Idolatry Is the Flipside of Bigotry: Consider the Case of the Jews and Blacks - Excessive idolization of one group may lead to blind hatred for whatever groups hated by the idolized group.

 

There are two ways to promote or authorize prejudice, the negative and the positive. The negative way is brutally simple. Pick any group and tar them, defame them, or dehumanize them. It could be a racial group, ethnic entity, religious community, or ideological camp. For example, consider all those Hollywood movies where Arabs/Muslims were rarely little more than Jihadis or terrorists. Present them as a bunch of ‘ragheads’, barely human ‘muzzies’ to mow down when necessary, like in William Friedkin’s adaptation of Jim Webb’s RULES OF ENGAGEMENT. (Webb, who opposed George W. Bush’s Iraq War, should have known better than to produce such a pernicious work, especially because it feigns balance before finally concluding ALL Arabs to be a bunch of towel-head scum deserving to be mowed down from old man to young girl.)
Negative prejudice is, of course, common during war-time, even though current conventions decry overt caricaturing of the enemy, as happened in World War I and World War II: The evil ‘Huns’ depicted as rapacious gorillas or the vicious ‘Japs’ as rabid rodents. Granted, there’s still a lot of fulminating about barbaric Iranians and cruel Russians, but it’s hardly up to the levels of wars of yesteryear(except when depicting ‘white supremacists’).

However, there is another(and more insidious) way to normalize and enforce official prejudice: The excessive positive elevation of a certain group to the point of quasi-idolatry. Why would this be? A mindless promotion of A doesn’t necessarily demean B, C, or D. Just because A is made more popular or special doesn’t mean others are robbed of their basic dignity and rights of humanity.
But this is true only insofar as A has no hostile agendas against B, C, D, E, F, and/or etc. If indeed A does mean harm to, say, B and C, our obsessive devotion to A inevitably blinds us to the interests, rationales, and worthiness of B and C, because all we’d ever want to care about is A-ALL-THE-WAY.

That is why idolizing certain groups is dangerous, indeed far more than certain individuals. We know from celebrity culture that idolatry turns certain figures into ‘stars’, ‘heroes’, and ‘icons’. The fans, who could number in the millions or even hundreds of millions, are so taken with their idols that they often turn a blind eye to the dark side of their demigods or, worse, even justify it as ‘cool’ or ‘badass’.
The dark side of populism was admitted when Donald Trump said that his most devoted followers will vote for him even if he murdered someone in cold blood. So many movie stars, rockers, rappers, and athletes have gotten away with murder(figuratively speaking but literally in some cases) simply because of widespread adoration. Oftentimes, bad behavior, rotten values, and stupid attitudes were normalized simply because many people tend to imitate their ‘heroes’. The weaponization of Taylor Swift was on the assumption that the Swifties will do as their goddess-princess decrees.

Idolization goes way beyond favoring something. Rather, it favors something at the expense of others, even oneself. If Bob, Bill, Peter, Jim, and Nicolas each favor the self, that’d be the most natural thing. Each individual understandably prioritizes what is essential and necessary for himself. There is fairness and balance in each of the men favoring his own interest, of course within the rule of law and principles of fair play.
The problem of idolatry arises when one of the guys, say Jim, is accorded special status and fawned over by the others to the extent that his interests, feelings, and well-being take precedence even over the self among the others. So, Bob, Bill, Peter, and Nicolas will happily sacrifice their own self-interest in order to favor Jim. But it can even get worse if Jim harbors hostility toward, say, Nicolas. Suppose Jim wants Nicholas’ house and car. Bob, Bill, and Peter’s devotion to Jim would be such that they will berate Nicholas for protesting Jim’s hostile moves against him.
Idolizing Jim didn’t necessarily dehumanize the others, but if Jim were to turn hostile against anyone, idolatry translates into a bigotry toward the target of his ire on the logic that, Jim being so awesome, he must always be right, and whatever or whomever he hates must be in the wrong, therefore even worthy of destruction. Thus, idolatry could easily be the flipside of bigotry.

If we expand the example of individuals to ethnic and racial groups in the US, there’s nothing untoward about various groups favoring their own interests. It’s hardly surprising that the Armenian-American community would be more fixated on what goes on in Armenia and its diaspora. Same goes for Greek-Americans, Italian-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Polish-Americans, Burmese-Americans, and etc. Each group favoring its own kind isn’t idolatry but merely natural self-interest. After all, if Irish-Americans don’t prioritize Irishness and their culture and people, who will?

There is a kind of equality and mutuality of respect when each group emphasizes what is most important to its people and culture. Your people respect the other people’s priorities, and vice versa. Your people don’t claim that their interests are first and foremost for the entire country and neither do the peoples of other ethnic groups. The varying interests may be unrelated — it’s doubtful if anything meaning to a Pakistani-American community has any bearing on the Cuban-American community and vice versa — , divergent, or in conflict, but even if tensions arise, there is no danger of idolatry if both contentious groups acknowledge that the entirety of the country doesn’t exist to prioritize one ethnic interests or agendas uber alles. For example, the Turkish-American community and the Greek-American community may not see eye-to-eye on the issue of Cyprus, but both are sensible enough to know that the US doesn’t exist to place Greek or Turkish gripes on the front burner. Thus, both groups lobby for their own ethnic or national interests, as do all the other groups.

But what if one group is elevated to the point of idolatry? Not only does it serve its own interests(like all the others do) but insists upon other groups to shower it with special attention, then favors, then respect, then reverence, then obedience, then worship. Suppose every group is pressed upon to praise and serve this particular group, indeed care more about it than care about itself. While each group’s ethnic interests are to remain mostly a ‘petty’ or ‘private’ affair, the interests of this particularly vaunted group is mandated as a public ritual and spectacle. All must openly profess unconditional support, devotion, and loyalty to this group.
So, while Greek-Americans must go through the usual channels(mostly hidden from view) to pursue their own ethnic interests, their support for this special group must be vocal and visible, loud and unambiguous. In other words, Greek-American interests are merely ‘your business’, but the interests of this special group are ‘OUR BUSINESS’, indeed duty and mission.
Of course, the group we’re talking about is Jewish. The two other groups with similar status(though largely owing to Jewish power of selection and promotion) are the blacks and the homos.

Now, if the specially favored group only craves hugs and kisses, it wouldn’t be so bad. While undue attention showered upon it robs other groups of their own concerns, at least it won’t generate hostility and hatred for other groups. But suppose the special group not only hogs most of the positive attention but insists, indeed demands, that all the other groups direct negative rage against whatever groups it has a vendetta against. Not only must we kiss its feet but we must kick the butts of its designated enemies, even if they’ve done us no harm or harbored ill will towards us. Thus, the idolatry for the special group can easily turn into a kind of bigotry, spawning a whole bunch of Idolatrous-Bigots or Idolots.

Idolatry for the Jews have turned many Americans into idolots, often unsuspectingly so. Whereas bigots are easy to recognize, not so with the idolots whose mindless hatred are usually shrouded in words of love. In the 1980s, plenty of bigoted movies featuring ‘raghead’ Muslim terrorists were common, but such blatant propaganda have fallen out of fashion. Yet, the great majority of Americans, even those who are critical of Israel, still favor Jews/Zionists over Arabs/Muslims. It owes to the continuing idolatry of the Jews.
So, it’s no longer about hating Palestinians, Arabs, or Muslims as natural-born terrorists but emphasizing the Jews as the Holy Holocaust people, the God’s Chosen, the high IQ genius folks, or funny fellas(via comedy). If someone says, “Muzzies suck and let’s nuke them all”, that’s obvious bigotry, and everyone would notice and condemn it(except for some Republicans who hardly batted an eye when Sheldon Adelson said Iran should be nuked). But if someone says, “We love Israel so much, and Jews are so special, and we must do everything for them”, people often forget that such favoring of one group often leads to a policy of dehumanization toward any group that happens to be in the crosshairs of Jewish Power.

