White or Western Specialness Forfeited by Blind Unconditional Obedience to Zion, or Now, the Myth of White Uniqueness in the West Gone Cuck

The idea that the West needs white people to uphold Western Values has been blown to smithereens by white submission to Judeo-Semitic Despotism.

Video Link

It’s often voiced or at least felt within the white community that whites advanced and developed far ahead of all the other peoples to better appreciate the values of freedom, personal conscience, and individual thought. It’s still openly voiced in the white racial dissident sphere, e.g. white people appreciate principles like Free Speech whereas nonwhites do not, therefore immigration must be halted to preserve Western values and principles. Establishment Conservatives opt to explain these matters in terms of culture than race, whereas so-called ‘Liberals’ and ‘Progressives’ dare not make a racial or even cultural case for Western values.
Still, if we judge people by practice than rhetoric, most white people, even ‘liberals’ and ‘progressives’, at least FEEL this way. So-called ‘Liberals’ are among the most dogged supporters of globalist Neo-Imperialism premised on making the world a better place via Western hegemony. Even something like BLM is, at least at the subconscious level, based on the assumption that white conscience/compassion is essential because nonwhites, especially blacks, simply cannot do things on their own: If indeed blacks are genuinely conscientious and capable, they would have dealt with the problem of black deaths mostly brought upon by black-on-black violence. Blacks would have cared about all those dead blacks and taken necessary measures. BLM, on the other hand, compels non-blacks to invest their treasury, talents, and hearts in black problems. The unstated implication is that blacks simply cannot deal with their own problems because blacks don’t much care about other blacks and/or lack the will and means to solve their own problems.
But openly stating the obvious would be ‘racist’, and so the BLM hysteria was all about the evils of blacks being killed by white ‘systemic racism’. The end result was to urge white people to care more about blacks, i.e. as blacks don’t care about fellow blacks, maybe whites and non-blacks should fill the vacuum, but with the pretense that the problem is ‘white racism’ because noticing black internecine violence and black unconcern for fellow blacks would be ‘unacceptable’ and ‘racist’.
And so, BLM placed caring-about-blacks at the front-burner of white priorities… except it did no good(and did much harm) because of the powerful taboos surrounding race. If you suffer from a problem that cannot be self-corrected and therefore go to see a doctor, the treatment could be worse than the disease if proper diagnosis simply isn’t allowed. With BLM, blacks outsourced their problems to whites but blamed it on whites than on themselves. It’d be like someone messing up his own car and then going to a mechanic for help but then blaming the mechanic for the car’s troubles.
Because the Jewish-controlled media have routinely fixated on the relatively rare cases of white-on-black violence(often in reaction to black aggression) while mostly ignoring black-on-black and black-on-nonblack violence, much of the world formed the impression that white policemen constitute the main source of violent deaths in the black community even though the primary reason for higher murder rates in the black community has been black-on-black violence.

Anyway, BLM couldn’t have grown so big without white involvement built on white conceits. Even so-called white ‘Liberals’, who stake their self-worth on ‘anti-racism’, can’t help feeling that nothing is possible without their commitment and input. Blacks just can’t fix their own problems; therefore, caring, intelligent, and well-educated whites must bolster, support, guide, or lead the movement-of-the-hour. Indeed, Negrolatry is essentially a white thing. Black jiveass self-regard alone doesn’t make for Negrolatry; it requires the fawning, gushing, and even delirious immersion of whites in stuff like Black Girl Magic, washing stinky Negro feet, and erecting monuments to fat black women, i.e. black self-esteem is incumbent on white caring.

There’s an element of submission-and-humiliation ritual in this but also a kind of condescension: “We progressive and liberal white people are so conscientious and full of compassion for these unattractive, troublesome, intellectually childlike, and economically challenged blacks. To boost black self-esteem, we caring whites are obligated to exaggerate their achievements and potential.” It’s like a special ed teacher heaping praise on retarded kids with Downs Syndrome, calling everything ‘wonderful’ and ‘brilliant’. Thus, Negroes are both the gods and the pets of whites. Whites are awed by black athletic, musical, oratory, & sexual prowess and worship blacks as the super-race, but whites also feel pity for black backwardness in all other areas and go out of their way to aid in black self-esteem.
So-called white ‘liberals’ and ‘progressives’ pride themselves on being ‘radical’, ‘different’, ‘subversive’, or ‘ahead of the curve’ in some way, making them feel glibly superior to ‘conventional wisdom’ as they go about pretending that some fat black woman is ‘beautiful’, a third-rate scientist like Neil deGrasse Tyson is OMG-brilliant, or the fashionable Negro Thinker of the Day, be he Ta-Nehisi Coates or Ibrahim X. Kendi is a freaking gEnIuS. Or, pretending that some guy in women’s sports is really a ‘woman’, if only as a status marker of being ‘more evolved’.

So, whether it’s the race-ist(or racialist) whites of the dissident right or the globalist whites of Con Inc., Liberal Centrism, or Progressive Left, there is either a blatant or implicit notion that whites are different, special, or more advanced in some way. Even white self-loathing is a way of saying, “We whites are so advanced in our ethics that we’ve transcended atavistic tribalism in favor of higher consciousness.”

And then, there are statistical racialists like Charles Murray. Instead of blurting out in an uncouth(but candid) manner, “We whites are special as a race”, they go about amassing copious data on ‘human achievement’ to arrive at the foregone conclusion, purportedly without any original intent to do so, LOL, that whites are the most awesome and super-special race there ever was, though pound-for-pound, they lose out to the Jews, the implication being that whites must suck up to Jews as the ultimate master race.
Further to the Right are figures like Jared Taylor who harbor no inhibition in blurting out that whites are indeed special & different and therefore have every right to maintain their own worlds separate from the troublesome darkies and the smart-but-robotic-and-unoriginal yellows.

But looking at today’s ideological and political landscape, there’s hardly any evidence of white specialness. All the values and virtues extolled in admiration and defense of the West, implicitly meaning the white-made-world, are hardly discernible among whites. Consider principles such as free speech, defense of liberty, rule of law, individualism, true conscience based on facts & critical thought, aka independence of mind, rejection of mindless dogma, and defiance against tyranny, none of which is possible without dignity and courage.
The so-called white ‘liberals’ and ‘progressives’ have shown themselves to be abject tools of power, a bunch of commissars with the mentality of the East German Stasi. Having outsourced all their thinking to the institutions, they turned into a bunch of NPC’s of the famous meme. Ideology is dead among so-called ‘liberals’ and ‘progressives’ who are far more likely to be animated by the idolatry of certain groups, namely Jews, blacks, and homosexuals. The Democratic Party is the quasi-official oligarchic party funded by super-rich Zionists and served by institutions run by Jewish supremacists and their cuck goy dogs.

As for the GOP, far from serving as the countervailing force against the Democratic Party, its big dream is to supplant the rival party as the favored tool of the globalist Jewish supremacist oligarchs. In other words, the GOP, instead of assembling a coalition of groups and interests at odds with the interests of Jewish supremacist oligarchs and globalist corporations, hopes to win over those very oligarchs by demonstrating an even greater servility to Zion.
So, if the Democrats are Jewish Supremacist, the Republicans aren’t anti-Jewish Supremacist but willing to be even more pro-Jewish Supremacist to win over the Jews as the ideal overlords of the GOP.
Perhaps, it’s part of GOP’s political DNA as the Republicans were, for a long spell, regarded as the party of wealthy rock-ribbed upper-crust reactionaries and Big Business(at odds with Big Labor, the underclass, and etc. that were more likely to be represented by the Democrats). But it’s also because Jews, who control the gods(what is deemed holy and unholy), have profoundly transformed the canonical themes of Americanism and Western values, with Holocaustianity having supplanted Christianity as the holiest of the holy and with ‘antisemitism’ constituting the absolute worst ‘sin’.

