’s hellbent on getting what it wants. Jewish objectives have certainly been realized with the whites in the West who are now utterly embarrassing as total cuck-maggot dogs of Jewish Power. When even cultural conservatives cannot push back against ‘gay marriage’ in fear of offending Jews as the Chosen Master Race of the West, the white race has become a total disgrace.

White America is the way it is because it’s been totally neutered by Jewish Supremacist Power. That’s why White America refuses to do what seems most natural, which is to ally with Iran against Jewish Power that seeks domination over all. The main issue has nothing to do with Islam(or Islamism) and everything to do with sovereignty. That’s what Jews hate the most, goy sovereignty of any kind. After all, Israel and the Jewish-run US have gone along perfectly fine with theocratic Saudi Arabia. They’ve also funded, protected, and armed the most radical Muslim elements, Al Qaeda and its variants, often in concert with its vassals or allies such as Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, and Turkey. Even after the supposed blowback of 9/11, the Jewish-run US(with Israel of course) has reverted to the policy of War with Terror(as opposed to War on Terror), and the main targets have been secular modern Arab states like Libya and Syria. (The CIA also backed the most extreme Muslim elements in the Caucasus to provoke Russia.) And the Iraq that was invaded and destroyed was ruled by a secular regime.

Jewish Supremacists and their cuck propagandists speak of the Clash of Civilizations, with the Liberal West locked in horns with Muslim barbarians who throw homosexuals off roofs. But Iran never had a policy of tossing fruits from rooftops. Such acts were carried out by anarcho-Islamic Jihadis whose primary support came from the US and Israel and their vassal states.
Incredibly, the Lone Superpower that’s obsessed with turning the world ‘gay’ is also committed to funding and enabling Jihadis who would cut off the heads of homos. For the empire, it’s a case of killing two birds with one stone. On the one hand, the Jihadi nihilists, plentiful to recruit from a vast pool of young Arab/Muslim men with little future prospect, come in handy in smashing sovereign regimes and societies that the Empire of Judea hates. At the same time, the atrocities by the Jihadis make for easy propaganda that the Liberal West must intervene overseas to ‘fight the terrorists’, the kind who toss ‘gays’ off roofs. So, even as the US tacitly supports or gives protection to the Jihadis to wreak havoc, it also uses Jihadi terror as a pretext for occupying whole swaths of the Middle East and North Africa. The US was in Syria protecting Jihadis from Assad & Russia, all the while justifying its presence in the name of fighting the terrorists. Jewish supremacist perfidy knows no bounds.

Even though Iran has been, for the longest time, working with secular and religious groups throughout the Middle East to contain the fires set off by Jihadi arsonists(with the backing of the US and Israel), it gets conflated with Jihadi terrorists because both are of the same religion. In the minds of low-IQ and/or low-information people in the West, the struggle is one of the Liberal West and Israel(as Western outpost) at war with Islamism when, in fact, it’s really about Jewish-dominated Western Empire and its satrapies at war with those countries that still dare to be sovereign. The Jihadis are NOT allied with Iran; if anything, Iran has been at war with Jihadis as proxies of Jews and the US. Iran was often allied with secular powers against other Muslim countries and forces, and the main issue has been sovereignty. The true dividing line has been between those-who-serve-the-West, like Saudi Arabia and similar whore puppets, and those-who-resist-the-West. One of Iran’s most important allies was Assad-ruled Syria despite it being a secular and modern Arab state. Today, Syria is ruled by Jihadis, and low IQ or low-information people in the West may assume that makes it more anti-West than ever, but if anything, the current Islamist regime in Syria is a total whore to Zion.

Like the cucked Arabs without sovereignty in the Middle East who do the bidding of the Jewish-controlled US Empire, the cucked whites in the West cannot conceive of any reality other than the one concocted by Jewish Supremacist Power. Instead of seeing Iran as a beacon of defiance, resistance, and sovereignty, the cucked Arab and Muslim countries in the region see it as a threat to the status quo that defines them. They lack pride as dogs and servants of the US empire, but they’ve found a niche in the global system and don’t want it disturbed. Better to submit and prosper than to join the resistance and face hardship in the struggle. Besides, as humans are prone to fooling themselves, the people of cucked Arab and Muslim countries may have deceived themselves into believing that they are free and independent. But then, how are whites in the West any different? They totally live under the thumb of Jewish supremacist rule but carry on with the fantasy that they are free and proud people of the greatest country in the world(USA) or liberal ruled-based orders(EU and UK).