So much of the US foreign policy woes can be traced back to Judeolatry. Why did so many Americans become rabidly and virulently hateful toward Russians, Iranians, Syrians, and Palestinians? Why did so many people become anti-white, demeaning any expression of white identity and interests as ‘white supremacist’? Why do so many white people hate themselves, their own race, ethnicity, roots, and culture? More often than not, it’s because they put Judeolatry at the center of their lives. You see, Jews are so great, special, wonderful, wise, and awesome that whatever or whomever Jews denounce(via academia, media, and government) surely deserves all the antipathy that humanity can muster.

This is plainly evident among what still remains of the Christian community in the West, especially America. As Christians, you’d think they care about the well-being of fellow Christians in the Arab World, but they’d rather cheer on the Zionist violence against the Arabs on grounds that Jews are so special that they’re justified even in bombing and slaughtering scores of Christians on the other side of the world. And, if any Christian, white or Arab, draws attention to this madness, he or she is immediately derided as an ‘Anti-Semite’ and ‘canceled’ by the so-called Christian or Conservative community. Consider the time when Christian Arab-Americans called upon Senator Ted Cruz to address the issue of Israel’s attack on Christians in Syria. The cuck-faced turd-maggot of Texas growled and brushed them off as possible ‘Anti-Semites’. Some Christian!

It’s the truth. The main reason why so many Americans hate Russia and Iran is simply sue to Jewish animus, i.e. Russia and Iran are relatively free of World Jewry, at least by the totally cucked standards of the West.
Often, the true rationale for hatred is subconscious because no one wants to admit that he or she is a mental stooge or cuck-puppet of the Jews, but deep in their corrupted hearts is the wish to appease Jews and win their approval. So, as Jews hate Russia, we must hate it too and convince ourselves that the reason why Russia opted for military solution in Ukraine is because barbaric Slavs are hot-blooded, even though it’s more than evident that Russia has been maddeningly patient over the years despite the series of provocations by the Jewish-run West.

Judeolatry always prioritizes Jews among the non-Jews. Thus, a common question is whether one acknowledges that “Israel has a right to exist” while conveniently forgetting or ignoring the fact that Israel was created by denying the right of Palestine’s existence. The positive sympathy bordering on worship for the Jews has turned into contemptuous dismissal of all claims by peoples who were wronged by Jews.
It’s why white so-called ‘conservatives’ always turn a blind eye to those at odds with Israel, characterizing them as ‘terrorists’ or ‘Jew-haters’ simply because they resist the injustice done to them by Jewish Power.

Take Iran and the Jews. Israel has been provoking Iran to no end, even using outright terrorism to murder Iranian scientists, engineers, and diplomats. But, not only do Jewish Zionists at the NYT place quotes around ‘terrorist’(as, when Jews do it, it’s not quite terror) but the pro-Zionist goy idolots always blame Iran despite the slings and arrows hurled at it by World Jewry. If goy idolots watched a Jew strike an Iranian, they’d pretend not to notice. If the Jew then spat on and kicked the Iranian, the goy idolots would look the other way or take sick pleasure in the rightful Jewish Master meting out punishment upon the lowly ‘Muzzie’ slave. But, suppose the Iranian finally had enough and pushed back at the Jew. The goy idolots will predictably scream ‘foul’ and express outrage at such ‘brutality’.
But then, it’s the same dynamic over Jews and whites. Jews attack and defame whites constantly, but most ‘conservatives’ either pretend not to notice or blame the ‘left'(or surreally invoke ‘China’); but then, the minute a white or conservative notices what’s happening and raises the JQ, the ‘conservative’ community goes into hyper-overdrive of howling about ‘Anti-Semitism’.

Consider what Israel’s been doing to Syria and Iran forever. World Jewry and their brownnosing goy puppets pulled every trick in the book to turn Syria into a neo-Medieval ash heap nearly overrun by crazed Jihadis, but Syria was saved at the last minute by Russia and Iran. And for that reason, all Americans are obligated to hate Russia and Iran. (The very people who don’t care about and even cheer on Jews slaughtering Arabs/Muslims will then suddenly say ‘Assad must go’ for ‘gassing’ his people, which turned out to be yet another Jewish lie.) Israel can lob any number of missiles into Syria and use terror on Iran, and the goy idolots will either ignore or defend such transgressions, but the moment Iran strikes back after every last ounce of patience has run dry, the West will throw tantrums about Iranian ‘aggression’.

Likewise, Jews are allowed to spew any amount of abuse at whites, demeaning and defaming them as ‘white supremacists’ and ‘nazis’ and etc. If Palestinians, Arabs, and Iranians who resist World Jewry are ‘terrorists’ and ‘radicals’, whites who want to restore their identity and agency are ‘white supremacists’ or the ‘far right’ even though they harbor no desire to rule the world. Viktor Orban, for example, is deemed as ‘far right’ for the moderate desire to preserve his nation’s people and culture. How dare whites have an identity and agenda independent of the decrees of World Jewry.

Sadly, so many white people, in their blind worship of Jews, have internalized anti-white passions(that sometimes border on pathological hysteria whenever Jews sound the alarm bell of ‘nazi’ or ‘white supremacist’ or ‘far right’). Such white people have been conditioned to believe that whites exist to serve the Other, especially the Jew, because apparently whites serving whites is ‘supremacist’.

Now, if whites insisted not only on whites serving whites but nonwhites serving whites as well(as was the case during the Age of Western Empires), one could raise the issue of ‘white supremacy’. But most whites on the Right believe that every people should guard their own identity, preserve their own culture, and serve their own interests, e.g. whites serving whites, browns serving browns, yellows serving yellows, blacks serving blacks.
If anything, it’s the Jews who insist that all non-Jewish groups prioritize what’s-good-for-Jews over any other consideration. So, if a goy is faced with the choice of doing something that is better for his kind at the expense of Jews and doing something that is better for the Jews at his own kind’s expense, he’s obligated to choose the latter.

It’s no wonder that so many whites do things that are obviously detrimental to their own kind, often on grounds that nothing is worthier than appeasing and pleasing the awesome Jews who, being so smart and special and/or chosen, deserve to have everything on a silver platter.
Indeed, even those who defy World Jewry feel obligated to support Israel or, at the very least, not name the Jew. So, Viktor Orban and other ‘far right’ politicians in Europe support Israel, even though most Jews want to do to their nations what was done to the Palestinians. What is the ‘Great Replacement’ but White Nakba orchestrated by Jews via the migration-invasion of the West by the Third World?
And in the case of Putin and his cohorts, they dare not Name the Power that’s been most instrumental in instigating the war in Ukraine. The world seems unperturbed by countless Ukrainian Slavs having been sacrificed on the battlefield in a conflict that was really about Jews using Ukraine as their gangster headquarters in Europe and as a ramming rod against Russia. When idolatry of a group runs so deep, even its targeted enemies are afraid to spell out the plain truth and expose its evil core.

While Jews are the tops when it comes to idolatry, blacks and homos also enjoy the special group privilege of unconditional adoration and celebration. They are usually discussed in terms of tragic victimhood and/or triumphant victory, and of course, the two modes go together as people tend to feel the most sorrow for the most special. With the Jewish media having elevated homos to angel status, an average American is more likely to be triggered by some homo being called ‘fag’ than about the Zionist-led US dropping bombs and killing civilians in the Middle East. And while we hear about the persecution of homosexuals around the world, what goes undiscussed is the role of homosexuals in the US deep state to further Zionist-US aggression and mass mayhem. Homos are the main co-imperialists alongside the genocidal and supremacist Zionists.