Given the current state of affairs, whites are mostly ‘wheaks’(or weak whites), rank hypocrites, servile dogs, numbnut toadies, insipid idiots, craven cowards, braindead commissars, venal opportunists, and second-rate turds. White Americans, who once contrasted their free spiritedness and individualism with the robotic nature of the Japanese, the servile demeanor of Mexicans, and the theocratic mindset of Muslims, are now hardly better than the rest of the world, or even worse. Any notion of white uniqueness now rings hollow.

As for those whites who insist that the Western advantage has nothing to do with race and everything to do with ideas and culture, they sound just as bogus because whites who make up the great majority of the West are no longer exemplars of the so-called Western Values.
2020 was a banner year as demonstration of the myth of the white/Western specialness given that so many whites collectively lost their minds over issue after issue, sheepishly or rabidly conforming to whatever craze, panic, or hysteria handed down from above. Where was the dignity of the individual, sense of skepticism, spirit of defiance, and power of critical thinking? Instead, most whites were lemmings or cattle with herd mentality.
Not that nonwhites were any better, though they certainly weren’t worse. There was plenty of (what came to be known as)Mass Formation Psychosis to go around on all five continents, though it was the White West that was most rabid about Covid hysterics while the Yellow East was the most mindlessly obedient.

In the West, a particularly sorry sight was that the people who prided themselves as the most secular, rational, educated, and intellectual consistently turned out to be the biggest suckers of a series of frauds, be they political(Trump as Putin’s puppet), medical(Covid’s gonna kill us all unless you get 100 boosters), racial(innocent blacks are being genocided by KKKops), biological(that male beating the females in women’s sports is a ‘woman’), cultural(“love is love”, or sodomy is just as valid as real sex), international(the unprovoked Russian invasion of eastern Ukraine), and etc.
Perhaps the pride of status and the prestige of influence got the best of them. As their side controls all the elite institutions, perhaps they were so sure that such an impressive array of experts, scholars, intellectuals, and opinion makers couldn’t possibly be wrong. The anointed Dr. Fauci. Or, given the ideology of ‘empowerment’ where power trumps principles, they’ve all turned ‘gangster’ and don’t care which means are employed AS LONG AS their side keeps the power and controls the world.

But, if anyone hoped that the Western Right offered a meaningful alternative, he would have been sorely disappointed, especially following Donald Trump’s recapture of the Oval Office that supposedly signaled the end of ‘wokeness’ and the new dawn of liberty, dignity, and decency. Instead, the result has been just another form of hypocrisy and collusion with the forces of corruption. Less emphasis on DEI but only to facilitate the Zionist agenda of suppression of voices critical of Jewish supremacism, Israel First-ism, and US government’s servility to Netanyahu & his tribal brethren in the US. And just look at the rank and file that make up the GOP: Mealy-mouthed cowards, flunkies, and toadies, a party of total supplication to Zion in the dream that rich, smart, and powerful Jews will shower them with cash and prizes.

And some of the biggest names in alternative ‘conservative’ or ‘right-leaning’ media, like Tim Pool(the Fool) simply want to have it both ways, which is to mouth off gripes generally unheard in ‘mainstream media’ but nevertheless to gain access to officials and to gain/keep advertisers. As such, even though they’ve been at pains to complain about the increasing censorship under the Democrats, ‘liberals’, ‘progressives’, and ‘woke’ types, they’ve either ignored the equally egregious(and in some cases worse) abuses by the Trump administration or tried to spin them as the fulfillment of MAGA patriotism.

In the end, pockets of meaning are to be found not by trusting the Right or the Left but in seeking out those voices that have a sense of independence and integrity for the truth regardless of one’s ideological leanings and party affiliations, like when Glenn Greenwald lambasted the ‘Liberals’ for trashing the liberal principles of free speech. And even though his detractors said he turned ‘right’, he was just as quick to call out Trump’s mangling of free speech(critical of Zionism) as a favor to his Jewish donors. Unlike so many ‘liberals’ who knew that the Hunter Biden laptop was NOT Russian ‘disinformation’ but pretended to for partisan sake, Greenwald called it for what it was, leading to the breakup with online news site The Intercept.

Video Link

Everyone in politics is part of a team, but if one forsakes his personal independence/integrity merely to be a team player, he’s a cog, not cognitive. Besides, it should be obvious to all that the Official Team doesn’t necessarily represent the values of the said ideology, just like the Catholic Church was never the end-all when it came to the meaning of Jesus’ teachings. Institutions play for power, and as such, there’s necessary compromise but also corruption that invariably leads to betrayal.
Indeed, one wonders if the main function of both political parties is to lend the other side a convenient excuse or plausible denial as to why it failed in its agenda. Perhaps, the Republicans don’t really want a conservative agenda even as they attract conservative voters. With Democrats blocking their supposed agenda, the Republicans always have an excuse as to why they couldn’t deliver, and vice versa. Do Democratic politicians really want ‘socialism’? They make the noises but likely with welcome relief that the Republicans will derail anything ‘radical’ that arises from their side. This way, both sides can have the cake and eat it too. Pump up its ideology with the readymade excuse that the OTHER side stood in the way. Some may argue that this makes for a Moderate Center to dominate US politics, but it’s more like the Extreme Center, with the dominant forces in the Middle of both the Democrats and Republicans supporting the extreme ultra-tribal Jewish supremacist globalism that dominates the US. It’s the middle or the center that is most extreme in its support of what many people call ‘genocide’ in Gaza while the supposed ‘extreme’, ‘marginal’, or ‘fringe’ elements on the left and right denounce the horror. Notice that the biggest warmongers are found in the center of both the Democrats and Republicans, whereas a ‘fringe’ or ‘extreme’ figure like Ron Paul called for a more modest role for the US in the world. The current state of Extreme Centrism is a danger to both the US and EU.

At any rate, one facet of the (mostly rightist)white argument against mass immigration(of mostly nonwhites) has gone out the window in light of developments surrounding the Gaza Horror(often called ‘Gaza Genocide’ or ‘Gaza Holocaust’). In the face of this evil, whites, especially craven cuckservatives and Boomer Conservatives(and even Liberals), have shown the least amount of sense, decency, principles, and values. The claim that the West needs white people to maintain the Western Principles of free speech, liberty, skepticism, open-mindedness, universal human rights, personal conscience, and political courage has been exposed to be a fraud. White people, by and large, have shown themselves to be cowardly, submissive, conformist, repressive, opportunistic, and quasi-theocratic(in their worship of the Awesome Jew).

The white elites in the Democratic Party said little or nothing about the horrors unfolding in Gaza(and the Zionist destabilization of the entire region by aiding ISIS in Syria and beating the war drums against Iran, one that the US will have to bear the brunt of). As for whites in the GOP(aka the ‘white party’), they’ve shown themselves to be castrated, wussy, servile, venal, and murderous(if only to appease Jewish Power). The main animating spirit among Republicans is Jew Envy, i.e. Jews are the golden goose, the super-elites, superior whites, and the rightful master race, not only the biggest victors but the most sacred victims(based on the cult of Forever Holocaust). Jews are the Cash Cow and the Holy Cow. As such, the main(and possibly the only) opportunity for white success and survival is to suck up to Jewish Power, appease it at every turn(even if it means aiding and abetting mass murder, genocide, and more unjust wars based on Zionist lies), and to gain some more shekels & pats on their white-dog heads. It’s also a vile and sleazy way to project and transfer the ‘sins’ of ‘antisemitism’ onto the Other, the Arabs/Muslims.