Wondering why White America doesn’t resist Jewish Supremacism, either as an ally of Iran or on its own, is like asking why Janissary didn’t join the Christian West against the Ottoman Empire. The Janissary comprised European boys taken from Christian families and trained to serve the Sultan, mentally-spiritually turned against Christendom.
White America is essentially a Janissary force of World Jewry. Some whites have come to a realization that something isn’t quite right among their people on their lands, but many more still believe themselves to be free, i.e. of their own volition that they, as proud Americans, stand with Jews and Israel in a Clash of Civilization against the Muslims.
Incredibly, Jewish Supremacists, the most anti-white people on Earth, have done a Jedi mind-trick on much of the white race that there’s no daylight between what’s good for the Jews and what’s good for whites. If Jews want it, whites must also want it, like a dog always going where the master wants to go… and if whites on occasion disagree, they must be infected with the rabies of ‘antisemitism’ or suffering from psychopathy, like the kind described by Jordan B. Peterson. They must be set straight by the ‘experts’.

Unlike the Sultans of old or, for that matter, the British Imperialist overlords, Jewish Powerites play a subtler passive-aggressive game of carrots and sticks, employing gangster threats but also pleading for sympathy as perpetual victims(of endless permutations of ‘antisemitism’). Having thus weaseled themselves into Western hearts and corridors of power, Jews have fooled a lot of people that, far from Zion abusing whites as dogs & slaves, Jews and whites have independently and conscientiously arrived at the same conclusion: The US must stand with Israel and nod along to whatever spews forth from the mouth of Netanyahu.

Surely, most whites in elite positions know what’s really up, but they cherish their status and dare not lose their privileges by speaking truth to power. Besides, a kind of Stockholm Syndrome has taken hold of the white elites who, completely captured by Jewish Power, have become accustomed to their roles of whores in a brothel run by Jewish pimps and madam.
If virtually all members of white elites know the truth but won’t say it, a good number of white masses still remain in the dark, but the small but growing number of whites are communicating to a growing audience what’s really happening and raising questions that dare not be asked in most ‘respectable’ circles where membership depends on playing by the rules.

MAGA is the joker card in all this. The rise of Donald Trump owed partly to the segment of the white population that is either wary of or hostile to Jewish Power. The wary aren’t necessarily anti-Jewish, but they’re sick of Neocon Wars and excessive Israeli demands. Those who are hostile tend to see Jewish Power as a malevolent force. Jews sensed this aspect of MAGA and did everything to smear Trump as ‘Literally Hitler’ and Der Fuhrer of Neo-Nazis, ‘white supremacists’, and the ‘far right’. Thus, the idea was for Jews to ally with ‘progressive’ whites, blacks, and Diversity against Trump and MAGA, and the establishment GOP was actually in cahoots with the anti-MAGA forces, if only for the sake of business-as-usual.

But then, the Gaza Horror happened, and to the consternation of Jews, the most vocal representatives of Diversity were in sympathy with the Palestinians. Jews had hoped to use Diversity against Trump-MAGA ‘white supremacism’, but Diversity was calling out on Jewish-Zionist supremacism.
Therefore, certain key elements of Jewish Power decided to give MAGA a chance in 2024 to make a move against the pro-Palestinian forces. If Democrats had been totally in charge, it would have been a tougher sell for them to go after pro-Palestinian voices in Liberal Institutions(especially college campuses) as it might have led to a ‘civil war’ within the Party. Democratic Party sending goons to arrest progressive and leftist voices in sympathy with the Palestinians on elite college campuses? A bridge too far.

Thus, it was far more convenient for Trump and MAGA to do it, except that this is bound to create a fissure within MAGA itself. If MAGA came to the fore as an anti-Neocon(if not exactly anti-Jewish) movement, how do Trump supporters now feel in their toady-like servility to Netanyahu and the Bill Ackmans of the world? How can MAGA claim to be ‘America First’ when it carries water for Israel Firsters?
It was a clever move by Jews to have Trump do the dirty work in hunting down pro-Palestinian activists. But, weighing the pros and cons, Jewish Power may have miscalculated in the long run as it has associated ‘Literally Hitler’ Trump, the man defamed by most Jewish figures since 2016, even more closely with Israel and Zionism. If Trump is Hitler and doing the bidding of Israel, what does that say about the nature of Israel? It’s a crypto-Nazi state.

 Video Link