With the worldwide goy fascination with blacks ranging from Michael Jackson to Michael Jordan, it’s easy to understand the appeal of MLK and Mandela(and now even George Floyd). Jews have played on this psychological feature of humanity to promote idolatry of blacks, especially among whites whose submission to Jewry is the indispensable foundation of Zionic hegemony. Jews must sit atop the White Horse that is robbed of agency.

Now, if blacks were mostly nice, Negro-Idolatry or Negrolatry might only have limited impact. It would draw excessive attention to stuff like the Super Bowl, college basketball, or popular entertainment at the expense of other matters, but it wouldn’t break a society.
But, in fact, blacks are the most aggressive, pathological, wild, savage, and destructive race on the planet. They’ve already leveled entire cities(like Detroit) and entire parts of cities in Baltimore, St. Louis, Chicago, Milwaukee, Oakland, and so on. If not for the ‘gibs’ provided by whites(and others) to the blacks in the US, most black communities would soon regress to the state of Haiti or, at best, Jamaica.

Yet, the idolatry of blacks means either turning a blind eye to the victims of blacks or even blaming them(or blaming others for what blacks do). So, even though the idolatry of blacks didn’t begin as hostility or hatred toward other groups, it de facto turns into that very thing because the pro-black idolots(or idolatrous-bigots) are inconvenienced by non-white victimhood that upsets the cart of Negrolatry.
The preponderance of victimhood at the hands of blacks undermines the faith in black wonderfulness, black nobility, black sanctity, black wisdom, and etc.
So, whenever blacks act badly, the Jewish-run media and their cuck consumers pretend the perpetrators are ‘youths’ or ‘lunch-time rowdies’. If a crazed Negro in an SUV rams into white people, blame the car, not the Negro. If Negroes steal too many cars, blame the car company for not making the cars more secure. There was the case of Asian-Americans blaming black-on-yellow violence on ‘white supremacists’ and MAGA. And there’s the Jewish Media’s constant reminder of Emmett Till to convey the message that, regardless of current black crime rates, the problem is all due to past ‘racism’, thereby implicitly justifying black behavior as unfortunate but all-too-understandable rebellion against a ‘systemic racism’.
Thus, the many victims of blacks are thrown under the bus, much like how the victims of Jews are ignored as either nonexistent or deserving of whatever violence meted out to them by Jews or their proxies, usually the shabbos goy US military and NATO.

 Video Link

Perversely enough, blacks sometimes sympathize with Palestinians as fellow victims and vice versa, but what would have made sense in the past no longer does today. When indeed blacks were second-class citizens in the US, one could reasonably draw parallels between the black experience and the Palestinian experience. But today, blacks are venerated in the US, innumerable programs exist to favor less-qualified blacks, tons of money are showered on the black community(much like tons of aid sent to Israel), and furthermore, most blacks in key institutions and industries are happy co-partners and co-imperialists with the US empire. Lloyd Austin, that fat fried-chicken and watermelon munching Negro, is a happy ‘Cogro’, or Co-Imperialist Negro, who is more than happy to do the bidding of Jews, of course alongside the white shabbos goy cucks, in instigating war in Ukraine, raining bombs on the Middle East, occupying one-third of Syria, and supplying Israel with more bombs to mass-slaughter women and children in Gaza and Lebanon. For every prominent Negro who sticks his head out for the Palestinians, ten other Negroes are happy to cheer on Zion and cuck to Jews to serve as Cogros for World Jewry. Most prominent blacks are more like Oprah, Obama, Lloyd Austin, Condolezza Rice, and etc. than Cornel West. And when a Negro like Ta-Nehisi Coates wanders off the plantation and talks about Jewish Evil, most prominent Negroes lend no support because their priority is to preserve their own statuses and privileges as Cogros.

Also, the US, far from being a land where rednecks round-up innocent Negroes and hang them from trees while guzzling moonshine, is now a place where most of the racial violence is black-on-white and black-on-non-white(and of course black-on-black). Thus, comparing blacks with Palestinians is now passe. Blacks in the US today are more like Jewish ‘settlers’ in the West who feel emboldened in attacking Palestinians, terrorizing Arabs, and gobbling up more and more land. Just like black violence led to White Flight(and non-white flight), Jewish-Zionist violence leads to Palestinian flight toward ever dwindling territories in the West Bank. And of course, in current South Africa, blacks act much like Jewish ‘settlers’ in Palestine. They attack white farmers, often murdering them in the cruelest ways. But if blacks at least have the right of indigenousness in South Africa, the Jews doing the terror in the West Bank are relatively recent arrivals from Europe(and America).

Because so many blacks are such ill-behaved louts in a world where so many people are invested in Negrolatry(the false fixation of blacks as holy and noble), the idolatry of blacks can only lead to the bigotry against their victims. We now live in a world that turns a blind eye to the victims of black violence(as if they don’t exist or matter) or berates them if they dare to complain. Either get brutalized and keep your mouth shut or shut the f*** up if you dare to name the problem.
And it’s not just the ‘liberals’. Remember that Mike Johnson, the GOP shabbos goy Congressman, told the country that we must understand and forgive black violence in BLM 2020. Not one word about the victims of black brutality. Predictably, he soon shilled for indiscriminate Jewish-Zionist terror against the Palestinians following Oct 7. You see, both blacks and Jews are so holy and noble that they always have reason to mete out violence to whomever, and we must comply with the way-it-is or cheer on the violence in ‘burn baby burn’ manner. Or pretend it is ‘mostly peaceful protest’. Maybe Jews and cucks will tell us the Gaza Horror is ‘mostly peaceful genocide’.

Many on the ‘Right’ have long assumed that the problem of Political Correctness and its more virulent form, ‘Wokeness’, is the Cult of Equality, but if indeed the new order was about equal justice for all, things would not be so bad because Jews, blacks, and homos would face the same standards. Some draw the distinction between ‘equality’ and ‘equity’, with the former meaning equal opportunity and the latter meaning equality of outcome, but even equity isn’t the main culprit in the current order.
After all, if equity were indeed enforced, the higher institutions would make sure that the various groups of goyim would be equally represented alongside the Jews. Or it could ensure that ‘conservatives’ are just as represented in the academia and media as the ‘liberals’ are. Or that Arab-Americans are given the same voice and representation as the Zionists. But where does anyone see ‘equity’?

No, the central theme of ‘wokeness’ isn’t equality or equity but idolatry of certain groups, mainly Jews, Blacks, and Homos. But then, most ‘right-wing’ types being brown-nosing shabbos goy cucks, they want to pretend otherwise because their strategy of ‘winning’ is always to play the dog to the Jews as masters. “Gee, maybe if we indulge Jewish Power with boundless talent and money, maybe the Tribe will choose us as the top dog.” So, as Glenn Greenwald said, the very ‘conservatives’ who decry censorship in defense of free speech will turn on a dime and call for clamping down on ‘Anti-Semitic’ speech. The very white conzos(conservative-bozos) who bitch and whine about racial preferences and the like will go out and out to demand that Jews and Israel be treated as special and sacred. And in so doing, the peoples, cultures, and nations hated by Jews get no respect.