As the Jewish Narrative would have it, ‘antisemitism’ has mostly been the ‘irrational’ & ‘rabid/virulent’ fear and loathing of the Christian(and then ‘racist’) White West in regards to the Jew as spiritual Christ-killers and/or an alien race with origins in Levant. Holocaust or Shoah, according to this narrative, was the ultimate and even inevitable culmination of the sickness inherent in the White West animated by hypocritical Christian purity spirals and then racial science that emerged in the 19th Century.
In having accepted this Jewish-driven Narrative, whites have been burdened with the greatest ‘sin’, that of ‘antisemitism’. Sure, some whites are more guilty than others. Germans are the most guilty, but other Europeans are guilty of either Collaboration or lack of resistance. White Americans are partly guilty too for having dragged their heels into confronting Germany prior to the Pearl Harbor attack. Besides, according to Jews, white American history of black slavery(and Jim Crow) is analogous to European hostility and violence toward Jews. As Jews control the academia/media and the ‘gods’, they could render anything as a sacred cow or a cursed scapegoat, and in order to get revenge on whites and to control them, the white race has been scapegoated for just about everything; it was also a useful ploy in forming a Jewish-Diversity alliance whereby Jews-blaming-whites-for-antisemitism and nonwhites-blaming-whites-for-racism became the core constituency of Democratic and ‘progressive’ politics.

As for wimpy and wussy Conservatives, their fear of Jews(and the labels of ‘antisemitism’ and ‘racism’) prevented them from calling out the actual political mechanism behind this anti-white defamation and crusade. The ONLY hope nursed by Republicans and Conservatives was to find some way to win over the Jews. For George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, it was following the Neocon blueprint for Wars for Israel. When that project went south, it was sucking up to Jewish supremacist globalists at every turn in all their agendas: Anti-Russian ‘new cold war’, harping about Iran as the ‘main sponsor of terrorism’, licking Bibi Netanyahu’s anus every time he visited DC, and pleading with Jews that they should favor White Conservatives who are more likely to be reliable(meaning mindless and obedient) supporters of Israel than White Liberals and Diversity Folks are. In other words, no criticism of Jewish Power, no pride and dignity on the part of White Conservatives. Just doglike mewling to the Jewish Master that their side is more likely to be UNCONDITIONALLY supportive of whatever Israel does, even if it is genocide, support for ISIS & Al Qaeda terrorists, and more wars for Jewish Supremacist Hegemony.

One thing for sure, by unconditionally supporting Jews & Israel, the White Conservative hope is to dump the ‘sin’ of ‘antisemitism’ on the Arab/Muslim/Iranian world. Supposedly, Western whites & Christians are now totally in atonement mode and doing their best to fully cure themselves of the ‘oldest hatred’, whereas THOSE MOOSLIM SAVAGES are the new ‘Anti-Semites’ and New Nazis, against whom the much reformed whites are aiding the noble and beleaguered Jews. (Never mind that the Arab/Muslim world is deeply divided, with the bulk of it only talking the talk when it comes to Palestinians while walking the walk of collaborating with the US as the #1 puppet of Zion.)

Now, where are the values of Western liberty, independence, and morality in such attitudes and outlooks? Where is the spirit of 1776? Where are the principles of the Enlightenment? Where are rationality, skepticism, and the determination to speak truth to power?
Instead, great many White Conservative, especially among Boomers, are of the Oriental Despotic mindset, except that, instead of bowing down before the Great Mongol Khan, Chinese Emperor(as the Son of Heaven), or Japanese Shogun, it’s at the feet of the Great Awesome Super Jews as the god-emperor tribesmen. Just one look at the cuck-maggot face of Mike Johnson and one word from his mealy-mouth are enough to make one nauseous. Physiognomy is real in that one.

In contrast, some of the key essence of Western Values have been best expressed by nonwhites since Oct 7, or the Gaza Uprising. They’ve shown courage, they’ve stood on principles(despite the prospect of career apocalypse), they’ve spoken truth to power, they’ve named the great evil of our age, Zionism which is now genocidal Jewish supremacism. They’ve called on the ruling elites to listen to the people and open up their hearts to the victims in Gaza(instead of pretending that Jews are Forever Victims who need to be saved from ‘New Hitlers’ that now even include starving children in Gaza).

For the longest time, White Democrats and ‘progressives’, at the behest of Jews, have been pushing for censorship and managed to silence countless voices on social platforms, especially 2016. But, when pro-Palestinian sentiments exploded on the Western Progressive side(against the wishes of Jewish Power that cultivated ‘wokeness’ to contain ‘leftism’ within the controlled framework of ‘climate change’, GloboHomo, Negrolatry, and White Demonism), Jews figured on easing the suppression of right-wing speech in the hope that the Right will take on the ‘woke’ types gone rogue and off-the-reservation, like Greta Thunberg, once a useful idiot in Jewish-Wall-Street-Soros promoted Climate Hysteria but now an independent voice calling out Jewish evils in Gaza. So, give the anti-‘woke’ Right greater leeway in social platforms, and have it duke it out with the generally pro-Palestinian Left.

But, this may have been a miscalculation as the kinds of rightism that were suppressed hardly harbored pro-Zionist sentiments, i.e. they may hate ‘wokeness’ but they hate Jewish Supremacism more than anything.
While Establishment Conservatives(or Con Inc.) have been downright pitiful in their doglike obsequiousness to Zion, the dissident/independent Right has long been at the game of calling out Jewish Power. Basically, we have Establishment Liberals and especially Establishment Conservatives sucking up to Israel Firsters while true leftists/progressives and alternative rightist/conservative voices are calling out the total perversion that has become Zionism.

In the current landscape, for all the litany of arguments against non-white immigrants as poor prospects of upholding the great and noble values of Western Civilization, in reality it’s almost as if whites, in their doglike servitude to Jews and in total absence of agency & conscience, have outsourced Western values to the ‘browns’ who’ve shown the spirit of freedom, justice, courage, dignity, and human rights in calling out the evils of Jewish Supremacism. Compare Kristi Noem the puppy-killing wench and Dumb Blondie Pam Bondi with this young woman.

Video Link

Kristi Noem, like virtually all white cuck politicians of both parties, observed Memorial Day by visiting Israel with an offer of UNCONDITIONAL support of whatever Jews do. It’s almost as if Jews are god and whites are their faithful servants. There is nothing like thought, rationality, or independence of mind. Just blind faith, craven opportunism, and stupid obedience.
And, there goes the idea that Conservatives care about free speech and America First. Some might say people like Noem and Mike Huckabee are merely expressing their religious convictions, but where in the New Testament does it say Christians must worship Jews, aid & abet their massacres, and look upon goyim(such as Palestinians and other Arabs/Muslims hated by Jews) as subhumans deserving to be smitten? It’s all the more embarrassing given that Jews have constituted by far the most anti-white and anti-Christian force in the West for as long as anyone can remember.