Ironically, of course, the people most hated by Jews are the White Conservatives themselves, whose only purpose from the Zionist perspective is to serve Israel and fight & die in its wars. The likes of Ben Shapiro and useless cuck Christopher Rufo exist to shepherd the ‘conservative’ movement to uphold ‘colorblind’ values(meaning whites should reject any white identity, agency, and unity) while, at the same time, making an exception for Jews and Israel. In other words, “I see no color but the technicolor of the Jewish dreamcoat.”

https://twitter.com/dr_duchesne/status/1846947229778805209

Nick Fuentes explains how the entire right-wing is fake and controlled
 Video Link

Jared Taylor ponders, ‟Black Crime: Why Our Rulers Hide It‟. He should also ponder, ‟Jewish Power, Why I Won‛t Address It‟

Black Crime: Why Our Rulers Hide it.

Hiding the truth is an essential part of this colossal fraud of pretending that this multi-racial society is going to work and — worst of all — that if it isn’t working it’s *our* fault. We’re supposed to believe that blacks and Guatemalans and Muslims would be just like us if only we would be nice to them. You can’t build a nation by hiding the truth. You destroy a nation by hiding the truth. And that is exactly what’s happening to the United States.

BLACK CRIME: WHY OUR RULERS HIDE IT - American Renaissance

"Black Crime: Why Our Rulers Hide It"

Okay... but how about "Jewish Power: Why Jared Taylor Won't Name It"

So much truth and untruth. In the above remark, Jared Taylor's standing as a bold critic and his reputation as a craven cuck both come into focus. In the video, he goes on and on about black violence and crime, something all of us in the racial-reality-sphere is well aware of. I suspect plenty of Democrats, mainstream Republicans, and 'censorals'(which are what so-called censorship-crazed 'liberals' really are) know the actual facts on the ground as well, but as 'Blaconography' and 'Blacrements' are of the pseudo-spirituality of the age, it would be neo-blasphemous to speak the obvious.

How could anyone fail to notice that black violence and criminality are the main causes of urban decay? But then, even as people's gut feelings are informed by raw reality, their deep sense of Good vs Evil and the Sacred vs the Profane are instilled and cultivated by indoctrination, narratives, rapture, & idolatry/iconography; and the academia & media that offer glowing images and moving tales are in the hands of the Anti-Whites. So, even as one may be rattled as a witness or victim of black street crime, such is an animal response. It's intense and powerful but hardly inspiring or uplifting. At the very least, if race-ist(meaning race + ism = belief in the reality of race and racial differences) realities were accepted as common knowledge, people could honestly process instances of black violence they've either witnessed, heard about(from friends, family members, or co-workers), or experienced. But, because what should be a matter of open knowledge and discussion is suppressed by the taboo mechanism of Negrolatry, mental processes simply fail among many who feel dirty and 'sinful' for their negative emotions and fears(about foul Negro behavior).

So, they draw themselves even nearer to the narratives and idolatry of Black Sacredness to repress their inner 'racist' doubts about the project of racial integration and America finally realizing redemption and true greatness through the Sacred Negro Heart. After all, MLK is now bigger than all the white men of US history, and Harriet Tubman than all the white women. 'Good' whites have been taught that white 'racism' once denied justice and opportunity to innately noble blacks(who have real souls whereas whites got 'holes' instead), and therefore, whites must profusely beg forgiveness and mend past wrongs by making ever bigger gestures of atonement.
No wonder then that one of the great white fantasies is to root for black success, triumph, and riches, indeed to want blacks to succeed more than oneself and one's people. Take Michelle Obama, an affirmative action fool, but she is the idol of so many urban-gentry white women who feel personally invested in her success(despite bogusly acquired) on account that Michelle Obama represents what Harriet Tubman could have been had she lived in a just society.
Now, there's nothing wrong with rooting for past underdogs to do well in the present, but the sheer exaggeration of black achievements is way out of proportion, what with so-called 'well-educated liberals' solemnly intoning about Neil DeGgrassie Tyson as a great scientific mind or pretending Tehinisi Coates or Ibrahim Kendi X are 'intellectual heavyweights' and our moral betters. In just about every white American heart, there is a tug-of-war between the reality of black thuggery and the myth of black nobility, with no resolution in sight(except in sports and rap, where the thug-factor is a big turn-on for jungle-feverish whites in awe of black toughness). For one to accept the reality, one must do away with the myth of Negro Nobility, and to maintain the myth, one must suppress the facts of black thuggery. Generally, people like warmth more than cold, and facts are often cold and hard, whereas myths glow with hope and dreams. Unless the facts are overwhelming and inescapable, people generally favor the myth, and this is why so many whites are so hopeless in their fantasies of the Negro as a figure of divinity, like with Morgan Freeman dispensing hickory-smoked wisdom long-forgotten by whites and retrievable only through the Negro soul.

So many people, including plenty of so-called ‘conservatives’, willfully or disingenuously disregard the facts about race, and people like Jared Taylor certainly have a leg-up on them on matters of racial truth. But, Taylor’s blind-spot blocks him from realizing he’s guilty of the same failing that he accuses the ‘woke’ and cucky whites of. Perhaps, it’s not a blind-spot but a sensitive issue he is very much aware of but overlooks for the time being for strategic reasons, i.e. eventually the ultra-rich and high-IQ Jews will see the light and realize their future can only be secured in an alliance with whites.
But, it seems less a strategy than a matter of desperation, like the Hail Mary pass in the last seconds of the fourth quarter of a football game. After all, the clock is running out for the white race, and there are no signs that Jews will ever regard whites as equal partners or even junior partners. Jews must have their ethno-supremacist hegemonism over the world, and whites are acceptable only as servants, agents, managers, and soldiers(or dogs and horses).

Perhaps, Jews are gravely miscalculating their future odds by pinning their supremacist dominance on the subjugation and humiliation of whites(though, of course, the white collaborators, or House Honkeys, are fulsomely rewarded with carrots), but that’s how they think and operate. At the very least, Jewish forecast of future events, however misguided it may be, is nevertheless far less delusional and demented than the white race-realist hope that there will one day be a secular conversion of the Jews towards a defense of the white race and civilization.
In other words, Jewish delusions are still less nutty than those of Jared Taylor, John Derbyshire, and the like. In the 1980s and 1990s, whites on the American Right may have felt encouraged with their inroads into the Jewish Community, but what they ended up with were the Neocons. Besides, it wasn’t so much a case of the American Right winning over the Jews but Jews worming into the American Conservatism to remake it into yet another vehicle(and battleship) for Jewish Power.
Indeed, the ONLY racial angle that Neocons ever cared about was Jewish identity and interests embodied by Zionism and Yinonism. Neocons, insistent upon whites serving Jews, worked with Neo-Lib Jews to suppress any last vestige of white identity, pride, and interests. Neocons weren’t Jews allied with white conservatives against Jewish so-called Liberals but Jewish ‘conservatives’ working with Jewish ‘liberals’ behind the scenes to manipulate white conservatives into serving Jews, much like how Jewish ‘liberals’ had manipulated white liberals for the same purpose. Neocons fulfilled the Jewish Dream of gaining total control of both political parties. Democratic Party had traditionally been the base of Jewish Power, and the GOP became yet another Jewish tool through the machinations of Neocons who ran circles around the likes of Bill Buckley who proved to be weak men.

Over time, patterns emerge, and one can't help but notice Taylor has been willfully leaving out the Jewish Factor in his criticism and commentary. This seems odd when the group most responsible for his marginalization and deplatforming has been Jewish. Is Taylor fearful of Jews? They’ve done much to destroy his life and reputation, but can they do even more to totally break him? Or, is Taylor’s last conceit of ‘respectability’ — “At least, I'm not like David Duke or Richard Spencer” — , which gains him access to a few venues available for American Renaissance conferences, so precious to him that he won’t go all the way and name the Jewish Power, whereupon he will be shut out from absolutely everything?

At any rate, there are parallels between the Jewish Strategy and the Taylor Strategy. Jews(who control academia, media, deep state, and whore politicians) remain silent about black thuggery, criminality, and pathology for the same reason that Taylor remains silent about Jewish subversion, gangsterism, and pathology. An ulterior motive is at work in the tactical silence about certain topics to gain a bigger advantage. Jews-in-the-know(and most Jews know far more than they let on to the dimwit goyim) privately understand what Taylor means about racial differences and black problems. Jews have long done business with blacks, and they have as many gripes about blacks as blacks do about Jews. It’s true Jews fleeced many blacks, but blacks were often obnoxious, derelict, and unreliable(and whatever they earned, they blew on bling like idiots); and wherever possible, blacks stole and grabbed whatever they could from Jews. Jews know racial differences are real and all that. But that knowledge, if made public and acceptable, could undermine Jewish Power that relies so heavily on white cuckery to the Tribe.

Granted, even without whites cucking to Jews, Jews could be successful and wealthy on meritocracy alone, but Jewish Chutzpah-ism isn’t content to live with whites as equals or partners. No, Jews must have power over whites, and that means control. As it’s nearly impossible for Jews, a mere 2% of the population, to physically conquer and subdue the much larger white goy population, whites must be manipulated emotionally and ‘spiritually’; their hearts must be played like a violin. Jews figure they tried peaceful co-existence with white goyim, but it led to the Holocaust. (Of course, Jews omit the reasons as to why Germans and the like were driven to such hatred. If anything goes wrong between Jews and goyim, the Jewish Narrative would have us believe pure-as-snow Jews were suddenly pogromed by goyim-gone-mad, just like Mad Vlad Putin happened to wake up on the wrong side of the bed and decided to invade Ukraine.) And so, Jews have decided they must rule over whites, especially Anglo-Americans and Germans.
With the latter, it’s easy as Germany has been the whore-puppet of the US since the end of World War II, and there’s also the Eternal Holocaust Guilt, which obliges Germans to suck up to Jewish demands at every turn, even if it means, ironically enough, lending material and moral support to Sub-Nazi elements in Ukraine being employed by Jews against Russia. With Anglos, the trick has mainly been to guilt-bait(and jungle-feverize) them with blackness for two reasons: Black Slavery in the South(and Jim Crow) and Black Stardom in popular music and sports. White Americans, amazed and dazzled by blacks in sports and music, are prone to feel guiltier about whatever wrongs were done to them. (Of course, Jews did their share in Western Imperialism, slave trade, and exploitation of blacks, but never mind.)

So, even though Jews know blacks are exceedingly problematic, they also see them as black gold as a leverage against whites. If Jews had to choose a white world and a black world to live in, they’d obviously choose the white one. With whites, they could have civilization and order. With blacks, they’d be surrounded by savages who would drive Jews crazy. But, the danger of living in an all-white world is that whites may come to resent Jews out of envy and/or aggrievement, and the worst case scenario for Jews is explosions of ‘antisemitism’ followed by exile(yet once again), or even something like the Shoah. So, ‘diversity’ is ideal for Jewish Power, especially one that involves whites and blacks as Jews could play one against the other. Blacks, for reasons stated above, are optimally useful to Jews for their over-representation in the visceral fields(which fills whites with admiration and awe) and in poverty(which can be blamed on ‘white supremacism’ or ‘systemic racism’).

Anyway, that is why Jewish control of academia/media is so invested in suppressing the facts about black pathology, thuggery, and criminality. Jared Taylor once surmised that once whites become cognizant of the real sources of black problems in the civilizational setting — combination of lower IQ, higher aggression, and jive-ass nature — , the power of ‘white guilt’ will begin to fade. They will realize most black problems stem from nature rather than history.
Now, we can understand why blacks would object to such knowledge for reasons of pride and grift. Black egotism or Afromania is too vain and boastful to admit there’s anything wrong with blacks or blackness, and blacks know a good thing when they see one: ‘White Guilt’ is the golden goose for black race-hustlers.
Of course, there’s also the element of fear as whites are frightened of black riots and rampages, but then white fear doesn’t lead to (re)action precisely because of the paralysis of ‘white guilt’. After all, whites have long feared black thuggery and red savagery(out in the Western frontier), but they reacted with equal or greater violence in the past because whites weren’t burdened by the ‘guilt’ thing. But because of Negrolatry and white reverence for blacks(even for a lowlife scum like George Floyd), white fear doesn’t burn as white rage and reaction but shrivels into flaccidity at the feet of BLM charlatans.

Taylor has acknowledged how blacks exploit ‘white guilt’, but why won’t he discuss how Jews are also invested in it for their own interests? Why is Taylor so chicken to name the Jewish Power? Or, does he tell himself that it’s really just a matter of strategy because, as things surely get worse, the smart-and-rich Jews will have no choice but to come over to the white side, and the Ju-White Alliance will seal the deal for the future of the hu-white race?
Whatever his reasoning or motives, the fact is Jews have the intelligence of Episcopalians but the character of Sicilians. With Jews, the Rule of Law becomes a matter of Lawfare(or Jewfare), or manipulating the law as a political and/or racial weapon. Too many Jewish judges and lawyers(and of course journalists) act like mafia dons, bosses, and hitmen without any sense of principle or honor(unless absolute loyalty to the Tribal supremacism counts as some kind of higher value).

Perhaps, Jews are just as deluded in their Jewish-Black Alliance as Taylor is in his dream of Ju-White Alliance, but there it is, incontestably so, and only a fool, liar, or coward would claim otherwise. Taylor’s running cover for Jews when Jews beat him with a stick is downright pathetic, up there with Donald Trump sucking up to Jews while they ram him in the arse. It’s all the worse because Taylor, a totally vilified figure with zero respectability in mainstream circles, has nothing to lose by naming the Jewish Power.

Furthermore, it’s not necessarily true that naming the Jewish Power will lead to the fate of David Duke who, by the way, ruined his reputation for life not so much by criticizing Jewish Power but by playing silly games with the KKK and the like. Nicolas Fuentes, despite being banned from just about everything, has been gaining in popularity because he’s a straight shooter on matters of power and how that power is often used for tribal purposes. Noticing and criticizing Jewish Power need not be associated with KKK or Neo-Nazis or such tomfoolery.

Perhaps, as the saying goes, you can’t teach an old dog new tricks, and Taylor is simply of a generation that can’t break free of the spell. They remember a time when Anglo-Americans ruled and Jews were ascendant(yet not dominant), when a Jewish-White alliance based on mutual respect and understanding was a possibility. That ship sailed a long time ago. As such, when the likes of Taylor and Pat Condell go on and on about Muslims, it’s worse than delusional; it’s downright pathetic.
Besides, even as Jews find anti-Muslim feelings among whites to be politically advantageous — Jewish ploy is always make-goy-fight-goy, and it sure comes in handy for Neocons when white dummies are led to fight Wars for Israel against Arabs/Muslims — , they also find it a bit unnerving. The way Jews see it, expressions of ‘Islamophobia’ are eerily a variation of ‘antisemitism’ of yesteryear. Today, it’s hate-the-Muslim-Semites, but it wasn’t all that long ago when Western hostilities were directed at Jewish Semites. Jews have opined numerous times that they dread to live in an all-white society as there is always the chance that whites will turn against Jews. Perhaps, Jews are being paranoid, but the history of Jewish-White relations hasn’t always been easy or pleasant, to say the least. Also, despite endless warnings about ‘antisemitism’, I suspect many Jews know full well that anti-Jewish feelings often result from anti-goy deeds by Jews. But, just as the cult of BLM always makes blacks out to be the victims, the current orthodoxy holds that Jews are never in the wrong vis-a-vis goyim(especially whites) and no blame must ever be placed at the feet of Jews.