In the post-World-War-II period, Jews(especially in the US) gained not only great power but unprecedented prestige as a wise and tragic people, the kind with the depth of knowledge, experience, and insight to revolutionize and repurpose the true meaning of Western Civilization, as well as the true principles of the American Experiment as a Proposition Nation committed to universal human rights, freedom of conscience/speech, equal justice, and anti-supremacism. It was hoped, surely a people who suffered the Holocaust would understand the pain of others and would, based on their own experience and contemplation, teach and remind the West of its failings and hypocrisies, in the manner of Gandhi who said of Western Civilization that it’s a good idea. With wise and intelligent Jewish elites at the helm, the dream was that the West would finally practice what it preached.
As things turned out, Jewish Power proved to be just as bad or even worse as the hypocritical imperialist-supremacists of old. All said and done, Jews merely exploited their Holocaust victim status to psycho-politically blackmail the West into supporting every Zionist abuse and browbeat into silence anyone who notices Jewish Power and its perversities. Indeed, there were warning signs when the Jews, while making much noise about the Holocaust and ‘racism'(mostly against blacks), were practicing a kind of Jim Crowitz in Israel/Palestine and forging alliances with Apartheid South Africa.

But the true face of Jewish Power bared itself with the end of the Cold War, with just about every policy, domestic and foreign, being based on “Is it good for Jews?” with total disregard for the interests and feelings of other groups.
Jews, once most closely associated with free speech, are now the main force for censorship. Thus, the Jewish conceit of fulfilling the mission of Western Civilization has been exposed as fraudulent. Jewishness is now mostly about demanding that White Cucks in the West do the bidding of World Jewry to sanction any country, terrorize any part of the world, and wage any war so that more power and wealth will be concentrated in Jewish hands. There are plenty of Jews who oppose this Jewish supremacist evil, but they’re mostly voices in the wilderness, helpless to change the course of history as delivered by both parties in total obeisance to Zion.

 Video Link

In the commencement video above, following the speech by the brown woman, the MIT College President Sally Kornbluth insists on sticking to protocols and the rules of the graduation ceremony — no politicking — , and I would be inclined to agree as nonpolitical events shouldn’t be politicized. In a Perfect World, Kornbluth the Zionist makes good sense. But since when has the Jewish-run academia and media played by any rules? Would Kornbluth have made the same remark if a black college student spouted off about BLM and white ‘racism’ in 2020? When controversial guests were shouted down and intimidated on college campuses, did college presidents and deans speak out or condemn such behavior? How many students were punished or expelled for physically threatening Charles Murray at the Middlebury Campus? If colleges should be politically impartial, why were college students offered milk & cookies and copious therapy sessions upon Donald Trump’s win in 2016? When have college presidents and deans condemned expressions of black rage? And did they similarly censure protests against South African Apartheid in the 1980s? Why didn’t colleges resist the witch-hunt against college administrators in the aftermath of the Gaza Uprising, soon followed by the Gaza Apocalypse and protests against it? The very Liberals, especially Jewish ones, who’ve been pontificating endlessly about the dark days of McCarthyism were either silent or utterly ineffectual against government demands that speech and expression be curtailed on campuses lest they offend the tender sensitivities of Jewish supremacist Zionist students. When have colleges ever demanded that voices of professors or students be shut down lest they offend white or Christian students?
And where were all these Conservative Politicians when Jews led the way in spreading anti-white hatred in media & academia since at least the 1960s? Why didn’t they ever call out the Jews or demand that anti-white hatred be condemned? White Conservatives, who’d done nothing for white students against the Jewish-led assault, were suddenly so outraged by ‘antisemitism’ on campus, even though the protests included many conscientious Jewish students and weren’t directed at Jews per se but at Zionism’s monstrous cancer into a form of JudeoNazism.

Besides, politicizing EVERYTHING has been the feature of the modern Jewish-led academia. There was a time when Archie’s comics were just fun. But college-educated commissars felt a need to politicize it with the globo-homo message. It’s oft-been noticed that TV ads & commercials blatantly promote race-mixing, especially ACOWW(or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs), GloboHomo, anti-white-male messaging, and the like. The Fashion Industry, in order to be more ‘inclusive’, recruited fatsos, freaks, and uglies over the years. Historical monuments, even non-Confederate ones, have been desecrated or removed because they might ‘offend’ some group, especially blacks of course. Hollywood Franchises have been saturated with ‘woke’ stuff that has nothing to do with the stories or themes.

All such developments are the product of the academia that promoted the politicization of everything. Even things that have nothing to do with homosexuality are wrapped in the ‘gay rainbow’ banner. And speaking of following the rule of law, when have people like Kornbluth given a damn? Hasn’t she heard of Jewish Lawfare? When billionaire Jewish oligarchs are using their muscle to intimidate colleges in violation of the spirit and even the rules of academic freedom, it seems the brown woman’s graduation speech was hardly the biggest offense, unless you’re a white cuck eager to win favors from Jewish Power by mewling about the rise of ‘antisemitism’, implying that doglike toadies like yourself would always stand by Jews no matter what they do and therefore should be favored by Zion.

So, next time the likes of Ann Coulter whines about how nonwhite immigration will undermine Western Values, that stupid white-bitch should look in the mirror along the rest of her ilk whose craven bullshit line and hope is still, “Look, you super-smart and super-rich Jews are totally awesome, and we whites want to be your dogs, whereas those browns are ‘ANTI-SEMITIC’, so please make us your favorite pets because we will roll over & fetch and surrender our agency in total devotion to you Jews as the rightful master race.”

Maybe whites failed to notice, but they’re now less representative of the Western spirit & values than the brown people with the power of courage and conscience are. In a true democracy, the most important thing is to notice WHO has the power and to honestly criticize that power, thereby preventing its tyranny. The Liberal West wouldn’t be liberal or western without the honesty to notice and the courage to criticize. The biggest power in the West is Jewish, now in supremacist mode. Yet, white people have not only failed to call out this power but pathetically and pitifully submitted to it like servile dogs.
Meanwhile, some of the most honest and courageous voices on the true nature of power in the West have been ‘brown’. In doing so, they are acting more in the spirit of Western values. Whites with any integrity should be shamed by this and rethink their position vis-a-vis Jewish Power, but for any such white person, there are likely two or three whose conclusion is, “Western Civilization is all about worshiping and serving Jews as the Chosen-Master Race, and therefore Western Civilization must be saved by deporting all those browns who refuse to bow down at the feet of Jews like we whites do.” The Jordan Peterson Way. Just pathetic.

 Video Link

What Anne Frank and Leo Frank teach us about Jewish Mendacity and where both Germans and White Americans failed with the Jewish Question — Why Jews cannot tolerate Free Speech and Facts & Reason of a Truly Secular Society

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/09/26/jasenovac-the-latest-holocaust-embarrassment/

The days of the “6 million” are numbered, and I suspect that Goldman, Goldstein, and friends know it. When that crumbles, so too collapses what little remains of Jewish credibility. When the orthodox Holocaust story goes down, the dominoes may well begin to fall. And when that happens, all bets are off.

I'm not too sure about that. Much of history has less to do with facts than the power of who gets to control the discourse. So, even if it's proven beyond a doubt that 6 million didn't die, the myth can go on as long as the Power decides if it must. The Power controls the knob and can amplify or mute whatever it wants — consider George Floyd, who died of overdose, has been canonized while Derek Chauvin will rot in prison for 22 yrs for merely having done his job of protecting blue city yuppie elites from black thugs. Most people don't do independent research and, as normies, just go with the Official Narrative. Now, there are surely historians and the like who know the 6 million figure is a gross exaggeration, but they fear being ostracized and/or blacklisted. Being labeled a 'denier' is tantamount to heresy in our so-called secular order with new gods, namely the Tri-Idolatry or Tridolatry of Jews, Negroes, and Homos. The Power will denounce you, and the normies will reject you as a 'neo-nazi', 'white supremacist', 'anti-semite', or some nutjob crank because they almost never look or think beyond what they got from public education and Jewish-run 'mainstream media'.