If Taylor were honest, he would admit he is guilty of the very same thing he accuses the elites of academia/media/government of. He too is selective with facts and omits certain issues from the discussion. Jews know their power rests on white submission, which is secured via ‘white guilt’ mainly about blacks(and so, we have endless media lamentations about Emmett Till). In addition, as Jewish Power and Wealth are now so excessive, Jews sensationalize the bogeyman of ‘white privilege’ and ‘systemic racism’ as misdirection from the fact that the West is ruled by Jewish Supremacism and Zionist Exceptionalism. When it’s not Evil Whitey, it’s Russia-Russia-Russia, with some side servings of China-China-China and Iran-Iran-Iran. Any trick to make goyim in the West bark at anything other than Jewish Power(and its key allies, homos and blacks). Frame it all on whites.

But, Taylor plays the same game. In a kind of battered-wife-syndrome, cucky Taylor is like a wife who clings to the hope that her abusive husband will return to her, and they can live happily ever after. People like Jared Taylor and John Derbyshire long ago concluded that Jews are not only rich and powerful but indispensable because whites rely on Jewish brilliance, wit, and genius to make Western Civilization work. So, just like the father awaiting the return of the Prodigal Son, the likes of Taylor pray for the Prodigal Jew to finally see the light and embrace their fellow-whiteness and use their genius, influence, and wealth for the security of white folks. And so, the whole truth and nothing but the truth are never to be expected from people like Taylor. They will mention blacks, Muslims, Latinos, Asians, and etc. but they will ignore the 800 lb Jewish Gorilla in the room because their strategy hinges on the change of the Jewish heart.

JARED TAYLOR || PHILADELPHIA: DESTINATION FOR LAWLESSNESS

Murder of Linda Frickey by Black Criminals and What It Reveals about the Lack of Racial Immunity for Self-Preservation & Resistance against Existential Dangers — Defeating a Nation, People, or Culture by Robbing It of the Will to Resist

Vincent James on this horrible news: WHITE GRANDMOTHER HAS ARM LITERALLY RIPPED OFF BY BLACK TEENS, MEDIA IS SILENT - The Red Elephants - Vincent James
James focuses on the reluctance of the media, especially national media, to either report the news or discuss its racial dynamics. Of course, if a bunch of white teenagers had done this to an old black woman, it'd be world news spread by Jewish-run media, and Biden would made several speeches about it, and Twitter would be lit up with a zillion comments on 'racism'. Indeed, Jussie Smollett's obvious 'hate hoax' got 1000x more sympathetic attention than this horrific news story, which is all too characteristic of the nature and extent of crime in the US. Not only are the Jewish-run media remaining mostly silent about this news story but the FBI, under the control of JAB(Jews-around-Biden), decided not to publicize crime statistics, of course for ONE REASON: Black crime, already and always so high, went through the roof as the result of the fantasy of BLM that led to the 'defunding' of the police. What is truly amazing in all this is the general white silence and wimpery. Worse, so many white dummies or whummies(even highly 'educated' ones, but then that is precisely the problem as education today = indoctrination = communion into 'woke' PC) still chant the BLM slogan or put up BLM signs on their windows and front lawns, as if doing so imbues them with spiritual righteousness — apparently, for post-religious Jaberals, their spiritual void has to be filled by SOMETHING, and when it's not the 'rainbow' sodomy, it's the myth of St. George Floyd(though, of late, Ukraine is the new crusade, but I don't see that lasting too long). However, even those who haven't fallen for the BS of BLM and Floyd Fantasy dare not speak the naked truth about blacks and crime. Even those who blame BLM for the rise in crime and deaths dare not talk about how crime is linked to blacks due to evolution and genetics. And even though blacks feel ZERO sympathy for the nonblack victims of black crime and thuggery, even anti-BLM voices frame their arguments in terms of lamentation for increased black deaths. Imagine a war in which the men of Army A are rejoicing over the deaths of men of enemy Army B, but Army B pleads to end the war because, boo hoo hoo, too many men in Army A are dying as well. Never mind their own men, for whom Army A feels zero sympathy. It goes to show that being right isn't the same as feeling righteous. Ones who are factually wrong but righteous in passion often dominate those who are factually right but defensive, apologetic, and gutless in emotion. On the eve of the Bolshevik takeover of Russia, a free market economist with better statistics and arguments would have been useless against true-believing Bolshevik fanatics. Maybe Bolshevik economic theory was based on false stats and wrong notions, but their adherents were extremely righteous in their conviction and willing to kill/die for their beliefs. So, in the absence of social and political order, the most strong-willed and impassioned were likely to come out on top.

All the correct statistics and the rightness in assessing reality are on the side of anti-BLM people. They are right in their knowledge that blacks commit the most crime, blacks routinely kill blacks, blacks also kill lots of non-blacks, and that white police 'genocide' of blacks is a total fantasy, despite the general 'liberal' belief that 10,000 blacks are killed annually by the police. They are also right in pointing out that increased police presence significantly reduce black deaths. But that's about being right, not about being righteous. It doesn't challenge the prevailing idolatry in the West that blacks are somehow sacred, that their bodies are special, their souls are nobler, and etc. Indeed, even anti-BLM voices often make their arguments in service to Negrolatry, i.e. they argue against BLM to save sacred black bodies that have been killed in larger numbers due to BLM policies. Righteousness can be founded on rightness in facts and reality but not necessarily, as facts often get in the way in the way of a narrative of heroes and villains, saints and sinners. More often than not, righteousness is divorced from rightness because emotions and spirituality often don't comport with facts and reality. It's like romance doesn't always choose the right or better person based on objective criteria. No wonder women fall for dangerous but dashing men, and men fall for femme fatales. Righteousness can be sentimental, or it can be furious, even murderous. Often, it starts as a gentle glow but then burns hot and threatens to set the world on fire. Consider how Christianity began as sympathy for Jesus the Good Man but turned into a worldwide crusade that destroyed countless pagan temples and persecuted so many as witches and heretics(and also led to countless sectarian violence). And, consider THE PLANET OF THE APES series, especially ESCAPE FROM THE PLANET OF THE APES where the apes in the first movie find themselves transported to an earlier time on Earth when humans still ruled. A man figures out what happened and realizes that the presence of the talking apes could begin to fulfill the prophecy whereby apekind eventually supersedes mankind as the masters of the planet. So, based on his calculations in regards to the future, the talking apes must either be killed or, at the very least, sterilized. But the movie audience, presumably all human, is likely to side with the apes despite the knowledge that the talking apes' presence threatens the future of mankind. Why would the audience feel this way? Because even though the correct 'math' is on the side of the man who sees the need to kill or sterilize the apes, the heart of the audience feels for the apes. They don't want to see the madonna ape and her baby be killed by Neo-Herod man. The movie ends with the baby ape going 'mama, mama'. So, 'mama' wins over 'math' because it feels more righteous even though the right thing to do, in order to secure mankind's future, is to kill or sterilize the apes. If the righteousness in ESCAPE FROM THE PLANET OF THE APES was on the level of sentiment, it turns into inflamed passion in CONQUEST OF THE PLANET OF THE APES, the hero of which is the ape-baby grown into the messianic Ape Avenger. (Of course, the religious-conservative orangutan elder was also right in THE PLANET OF THE APES as to the danger posed by humans to the ape world. Still, he was better-positioned than his human counterpart in ESCAPE because the ape world was tribal, traditional, and communal in their antipathy toward humans, whereas the thinking/talking apes in ESCAPE arrive in a liberal human order that, especially in the post-WWII and Cold War atmosphere, goes out of its way to be enlightened, tolerant, and compassionate. Thus, if the orangutan elder served the general will of the ape order, the human 'villain' in ESCAPE must act on his own against public sentiment.) Even when factually wrong, the righteous possess the drive to assert their will and go on the attack. Jussie Smollett pulled the insane 'hate hoax' because of his sense of righteousness. Being black, there's obviously more natural egotism, but our culture instills blacks with angry righteousness via academia, media, and official pronouncements. Indeed, the Civil Rights Movement narrative now counts for more than all other events in US history, and MLK is deemed greater than all great white historical figures combined; his only rivals are Harriet Tubman and George Floyd. For the righteous, it doesn't matter if something is factually correct or incorrect. What matters is they are on the 'right side of history', on the side of angels, and/or war with the demonic(as currently defined). So, stuff like facts are secondary to the cause, the agenda, the crusade. If facts are inconvenient, ignore them. If lies are useful, use them. As righteousness trumps all, reality exists to serve one's sacral vision of the world. It's like biology is a mere inconvenience to a tranny who insists he's a woman. As globo-homo has been sacralized, the homo or tranny's feelings are next-to-godliness, and reality must take a backseat to the passion of globo-homo. Likewise, no matter how many 'hate hoaxes' are exposed for what they are, the phenomenon continues because they aren't about facts but the faith of Negrolatry, Globo-Homo, or Jew-Worship. So, even when the latest 'hate hoax' is factually shown to have been the work of some lowlife Negro, Homo, or Jew, what matters is that it was for a good cause, to push the holy narrative, just like the Catholic Church, knowing full well that miracle sightings were bogus, pretended otherwise to keep the flock faithful. Such mentality now affects the entire media, even academia. Not that journalists and scholars aren't interested in facts and details, but they believe that the holiest of the holies are Negrolatry, Globo-Homo, and Jew-Worship, and therefore, even falsehoods that prop up the idolatry and narrative are preferable to facts that belie them. But then, there's another trick, that of 'prestige'. The establishment media and academia posture as being rational and factual by abusing their brand to dismiss any inconvenient fact, data, or idea/theory as 'discredited', thus persuading the less knowledgeable that certain things have been rejected by SCIENCE. New York Times uses its prestige to repeat over and over that Charles Murray's Bell Curve theory has been 'discredited' but without showing any scientific proof. For many people, official prestige is enough to sway them. (By the way, Murray is a perfect example of the weakness of rightness in the face of impassioned righteousness, like at Middlebury College. He may be right about lots of facts, but he's bloodless and passionless about his knowledge. At times, he's even defensive and lamenting, like Robert D. Putman who wrote BOWLING ALONE. Both scholars operate on the basis of, "I wish it wasn't true, but it is." It's impossible to be righteous with the right data with such wussy attitude. If rightness is to prevail, it must also be righteous and grow a pair.)

As a matter of factuality, BLM is a lie, which means policies based on it are nonsensical, and as such, they can only do harm as reality is willfully misunderstood and mishandled. It's like misdiagnosis in medicine can be harmful, even fatal. Imagine a lung cancer patient being ordered to smoke more as a cure. (Just think of what the lies about Covid-19 did to the world.) Despite all the lies, so many people in the US still chant BLM slogans and even put up BLM signs. They are saying and living the lie, but they do it anyway because they feel righteous. In contrast, even though anti-BLM people are on firm ground as far as reality is concerned, they are anxious or afraid to speak the truth. A few may defend the police and even put up support-the-police signs, but virtually NO ONE in the US puts up signs saying BLACKS MURDER BLACKS, BLACKS RAPE WHITES, BLACKS ATTACK NON-BLACKS, etc., all of which are infinitely truer about reality than the fantasy of BLM. Furthermore, any sane person should know by now that BLM policies led to even more black deaths, but BLM still remains the righteous position whereas critics of BLM are still apologetic about the truth. 'Black Lives Matter' is like China's 'Great Leap Forward', which was actually a great leap backward. More black lives were killed as the result of BLM, but such facts are secondary to the righteous rage of 'social justice' where blacks are saints and whites are demons. But white people weren't always this way. They used to be rationally race-ist and have a far more realistic assessment of group differences. Sure, there was also more bigotry of the stupid sort, the gratuitous nastiness of a**holes, but there was also a good deal of common sense, as well as a sure sense of white worth, white pride, European heritage, and historical meaning, all of which kept whites believing that they were of a race, culture, and civilization worth preserving and defending, even expanding. Fast forward to today, and many whites feel as though they're diseased with a 'sinful' and 'racist' identity that must be expunged somehow. There are still many whites feel otherwise, but even many of them lack the guts to stand up and speak up for their race. Furthermore, despite their lack of white self-loathing, they tend to give special consideration to Jews and blacks over their own kind, as if they feel they must prove they are not 'racist'. It's like Donald Trump relied heavily on white support but was always yammering about how his policies are so great for Jews and blacks. All of this is a powerful demonstration of the effect of undermining resistance in a people. It's like a person with severely compromised immunity can fall seriously ill or even die from a mild disease. A healthy person's body fends off all sorts of germs, even the nastiest ones, but an unhealthy person can succumb to even the common cold or mild case of flu. For him, it could be totally debilitating or even fatal.

Jews understand this very well. One way to destroy a powerful system is to assemble a powerful counter-force and go on the attack. All throughout history, a powerful domain was defeated by an even more powerful domain. In World War II, it took the combined might of UK, US, and USSR to destroy the powerful Nazi Germany, which had been unified into a powerful industrial fighting force. It's like it takes a powerful boxer or wrestler to defeat another powerful boxer or wrestler. To amass a powerful force and hurl it against another powerful force is no easy feat. It's like it's nearly impossible to fell a tree with one blow. So, what did people do through the ages? They took an ax and slowly chipped away at the tree. Then, when enough of the tree was chopped away at the base, it would fall from its own weight. Just leave it up to gravity. Indeed, no matter how big and powerful someone is, anyone(even a child or old lady) could beat him if he was debilitated by drugs or disease. It's like naturalists in the field can work on bears, lions, rhinos, and other dangerous animals once they'd been tranquilized. White America used to be united and powerful. What made it so? Racial consciousness, historical sense, pride of achievement, sense of community, and spiritual conviction(that its faith was the best one). There was no chance that Jews or any people could bring down such a power. Politically, economically, technologically, and militarily, the White West was the most powerful entity, invincible as a united force. Nothing even came close. Yet, even if it couldn't be beaten from the outside, it could be weakened from the inside. Anti-whites could enter into institutions and rewrite the laws. They could enter the academia & media and alter the narratives and idols/icons. They could use entertainment and leisure to make the white masses prioritize hedonism and decadence over morality, family, community, and nation. They could take over medicine and promote all sorts of drugs on which people become dependent. They could use education and communication to instill whites with feelings of 'guilt' and 'sin'. Information and Media could also be used to promote non-white, anti-white, Judeo-centric, Afro-centric, and/or homocentric idols/icons and narratives over pro-white, normative, and Eurocentric ones. Also, language and terminology could be used to turn certain words into incantations and truisms that were to be accepted as 'self-evident' than debated. "Diversity is our strength, diversity is our strength..." or "black lives matter, black lives matter", "white supremacism! white supremacism!" "Migrants Welcome, Migrants Welcome", ad infinitum.