This is why honest people fear telling the truth. They are caught between the Power and the People. The Power is mainly concerned with control and will spin any narrative, push any lie, and suppress any truth to maintain its grip(and the Power operates likewise all over the world, no less so in China, Iran, and Russia with their own sacraments and taboos). The People, most of whom are 'normies', are easily manipulated by the Power. In some ways, they are more easily manipulated in so-called 'liberal democracies' due to the conviction-bordering-on-faith that the People are free. In truth, people in so-called 'democracies' get to vote for whore-pawns vetted and bought/sold by the oligarchs who also own nearly all the media that hire mostly flunkies, careerists, propagandists, and activists(in line with oligarchic agendas). Under communism, people were more skeptical because they knew everything was propaganda.

To be sure, in the so-called 'liberal' West, there was certainly lot more freedom than under Stalinism or Maoism, but the danger lay in the fallacy that better is best. If Bob the gangster is a better person than Tom the gangster, a real psychopath, it still doesn't mean Bob is a good person. Though not as terrible as Tom, he too is a criminal, a thug, and even a killer. The so-called 'liberal West' was undoubtedly freer than communist systems(or other hardline forms of autocracy) and more kinds of speech were allowed, but that doesn't mean it was the bastion of truth. But the cult of 'muh democracy' and 'muh free speech' fooled a lot of people that they are getting the truth from the media(because it's part of the 'free press') in a society committed to free inquiry, free speech, and freedom of conscience. But like the hare that took for granted its lead over the tortoise, people in the West have been complacent in the assumption that they are living in the best of all possible worlds in terms of freedom and truth(and prosperity). This has resulted in 'insouciance', as Paul Craig Roberts calls it, that has led to so much erosion of liberties and rights before our eyes. Even as people in the West keep losing more liberties and rights, they always assure themselves, "I'm living in a liberal democracy, therefore I'm free... unlike those living in autocratic Russia or China."

Of course, the West was always under some kind of oligarchic power, but it's getting worse because it's ruled by Jews who refuse to even acknowledge their dominant position(fueled by a tribal sense of supremacism & contempt), lack any sense of magnanimity, have intoxicated themselves on moral narcissism, and are caught in the web of their own paranoia. In the West, never has so much power been concentrated in the hands of so few who are so hostile toward and derisive of those they rule over. Why else would they push for the Great Replacement or White Nakba? It's because Jews don't regard white folks as their own people but as the Goy Other that must be kept in their place, and what better and more permanent way to destroy white power than by demographically eclipsing whites with non-white goyim. Jews say O Vey, whites better Obey. The current West is something like an 'oligomocracy', i.e. it's totally controlled by the oligarchy but within the framework of what appears to be a democracy.

Honest people find themselves caught between the Power that prioritizes control and the People who gobble up whatever slop they're fed. It's the Glob and the Mob. Consider how the Twitter Mob works. Them 'woke'(or Jewoke) idiots swallow all the crap fed them by the Jewish-controlled media and academia. They think they are more 'sophisticated', 'evolved', and 'hip' because they get their ideas and views from supposed 'progressives' with elevated elite credentials. Not that American 'conservatives' are much better as they wolf down all the crap fed them on Talk Radio which is mostly controlled by Neocon monopolists. (And even alternative voices like Alex Jones would have us believe Arabs own Hollywood and China has something to do with diminishing freedom in the West.) These proggies feel smarter because they hang around tonier parts of the city, attended fancier colleges, watch Young Turks, listen to NPR, and maybe have a subscription to the New Yorker. Now, one can get lots of valuable news and information from such sources — they sure beat the 700 Club and much of Talk Radio — , but all said and done, they dare not venture outside the boundaries of discourse as insisted by Jewish Power. Indeed, the sudden war on Free Speech by so-called 'progressives' has been instigated from above by Jewish supremacist opinion-makers.

They are not about free-ranging intelligence in search of truth but corralled and tamed 'intelligentry' in service to Jewish Power and the gods it controls. Jews fear true secularism where people are free to use reason and facts in pursuit of worldview that comports with reality. Such secularism favors no side as plenty of dirt can be dug up about any group. It could dig up lots of dirt on Anglos, Germanics, and Slavs but also plenty on Jews, blacks, homos, and etc. Mao Zedong soon realized his system couldn't be sustained by the principles of the Hundred Flowers Campaign. For a season or two, something like a real liberal spirit prevailed in China as people were allowed to say anything, even against the party. Few drips turned into a torrent that then threatened to break the dam of party authority. Likewise, the liberal experiments in Czechoslovakia in the mid 60s eventually led to Prague Spring that challenged the very authority of the Communist Party. Soviet tanks had to roll in to turn the tide. Mikhail Gorbachev had his own Hundred Flowers Campaign called Glasnost and, unlike Mao who soon reversed course, he allowed it to take root and grow. Result was a million complaints from the people and the utter demoralization of party members. It wasn't long before the whole edifice of Soviet authority crumbled. (Of course, by then, all of Eastern Europe had given up on communism and looked to the West for aid, guidance, and investment.)
In order for communism or at least communist party authority to remain, the Marxist brand of secularism had to enforce its sacraments and taboos. While lots of things could be questioned, certain things could not be. Marx and Lenin were gods, and communism was 'scientific materialism', and only a mentally ill person would dare question it.
Truth and facts are neutral. So, the Power wants truth and facts to shed light on the bad of the enemies and rivals but not of itself. The Power encourages the educated class to dig up all manner of dirt about the other side(s), even rewarding those who manufacture falsehoods(as with the Russia Collusion Hoax, Assad Gas Attack Hoax, and Jussie Smollett Hoax). The Power seeks flaws in the arguments and ideologies of competing powers but not in its own. Thus, secularism can never be totally rational or factual because the Power favors its own control than the general truth.
In a genuine liberal-secular democracy/republic, free speech and free discourse can boomerang on the Power as the educated class(often filled with resentment against the rich and privileged) may well critique the Power itself. Indeed, this is exactly what happened with the Anglo elites in US and UK. Even though they had plenty of educated men on their side, they also had to contend with the increasing chorus of criticism coming from within and without their own ranks, not least from Jews.
In regards to the Power, there are two natural tendencies among the People: Submission and Rebellion, and the two tendencies often co-exist. As often as not, rebellion is borne of resentment of not having been favored and/or approved by the Power than based on any real principle, though all rebels pretend they are motivated by higher values, and the same goes for submission, i.e. people join the Power and collaborate for personal gain, careerism, and peace of mind(as dissent can lead to harassment, purging, and even death) than out of any deep conviction. Most people are benders than standers.

At any rate, the Power is likely to attract as much criticism and pushback as cooperation and support in a free society. The opposition could be a matter of partisanship or personal conscience, as is true of compliance. When Anglo-Americans ruled the US, they had both lots of supporters and lots of critics. Of course, the influence of criticism altered the character of the ruling elites, in which case the once-supporters could become the new critics and once-critics the new supporters. Or, the change came about because the character of the support was altered by the influence of media and academia. After all, even the supporters of the Anglo-American Christian Order were bombarded by the Jewish-controlled media, and their children(groomed to work for the Power) were shaped by the increasingly Jewish-dominated academia. Consider the fate of the GOP. At times, the leadership came under Jewish influence and mandated a new set of 'values' for American Conservatives to follow, but at other times, the rank-and-file were altered by Jewish Influence and exerted pressure on the leadership to change course; or else, they threatened to leave the Party for the Democrats or the Independents.

No doubt, Jews understood this aspect of the secular-liberal dynamics of Power. Free Society meant free speech, and free speech meant the freedom of conscience and the free play of ideology to critique and challenge power and authority. Indeed, no group than the Jews did more to involve itself in taking apart, deconstructing, exposing, and invalidating the existing concentrations of Power, indeed so much so that, Jewish influence was seen almost as synonymous with social critique, dissent, ideological radicalism, and other modes of rebellion/dissidence, so much so that even anti-Jewish groups and those at odds with Jewish agendas developed grudging respect for Jews as standard-bearers of civil liberties. Now, we know it was either just a ploy or something Jews came to regret.

Secular freedoms can support and protect any side but also subvert and tear it down. One can use free speech to spread and defend Christianity or to mock and expose it as a delusion or hypocrisy. One can use free speech for or against Marxism. Secularism, in and of itself, doesn't have sacred cows, and that means ANYTHING can be critiqued, appraised, questioned, attacked, mocked, impugned, and etc.
Marxists understood this very well, which is why they made Marx and Lenin the new sacred cows. You could question, criticize, and condemn religions, capitalism, feudalism, traditionalism, liberalism, and etc. in a Marxist state but one could not question the 'scientific' and 'materialist' truth of Marx and Engel's ideas. After all, if secularism in a communist state could critique and diagnose Marxism like any other ideology or worldview, it could be delegitimized in the eyes of the public, not least because so many Marxist policies weren't working according to plan.

Jews are no different than Marxists in their grip on power. Though Jews today are super-capitalists and the LAST THING they want is communism, they know that the current Power Arrangement cannot allow total free speech founded on absolute commitment to secularism. They prefer a sacral-secularism, or 'securalism' whereby Jews get to pick and choose what is holy and unholy. Jews know that official religions aren't possible in a secular order, and so, they use media and academia to generate sacral-emotions on certain topics. That way, Jews can have the cake and eat it too: Jews can maintain what is ostensibly a secular order without official religions but also have a population that feels, thinks, and behaves as virtual spiritualists on certain matters.
Under this order, there are three kinds of qualities: Holy, Material, and Unholy. 'Holy' are those subjects that command reverence & piety and, therefore, cannot be discussed freely; one must idolize, mourn, and/or celebrate them. As the Michael Jackson and Oprah cults have shown, people can be made to feel 'holy-schmoly' about anyone or anything. 'Material' are those subjects that are unrelated to the Holy and, therefore, can be discussed freely: Like the science of dairy products or the migratory behavior of birds. 'Unholy' are those matters that pose a danger to the Holy and, therefore, cannot be discussed freely; they must be condemned outright and, in the absence of legal protection of free speech, banned, as is already the case in UK, Canada, and EU.

MLK, Mandela, George Floyd, Globo-Homo, and Jews are holy. All Good People must gush about them. Covid-19 and 'vaccines' have also entered the realm of the Holy; the 'jabs' and the never-ending boosts are the new communion rituals. If you dare to discuss Covid-19 freely and speculate as to the effectiveness of Ivermectin, you are a heretic and must be mocked as a 'horse-dewormer' taking devil-worshiper. Most diseases and treatments are in the 'Material' realm, or open to free scientific discourse, but Covid-19 and the 'vaccines' are not; the only allowable 'science' is the one pushed by the Jewish Globalist World order that controls the Deep State, Big Pharma, and Big Media. Indeed, notice how the nay-sayers of the 'vaccines' are effectively 'excommunicated' from the church of 'trust-the-science'(or schwience). And of course, anyone who dares to freely discuss the problems of racial differences, black crime, Jewish perfidy, homosexual decadence, tranny nuttery, and etc. are immediately deemed 'Unholy'; everything is done to ban such voices from media, academia, and even internet platforms that once used to be bastions of free speech. Like the Marxists in communist nations, Jewish Supremacists realized their grip on supremacy isn't tenable in a world of free flowing opinions and ideas where anyone and everything can come under scrutiny, criticism, and reappraisal. 'Unholy' views are immediately and roundly attacked as 'far right', 'hateful', and etc., funny coming from a people who've committed the most violence and mass killings since the end of the Cold War. Just ask the Arabs and Muslims whose policies led to the destruction of millions of them. They were victims of Jewish-Supremacist policies that animate the cuckish aggressions of the Anglo-managed US and UK.

American Pravda: the ADL in American Society - From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day - by Ron Unz

Something of the Jewish character can be glimpsed from a consideration of Anne Frank and Leo Frank. The comparison may seem perverse as one was an innocent victim of Nazi inhumanity whereas the latter was a pervert-murderer. But, not if the comparison focuses on the Jewish Reaction to the two individuals(or the two events they're associated with), and it has to do with Denial, a term usually associated with the Holocaust but which applies so often to Jewish reactions to events. Even to this day, Jews are in USS Liberty Denial mode. While Nazi horrors were many times more murderous and destructive than Israel's attack on the US ship, the nature of the lie is the same: A pathological inability to face up to the truth for purpose of ethnocentrism. (Ironically, Holocaust Denialists and Holocaust Dogmatists have more in common than they realize. Both are invested in History as Faith, either in the total innocence or absolute guilt of the Germans. This false dichotomy has made it virtually impossible to have a true historical discussion on the subject as anyone suspected of 'revisionism' is thrown into the Denial Camp.) What matters is the attack on USS Liberty was clearly a hostile act by Israel, but to this day, Jews refuse to own up to what happened. And not just the Israeli government, which would at least be understandable, but Jews all around the world. What does this say about Jewish Power and the general character of Jewishness when most Jews aren't willing to face up to the most obvious facts?

And if Jews aren't willing to face up to what happened to USS Liberty, why would they be any more honest or principled on far graver matters? And if most Jews, 'conservative' and 'liberal', so readily circle the wagons on something so obvious and undeniable, the only logical conclusion is that, for most Jews, ethnic unity and power take precedence uber alles. Besides, it's not as if Jewish criminality has been limited to isolated incidents like the USS Liberty attack. Jewish finance played a significant role in the expansion of European Imperialism, not least the Anglo kind. Jews had a key role in the Atlantic Slave Trade(at least in South America) and the forced sale of opium to China. Jewish merchants played a role in the Westward expansion and the 'genocide' of the American Indians. Jews wiped Palestine off the map, and Jewish radicalism played a key, even decisive, role, in the spread of communism and its horrors that led to the deaths of millions. And since the end of the Cold War, World Jewry have been the main butchers of the world as overlords of the lone superpower, the US, the foreign policy priority of which has been appeasing Zion by serving as its murderous attack dog. Just ask the Iraqis, Libyans, Syrians, and many others.
Furthermore, Jews have been the main concocters of this 'wokeness'(or Jewokeness) that plants poison seeds in the souls of whites(mainly via Afromania and Globo-Homo degeneracy) and prepares the West for White Nakba.

But, because Jewish Power has been dispersed among various nations in which goy 'buffers' were often employed to do the bidding of Zion, much of Jewish Evil has been attributed to anyone but Jews. So, Iraq War is blamed on George W. Bush and 'Neocons'(with Cheney and Rumsfeld as the most prominent faces), and most of the current lunatic policies are blamed on Joe Biden even though he's just a puppet of his Jewish Handlers. Even when Jews were considerably less powerful in the past, they had sway over key members of the goy elites via the control of money.
What all this means is that, while Jews have much to accuse the goy world of, they also have much to be accused of and much to answer for. Also, apart from the policies of National Socialist Germany that sought to be Jew-Free, thereby making its crimes its own, it's not so easy to differentiate the Jewish Role from the Goy Role in much of the Modern West. Jews, like the Irish, collaborated in much of British Imperialism. If most Irish did it as foot-soldiers, Jews did it as financiers. So, ironically, National Socialism rendered Jews the most innocent of German crimes during the Nazi Era, whereas the Western Powers that allowed Jewish participation made Jews accomplices in their 'racist' domination of the world. Not that any of this matters in the current Jewish-controlled Historiography whereby we are to believe Jews were always pure-as-snow innocents who were totally blameless of Western Imperialism and, if anything, the main poor hapless victims of Western 'antisemitism'.