Over time, despite still being the dominant majority in the West, despite having suffered no military invasions, despite continuing to hold lots of wealth, and despite having lots of people with talent, the White World came to be near-fatally weakened on the tribal, racial, communal, moral, spiritual, and national level. Forget about European pride when you've been told that a recently arrived Arab or African is just as 'European' as a European(if not more so) with ancestry going back 10,000s of yrs. Never mind racial unity when 'racism' is the greatest sin, and 'white racism' is the worst of all 'racisms', especially against blacks even when blacks act like thugs and louts. Forget about community when individualism is all that matters; your hedonism and pleasure matter more than family and society. Besides, if a community must be formed, it has to be around stuff like globo-homo or BLM as any theme with the slightest hint of being pro-white, genuinely Christian, or truly European is anathema in the Current Year. And what is morality when right-or-wrong is a matter of mindlessly praising and serving Jews, blacks, and homos? And forget about spirituality in a world where churches fly the homo flag or care more for the Negrolatry of George Floyd than about God and Jesus. With the White World degraded to such level, forget about nationalism. What nation is left to save or defend? It's been said the US defeated the Soviet Union without firing a single shot in the Cold War. World War III was averted but US nevertheless won over the communist system. Actually, this isn't really true. Soviet Union defeated itself because communism wasn't a workable system in the long run. Even if there had been no Cold War and even if the US and USSR had just ignored one another, USSR would have lost anyway(even without US hostility) because the economic system was too confused and inefficient, and without incentives. Soviet Union defeated itself, but the US took the credit. Imagine if someone you hate drinks himself to death, but you take credit of having beaten him. In contrast, the defeat or the fall of the White World is truly amazing. Unlike the USSR that practiced a deeply flawed economic system, white people in Europe, Canada, and the US had everything, most of them right. They had freedom and democracy, they had capitalism, they had social safety nets(a bit of socialism), they had national identity and pride, and lots of other things that make society work. And yet, whites have become increasingly defenseless against problems and challenges that should have been obvious to the naked eye and could have been handled with a bit of good sense. The fate of the Soviet Union was the failure of failure, whereas the fate of the White West is the failure of success, i.e. people with so many good ideas and systems failing to secure and strengthen them and instead, meekly and weakly, letting themselves to be nudged, prodded, pushed, and attacked with ever more ridiculous demands.

The White West was the most powerful force in the world. So powerful that even after WWI, it dominated the world. And even after WWII, the white-dominant US was the biggest power in the world by far. (And even the Soviet Union was white.) There was no force that could challenge or defeat it. And yet, its mechanism of self-preservation and resistance grew ever more compromised from the inside. Instead of being defeated outright in the physical/material/military sense, its inner sense of worth, confidence, meaning, and value came to be eroded over time... until there was a critical mass of whites who called for the outright destruction of whiteness and whites who were too spineless to stand up and say NO. In a way, what happened to Russians and White West during and after the Cold War is like the mirror opposite. During the Cold War, the America-led West grew richer and more abundant and developed the most powerful military. In contrast, the Soviets with a far smaller economy strained to keep up militarily and couldn't even fill up store shelves with basic items. By every metric of material success, the American-led West beat the Soviet Union by a mile. But, despite all such gains in the West, there was a ceaseless decline in patriotism, national identity, cultural heritage, civilizational confidence, communal unity, and racial sense. White Americans had more, ate more, and had more fun, but they increasingly became defensive about their identity lest they give offense as 'racists'. In contrast, while material conditions worsened in Russia under late communism and then truly hit rock bottom in the 1990s, Russians never felt there was anything wrong with being Russian, that Russians were burdened with special 'historical guilt', or that they were soul-sick for their ethnicity or nationality. Even when material conditions were at their worst in Russia, Russians didn't feel bad about their history, country, culture, and identity.

In the end, who wins out? A rich man who hates himself or a poor man who likes himself? Such a rich man, for all his wealth, begins to work against himself, whereas the poor man, despite his poverty, works for himself, to build himself up. In the long run, a man robbed of his soul is worse off than a man robbed of his possessions. It's even worse if the man robbed of his soul is told that hating himself is the highest good, or the new soulfulness. White Californians had it so good. In the same period, Russians had it so bad. But today, Russia is asserting its national will and taking back historical parts of Ukraine. In contrast, white Californians, over several decades, have been unwilling, thus unable, to do anything to stop their decline and demise even though there has been no military invasion of California. While Russians were doing something about the globalist oligarchs, White Californians let Jewish oligarchs take over everything and demand and dictate as if the Golden State was their fiefdom. While Russia reasserted control of its borderlands, white Californians, once over 80% of the population, have been reduced to 35% and keep on losing. While Russia said NO to globo-homo, white Californians are always at the mercy of whatever fads and fashions pushed by Jews, indeed as if they have no minds or souls of their own. When the Cold War ended, white Californians had so much more than the impoverished Russians. But whereas Russians never felt bad for being Russian, so many White Californians had no ethnic pride or racial sense of pride left. They lost their sense of self-preservation and resistance because Jews gained the key into the control centers of the West and reprogrammed the White Mind via the academia and media with negative feelings about 'white guilt', 'racism', 'homophobia', and etc. (While the Soviet Union was also 'anti-racist', the policy didn't come at the expense of Russian-ness, which was not insulted and excoriated as being uniquely guilty. Jews pulled that number first on Germans, then Anglos, and then rest of Western Europe.) And this poison is the new white identity or anti-identity all over the West, from US to Canada to Australia to EU. Indeed, one reason why current Europeans hate Russians(and Hungarians) with such virulence is that their new identity is one of self-negation. A German believes it's wrong for a true German, a white German, to feel pride of identity. No, 'German-ness' has value only in association to 'diversity'. If a black African becomes a 'German citizen', then and only then does German identity have value. For true/white Germans, German-ness is a burden, a curse stained with Holocaust Guilt. Only when outsiders become 'New Germans' does German-ness gain value as newcomers(especially if non-white) are without Holocaust Guilt. But it's not just the Germans. Almost all Western Europeans now feel and think this way. Their national anti-identity is one of self-negation-and-abnegation, of welcoming the non-European world to take over as the New Europe.

Then, it's hardly surprising that such people would be terribly triggered by Russians who affirm their national identity and heritage and culture. How dare they? Don't Russians know that 'good whites' work to undermine their own national identity, national borders, national heritage? It's become customary in Europe to feature black actors in historical roles of Europeans. Whiteness is BAD and is made GOOD only through self-negation and cucking to others. When such mentality dominates the 'rules-based order' of the West, of course Russia proudly asserting its position and projecting its power to secure its existence and future is deeply offensive. Don't be like those barbarians! Be like the British, Irish, or White Californians whose highest notion of good is winning approval from Jews. So, Jews were very smart. They knew that the White West was mighty and impossible to defeat and take over militarily, but it could be rendered defenseless if its resistance mechanism were altered from within. Jews didn't have to fire a shot. Just get the key and worm inside to the inner workings of white institutions and media that control the thoughts and feelings of the white masses, especially true in the era of electronic media where virtually everyone's mind is tuned to the wavelength of those who monopolize key media centers. Then, why should anyone be surprised about the sickening silence surrounding the horrific murder of Linda Frickey? She's white, and whiteness is bad. Don't resist against black savagery! That's 'racist'! Gee, maybe those blacks(called 'teens') did us a favor by ridding the world of some of this shitty 'whiteness', of which Linda Frickey was a part. What a world we live in. White American cowards who don't lift a finger to protect their own from black savages and illegal invaders get all triggered over Russia finally pushing back against Jewish use of NATO as battering ram against Russia. Death Of The Jewish Pencil - Brother Nathanael