Though Anne Frank and Leo Frank are two very different individuals, both have been shrouded by Jewish Lies. Thus, what unites them is the culture of Jewish Mendacity. Never mind the stuff about Anne Frank story being partly created by her father. Never mind the rather ludicrous canonization of some Jewish Girl into the new madonna. We can accept that she was a nice girl and met a sad fate(though she died of disease than gassing or a bullet to her head). The LIE is in propping her cult as the main face of Jewishness, thereby creating a false impression as to why there was so much anti-Jewish hatred and why the Germans were driven to such extremes. It'd be like using some Japanese girl who died in Hiroshima as the main face of Japan's place in World War II.
Now, clearly many innocent children of all nationalities perished in the war, and there's no problem in remembering and mourning Jewish children who died in the Shoah. And Japanese children who died in the war should be remembered as well. But the war against Japan wasn't about some crazed desire to kill innocent Japanese girls. Rather, Japanese children were the unfortunate and tragic casualties of a war in which Japanese adults in powerful positions decided to play with fire. To understand Japan's role in WWII, one needs to focus on the politicians, industrialists, military men, ideologues, and the Emperor. Likewise, even though many innocent Jews, even children, were persecuted and killed in WWII, no real understanding of the Jewish Role in the war can be understood without taking into account the dangerous and even reckless roles played by Jewish radicals, bankers, gangsters, fraudsters, corrupters, and perverts. Remembering Anne Frank as a sad child victim of History is a decent thing to do, but using her as the Face of Jewishness in the Modern Era is utterly bogus.
After all, Germans could do the same. Consider all the innocent German children who were killed by bullets or bombs, or who were raped(most likely by Soviet troops), or perished from starvation and disease. All such lives should be remembered, but it'd be foolish to use her story as exemplary of Germany's role in World War II. No, Germany got embroiled in the horrors because of Adolf Hitler and his reckless worldview(though it certainly wasn't helped by Josef Stalin, FDR, Winston Churchill, and others itching for some kind of major conflagration). Anne Frank Cult as the face of the Holocaust Narrative overlooks the role of Jewish Power that led to the rise of Hitler and the National Socialists. Germans went to the dark side not because they wanted to hurt innocent Jewish children but had-it-up-to-here with the crimes and corruption of Jewish Power. However, in handing power to a bunch of radical Anti-Semites, there was the danger of innocent Jews getting it in the neck as well. But innocent Japanese also got burned for the crimes of their rulers.
Granted, it's never quite simple to draw a clear line between guilt and innocence. After all, many Japanese supported the policies of their rulers. But then, their minds were largely manipulated by the rulers who controlled the media, so there was a kind of circular logic to the mania. Likewise, many Jews did nothing to restrain the vileness of their tribal elites(and little has changed over the years as Jews like Norman Finkelstein and Max Blumenthal are exceptions than the rule) and a good number of them participated, though not as key players, in the vile machinations of their tribal leaders. So, absolute guilt and absolute innocence are virtually non-existent. One could say children are innocent, which is true enough, but it's only a matter of time before children are indoctrinated into soldiers of the regime, much like it's only a matter of time before tiger cubs grow into predators. Children are innocent in the moment but not in their destinies, most of which are controlled by external forces; besides, even the internal drives of human nature leads one to aggression, competition, domination, or service to dominant forces.

If Jews used an innocent girl, Anne Frank, as the face of all Jews threatened or killed in the World War II period, Jews denied the guilt of Leo Frank altogether even though he was most certainly guilty of the rape-murder. A case of rape-murder denial. Though only one girl was raped and killed by Leo Frank, the Jewish pathology behind the denial isn't much different in kind from the denial of those who naysay all documented details of the Shoah. In some ways, it's worse among Jews because, whereas Holocaust Denial is a fringe phenom among goyim, Leo-Frank's Rape-Murder Denial has been the mainstay of Jewish Power and Jewish Majority, much like USS Liberty Attack Denial. Add to this the Jewish Virtual-or-Emotional Denial of the Rosenbergs' guilt in slippling atomic secrets to Stalin. While most Jews came to admit Rosenbergs were guilty of the act, they melodramatized the Narrative to make the Rosenbergs and other communists the 'victims' of 'red-baiting' and 'paranoid' anti-communists. So, even when Jews admit a good number of Jews were involved in treason and treachery, they canonize the guilty as 'victims' while reviling the prosecutors as subhuman persecutors of all things decent and humane.

Leo Frank was eventually lynched by a mob that just about had enough. He was only one person, indeed the only Jew ever lynched on American Soil. Therefore, it may seem ridiculous and perverse to compare his case with the Holocaust where, purportedly, 6 million Jews perished(though the real number is probably half that), Anne Frank included. US was good to Jews, Germany of the Nazi period was horrible for Jews. And yet, history and truth aren't merely about numbers. One Jew or Six Million Jews, the motivations of goy hatred could be the same. Thus, what the Leo Frank Case(the death of one Jew) and the Anne Frank Case(the death of millions of Jews) have in common is the Jewish tendency to commit horrific crimes and use the tribal network to circle the wagons.
Lucky for Jews, such Jewish behavior led to minimum anti-Jewish violence in the US(relatively speaking), but consider the goy rage in both US and Germany. In the US, southern white goyim were more than willing to give Leo Frank the benefit of doubt and his day in court. Frank wasn't treated like some Negro but had all the legal defense one could hope for. And yet, facts proved his guilt beyond a doubt, and the proper thing for Jews would have been to make him face justice. But, what did the Jewish community do? They circled the wagons. They chose tribal ethnocentrism over justice for the dead goy girl. Apparently, the life of a Jewish rapist-murderer was more precious than the life of a goy girl seen as little more than a shikse whore(later to replayed by Roman Polanski's case). Jews not only refused to face up to facts but tried to frame a Negro. And then, the Jewish Press slandered southern whites(who'd been kindly to Jews) as a bunch of raving 'anti-semites' when they'd offered Leo Frank every opportunity to prove his innocence. The real issue isn't that Leo Frank was a creep. All groups have their rapist-murderer creeps; John Gacy was no Jew. The issue was the Jewish Community went out on a limb to protect a fellow Jew despite his obvious guilt(and things are even worse today, with Jonathan Pollard giving the US a middle finger as he swaggers around Israel as a 'hero').

The Southern White Goy community just about had enough and took matters into its own hands. They grabbed Leo Frank from the jail cell and lynched him. The goy rage wasn't much different from what would happen among Germans during the Weimar Period, in which many German Jews, backed by World Jewry, did horrible things to the German economy, culture, and political process, which they would repeat all over again in Russia of the 1990s. But, the difference is German Rage put radical Anti-Semites in power, and the Nazis had a worldview not so different from that of Jews: supremacism. Just like so many Jews felt Jews could never do wrong and should always circle the wagons to protect other Jews, guilty or innocent, the National Socialist direction for Germany was Aryans Uber Alles.
Still, the rage that many German citizens felt that drove them to support the National Socialists wasn't much different from the rage felt by the Southern White mob that finally had had enough of Leo Frank and had him lynched. In both cases, goyim were driven to the limit by Jewish vileness. Historically, Germany had been less anti-Jewish than most European nations, but Germans came to believe that their relative niceness toward Jews only emboldened Jews to act more shitty. Likewise, historically the American South had been kinder to Jews, but how did Jews pay back this favoritism? They circled the wagons to defend the loathsome Leo Frank, the rapist-murderer of a white Christian girl.

Most crucially, both the US and Germany failed to do the right thing. In the case of Germany, the new regime went after ALL Jews. Even if many Jews had acted badly, there was no reason to target all Jews as the majority of Jews hadn't been gangsters, communist radicals, or financial thieves. And some were patriots who had fought in World War I and respected German culture. In going after all Jews, National Socialism disgraced itself and finally blackened German reputation with war and genocide.
One would like to believe the American Example was infinitely better. After all, Americans didn't go after all Jews but targeted one Jew, the guilty Leo Frank. Not that Jews ever appreciated this as they lionized Leo Frank as a saint, and the organization that grew out of the incident, ADL, now serves as the 'moral' muscle of Jewish Power and twists arms everywhere to push for Censchwarzship.
Still, it's surely far more sensible to go after the one guilty Jew than go after an entire community. Better to kill one bad person than kill 'six million', among whom the good are mixed with the bad. And yet, Americans also made a fatal mistake in the Leo Frank case. While only Leo Frank was responsible for the rape and murder of the white girl, much of the Jewish Community had been downright vile and verminous in trying to exonerate him out of tribal solidarity that smacked of racial supremacism: "We Jews are above the law when it comes to harming lowly goyim." (What's truly disgusting is that, even after all these years, Jews have doubled-down on the rape-murder denial and pretend as if Leo Frank is their own 'Emmett Till', all the funnier when even the real Emmett Till wasn't the 'Emmett Till' of myth, though St. George Floyd takes the cake when it comes to perfidious Jewish-manufactured idolatry. Even though the white mob was pushed to extreme measures against Leo Frank because of the dirty Arnold-Rothstein machinations of the Jewish Community, Jews have blame only the whites, never themselves.)

The real shame of the Leo Frank case isn't that some lowlife Jew was lynched. It's that White Americans didn't go far enough and do more. While it's a good thing that White Americans never became radically deranged like the Germans under National Socialism, they failed to realize that the main villain of the Leo Frank case wasn't Leo Frank himself but the Jewish Power Network defined by Jewish Tribal Supremacism. Indeed, Leo Frank would have been summarily tried and sentenced, and that would have been that had it not been for obnoxious Jewish meddling. The case was prolonged and perverted because Jews pulled every string in the book to prevent justice for the rape-murder victim. So, while Leo Frank was guilty of his crime, the Jewish Power Network was guilty of something far more egregious and consequential: Corruption of the justice system, and for what? Jewish supremacism that holds in contempt the humanity of white girls regarded as 'shikse' whores. So, White Americans shouldn't have stopped with Leo Frank. They should have started a movement to root out the networks of Jewish corruption and villainy. This doesn't mean they should have become like raving Nazis and gone after innocent Jews or done what they did to the Japanese-American population during World War II. Rather, at the very least, they should have done everything to root out the widespread elements in the Jewish Community that form networks and work together in favor of Jewish lives and interests regardless of truth and/or justice. The failure to do that has led to the rise of Jewish Networks that now rob the world through Wall Street and Big Pharma, that perverts the law to let Antifa thugs and BLM lunatics to run free and get a slap on the wrist if arrested... while January 6 protesters are denied the most basic of legal rights and parents who protest anti-white CRT agenda are labeled as 'domestic terrorists' by vile Jewish supremacist Merrick Garland(who almost became Supreme Court justice).

So, if Germans went too far in their reaction to Jewish Evil by going after ALL Jews, even good ones, White Americans didn't go far enough by fixating on the individual Jew while overlooking the power of the Jewish Network. After all, it makes no sense to see Jonathan Pollard as merely a bad individual Jew. He did what he did as part of a Jewish Network, and this network, with tentacles in academia-media-government-banking-etc., eventually pulled all stops to spring that lowlife scum from prison. Germans under National Socialism, in going after bad Jews, even went after innocent Jews, destroying the lives of girls like Anne Frank as well. White Americans thought the problem would be solved by taking out Leo Frank the bad Jewish individual while overlooking the fact that Leo Frank managed to elude justice for so long because of the Jewish Power Network operating on the premise of Jewish Supremacism and total contempt for 'filthy goyim'.

The Ideal Way for Americans would have been to Name the Jewish Power, to expose the Jewish Network. Jewish Evil isn't a simple matter of bad individuals doing their own thing but, more often than not, a matter of a bunch of Jews acting in concert within a network. It's like the Mafia, which is why RICO laws were necessary to bring down the underworld empire. Just going after individual mafia hoodlums(as if they're lone wolf street thugs) hardly made an impact on the mafia network; it was like cutting off one tentacle off an octopus that merely grew new ones. To take out the Mafia, the individual crooks had to be linked to the network and its bosses.
Likewise, Leo Frank was protected by the Jewish Network, which later canonized him as a saint, much like Tony Kushner did for the Rosenbergs in ANGELS IN AMERICA. To prevent further such abuse, White America should have at least gone after the Jewish Network and exposed it for what it is. Granted, it would have been more difficult with Jews than with the Italian-Americans whose criminality was far more specific to a social milieu. Indeed, Italian-Americans who broke from the Criminal Community tended to assimilate into Anglo-Americanism or Generic Americanism. In contrast, even Jews who operated above ground retained a powerful sense of tribal identity and loyalty, rendering mafia-like much of the Jewish networks in academia, media, government, and etc. Rudy Giuliani became just a New York mayor and did little for the Italian-American community. The idiot Cuomo Brothers are mainly careerists and have nothing to do with Italian-ness. But look at Jews like Victoria Nuland, Wendy Sherman, Merrick Garland, Stinkin' Blinken, and the rest of them, and they are NOTHING without Jewish Tribalism. Indeed, the demands of Jewish Tribalism are so strong that even goyim in politics cower before its will. Even Donald Trump who, in 2016 boasted that Jews don't own him because he's so rich, did little in office but take it up his ass from the Jewish Lobby and beg, "Can I suck your dic*?"

What the West needs is a RICO-ist approrach against Jewish Power Network. The evil didn't end with Leo Frank. He almost got away with rape/murder because of the Network, the same reason Roman Polanski has been able to sit nice and pretty all these years without facing justice. Indeed, can anyone explain the silence about USS Liberty without taking the Jewish Power Network into account? Or what really happened on 9/11 and how lies were spread in the media(essentially a Jewish Power Network) to rouse public support for Iraq War? Or how Jews managed to rape the Russian economy in the 1990s? Did just a handful of Jews, as mere individuals, manage to pull off the heist of the century all on their own? Or, were they enabled by the Worldwide Jewish Network? And consider the Russian Collusion Hoax. The Covid Hysteria and the rigging of the 2020 election. These were not done by isolated individuals but by the Network with links in government, media, academia, courts, finance, etc.

So, the lesson of the 20th century in regard to Jewish Perfidy is that the Germans went too far and the Americans didn't go far enough. Germans, in going after Jewish Evil, went after the entire population. Americans, in contrast, targeted only the individual while ignoring the power of the Jewish Network. Indeed, it is precisely because the Network was left alone in the US that Jews even managed to push the narrative that Leo Frank was some innocent saint lynched by a crazed 'anti-semitic' mob that, I supposed, one day just got off their ass to kill a totally innocent Jew for the hell of it.
IAIN DAVIS DISSECTS THE PSEUDOPANDEMIC